Local versus Foreign Women

.

Men and women are two sides of the same coin. Without each other, there can be no fulfillment and no peace of mind. Together, there is life. This is the way it has been since the very beginning. It is an active thing, not a passive one. It's not enough for the people to just show up in each others lives. Each of you needs to actively love the other.

Many American men are willing to do this. Almost all American women are not. To make matters worse, these women do not value the men who are willing to love them. Instead, they value the men who couldn’t give a shit about anything. He gets laid constantly and gives nothing to anyone (even himself). Since this type of man is good for nothing and is often a criminal, the last thing he is interested in or is capable of is taking care of a woman or a family. Women are also like this themselves, but pretend they are not. That pretending often extends towards making a phoney marriage and having several children she has no intention of putting any effort into raising. Most of the time, the point of the marriage is to manipulate the system into fleecing a good man of all his possessions.....rinse, repeat, until she gets too old.

This is not normal. For whatever reason, it is a problem endemic to westernized countries but is worst in the US, where our laws seriously enable these behaviours.

What many American men are figuring out though is they don't have to put up with this. By understanding the problem and its various aspects and, most importantly, the actual depth of the problem, he can avoid most of it, even fight back. The biggest obstacle though, is he is incomplete without a legitimate love in his life. American women use this fact as their greatest source of sinister manipulation. They will dangle the image of this in front of you constantly but never, ever give it to you. The reason is simple: they can't. Because they can't, they are completely unacceptable as anything but a casual sexual fling. But one that is constantly trying to do you harm, requiring extreme vigilance and protective measures. Hopping from one loser to the next, in the vain hope that the next one might not be like this is a depressing way to live. Rather than find a rare jewel, most men simply give up after a while and retire from "the game".

Most men don't know that this is abnormal. They think all women are like this and have always been this way. That's a dirty lie. A lie that women in this country foster in an attempt to keep men from looking around. It turns out, that things were never like this for our grandfathers and great grandfathers. It's a recent problem. More importantly, it's a localized one.

In large chunks of the world, women aren't like this. They are the way they are supposed to be. If you bond with one and then love them, they will love you back. Although this is only the bare minimum needed for a good marriage and a good life, it changes things dramatically.

This means that it is a good idea to date a number of women from these places. Because you will find a jewel there eventually. No matter what, you will find a large pool of women who are sincere in their attempts to be with you. Some of these women will be sexually promiscuous. Some of them will be nuns. Most will be somewhere in between. Luckily, sincerely loving women will be common, no matter what she is like elsewise.......because it's a seperate issue. If you want a nun or a tart, a schoolteacher, a welfare mom or a doctor, you will find someone sincere. Since you will also find the occassional evil person mixed in, you must learn to tell the difference. But the odds are stacked in your favour.

That just doesn't exist in the US anymore (but it was once the rule, not the exception).

.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.

Fatherlessness = F@#%ed-Upness

.

The liberal a-holes really did take the Moynihan report to heart. (Reporting on the destruction of Black society due to fatherlessness). What they are doing, they are doing on purpose.

Every time this issue is measured, it comes out the same. Broken homes with the father absent = fucked-upness. Happy homes with a strong man as the father = happy, well adjusted children. Every single time. And yet, you have various groups creating policy on weird theories with no basis in observation, often very superficial in their reasoning. The theory is just a thinly veiled excuse to cover an agenda. Of course, they don't believe their own nonsense. They know full well what they are doing. They are just hoping that their theory will go unobserved because it quickly becomes revealed as bullshit and lies by anyone with the skill and knowledge to assess it.

The best way to handle this is to, first, identify who they are specifically. A good example is how you can see that the entire profession of psychology has ceased doing what it is supposed to do (treat mental illness) and is instead acting as the manipulative arm of something sinister. For God's sake, absolutely forbid your woman from seeing a therapist (boy, did I learn this the hard way).

The second thing to do is to say no to them. Marginalize them. When a vote comes up to divert time money and resources to them, vote no. Repeat this basic pattern over and over again until the people involved no longer matter. Don't listen to their arguments and bullshit. Pay attention to what is directly observable and can be reasonably inferred from that. If what a person wants, works, keep it. If it doesn't, kick them to the curb.

Do not accept attempts to argue away what can plainly be seen by everyone. A theory that contradicts reality is wrong, and probably only exists to fool you into doing something stupid.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Senator Daniel Moynihan: “By 1983 the poverty rate reached its
highest level in 18 years….The principal correlate had been the change in family structure, the rise of the female-headed household.” (Family and Nation, p. 95)

Here are some of the observed effects of removing a father to the position of a visitor in a child`s life.
"Based on our clinical experience with a number of latency aged and adolescent girls whose parents divorced during their oedipal years, we postulate that particular coping patterns emerge in response to the absence of the father, which may complicate the consolidation of positive feminine identification in many female children, and is observable during the latency years. We illustrate both the existence of these phenomena and implications for treatment:
1. intensified separation anxiety
2. denial and avoidance of feelings associated with loss of father
3. identification with the lost object
4. object hunger for males." "In an earlier study by Kalter and Rembar at [Children's Psychiatric Hospital, University of Michigan], a sample of 144 child and adolesce atients, whose parents had divorced, presented [for evaluation and treatment] with three most commonly occurring problems:
63% Subjective psychological problem (defined as anxiety, sadness, pronounced moodiness, phobias, and depression)
56% Poor grades or grades substantially below ability and/or recent past performance
43% Aggression toward parents Important features of the subgroup of 32 latency aged girls were in the same order: 69% indicating subjective psychological distress 47% academic problems
41% aggression toward pa ts.
Clinical Observations on Interferences of Early Father Absence in the Achievement of Femininity by R. Lohr, C. g, A. Mendell and B. Riemer, Clinical Social Work Journal, V. 17, #4, Winter, 1989

Also see:

Bonecrcker #109 – The Benefits of Boys-Only Schools .

Zenpriest #1: Women Raised Without Fathers

Zenpriest #22 – “Broken Men” and Women’s “Fixing” Them 

Excerpt from Baskerville, S. Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family. Nashville: Cumberland House Publishing, 2007

“Virtually every major social pathology of our time: violent crime, drug and alcohol abuse, truancy and scholastic failure, unwed pregnancy, suicide and other psychological disorders – all these correlate more strongly to fatherlessness than to any other single factor.[1] According to the National Fatherhood Initiative, “Children who live absent their biological fathers are, on average, at least two to three times more likely to be poor, to use drugs, to experience educational, health, emotional, and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than those who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.”[2] The overwhelming majority of prisoners, juvenile detention inmates, high school dropouts, pregnant teenagers, adolescent murderers, and rapists all come from fatherless homes. Children from affluent but separated families are much more likely to get into trouble than children from poor but intact ones, and white children from separated families are at higher risk than black children in intact families. The connection between single parent households and crime erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime[3].”
[1] Attempts to attribute these behaviors to poverty or racial discrimination have been refuted by studies that control for these variables. See Urie Bronfenbrenner, “Discovering What Families Do,” in David Blankenhorn, et al. (eds.), Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family (Milwaukee: Family Service America, 1990), p. 34; Ronald Angel and Jacqueline Angel, Painful Inheritance: Health and the New Generation of Fatherless Children (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993), p. 188. Even left-wing scholars concur: Norman Dennis and George Erdos, Families Without Fatherhood (London: Civitas, 2000).
[2] Horn and Sylvester, Father Facts, p. 15.
[3] Elaine Ciulla Kamarck and William Galston, Putting Children First (Washington: Progressive Policy Institute, 1990), p. 14.

Humanity Transmitted Through the Generations (Tattoos, The Bible, Fatherlessness)

.

Unfortunately for us, our behaviours aren't hard wired like those of many animals. Humans have free will. Most of what we are is transmitted from person to person when we raise children. All you need to do to know this is so, is to look at what happens when people refuse to raise their children (uncomfortably common). The children grow up feral. Most of the parts are there. But they aren't working right. Something of that child's basic humanity is missing. Sometimes, it is something quite large that is missing.
.
The point is, that John Grey (geee, could this guy be more of a closet homosexual trying to subvert marriage and family) crap about men and women being different, so most conflicts are caused by miscommunications, is a total lie. Yes, there are biological differences. They pale in comparison to the socialized differences. But, men and women were designed to be together. Our makeup, on all levels, is created in such a way that we fit together.

Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"

Before all this shit started to happen (somewhere around WWII is my best guess), men and women had been together relatively harmoniously for a loooooong time. Each chose the other based on the quality of person they were and worked hard to survive, thrive, and most importantly, refine what it means to be human and pass that on to the next generation.

That process has stopped cold. Although there were slight hints of it in our parents and our grandparents’ generation, it's gone hog wild in our generation. The fact that men and women are different has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they are "poisoning the well" of human goodness, en masse. They are denying our basic humanity. The results are everywhere to see in our society. The message is very clear; they only want men who will cooperate in this sick agenda.
.
People Can Choose Anything They Want To... But They Can't Choose the Consequences
.
Feral isn’t a good term. It implies that people have returned to a wild, natural state, much like a pet will if you abandon it. Savage is a better term. A good portion of what a human is (which is different from every other creature on the planet), is a matter of choice. When we raise children, we can choose to put good things or bad things into them. When they get older, they can choose what they bring into themselves. It’s been this way since homo-sapiens first swung down out of the trees and chose to live like men, not animals. We can choose to live like good men or bad men. Unlike animals, that choice isn’t made for us already by our biology. It’s the source of our power and also the source of our folly……depending on the natural consequences of the choices we make.

Increasingly, women are choosing to bring bad things into themselves and to pass on those bad things to their children. They look for men WHO WILL ASSIST THEM IN THIS TASK. At the very least, they shirk their responsibility to bring good things into themselves and put good things into children. Instead, they let random people influence themselves and their children. A lot of evil people know about this and seek to exploit this situation for various ends (for example, gangs, pimps, drug dealers, and other miscellaneous scum).

One thing that REALLY pisses women off is when you point out the specific consequences of things they do. They get highly offended, thinking you are trying to manipulate them (being huge manipulators, they think everyone else is too). There is a grain of truth to this. Often, when someone is trying to manipulate you, they will punish you with shame and anger, anything to attach a negative emotion onto whatever it is they want to change for their benefit. They are a bit vague and ambiguous on the connection. You should/should not do that thing. Why? Because it’s right/wrong. What they mean by right is what they want. What they mean by wrong is what they don’t want. But this isn’t what I’m talking about.

People can choose to do anything they want to. But they can’t choose the consequences. That’s what I’m talking about. Women constantly get these two things confused. They want to be free to do whatever thing they want AND to choose the consequences. This isn’t possible. It’s like someone jumping off a building and expecting not to fall.

The ingenuity of men is one long history of using superior understanding to seem to break the laws of nature for some benefit. But it’s only an illusion. What’s actually happening is men learn more laws of nature and combine them to get a different outcome. For example, if you jumped off a building with a parachute, you might get a completely different consequence. That’s great. It’s why MEN have been the ones to build everything of consequence for the last several thousand years.

But women see this and are fooled. They see the man jumping off the building in a parachute and landing safely. So, they insist, it’s OK to just jump off. After a few have fallen to their death, they start screaming at men to do something. They get royally pissed when you hand them a parachute, and they throw it away, usually screaming about how worthless you are the whole time. A few more fall to their deaths. Finally, the men throw their hands up in frustration and walk away.

Some get so fed up, they leave and cross the mountain range to the next tribe over. They strike up a conversation with a local girl and mention the parachute they invented. The girl smiles and says…..oooooh, a parachute, how does it work, can I try it?
.
Tattoos and Piercings
.
Of course, throughout history tattoos and piercing have been used for both slavery and as body art... but not in our culture. In our culture it's deviant. Oddly enough, it is still deviant among various minorities that do have a cultural history of tattoo/piercing use, once they join our culture. In our culture, the use of tattoos and piercing on slaves/criminals was dominant. Someone who gets them here is trying to identify with that element. Sometimes it's an attempt to do so in a safe way (look at me, I'm bad, I'm cool). Unfortunately, it is mostly used in an unsafe way (look at me, I’m one of you, come fuck me). You can tell things about women who do this sort of thing... unpleasant things you would be very unwise to ignore. Less so with men though. Because so many women choose the bad men over the good, many men have taken up looking a certain way to get women. Many of my friends are like this. Most have regretted it though.
Having a visible tattoo or inappropriate piercing makes you unemployable at most professional jobs... why? Because it identifies you as not one of the elite that hold those jobs... one of the underclass. Women get these done for the same outcome... to be identified as one of the underclass who is wide open for approach by a low class man. The more wild and obvious the tattoos or piercings, or the more numerous, the lower the class. There are always exceptions but they are rare. If your daughter comes home one day with a pierced tongue, she is telling you that she has decided to give blowjobs to various inappropriate men. Drugs are often involved. The men certainly understand that signal and will come after her. This means you must be extra vigilant or bad things will happen. As I said, it is a very reliable sign.

Say what you will, but it shows more commitment than a wedding vow!

This is a tough issue because, like all lies (the lie being that people with tattoos and piercings are normal), it has a grain of truth. Normal people do get tattoos. They get them to be naughty and feel adventurous. Men get them because they know women will mistake them for inappropriate men, and are attracted. You can tell who these people are easily. You can't see their tattoos or piercings unless they are showing off. They hide them in polite company. The exception to the exception, are women who get tattoos around their butt, breasts and vagina or people that get their sex organs pierced. These people are sending a clear message that they are a sexual object and expect to be used as such (big warning sign for men).

Even relatively normal (are there any, lol) people who belong to the BDSM scene have a strong thread of this going through them. They hate when you say that, by the way. It goes sort of like this... people think the whole point is to devalue, objectify, and humiliate your partner.....to dehumanize them. But the BDSM crowd says, no no, that's not really true. We pretend to devalue, objectify, and humiliate people in order to have great sex, and they love it. Anyone who does it for real is an asshole and not welcome. Great. So you get to know them and find out that they really are trying to devalue, objectify, and humiliate people... in a bad way. Or, to put it another way, a female submissive wants you to do various bad things to her so she can have screaming orgasms. This is supposed to be limited to the bedroom. But, if you don't treat her like the crawling worm that she is all of the time, she will lose interest in you. The last thing she wants is sincerity, warmth and love from you. These things spoil her perversion. She's using you for sex and has no second thoughts about leaving once reality intrudes (ouch, I have painful memories about dealing with someone like this). The easiest way to spot a female sub is by her tongue piercing and tattoos in the form of a chain around her wrists and/or ankles.
.

Click Pic for "The Truth About Misogyny"

The Bible is Anti-Woman?
.
Feminists would have you believe the bible is anti-woman and a tool men use to oppress women. Many people swallow that crap and abandon the bible as a source of wisdom and abandon religion and belief in God as being made up to enslave people. They never stop to ask three things. One, is what the bible saying true? Two, does the point seem to be mean spirited, oppressive or hateful toward women? And three, being simply an arbitrary collection of other books the early Christians used, is everything in it of equal value or is some of it correct and some of it wrong?

Click Pic for "The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth"

For the most part, the bible isn’t anti-woman and much of what’s in there about women and how to deal with them is correct. Further, those who say different seem to have an agenda of separating people from their faith as a means of controlling them (ironic that they should claim the faith controls them, lol). It’s important to examine these ideas and try to see if you can verify if they are true or not by observing their application in everyday life. Because it is only that process that can sort out the truth from the crap.

There is great danger in not doing that process. Because you can easily accept attitudes, philosophies and beliefs as true, even though they support behaviours that don’t work. People get attached to these and then start selectively attending to (or even making up) “evidence” that supports their position while desperately denying whatever contradicts it. That makes you powerless and usually results in intense suffering. Instead, what people should do is something almost like the scientific method. Treat the beliefs as a theory. Then try to hypothesize what will happen in specific situations when you choose behavior based on the theory. When the hypothesis is correct, it adds evidence that the theory is strong. Replace weak theories with strong ones, making your behavior more and more effective.

Click Pic for "Feminizing the Decline"

My point is the bible isn’t misogynistic. It’s warning of the problems inherent in women that have been with us from the beginning. Specifically it’s warning us not to be tolerant of them or we end up with the type of problems we are starting to see today. But there are people who actually DO hate women. They use the problems that men are starting to wake up to as a chance to sneak a bunch of stuff in there that isn’t true, particularly in regard to how to deal with women. They advocate punishing women and causing them pain. Those men are fools but tough to distinguish from the real information that is becoming available (after all, there was a time for each of us that we would never have believed the things we know about women today). Hence, the warning to always test ideas about women and techniques to deal with them. Only retain what you can observe for yourself and keep those techniques that work. Why? Because, if you don’t, the crap will prevent you from seeing things as they really are and will disempower you.

A "misogynistic" quote from the Bible is a good example of people throwing bullshit at you in an attempt to get you to dismiss ideas that might illuminate the truth and lead to powerful ways of dealing with things. If you never questioned the idea that what the Bible says about women is motivated by hatred, it would slide right by you. There are ALOT of people walking around that absolutely hate Christianity because they accept little tidbits without examination. They have been skilfully and purposefully separated from their faith by people who want to manipulate them. Feminists are only one of these types of people.

.

Click Pic for "It's Not Marxism Because..."

Fatherlessness = Fucked-Up-Ness
.

The liberal a-holes really did take the Moynihan report to heart. (Reporting on the destruction of Black society due to fatherlessness). What they are doing, they are doing on purpose.

Every time this issue is measured, it comes out the same. Broken homes with the father absent = fucked-upness. Happy homes with a strong man as the father = happy, well adjusted children. Every single time. And yet, you have various groups creating policy on weird theories with no basis in observation, often very superficial in their reasoning. The theory is just a thinly veiled excuse to cover an agenda. Of course, they don't believe their own nonsense. They know full well what they are doing. They are just hoping that their theory will go unobserved because it quickly becomes revealed as bullshit and lies by anyone with the skill and knowledge to assess it.

Click Pic for "Following the Masculine Principle is the 'Right Way'"

The best way to handle this is to, first, identify who they are specifically. A good example is how you can see that the entire profession of psychology has ceased doing what it is supposed to do (treat mental illness) and is instead acting as the manipulative arm of something sinister. For God's sake, absolutely forbid your woman from seeing a therapist (boy, did I learn this the hard way).

The second thing to do is to say no to them. Marginalize them. When a vote comes up to divert time money and resources to them, vote no. Repeat this basic pattern over and over again until the people involved no longer matter. Don't listen to their arguments and bullshit. Pay attention to what is directly observable and can be reasonably inferred from that. If what a person wants, works, keep it. If it doesn't, kick them to the curb.

Do not accept attempts to argue away what can plainly be seen by everyone. A theory that contradicts reality is wrong, and probably only exists to fool you into doing something stupid.
.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:
Philalethes #25 – You Can Have As Much Freedom As You Are Willing To Be Responsible For, But No More 

Bonecrcker #109 – The Benefits of Boys-Only Schools
Zenpriest #1: Women Raised Without Fathers
Zenpriest #22 – “Broken Men” and Women’s “Fixing” Them 
Yes, Fathers are Essential -- by Carey Roberts

.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.
Senator Daniel Moynihan: “By 1983 the poverty rate reached its
highest level in 18 years….The principal correlate had been the change in family structure, the rise of the female-headed household.” (Family and Nation, p. 95)

Here are some of the observed effects of removing a father to the position of a visitor in a child`s life.
"Based on our clinical experience with a number of latency aged and adolescent girls whose parents divorced during their oedipal years, we postulate that particular coping patterns emerge in response to the absence of the father, which may complicate the consolidation of positive feminine identification in many female children, and is observable during the latency years. We illustrate both the existence of these phenomena and implications for treatment:

1. intensified separation anxiety
2. denial and avoidance of feelings associated with loss of father
3. identification with the lost object
4. object hunger for males." "In an earlier study by Kalter and Rembar at [Children's Psychiatric Hospital, University of Michigan], a sample of 144 child and adolesce atients, whose parents had divorced, presented [for evaluation and treatment] with three most commonly occurring problems:
63% Subjective psychological problem (defined as anxiety, sadness, pronounced moodiness, phobias, and depression)
56% Poor grades or grades substantially below ability and/or recent past performance
43% Aggression toward parents Important features of the subgroup of 32 latency aged girls were in the same order: 69% indicating subjective psychological distress 47% academic problems
41% aggression toward pa ts.
Clinical Observations on Interferences of Early Father Absence in the Achievement of Femininity by R. Lohr, C. g, A. Mendell and B. Riemer, Clinical Social Work Journal, V. 17, #4, Winter, 1989

Excerpt from Baskerville, S. Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family. Nashville: Cumberland House Publishing, 2007

Click for "Just Say No to Divorced Women and Single Moms"

“Virtually every major social pathology of our time: violent crime, drug and alcohol abuse, truancy and scholastic failure, unwed pregnancy, suicide and other psychological disorders – all these correlate more strongly to fatherlessness than to any other single factor.[1] According to the National Fatherhood Initiative, “Children who live absent their biological fathers are, on average, at least two to three times more likely to be poor, to use drugs, to experience educational, health, emotional, and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than those who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.”[2] The overwhelming majority of prisoners, juvenile detention inmates, high school dropouts, pregnant teenagers, adolescent murderers, and rapists all come from fatherless homes. Children from affluent but separated families are much more likely to get into trouble than children from poor but intact ones, and white children from separated families are at higher risk than black children in intact families. The connection between single parent households and crime erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime[3].”

[1] Attempts to attribute these behaviors to poverty or racial discrimination have been refuted by studies that control for these variables. See Urie Bronfenbrenner, “Discovering What Families Do,” in David Blankenhorn, et al. (eds.), Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family (Milwaukee: Family Service America, 1990), p. 34; Ronald Angel and Jacqueline Angel, Painful Inheritance: Health and the New Generation of Fatherless Children (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993), p. 188. Even left-wing scholars concur: Norman Dennis and George Erdos, Families Without Fatherhood (London: Civitas, 2000).
[2] Horn and Sylvester, Father Facts, p. 15.
[3] Elaine Ciulla Kamarck and William Galston, Putting Children First (Washington: Progressive Policy Institute, 1990), p. 14.
.

.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.

Ritalin and Abusive Schools

.

This is more than just typical gender bias coming to play. It's hardcore child abuse. Its cooperation among mothers, female teachers and a handful of doctors to get children hooked on dangerous drugs (Ritalin is amphetamine, speed). The DEA is considering restricting Ritalin prescription, the same way it restricts Valium, for the same reason... wide spread abuse leading to recreational use by prescription. Also, Ritalin is one of the most common things used to make crystal meth. It's a widespread problem in schools. Typically, a woman will drag her son to doctor after doctor until she gets one that agrees to prescribe it... because most know damn well the kid does not have ADD and the mother is trying to use drugs to zone out her kid so she can spend her time eating bon bons, drinking, smoking crack, screwing drug dealers or whatever else she does instead of watching her children.

Understand that very bad people have infiltrated our schools with the deliberate intent to harm children. This is one of those ways. The deliberate with-holding of education is another. A third is attempting to brainwash children to accept sick and perverted ideals that are specifically at odds with what their parents want for them. Many women are only too glad to cooperate, unfortunately.

ADD is actually a rather rare condition that is related to to two things... mild to severe mental retardation and drug use. Those commercials you see on TV about possible adult ADD never mention that drug use (and severe alcohol abuse) is almost the exclusive cause of adult ADD. In children, you almost never see ADD (separate from drug use) except in mildly retarded children that got that way because their mothers drank heavily or smoked crack while pregnant.

If your ex-wife is attempting to abuse your children by getting dangerous prescription drugs or surgery for them, you need to get your lawyer on the phone double quick and get an order to cease and desist. Threaten to use it to take away custody (if she won't stop, challenge custody). This issue will come up with frightening regularity.
.
Abusive Schools
.

Many teachers know exactly what they are doing by indoctrinating children. They do it on purpose... because they hate men and because they are intentionally trying to be subversive.

Click Pic for "Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men"

What's going on is most female teachers (especially the lesbian ones) and many male teachers are intentionally trying to instill certain values in the children they teach. They purposefully go against what most parents want their kids to absorb and much of what they are trying to program into our kids is deviant. They mask what they are doing under political correctness.

Typically, what they do is talk about something perfectly reasonable on the surface. Then, the moment you have your back turned, they throw in a bunch of deviant stuff.

For example, there is a big movement to separate out religion from government and our schools. It's perfectly reasonable to want no religion to have undo influence over our government or be taught as doctrine in our schools. But that's not what they are after. What they are after is to have the principals of atheism be dominant in government and be taught as doctrine in our schools. They actively attempt to shame and stamp out belief in God.

A weird twist on this theme is attempting to expose impressionable youths to Islam, Wicca, and other tenants that have a strong sick streak running through them. Specifically, what they do is portray these in an extremely idealistic light, never mentioning the strong undercurrent of evil flowing through those. One thing those kids will never be shown is the legions dancing around and cutting themselves and their neighbours with knives, like certain of the Islamic sects do (nothing to see here).

Other things they try to instil in kids... the idea that abortion is completely right morally, tolerance of the behaviours that lead to the spread of AIDS, promiscuity, homosexuality as a lifestyle choice (rather than a biological fact, for a small percentage of the population), the idea that men are inferior and woman are superior, that America is a country causing most of the evil in the world, tolerance of drug use, tolerance of pedophilia, the fact that certain minorities are over-represented in prison, and have other social problems, is the result of racism rather than choices they made, promiscuity is OK, acting like a man is not OK. The list goes on and on.

Schools are spending more and more time socializing kids in ways their parents would not approve of and less time educating those kids (this includes college, in a big way).

Worse, teachers feel quite smug about doing things to your kids in direct opposition to your rights as a parent. The whole issue of abortion without parental consent is one example. Another is vaccination. In most cases, the law is on your side, but unless you come right out and threaten the teacher with being arrested or sued, they won't stop.

Several people I know have had to do this to put an end to abuse of their children in school... anywhere from medical abuse to trying to get the kids thrown out of school for supposed misbehaviour (that turned out to be nothing more than the teacher simply not liking the kid).

It's a big, big issue that is mostly hidden. Having your kid inappropriately diagnosed as ADD and then force fed dangerous amphetamines and/or barbiturates, is only the tip of the iceberg.

Seriously, if you have kids, you need to keep VERY close tabs on what is happening to them in school. You'll run into everything from psycho man-hating bitches telling him he is a dumbass every 5 minutes, to some mincing, child hungry pedophile putting the moves on him during gym class.

Schools are dangerous for children.
.
Subversive Teachers
.
One of the things that bothered me the most was discovering (by meeting these people in my own social circles) that feminists (particularly lesbian feminists) are actively seeking careers as teachers with the specific intent of promoting feminist, anti-man, ideology. To quote one chick, we are being subversive. We want kids to have our values, not their parents’ values. The implication was that their parents’ values were sick, while theirs were good. There are two problems with this. It is completely disrespectful and in no way their place, to make such a decision for children who aren’t theirs. The other problem is the parents values are actually normal (that’s why their lives are fulfilling, stable and sane) while the lesbians’ values are totally fucked up (that’s why their lives are miserable, unstable and constantly filled with insane situations).

We need to pass strict laws on what teachers are allowed to do in the classroom. Children are sent to school to learn skills and knowledge, not (usually sick) social conditioning.
.
The Benefits of Boys Only Schools
.

Boys want girls but girls only want boys who are part of the criminal class of society (their mothers taught them that boys like this are desirable by choosing men who are like this). Boys from that class can barely read. So, to avoid becoming low status, boys avoid all those things that are connected with being a normal, educated man. They start getting involved with things that attract girls, like drug use and gang violence. They’ve seen their mother kick out their father and spend time with every loser on the planet, so they think that’s what a successful man is all about. An unsuccessful man was their father who wanted to stay but was forced away and probably victimized financially by mom (ie he’s powerless, a loser, a failure). And people wonder why young boys want to emulate the criminal?

By having a boy’s only school, the men who ran it were able to control what brought a boy status. Gee, what surprise, academic success brings status in that environment so boys there seek it. That would have ended with the first girl student admitted.

If it was the straight A student/captain of the football team that was popular with girls, things would be different. Instead, it’s the failing drug addict smoking pot behind the gym while cutting classes. If he’s carrying a gun, he’s even more attractive.
.

Previous / Index / Next

.

. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
"If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal -- a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students -- I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed." -- said Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.
.
"Give us the child for 8 years and it will be Bolshevik forever." -- V.I. Lenin
.
"We must declare openly what is concealed, namely, the political function of the school...It is to construct communist society." -- V.I. Lenin
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
A New Kind Of Bigotry
Phonics: Learning to Read – by Angry Harry
Why Did Teachers Adopt Poor Teaching Methods? -- by Angry Harry
Stop Helping the Boys! – by Angry Harry
Sexual Psychology - Part One: Working Class Heroes - Puberty
.
.

Women in Power

.
I used to work the night shift as part of the zombie squad for the inpatient mental health hospital for Cook County (Chicago). One night I walked in, went over the charts, got the patients settled and started to create the next day’s treatment plans, when I notice a black cane in the corner. Now, having knowledge of various things like weapons and knowing that many of our patients are criminal scum, I was immediately suspicious. I pick it up thinking it’s probably a zip gun smuggled on the unit by some dangerous psycho and start fiddling with it. Eventually, I discover it is actually a hidden storage device and extract four or five vials filled with brandy of all things. Of course, I write it up in the duty log and secure the cane in a locked cabinet. By morning, the next shift shows up and I explain what happened to one of the women who is taking over for me. I find out…..it’s HER cane! She turns as white as a ghost as I explain what I found and then goes into this long bullshit explanation about how she bought it at a garage sale and had no idea what was inside (boy is she a lousy liar). I’m like……alcoholic. Anyway, over the next week, I notice that several of the patients are using the cane (note, neither the patients, nor the female staffers need a cane to walk with….all being young and relatively healthy). So, I start to lean on the patients and discover that this wacko staffer is trading the alcohol in the cane to male patients in exchange for sex and drugs. I immediately reported this to my superior (another woman) and the head of the clinic system (still another woman). A month later, I left that job to work on my doctorate. But a year or so later, what do I find, but the female staffer who was doing this sick shit was promoted to the head of that individual clinic while my old superior was made head of the entire system. That system crashed less than a year later leaving no services for the severely mentally ill in all of Cook County (at least those who don’t have money) for quite some time.

This is a clear and specific example of just how big a mistake it is to promote women into positions of power and what happens when you do.
.
Most People Who Work in Community Health are Insane
.

Most of the people who work in community mental health are completely insane…..that includes almost all of the people working on the master’s level, especially in counselling and social work. It was because of these people that I abandoned my career in Clinical Psychology and went for the doctorate in Chiropractic instead.

Some examples of the behavior I saw among staff working inpatient community mental health:
First off, the main offices were located in the worst, most dangerous urban environment I’ve ever seen (and I’ve been to a lot of shitholes in my time). I kept my Glock on me at all times there.

One male staffer got caught on three separate occasions, getting blowjobs from male patients. All three were HIV positive.

Another male staffer, had sex with a number of female drug addicts who were slated for release into rehab (they were prostitutes).

A female staffer had a former patient living with her as her lover. He was an ex-con (for murder), heavy drug user (also HIV positive), incredibly violent, and had been inpatient for a psychotic break, with a long history of violence during his psychotic episodes.

I caught this same staffer dispensing meds to patients that they had no prescription for (a felony). When I told her to stop, she screamed for over an hour about how I dare tell her how to do her job. Supervisor did nothing.

Another staffer traded bourbon with patients for crack cocaine. Although I brought this to the attention of the highest levels of management (all women), they did nothing and eventually promoted this woman to run the entire inpatient system (a very high level, highly paid government job). Although all government jobs require mandatory drug testing in the city, ours was mysteriously overlooked in the testing system.

My immediate superior had been caught several times, having sex with employees under her, on the physical plant grounds.

Two female staffers told me this bizarre story one day (one was the drug user….go figure) about how they saw a flying saucer that whizzed all around the facility grounds (nightshift) until stopping barely a few feet from them and whizzing away…..I shit you not.

Once, I had to escort one of the female staffers home because her ex-husband was threatening to kill her.

Lastly, the entire system was, in my opinion, a scam. Very few of our patients were of the legitimate, mental illness variety (even though we were the centralized mental health facility for a major metropolitan area). Some of the patients had mental illness like symptoms that were completely the result of crack cocaine use (ie, after a couple of weeks of rehab, they became symptom free, even in serious cases). But most of the patients were simple crack addicts who were homeless. At the cost of thousands and thousands of dollars, we warehoused these yahoos for a bit before moving them in and out of rehab and trying fruitlessly to place them in outpatients systems (drug use makes you ineligible you see……means you are out on the street). They were in no way interested in anything except doing crack and just running the system to get a roof over their head (you aren’t allowed in the shelters if you are using drugs…they test). A typical example would be one of these yahoos being picked up by the cops. An ambulance (at least $2 thousand dollars each trip) would transport them to our facility where they would stay inpatient (about a grand a day) until they were “stable” enough to be placed outpatient or they decompensated and had to be hospitalized ($2-3 grand a day). All for someone who isn’t mentally ill. As far as I could see, these wastes of life completely pushed out all the legitimate patients. Which tells me that the people designing the system are the most insane of all.

The system is insane and any person who tells you they work in that system is probably insane too. If not, they soon will be.

.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
Boycott Those Who Disrespect Men
.

Prostitution

.
I think the only way prostitution could ever work would be to use price fixing and extremely rigid controls to make sure that AIDS isn’t spread everywhere and that the criminal element wouldn’t dare run the show. Basically, what we have now is that the criminal element in the US runs prostitution, which is heavily entwined with drugs. It’s also the only way a normal man (i.e. a non-intravenous drug using heterosexual) can reasonably expect to catch AIDS.

If they can’t solve those two problems, they can’t legalize it. If they want to try, they should start small, like what they have in Nevada.

If you don’t fix the price, you will have most women abandoning all pretence of family and respectable living to make thousands of dollars a night as a prostitute. Of course, once they reach age 30 and can’t work anymore, society will pick up the tab for taking care of them. I mean, we already have a huge problem in this country where too large a percentage of our best looking women choose to strip instead of becoming normal decent folk. Most of these get hooked on drugs and become the absolute worst of the worst when it comes to women. How would you like that to become most women? Women are bad but most aren’t that bad. Uncontrolled, legalized prostitution would make most women as bad as the average crack whore.
.
The Problems with Whores
.
The problem with a whore is she takes the obnoxious high risk behavior women engage in to ridiculous extremes. Even with all the crap women do, few are having sexual contacts into the hundreds per year with complete lack of restrictions. However, all whores do this. And a whore that will have sex with you for money will happily have sex with a high risk man, without a condom….for more money. Anyplace (like the United States, for example) where being whore is all about letting men beat you in exchange for speedy drugs, you are almost guaranteed to be exposed to AIDS, many other diseases almost as deadly/nasty, not to mention the criminal element. Just say NO to any westernized woman who has ever worked in the sex for money industry in any capacity. Although every woman has a screw loose, these women have 90% of their screws loose. Quite frankly, your chances of being exposed to AIDS is close to nil, unless you specifically go looking for it by screwing prostitutes or specifically seek out the IV drug user crowd or if you have sex with men.

I cannot comment on the sex for money scene outside the US but I think it’s asking for trouble. Definitely, not something you should even consider unless you spend a significant amount of time investigating the real risks involved. The problem though is there are people with an agenda who don’t want you to have access to that scene, who lie about the risks (which, of course makes people doubt the risk is real). But, there are also people involved in the scene who lie the other way about the risks because denial is a big part of how they handle those risks. The truth is there is significant risk…..of catching AIDS (I actually know a guy who died of AIDS this way), of catching something else just as bad, of being robbed etc., and lots of other stuff. Anyone who tells you different is LYING. What you need is truthful information that allows you to plan behaviors that minimize your risk. If you can’t or simply won’t do that, then the price in terms of risk is probably unacceptably high.

Personally, I wouldn’t consider an American prostitute under any circumstances. They are the worst women on the planet and I’d enter a monastery before I let one of those sick bitches even touch me. I might consider a woman from one of the eastern countries like this but only if she was of such high quality that I would never see a woman like that here, let alone screw her. And I would only do that if I spent a hell of a lot of time minimizing my risk and networking with guys who frequent that specific scene and know what they are doing.
.
Would You Strip Down in a Room with a Crack Addict?
.
Let me ask you. Would you strip down in a room alone with a crack addict who has been arrested numerous times for violent crimes? Because that is exactly the type of person you are with when you get a prostitute. I can almost guarantee you will be exposed to AIDS, herpes, hepatitis, TB, and a host of other things you wouldn’t wish on your worst enemy. This person belongs to the criminal subculture….a part of society it is very important to avoid all contact with, because it exists for the sole purpose of hurting normal folks. There is also the additional issue that many prostitutes don’t live that lifestyle by choice. They are actually slaves. Some are girls from the very worst situations domestically. Many have actually been tricked and then kidnapped into leaving a foreign country and then put to work in the sex trade. A great many strippers fall into that category. Do you really want to be a part of that…..hanging out with the Russian mob so you can have sex with an AIDS infected slave, and pay out the nose for it? Things are tough in the dating scene. But they’re not THAT tough.
.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
"Prostitution is not a result of social conditions, but of some cause deep in the nature of women; prostitutes who have been "reclaimed" frequently, even if provided for, return to their old way of life. . . . I may note finally, that prostitution is not a modern growth; it has been known from the earliest times, and even was a part of some ancient religions, as, for instance, among the Phoenicians. 

Prostitution cannot be considered as a state into which men have seduced women. Where there is no inclination for a certain course, the course will not be adopted. Prostitution is foreign to the male element, although the lives of men are often more laborious and unpleasant than those of women, and male prostitutes are always advanced sexually intermediate forms. The disposition for and inclination to prostitution is as organic in a woman as is the capacity for motherhood." - Otto Weininger, Motherhood and Prostitution, Sex and Character 
.

The Most Feminacentrist Statement of the 20th Century

.
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today's warfare victms. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children" -- Hillary Clinton at the First Ladies' Conference on Domestic Violence in San Salvador, El Salvador, November 17, 1998

You dead and maimed guys are so lucky!

This speech is incredibly insidious. On the surface it's about women suffering as the unseen victims of war (the grain of truth to this lie). But there is a hell of alot implied by the way she chose to say it.

1) Absolutely no mention of the men who died or were maimed in this war. The implication is that their suffering is separate from their women and isn't worth mentioning.

2) There is a very strong implication that women had nothing to do with a war. It was a needless thing (caused by the thoughtless actions of men) that harms them. Actually, most wars are fought to protect women. History is one long string of good men sacrificing themselves to protect their women and children from bad people.

3) She mentions refugees as if they are only composed of women.

4) She comes right out and says the women are the primary victims of war. This isn't true. The primary victims of war are all the people killed by bullets, bombs and other horrors. These are mostly men. Not only are women secondary victims of war, but there are a hell of a lot of men and children that are also secondary victims.

5) The only time the loss of men is mentioned is how their deaths affect the women emotionally, and more importantly, financially. The irony is completely lost on her. The women she is speaking to probably care much more that they lost someone they loved rather than someone who took care of them. Obviously, Clinton can't see that. It never occurs to her. I bet more than one woman at the conference had a strange look on her face, thinking, what the heck is this gringa talking about? Why is she talking about unimportant stuff? I lost my husband. I loved him!

Guys, this fool was/is looking to be our next president. If you think laws and politics enable women now, imagine what it would be like after 4 years with her at the helm.
.
Dishonesty at N.O.W.
.
The term dishonest implies that NOW has a legitimate agenda and is just willing to fight dirty to promote it. More and more it’s becoming clear that this isn’t true. These are deeply evil people doing everything in their power to hurt everyone they can, ESPECIALLY women. Every single issue they promote, they take the position most likely to hurt people, no matter how bizarre or unlikely, going to incredible lengths to make their wacko position seem reasonable. They are almost satanic in their promotion of abortion (as in, they want women to have as many abortions as possible and celebrate it) .While legitimate issues of women’s rights go unchampioned, they spend all their time trying to strip rights away from men.
.
Good Job on the Stats!
.
QUOTE: JUSTICE SYSTEM BIAS: Even though the amount of the average “child support payment” due from women is half the amount due from men, and even though women are twice as likely as men to default on those payments, fathers are 97% of “child support” collections prosecutions [Census Bureau]

I had no idea of that stat. It’s an important one, IMHO and illustrates quite nicely how the whole “deadbeat dad” issue is a total lie.

QUOTE: HIGHER EDUCATION: There are more than 200 all-female colleges for women and now not one single all-male college for men. 5.8% fewer men than women are enrolled in 4 year colleges, even though two thirds of those who score higher than 550 in SAT Math are males. In 1993 only 44.5% of college enrolments were men, and that figure has declined since then. Only 45.8% of of bachelor’s degrees were conferred to men in 1992, even though 98.2% of the top fiftieth percentile of the GRE are men, and ZERO PERCENT of American high school girls correctly answered 28 out of 67 TIMSS advanced math questions. Only 38.4% of private 4 year college students were men as of 1990, and this figure has declined since then.

I personally have run into this bit of discrimination. There was a time when I approached the Chicago School of Professional Psychology about their PsyD. Program. Even though I had GRE scores in the 99 percentile, high grades, published research and good references, they passed me over. Almost all of students there are women. More importantly, all of the women I knew who went to that school (including my own fiancé, at the time) had below average scores, grades and were missing research achievements (supposedly very important) like mine. I approached the head of the board that screens applicants (a woman) and was very rudely rebuffed. Perhaps I should have sued them. Of course, knowing what I know now, I would NEVER choose to enter the field of Clinical Psychology.

QUOTE: CHILD VIOLENCE: Even though mothers commit 55% of child murders and biological fathers commit 6%, even though NIS-3 shows that Mother-only households are 3 times more fatal to children than Father-only households, children are systematically removed from the natural fathers who are their most effective protectors and men are imprisoned at rate 20 times that of women.

This reminds me of that TV commercial showing a father and a little girl holding hands and acting in a loving manner, while the word Abuser is printed on his back, to be seen by a woman, with a caption urging people to report men even if they just mildly suspect abuse. The commercial is an obvious attempt to cause harm to normal families without abuse and a strong father role model. It conveniently ignores the fact that most abuse (and by far, the worst abuse) comes from women, not men. Of men and women, women are the ones who no longer feel the strong bond that makes harming a child, taboo….not men. That is sad and disturbing. And I can think of no stronger argument for the fact that women are the problem in society….not men. Further, of the men who DO abuse, almost all of them are omega males. The commercial shows the nice, white, middle class, respectable dad as the abuser. But the truth is, it’s the drug using, lower income, criminal record scumbag that is the abuser. Unfortunately, minorities are over represented in this population.

Good job on the stats.
.
Women Are Lying About Wanting to be Empowered

Click Pic for "The Fish and The Bicycle"

.
The problem here is women are totally lying about wanting to be empowered. To have power, one must have independence and be self-reliant. This is the exact opposite of what women and children have been for most of human history. Instead of being independent and self-reliant (ie having power) they have been dependent and relied on men for everything. In return, there is a bunch of stuff they are expected to give men…..certain roles they must perform for the system to work.

Now, a handful of women have always been an exception. I can totally see how more women would want to have power by becoming self-reliant and independent. BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT THEY ARE DOING! Instead, they want to be empowered but still rely and depend on men for everything. They think they can do this by creating various ways and means to force us to take care of them, both as individuals and a society, without giving anything in return. They don’t want marriage but they still want money from men via alimony and child support. They want to vote but don’t exercise wisdom in what they vote for. They want jobs but are pathetic as employees, but God forbid you fire them, you’ll get sued (plus they will trade sex for promotions).

The cure of course is to refuse to give them anything they haven’t earned. Right now they are completely full of shit when it comes to empowerment. Force them to not be full of shit. Give them jobs but fire them if they perform poorly. Don’t marry them under conditions where they bail from marriage in large numbers but force men to continue paying.

In other words, say NO to them. They want things from men. Tell them no. They want to be empowered. That means getting things for themselves. It most certainly doesn’t mean getting things from men but not giving anything for them in return.
.
Women Only Have What Rights Men Give to Them
.

Women are as Independent as a Tropical Fern in a Greenhouse in Iceland

Women only have what rights we give them. The real core of the problem with women is other men. The men who open their wallets in a snivelling desire to get laid. The men who pass foolish draconian laws to solve problems that don’t exist. The men who promote women in return for sexual favours. The men who marry obviously inferior women. And most of all, the men who swallow the most outrageous of lies, rather than bother to think critically about what is happening both to them and everyone around them.

The bottom line is women have no real power, no intrinsic power. They are totally, completely and permanently dependant on men for power. This situation is deeply rooted in our biology and not going to change because some wacko broads think it should. We created this hobgoblin ourselves, feed it and keep it alive despite it’s obviously odious nature. The very moment we stop, it will evaporate in a puff of smoke. Women know this. Their biggest fear is we will wake up and know it too.
.
America is Not a Socialist Country?
.
QUOTE: "America is not a Socialist country. In fact we are the LEAST socialist country on earth. We have the lowest taxes of any developed country so I don’t know where you guys keep getting this socialist crap from.

Feminist is one thing, Socialist is another."
.

Click Pic for "Are Americans Practicing Communism? The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto"

.
You guys are right, I really should be more careful in what I mean, but there is no specific term for it. For example, communism is a dirty word. But not because there is anything wrong with that model (even though it is a bit unrealistic). What makes communism a dirty word are the specific PEOPLE who identify themselves with communism, give lip service to that system but are involved in all sorts of crazy shit that isn’t too related to the values they supposedly hold. Socialism has a very similar thing going on in a great many countries but hasn’t yet been revealed as being quite as bad. Here in the US, although the same people are involved with the same pattern of behavior, they don’t call themselves socialists. They call themselves liberals. Part of the problem is these malevolent shadow players adopt a name with a well defined set of goals and values to hide what they are doing. Their goals, values and behaviours are way out of line with what the name implies. The biggest example of this I can think of is feminism.

The specific part of the “socialist” agenda I’m talking about is the forced redistribution of wealth by centralized violence via alimony/child support and the attempt to dilute/remove the family as the prime source of socialization and values for children and replace them with the government (conveniently replacing good values with ones the socialists need to manipulate people with that are quite frankly immoral). Also, through various means they have set up a system where a person can be a very low quality human being and still survive, even thrive and multiply. They have removed many of the perks a person gets for being a good person. The biggest one of these is being treated with preference and respect by women. That prize now goes to men who are scum….thanks to direct manipulation and brain washing by these people.

Although centralization is a key element of what these people are about, that isn’t their defining characteristic. And you are right, the US is much less socialistic (in the real sense of the word) than many other countries. The defining characteristic is the ABUSE of that centralization….turning it away from its intended purpose (usually leaving that purpose unfulfilled) to serve a fucked up purpose. They hijack our institutions and twist them to evil ends.

Although removing all elements of socialism from our society would solve the problem, it would also bring about other problems. Perhaps it would be better to say that we need to regain control of those institutions from these evil bastards and reform them. However, certain socialistic institutions are highly inappropriate and have always been abused harshly and their reason for being was mostly a lie. Child support and alimony are right at the top of the list for that.
.

Previous / Index / Next

.

.