tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31428295727463031362024-02-18T23:52:26.151-08:00The Masculine Principle.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comBlogger86125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-78018402366346124532015-03-11T23:30:00.000-07:002015-04-29T16:10:45.404-07:00Table of Contents - Glossary.<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/The%20Masculine%20Principle" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/The%20Masculine%20Principle" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUZ61JbvIvnWx7wEqZvPqpUe00a78cCcbR1WL4C4TlRG-DIjzMTfOEFeeq3pcKlRF-Nls2JYhfVpC4HT8b2bKBautxaJFddAP2l9UeltCwxOMUZXzrvUhykGbAk1oSioyx-Rg86FC1UpS/s1600/The+Masculine+Principle.jpg" height="400" width="400" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;"><i>". . . The fact is that males and females are like two substances combined in
different proportions, but with either element never wholly missing. </i></span><br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoy_OS0eSUD2EctbhWS6IUpy4AzKeJ9cSxeT2ocnqoOYw9HAcRaxnnIWfHK0XrjBnldoC1gzo1LcM7oEW5h-QjnCWurQQUosryhJXULL0nlzfQ9KyTIOp23DJ3CQZ7qVDUP4-shn_TB7Y/s1600/1195427607377807441Stellaris_Yin_Yang.svg.med.png" height="200" width="200" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"><i> </i></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>We find,
so to speak, never either a man or a woman, </i><b>but only the male condition and the
female condition.</b><i> Any individual is never to be designated merely as a man or
a woman, but by a formula showing that it is a composite of male and female
characters in different proportions."</i> -- <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mf" target="_blank">Otto Weininger, <i>Sex and Character</i></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%201%20-%20Introduction" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Chapter One: Introduction</b></u></span></a><br />
Part 1: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">The Masculine Principle</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 2: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" target="_blank">Generalizing in a Politically Correct World</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 3: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">Peer Reviewed Research: The Holy Grail of Truth?</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 4: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" target="_blank">The Truth About Misogyny</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 5: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" target="_blank">A Guide to Birdwatching</a> <br />
.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%202%20-%20Sexuality" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Chapter Two: Sexuality</b></u></span></a><br />
Part 1: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">Male and Female: Equal But Different</a><br />
Part 2: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)</a><br />
Part 3: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html" target="_blank">Love is for Suckers... Blood Suckers</a><br />
Part 4: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 5: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html" target="_blank">The Myth of Tiresias and the Ten Pleasures of Sex</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 6: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">You're Such a Tool! (Briffault's law)</a><br />
Part 7: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" target="_blank">Rites of Passage - Making Boys into Men</a><br />
Part 8: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" target="_blank">Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager In The House?</a><br />
Part 9: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">The Amazon Women (The Science of "Why Males Exist")</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 10: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">Testing, Testing... 1, 2, 3... Testing</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">.<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%203%20-%20The%20Gender%20War" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Chapter Three: The Gender War</b></u></span></a><br />
Part 1: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fish-and-bicycle.html" target="_blank">The Fish and The Bicycle</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Part 2: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" target="_blank">Social Strategy: Why Men Shouldn't Argue With Women</a></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Part 3: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">The Suffragettes versus The Republic</a> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Part 4: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy</a></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Part 5: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" target="_blank">The Suffragettes versus The Marketplace</a> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Part 6: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">The Suffragettes versus The Truth</a> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 7: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">Father Custody and The Legend of the Selkie</a></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
Part 8: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" target="_blank">The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)</a><br />
Part 9: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">Feminizing the Decline (Hypergamy & Birthrates)</a> <br />
.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%204%20-%20Marxism" target="_blank"><u><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Chapter Four: The Pillars and the Plot</span></b></u></a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 1: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-powers-that-be.html" target="_blank">The Powers That Be</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 2: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" target="_blank">It's Not Marxism Because...</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 3: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/cultural-pillars-and-critical-theory.html" target="_blank">Cultural Pillars and Critical Theory</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 4: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" target="_blank">Useful Idiots Play Checkers, Marxists Play Chess</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 5: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-family-plot.html" target="_blank">The Family Plot: The Past (Their Oppressors Are Children)</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 6: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-dialectic-of-family-marriage-15.html" target="_blank">The Family Plot: The Present (No-Fault Divorce & Hypergamy)</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 7: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/marriage-20-versus-civil-unions-and.html" target="_blank">The Family Plot: The Future (Civil Unions & Shared Parenting)</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 8: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/following-masculine-principle-is-right.html" target="_blank">Following the Masculine Principle is the "Right Way"</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">.</span><br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%206%20-%20Conclusion" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Chapter Five: Conclusion</b></u></span></a><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 1: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/work-with-world-dont-fight-against-it.html" target="_blank">Work With the World; Don't Fight Against It</a></span><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 2: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank">The Liberation of Men</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 3: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-want-of-men-was-their-ruin.html" target="_blank">The Want of Men Was Their Ruin</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Part 4: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/one-mans-kingdom.html" target="_blank">One Man's Kingdom</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span> <br />
<span style="font-size: small;">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Glossary</b></span></span> <br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">Fitness Test (aka Shit Test)</a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- FRA - Father's RIghts Activist <br />
- FRM - Father's Rights Movement </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- Game - The Art of Seduction</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">Hypergamy</a><br />
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">I.O.I.('s) - Indication of Interest</a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- Mangina - A man who supplicates to women to gain their favour </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" target="_blank">Manosphere - The Online Men's Issues Community</a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- MGTOW - <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2001/02/mgtow-manifesto.html" target="_blank">Men Going Their Own Way</a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Go-Your-Own-Way-Understanding-ebook/dp/B00OVCRMT0" target="_blank">Mig-Tow - MGTOW 2.0</a> </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- MRA - Men's Rights Activist </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- MRM - Men's Rights Movement<br />
- MM - Men's Movement </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.htmll" target="_blank">N.A.W.A.L.T. - Not All Women Are Like That </a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- P.U.A. - Pick-up Artist </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
- <a href="http://toqonline.com/archives/v7n2/v7no2_Devlin.pdf" target="_blank">Rotating Polyandry</a></div>
- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">Shit Test (aka Fitness Test)</a><br />
- SJW - Social Justice Warrior<br />
- SMV - Sexual Mating Value <br />
- White Knight - A man who defends a woman no matter her behaviour<br />
. .http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-78803547961887444552015-03-11T23:15:00.000-07:002016-02-14T10:21:20.620-08:00The Masculine PrincipleThe Masculine Principle is a philosophical concept that is described in the beginning of Otto Weininger's <i><a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">Sex and Character</a></i>. Throughout the book, Weininger refers to "The Male Principle" or "The Female Character" in a way that<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg52lQbmT0IRVtkNtpcgE_dfwrD3koem7MDFB4XXUu6cLu1rbVjyQsb3OvBksTWp11th9dHyftvET8q-EElDL-C3i646lmdcR0dW9HeTy_eeif-yF5Q27NtgRjzDnnP3AUSKttLJWEyzrE/s200/Sex+and+Character+by+Otto+Weininger.jpg" width="198" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Sex and Character"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
means "The Absolute Male" or "The Purely Female." In reality however, there is no such thing as a 100% masculine male or a woman that is completely female. What is present instead is an over-riding "principle" that dominates a man or woman's character in varying degrees.<br />
<br />
<i><b>". . . The fact is that males and females are like two substances combined in
different proportions, but with either element never wholly missing. </b></i><b>We find,
so to speak, never either a man or a woman, but only the male condition and the
female condition</b><i><b>. Any individual is never to be designated merely as a man or
a woman, but by a formula showing that it is a composite of male and female
characters in different proportions."</b></i><br />
-- <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mf" target="_blank">Otto Weininger, Sex and Character, "Males" and "Females"</a><br />
<br />
For example, the average man is not "purely male," but instead something like 80% male principle and 20% female principle. Therefore this average man is influenced mostly by the male principle, but also to some degree by the female principle. Another man standing next to him might be 60% male principle and 40% female principle, which still makes him dominated by the male principle, but he takes on more female characteristics as well. Females obviously are dominated by the feminine principle in the opposite but corresponding way. Thus, the name of the book - Sex and <b><i>Character</i></b>. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPlHD7eB_Vs2GaS36d5oMt_lAvaP9f7sO3SLjs579ppKMqXwOCuQxow8is80R9sq6FNr_q5RCPSaAq1t6koS81rOIB9tll2STyw0wDqxaaa_SBLFSH5nZJnABLNtiSlwovaa_c9q7pRZ4/s1600/1024px-Yin_yang.svg.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPlHD7eB_Vs2GaS36d5oMt_lAvaP9f7sO3SLjs579ppKMqXwOCuQxow8is80R9sq6FNr_q5RCPSaAq1t6koS81rOIB9tll2STyw0wDqxaaa_SBLFSH5nZJnABLNtiSlwovaa_c9q7pRZ4/s1600/1024px-Yin_yang.svg.png" width="320" /></a>This philosophical concept can be visually observed with the diagram of the Yin and Yang. Men and women are two sides of the same coin, but those sides are not the same. They are starkly distinct from eachother. Also, in each side can be found a dot of the other - but they are still distinct from eachother. The dots aren't an androgynously melded grey area, but rather distinctly represent the characteristic of the opposite side - white or black. <br />
<br />
This manifests itself both physically and psychologically.<br />
<br />
In a newborn baby boy, for example, a few drops of milk might secret from his nipples. In fact, the rudimentary biological structure is in place within the male's nipple to secret milk just as in a female's - it's just not as developed in the male's body, but the female element is still present. Conversely, women have facial hair just as men do, except theirs is finer and does not grow in as thickly as a man's. This is the male element present in a female's body. And, when observing that some women have more facial hair than others, we can say that in regard to that specific characteristic, one woman has a greater degree of the masculine element, say 20%, than the woman with less facial hair, who exhibits 10% of the masculine element. In both cases, the women are dominated by their female characteristics, but display characteristics of the other sex to a varying degree. Some men have wider hips than others, but they are still "men," and some women have less developed breasts than others while still being "women."<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-hardwired-difference-between-male-and-female-brains-could-explain-why-men-are-better-at-map-reading-8978248.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-hardwired-difference-between-male-and-female-brains-could-explain-why-men-are-better-at-map-reading-8978248.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiS7_FvaW5boH_vozRDAGB3bLHXwVk3BnhQ0xbTvyT_IreHV4ukeBmbojYN1fuSKFrjgUHqf1YXL4Raz92l2x6duwX9RXb8nDi4sOHJr5w-qPgCdjVa3y4DHhf-46iaN6e-CYFCt1Hzdss/s1600/612px-Sapioheterosexuality_Symbol.svg.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Hardwired Differences Between Male and Female Brains...""</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In the same way, men and women have different psychological characteristics which form their mental character - and while no-one is fully of the male psychology or the female psychology - when detached and in the concept of an absolute "principle," it becomes much easier to define what is "male" and what is "female."<br />
<br />
Thus the title of this book, <i>The Masculine Principle</i>.<br />
<br />
The following pages explore what the masculine principle actually is, and of course, how it relates to and compliments the female principle - and vice versa. Why is it that marriage has produced, throughout all of recorded history, a synergy that is a greater force than merely the two opposite parts? Would there be any synergy at all if both halves were androgynously grey?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqaPtiWm4z8ddIM0veQM8HWiJU1MQe-swJYzoBlbvkA7EosyX9460crvp_-2HMCtH2dfpdGwD_6O-3JrPfZKywVTIahQqK0Uov8lbQBuAkSx8CjkI2D_G1SBuAcnFtWnvf-7B4pRfnNnU/s1600/man-and-woman-holding-hands.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqaPtiWm4z8ddIM0veQM8HWiJU1MQe-swJYzoBlbvkA7EosyX9460crvp_-2HMCtH2dfpdGwD_6O-3JrPfZKywVTIahQqK0Uov8lbQBuAkSx8CjkI2D_G1SBuAcnFtWnvf-7B4pRfnNnU/s1600/man-and-woman-holding-hands.jpg" width="151" /></a>In the corporate world, mergers and acquisitions are motivated by synergies - they seek to add new companies into the fold that compliment eachother, rather than merely to grow into a larger corporate blob of the same nature. eBay, for example, purchased PayPal several years back not because it was a competitor of theirs, but because they wanted to enhance eBay's performance as a company and speculated this could be accomplished with adding PayPal's unique payment system to eBay's existing structure. Well, that was the idea anyway - not just to "grow" but to create a synergy that made a combination of the two worth more than they would be separately. Both had a role to play - eBay to sell the product, and PayPal to collect the money. What they did <i>not</i> do was buy PayPal and try to turn it into a <i>competitor</i> of theirs. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcbZX9waJaGr0-Yt8f6q7LBx5GBu5Goxj20Wsdcs01BM7KgmpOQ2BrRhL7wRRAjWOX8qA9lyVUqadYxToCrn2SRLt7YMmyK-fB1Jqc4tdOKBCyt-2WMvK-EcPsoL7QU14rr_UR70Di6ZI/s1600/016922-3d-transparent-glass-icon-symbols-shapes-female-symbol2-sc48.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcbZX9waJaGr0-Yt8f6q7LBx5GBu5Goxj20Wsdcs01BM7KgmpOQ2BrRhL7wRRAjWOX8qA9lyVUqadYxToCrn2SRLt7YMmyK-fB1Jqc4tdOKBCyt-2WMvK-EcPsoL7QU14rr_UR70Di6ZI/s1600/016922-3d-transparent-glass-icon-symbols-shapes-female-symbol2-sc48.png" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_hUUN6p_hrlAhdG6tmnj0j83B4AmQ8EQfYxZXkW2csu5HIDLn_bpAjp9eKuSlXTFBNjp3gxpBPCubPP9WYkKYjgw-G2EyRAJ8di5IY-_dPY1ScUiFf3TQCSbaCVmUgwc0QvcAJlCQ6Bk/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_hUUN6p_hrlAhdG6tmnj0j83B4AmQ8EQfYxZXkW2csu5HIDLn_bpAjp9eKuSlXTFBNjp3gxpBPCubPP9WYkKYjgw-G2EyRAJ8di5IY-_dPY1ScUiFf3TQCSbaCVmUgwc0QvcAJlCQ6Bk/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a><br />
A man and a woman can create such a synergy within the family, if they compliment eachother rather than compete with eachother. An example might be how fathers traditionally have been the authority figure in the household - a position that needs clearly defined principles of right and wrong to be established and enforced. The father will generally make it known that his daughter should <i>not</i> come home pregnant, for that would clearly be wrong. The mother, however, by following the female principle, has a more diffuse concept of right and wrong and is motivated by her compassion to forgive her daughter's transgression and help her rather than punish her - to show mercy, as it were. <i>But</i>, it must be noted, one cannot actually show mercy unless it has first been established that the daughter did, in fact, do something wrong. Mercy without the principle of right and wrong is not actually mercy. It needs justice for it to exist as a concept, otherwise it is merely blind emotion and instinct - which is how animals exist in their brutal and harshly uncivilized world. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga3AuI0GfPK23R6IH0-pSU0wtXbsUQYAcyC2Ci7dwbfmic9bwJoLwPl7lrVkCPAK_0oqcCfXSpr_A3z8xbPjbAVWtaOJ-yUWQFeXxrudILcb_YTRM36eVO3W3VGwGx2efuyrWZOYOaVew/s1600/justice-mercy-scale.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga3AuI0GfPK23R6IH0-pSU0wtXbsUQYAcyC2Ci7dwbfmic9bwJoLwPl7lrVkCPAK_0oqcCfXSpr_A3z8xbPjbAVWtaOJ-yUWQFeXxrudILcb_YTRM36eVO3W3VGwGx2efuyrWZOYOaVew/s1600/justice-mercy-scale.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
In this case, the synergy is created by the masculine principle establishing right and wrong, but being made into something mercifully forgiving by the influence of the feminine principle. Together, the two principles combine to create something better than they were separately. The father should <i>not</i> kick the daughter out of the house, but instead ought to show her mercy. On the other hand, the mother should <i>not</i> be so overwhelmed with compassion that she refuses to even acknowledge the daughter did wrong. If it is not first established that a wrong was committed, then what is to stop all of the rest of their daughters from coming home pregnant as well? Together, these principles combine to create a system of justice that is capable of showing mercy, and the offspring of the man and woman will fare much better as they attempt to survive in the world because of it. A synergy has been created because the man's character and woman's character complimented each other rather than entering into competition with each other. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" border="0" height="195" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKlb_HihdgOQWcXoDSNmVX5MtrzP8EZLIy9acz3io3N0gOgc03JLQCji4qcbi3zXzNX_iQVWUjUazCu0VT8V_DYLlWCVpof9gpdnIVIUguu4LN3eh5AJRgZ8sm-_HY6HeoC6zYP9EWsoM/s1600/he-man-woman-haters-club-609x372.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Truth About Misogyny"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Be forewarned, however, that what we are about to explore is <b>not</b> a politically correct topic. This subject is one that exposes many of the falsehoods people like to tell themselves for the lies which they really are. Over the past couple of centuries - and especially in the past few decades - our society has become increasingly influenced by the feminine principle - to the detriment of the masculine principle and the synergies created by its combination with the feminine. One of the effects of this has been the over-riding of the objective truth with the subjective truth.<br />
<br />
Truth must be ordered for it to be a functional benefit to humans. America's Founding Fathers borrowed heavily from John Locke's system of ordering, which he derived from the "philosophical position" of God and the Bible - from "The Absolute."<br />
.<br />
This, by the way, has nothing to do with whether God is real or not, but rather <i>what God philosophically represents</i>.
Buddhism as well acknowledges The Absolute, as do countless other
religions and philosophies. In a functional sense they are all
interchangeable because philosophically they all represent the same
thing thing: Absolute Truth. For the sake of keeping things simple,
however, I am going to refer to Christianity and the Bible here, because
it is the religion most of us are familiar with, thus making it far
easier to use as an example than a religion or philosophy which is more
obscure. <br />
<br />
In the Bible, when God refers to himself it is usually in the form of a riddle:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJm07_bN-c34cF_RlvIoWB5T4TQcZWAR8Xbe0RbCAuU0Wm1dfLN4mDiJBQBw8iIWMcF9Kq9YRgP4lqQ4PUE-ILRUa3iyWHTGGj61ihIROBBDYLFf-62zVNvPkjasmNxbhiJVu1rvEI-Vk/s1600/the-truth.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJm07_bN-c34cF_RlvIoWB5T4TQcZWAR8Xbe0RbCAuU0Wm1dfLN4mDiJBQBw8iIWMcF9Kq9YRgP4lqQ4PUE-ILRUa3iyWHTGGj61ihIROBBDYLFf-62zVNvPkjasmNxbhiJVu1rvEI-Vk/s1600/the-truth.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<i>"I am who I am."</i><br />
<br />
<i>"I am the beginning and the end/the Alpha and the Omega."</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>"I am the TRUTH!"</i> <br />
<br />
Every riddle God gives in the Bible to his identity is also synonymous with "Absolute Truth."<br />
<br />
"God" is Absolute Truth.<br />
<br />
Absolute Truth existed before we were here, and it will exist after we
are gone. The Absolute Truth just “is” – It is what it is (I am who I
am) – the Absolute Truth doesn’t need to explain nor justify, it just
IS. The Absolute Truth exists on a different plane than we do, therefore, whether
we figure out the true nature of Absolute Truth or not, does not in
anyway refute the existence of said Truth. It exists externally from humans, even though elements of it are found within us.<br />
.<br />
The ordering of Truth, therefore, with Absolute Truth at the top, is as follows: <br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGYBdn_KodPtm7cBNHk1oZ9MQYYkLc-JFNgSJIjUALtBha_c0vvTsAnkCdORMemAxZHoSR25X7ywLodpmENWXfEi2pXwrggENgXU6HWqcHDMn9vU0maGjDKCnV386tCLZBV8juJPsFFX1_/s400/EggDoll.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="290" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGYBdn_KodPtm7cBNHk1oZ9MQYYkLc-JFNgSJIjUALtBha_c0vvTsAnkCdORMemAxZHoSR25X7ywLodpmENWXfEi2pXwrggENgXU6HWqcHDMn9vU0maGjDKCnV386tCLZBV8juJPsFFX1_/s400/EggDoll.jpg" width="320" /></a>1 – God’s Law/Absolute Truth<br />
<br />
2 – Natural Law/Apparent/Objective Truth<br />
<br />
3 – Civil Law/Relative/Subjective Truth <br />
.<br />
It works like one of those Russian matryoshka dolls where the one fits
inside of the other, in order to contain the wild malleability of the
human mind (We can justify <i>anything</i> if we really want to, ie.
Relative Truth – Jail is full of self-claimed "innocent" people).<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiKljOeV_tNe8b56KcCamht6WE0pwLp2k-AnX-BT-bvNgYjL-ieh-M3nCpZBPL_8Fys81P5sMextSUm3oLNOphnrhHDce6HtkqsZFUz87hYtLiAHtX6Xd4uqZyXtLPQxLJzjgSuTRMgZ4/s1600/Flat+Earth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiKljOeV_tNe8b56KcCamht6WE0pwLp2k-AnX-BT-bvNgYjL-ieh-M3nCpZBPL_8Fys81P5sMextSUm3oLNOphnrhHDce6HtkqsZFUz87hYtLiAHtX6Xd4uqZyXtLPQxLJzjgSuTRMgZ4/s1600/Flat+Earth.jpg" width="320" /></a>If a Civil
Law/Relative Truth contradicts a Natural Law/Apparent Truth, then the
Civil Law/Relative Truth is a false one, and so forth. In this way, the
“lower truths” are contained by the “higher truths,” and thus we are
provided with a philosophical framework <b><i>that anchors us to reality.</i></b> <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEPxHpVz71KdF2JaOL4KQFNS2CPPy46T2KgXTxrhD38mlMQGOfIJw56QQzBxGVkWvQeKM1K3l6NxXneBy8h2D7si6I_3ZetkRPRqp65diqoPh4GhiAbKnuSamIuOA85xwZMfdj1O3XazU/s1600/earth-globe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEPxHpVz71KdF2JaOL4KQFNS2CPPy46T2KgXTxrhD38mlMQGOfIJw56QQzBxGVkWvQeKM1K3l6NxXneBy8h2D7si6I_3ZetkRPRqp65diqoPh4GhiAbKnuSamIuOA85xwZMfdj1O3XazU/s1600/earth-globe.jpg" width="320" /></a>Now, some things that were true yesterday are no longer true
today. Changes to medicine and technology can indeed change what is true. 200 years ago, I would have said it is absolutely true that man
does not have the ability to fly, let alone propel himself faster than
the speed of sound… but today, the truth is different – the truth
evolved. Also, sometimes things we once assumed were true, like the earth being flat,
are illustrated to have been false. Thus, we need something “higher” than
apparent truth - because we are not omniscient. We can't be 100% rigid in our beliefs in apparent/objective truth after the Absolute Truth has revealed itself to us. Once<br />
we acknowledged the earth was in fact round, we had to adjust our objective thinking to accomodate this newly known fact - it changed our thinking of the sun, moon and stars. Further down the chain of truth, we had to alter the subjective truth and stop believing we would fall off the edge of the earth if we sailed out too far, and therefore, any laws preventing us from doing so were obviously false laws and had to be removed from the books.<br />
<br />
This ordering of truth works as a hierarchy and it can't work in reverse. You might be saying, "Well, duh!", but the Soviets illustrated how this can happen by the way they ordered their farmers to plant crops according to a scheduled date on the calendar, rather than to the actual rythym of the seasons. This left their farmers sometimes planting crops into frozen ground. The resulting failed harvests led to starvation for the people. Somehow the bureaucracies in charge convinced themselves that the seasons could be legislated, rather than their legislation having to accomodate the seasons. This happened to them because they un-ordered the truth. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s400/Truth.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="328" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s400/Truth.jpg" width="400" /></a>Absolute Truth is purity. It controls all other truths. It is without fault. It is <i>never </i>wrong.
It is enduring, it never changes. It couldn’t give a rip if we
understand it or not. It is eternal, and it exists on an entirely
different plane than us, and often, our understanding. That we thought
the earth was flat had no effect on the physics that ruled the earth and
the solar system. On that level, our understanding is irrelevant.
Absolute Truth trumps all, no matter what we conjure up in our brains.<br />
<br />
I think, after a while of studying this whole malaise we are in as a society,
eventually one gets exposed to the changing philosophies of mankind,
such as how a change of thinking about fraternity and equality arose out
of the French Revolution and this led to a philosophical change in the
way society viewed the reality about us. It is often pointed out that this
philosophical change is what led to the birth of Marxism and feminism, which are both based upon "the Relative Truth Uber Alles." <br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNhyphenhyphenpG274fIqHzCS4aJoOPr1DuPgqZm4-EUyszATC6FtNkfCRgWsPWIkrV8bV7egwZa9WBXjgplGGCKjGfuhuy5U5OTvhQyhq-4LNIEk8SMAT3tejHu0vXX-EDxH66F0SwlacW_TWeTRk/s1600/And-you-will-know-the-truth-and-the-truth-will-make-you-free.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
It is these concepts that will be explored in this book. The Masculine and Feminine Principles and what they are sexually, biologically, and psychologically. How do they interconnect with each other? How do they relate to the structure of our civilization and to the philosophical nature of "The Truth." What is it that separates us from the rest of the animals and makes us human? Could it be the concept of Truth itself? <br />
<br />
The following pages will attempt to speak clearly without regard for personal feelings - we are seeking the Truth and trying not to perpetuate falsehoods simply out of politically correct fear. Sometimes the Truth hurts - but it's still neccessary to have it.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/04/i-stand-alone-today.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/04/i-stand-alone-today.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKdkmCmIGf-F7JURlnDi38i4B_ult3CA2SSJL1lW-3sfehhmtDK5Qm5RHMhozhyphenhypheneNukxu_TtO-n0Gc0zJOQ8vyLB-ISR2dleraYwQHvDnkVfQ8eqcPYNE7YeSRKdoMMo3sfLUH60NpXvU/s200/The+Masculine+Principle.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "I Stand Alone Today"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
There are certainly anti-feminist sentiments to be found here but make no mistake, this isn't a social justice warrior's treatise trying to foment some men's movement to counter feminism. Movements, like herds and harems, are the domain of the Feminine Principle. It would be anti-thetical to the Masculine Principle to attempt to counter the Feminine Principle by mimicking it - that's where androgyny comes from, a condition I completely abhor and reject. The Masculine Principle must be <i>masculine</i>, and one of its features, which will be discussed later on, is its ability to seek the Truth so we can better understand the structure of the world about us. It's something men have been doing since the beginning of time, and this book will attempt to continue in that ancient, masculine tradition. <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<span style="font-size: medium;"></span>
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-EYAsV-dWRWw%2FUgKDT12aFMI%2FAAAAAAAAEJQ%2F1S0YGg-28x4%2Fs400%2FEggDoll.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGYBdn_KodPtm7cBNHk1oZ9MQYYkLc-JFNgSJIjUALtBha_c0vvTsAnkCdORMemAxZHoSR25X7ywLodpmENWXfEi2pXwrggENgXU6HWqcHDMn9vU0maGjDKCnV386tCLZBV8juJPsFFX1_/s400/EggDoll.jpg" --><!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-1KGq2NOHcEw%2FUgKFiD56J1I%2FAAAAAAAAEJg%2FzhbVRivztS8%2Fs400%2FTruth.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s400/Truth.jpg" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-10946048950017883022015-03-11T22:30:00.000-07:002015-05-17T12:43:23.912-07:00Generalizing in a Politically Correct World (NAWALT). <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj290i_WYYTzn0PGzNvnodOVdceNIUzDiT0dC1jc7k6ufp06IJjp_dUkP7V0-rlwbDRIlUpGiAF6wibT_7WLppGRVUrEZOY5nxDvLGJhMz4ghEjGGVkJr5rlYcjETKLrCWL50O2pgeG_LQ/s1600/Generalizations.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="385" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj290i_WYYTzn0PGzNvnodOVdceNIUzDiT0dC1jc7k6ufp06IJjp_dUkP7V0-rlwbDRIlUpGiAF6wibT_7WLppGRVUrEZOY5nxDvLGJhMz4ghEjGGVkJr5rlYcjETKLrCWL50O2pgeG_LQ/s400/Generalizations.bmp" width="400" /></a>Possibly the most consistent argument one is faced with when discussing politically incorrect subjects is the knee-jerkingly reflexive, <b>"You can't generalize like that!"</b> This is usually followed with an anecdote about someone's friend's cousin who lives next door to a lady located in a neighbouring town - ten years ago. The purpose of telling this story is that it "obviously proves" the politically incorrect premise is wrong. It is the trick of personalizing an <i>individual</i> characteristic over a <i>group</i> characteristic - which, by the way, indicates the person giving the annectdote has already lost the plot and is not arguing in good faith. <br />
<br />
Any logical person will soon realize that when discussing macro-issues in regard to society and its trends, not only <i>can</i> you generalize but in fact you <i>must</i> generalize. To fail
to generalize is to demand all things must only be regarded one-dimensionally and in terms of the
lowest common denominator. A more complex and proper way of thinking is that <b>“there are individual <i>groups</i> and there
are <i>individuals</i> within those groups.”</b> <br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4SA1C4uvRMYbjIUQWK2qZtJDrHITK0H3FfXZfMtcWylKDnqFc4HkEeAKePGRPxJsj4JuIQ7u_p0zg91OAjiZ4KpEyXa0xHXsNrrNKrj3lwJhU0CFc3kkJsw5TGTKC86BYSa1Abl71cpo/s1600/andrej-pejic-new-york-magazine-karlismyunkle.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4SA1C4uvRMYbjIUQWK2qZtJDrHITK0H3FfXZfMtcWylKDnqFc4HkEeAKePGRPxJsj4JuIQ7u_p0zg91OAjiZ4KpEyXa0xHXsNrrNKrj3lwJhU0CFc3kkJsw5TGTKC86BYSa1Abl71cpo/s1600/andrej-pejic-new-york-magazine-karlismyunkle.jpg" width="239" /></a></div>
For example, saying something like “women have larger breasts than men” is a
sweeping generalization. But it's a true one – even though <i>some</i> women
have smaller breasts than <i>some</i> men. In the collective group of “women”
there <i>will</i> be some individual women who have small breasts, while in the
collective group of “men” there will be <i>some</i> porky men sporting a set
of man-boobs. But only a simpleton would try to cherry pick a flat chested woman
and stand her next to a<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJX7kvBxeWuKG4cX8l7BcqQ7iSGcg1vcCSjze4irFfkKg65jy8lOFjbcWixbdxFYZaKdR51xi-L8OGSBs-RiQruNiukRkf87SnY73CqQNY3yK0e4iaD1MSGNqeG2Y-7JTox4KNPUAXZO4/s1600/The+Bro.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJX7kvBxeWuKG4cX8l7BcqQ7iSGcg1vcCSjze4irFfkKg65jy8lOFjbcWixbdxFYZaKdR51xi-L8OGSBs-RiQruNiukRkf87SnY73CqQNY3yK0e4iaD1MSGNqeG2Y-7JTox4KNPUAXZO4/s1600/The+Bro.jpg" /></a>man-boobed male and claim that this is in any way
an honest reflection of the physical nature of man and woman, therefore, we should not say that “women
have larger breasts than men” anymore. It would be lunacy! The only thing we might be
able to learn then is that “both men and women have nipples.”<br />
<br />
Wow! Stop
everything right there! The Tower of Babel is already reaching into the heavens!
What more could we possibly learn?<br />
<br />
Generalizations are absolutely necessary in order to learn anything about macro-issues and societal trends. <br />
. <br />
Of course, what a person <i>cannot</i> do is take <i>one</i> individual and
generalize that the entire group resembles that <i>individual.</i> Take Marc
Lepine, for example. Feminists have been screeching for over twenty-five years now
that Marc Lepine is “proof” of the murderous hatred <i>men </i>harbour for
women. Now <i>that</i> is pure bunk. The actions of <i>one</i>
<i>man</i> is in no way a reflection of the mentality of the 15,000,000 other
men who live in Canada. That is a <i>wrong</i> generalization.<br />
<br />
But, to say that men are taller or heavier than women? Yes, this is a proper
generalization, because the majority of men are taller and heavier than the
majority of women – even though in <i>some</i> individual cases, you will be
able to see a taller or heavier woman than a man.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpH7A4y-9GnVjyan7EAGnHzVfq0uFoCQ4TEimbQ6moykI1YUiRa2BzzOuEi1JykO0JLxvg26R0p6W8PcUDK_AoveC40kC1x0fSVWdVKgCctVtogA0h6mzGxcw-8-9hEJt_QLXHkKtAPwA/s1600/Flying+Penguins.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="222" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpH7A4y-9GnVjyan7EAGnHzVfq0uFoCQ4TEimbQ6moykI1YUiRa2BzzOuEi1JykO0JLxvg26R0p6W8PcUDK_AoveC40kC1x0fSVWdVKgCctVtogA0h6mzGxcw-8-9hEJt_QLXHkKtAPwA/s1600/Flying+Penguins.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
We generalize that “birds fly.” But oh my gosh! You can’t generalize like
that! Don’t you know that Emus, Ostriches, Kiwis and Penguins don’t fly? This is
such a lame argument and it ought to be obvious that any biologist worth his salt must <i>necessarily</i>
generalize that “birds fly.” Look up, grasshopper… not down!<br />
<br />
In fact, generalizing is very beneficial and is used quite successfully in many areas of society - such as when the insurance industry analyzes the average frequency of an event (ie. a housefire) in order to offer protection to the individual homeowner while still reliably turning a profit. The government generalizes as well when they pass such laws as speed limits with fines for punishment. It is fully understood that <i>not all</i> of the people will reduce their speed, <i>but most of them will</i> and therefore, it works to keep <i>most</i> people driving at a reasonable speed and makes the roads safer - which is the positive result that is being sought.<br />
<br />
Another example is that if we can see that men politically vote 60/40 for principles extolling freedom versus those which promote socialism, while women tend to vote 30/70 on the same issues, then there is little doubt that over time the government will become less freedom oriented and much more mired in socialism - as has been explored by John Lott and Lawrence Kenny's study titled, <a href="http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf" target="_blank">"Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?"</a> <br />
<br />
Many of the arguments that get put forward in regard to sensitive issues
(like the War of the Sexes) automatically get dismissed with the intellectually dishonest statement, “You can’t generalize like that.”<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjX58QjGVjikRTikExFPGZBsZn3v5DeKayz79sVDNea2jaK7ei87OAyi2yBqSRS6fdxBajICSkTWoeqyyimci9547QaXYEbBePFcRq5pEn_EI-8Sleqhdf0l-bIVIo-iqEqf6omupEoCJs/s1600/quote-you-perceive-i-generalize-with-intrepidity-from-single-instances-it-is-the-tourist-s-custom-mark-twain-334742.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="187" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjX58QjGVjikRTikExFPGZBsZn3v5DeKayz79sVDNea2jaK7ei87OAyi2yBqSRS6fdxBajICSkTWoeqyyimci9547QaXYEbBePFcRq5pEn_EI-8Sleqhdf0l-bIVIo-iqEqf6omupEoCJs/s1600/quote-you-perceive-i-generalize-with-intrepidity-from-single-instances-it-is-the-tourist-s-custom-mark-twain-334742.jpg" width="400" /></a>Nonsense.<br />
<br />
In fact, no-one is going to figure out anything if they
fail to generalize. Ignoring the similar actions/traits/situations in 80% of
the cases because 20% of the cases do not coincide… well… that is not going to help us at all in analyzing the world as it unfolds about us. <br />
<br />
The thing to keep in mind is that there are individual groups (ie. men and
women), and there are individuals within those groups.<br />
<br />
The way to learn something is to recognize that the trait of the group
follows in “this” direction, even though there are individual exceptions which
follow “that” direction.<br />
<br />
It’s time to stop looking for the lowest common denominator. <br />
<br />
<b>There are individual <i>groups,</i> and there are <i>individuals</i> within those groups. </b><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. <br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<b> </b><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6qKiGaZ7-moU7S0tvu0G6WKkaQjpjMMaLGzK7co5bUixNz0yJ2U8fQbGgzpVlgpcazdJk8LJEP33635QpxZdKl7h4hc_6QRVyDYsI5ju3xq9b0Jz5n5eJ_-Jv_OEMr5_D5W-PibdvVTo/s400/Not+All+Women+Are+Like+That+(NAWALT).jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character (Would Make Me a Sandwich!)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>"Meanwhile, as long as there's one honest woman living at the temple
atop Mount NAWALT in Tibet..." </b>-- White Knight<br />
.<br />
--------------------------------------------<br />
.<b> </b><br />
<b>Mathieu of Boulogne (1295) on NAWALT</b><br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2003/01/lamentations-of-matheolus.html" target="_blank">From “The Lamentations of Matheolus”</a></b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Proverbs 31:10-31 The Wife of Noble Character (Would Make Me a Sandwich!) - Click Pic:" border="0" height="200" id="Image22_img" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhODpFL3eAaGS9BhYLWbXsM11i8NWH-KgQjHah_LSSUt1g1wTFo5q1NZpjbrQGhIDPQBCpyZSF447C93H21rvMG7mFrA2GT5y1zWV84-m2bo5IP6RSaS0YEz_Do2D4KhhFrswUjPqnj9pQ/s200/woman_make_me_a_sandwich_.png" style="visibility: visible;" width="200" /></a><i>"Yet one might disagree with me,
criticize my conclusion. and, putting forward the opposite point of view,
suggest that my words are completely untrue. For, if some women are evil and
perverse and abnormal, it does not necessarily follow that all of them are so
cruel and wicked; nor should all of them be lumped together in this general
reproach. A speech is badly composed if one's general conclusion is only partly
valid. Logic hates this type of argumentation. Nevertheless, this present work,
which expresses the pain in my heart, wishes me to exclude nothing, but commands
me to push my argument to its logical, if extreme, conclusion, which is that no
good woman exists. Solomon, in his works, makes an amazing comment, which
supports my case, for he exclaims, "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" target="_blank">Who could find a virtuous woman?</a>" The
implication here is, of course, that this would be impossible. Since he says
this, who am I to disagree? Why should I be shocked? What's more, he says that a
base and broken man is worth more than a woman when she's doing good. Thus there
is no woman worth anything at all; I don't need to look for further proof.
That's enough logical demonstration. </i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>My exposition is clearly valid, for
woman has - and there is ample evidence of this - deceived all the greatest men
in the world; I shall be basing myself on rational argument. If the greatest are
deceived, then the lesser naturally fall. In the street where I live they say
that what applies to the greatest amongst us applies even more to lesser
mortals. Who were the greatest lords? Who has ever heard of greater men than
Solomon or Aristotle? Yet good sense, riches and reason were not worth a
dung-beetle to them; all were made to look as if they had gone out of fashion;
these men were both outmanoeuvred by women, deceived, vanquished, and
tamed."</i><br />
<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<b>Belfort
Bax on NAWALT</b><br />
<br />
It seems not much has changed in a century, but
this is a beautiful reply (Notice how he only responds to male feminists?
Lol!):<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><a href="http://www.angryharry.com/FraudOfFeminism.htm" target="_blank">The Fraud of Feminism - Belfort Bax, 1913</a></b> pp24-26<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuVmvFiaE5s3VJGvpIjwEQYGJIlXvtHeWzq69zUBiV7sXbqT8kLkss_c-50u40XMjDyNhSypOCcso_ZtmBGcaLs1-X9yMzT-huGoLYjrWTDb3Ji8-lg8fDjXfms50GnX-C3by5f1IpKk/s1600/sun.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuVmvFiaE5s3VJGvpIjwEQYGJIlXvtHeWzq69zUBiV7sXbqT8kLkss_c-50u40XMjDyNhSypOCcso_ZtmBGcaLs1-X9yMzT-huGoLYjrWTDb3Ji8-lg8fDjXfms50GnX-C3by5f1IpKk/s1600/sun.jpg" width="400" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuVmvFiaE5s3VJGvpIjwEQYGJIlXvtHeWzq69zUBiV7sXbqT8kLkss_c-50u40XMjDyNhSypOCcso_ZtmBGcaLs1-X9yMzT-huGoLYjrWTDb3Ji8-lg8fDjXfms50GnX-C3by5f1IpKk/s1600/sun.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8U2OEbHGityExOEaGf4U-k2XYAQrtlwn-COM6owyUw_kIWDe6KLitCcjtqIczvIFWGjxaS_0waK_dLmNBAooThh3dZhQbz-qgPwh93sAB46_MG9UGhsx56nTcR8-uxxSk4qadlYWj9HQ/s1600/up-down.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8U2OEbHGityExOEaGf4U-k2XYAQrtlwn-COM6owyUw_kIWDe6KLitCcjtqIczvIFWGjxaS_0waK_dLmNBAooThh3dZhQbz-qgPwh93sAB46_MG9UGhsx56nTcR8-uxxSk4qadlYWj9HQ/s1600/up-down.jpg" width="305" /></a><i>"At the time of writing, the
normal person who has no axe to grind in maintaining the contrary, declares the
sun to be shining brightly, but should it answer the purpose of anyone to deny
this obvious fact, and declare that the day is gloomy and overcast, there is no
power of argument by which I can prove that I am right and he is wrong. I may
point to the sun, but if he chooses to affirm that he doesn't see it I can't
prove that he does. This is, of course, an extreme case, scarcely likely to
occur in actual life. But it is in essence similar to those cases of persons
(and they are not seldom met with) who, when they find facts hopelessly
destructive of a certain theoretical position adopted by them, do not hesitate
to cut the knot of controversy in their own favour by boldly denying the
inconvenient facts. </i><br />
<i>. </i><br />
<i>One often has experience of this trick of controversy
in discussing the question of the notorious characteristics of the female sex.
The Feminist driven into a corner endeavours to save his face by flatly denying
matters open to common observation and admitted as obvious by all who are not
Feminists. Such facts are the pathological mental condition peculiar to the
female sex, commonly connoted by the term hysteria; the absence, or at best the
extremely imperfect development of the logical faculty in most women; the
inability of the average woman in her judgment of things to rise above personal
considerations; and, what is largely a consequence of this, the lack of a sense
of abstract justice and fair play among women in general.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The afore said
peculiarities of women, as women, are, I contend, matters of common observation
and are only dis-puted by those persons--to wit Feminists--to whose theoretical
views and practical demands their admission would be inconvenient if not fatal.
Of course these characterisations refer to averages, and they do not exclude
partial or even occasionally striking exceptions. It is possible, therefore,
although perhaps not very probable, that indi-vidual experience may in the case
of certain individuals play a part in falsifying their general outlook; it is
possible--although, as I before said not perhaps very probable--that any given
man's experience of the other sex has been limited to a few quite exceptional
women and that hence his particular experience contradicts that of the general
run of mankind. In this case, of course, his refusal to admit what to others are
self-evident facts would be perfectly bona fide.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The above highly
improbable contingency is the only refuge for those who would contend for
sincerity in the Feminist's denials. In this matter I only deal with the male
Feminist. The female Feminist is usually too biassed a witness in this
particular
question."</i><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span>
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-bMdM1IcGsPg%2FVQCX4emJ99I%2FAAAAAAAADEA%2F88WqoQY2ctQ%2Fs1600%2Fsun.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyuVmvFiaE5s3VJGvpIjwEQYGJIlXvtHeWzq69zUBiV7sXbqT8kLkss_c-50u40XMjDyNhSypOCcso_ZtmBGcaLs1-X9yMzT-huGoLYjrWTDb3Ji8-lg8fDjXfms50GnX-C3by5f1IpKk/s1600/sun.jpg" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-55094625517479715652015-03-11T22:15:00.000-07:002015-09-06T10:38:12.892-07:00Peer Reviewed Research: The Holy Grail of Truth?<span style="font-size: small;"><b>"It is an outrage that they should be commonly spoken of as
Intellectuals. This gives them the chance to say that he who attacks
them attacks Intelligence. It is not so. They are not distinguished from
other men by any unusual skill in finding truth nor any virginal ardour
to pursue her. Indeed it would be strange if they were: a persevering
devotion to truth, a nice sense of intellectual honour, cannot be long
maintained without the aid of a sentiment which Gaius and Titius could
debunk as easily as any other. It is not excess of thought but defect of
fertile and generous emotion that marks them out. Their heads are no
bigger than the ordinary: it is the atrophy of the chest beneath that
makes them seem so."</b> ~C.S. Lewis, <i>The Abolition of Man</i> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHjh8ExYEkwaWObTXXfpd-HhtDB6Kx2yyuNvxqIuGV_BrO317wPBkgvG3K2WCYa1-d3lxPiSFkqaetTQKufajzs-OnYdBW5zkzCEuYzAyw_6PRpa6UEI9CotQgZux9gqFW31El6tgMk0A/s1600/grail-hd2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="275" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHjh8ExYEkwaWObTXXfpd-HhtDB6Kx2yyuNvxqIuGV_BrO317wPBkgvG3K2WCYa1-d3lxPiSFkqaetTQKufajzs-OnYdBW5zkzCEuYzAyw_6PRpa6UEI9CotQgZux9gqFW31El6tgMk0A/s1600/grail-hd2.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">I've read once that when Harvard University was founded back in 1636, its original mandate was to be "Protectors of the Truth." Back in those days, Western Civilization had a clear concept of Absolute Truth because most of its citizens were Christian and many of its customs and laws were based directly upon the Bible. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Pretty much all civilizations that have ever existed have had a religion at its base or in its historical founding. What religions tend to do is make a large group of people more "functionable" because they all share the same belief system. </span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">For example: Driving on the left-hand side of the road or the right-hand side doesn't really matter - both sides are equally valid in every way. What does matter, however, is that everyone understands which side of the road is the "correct" side to drive on. Without such "moral values," the road system just wouldn't work. It doesn't really matter which religion it is in this functional sense and</span> it's for this reason that when anthropologists and archaeologists study a culture they focus so heavily on trying to understand their religion - it reveals much of the culture's structure and helps explaining its history, its laws, its traditions, and so forth. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">The reason why Atheists, despite all their allegiances to science, have never created a successful civilization (it's not like this is the first time abolishing God has been thought up!), is because <i>they</i> are ignoring the <i>scientific</i> facts presented to them: </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.whitman.edu/VSA/trois.imposteurs.html" target="_blank"><b>"If God did not exist, <i>it would be neccessary to invent him."</i></b></a> -- Voltaire</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">We obviously can't decide "which side of the road to drive on" completely of our own volition - that each side of the road is equally valid and therefore it is of no consequence. No matter how smart you think you are! We must all follow the same system or it just doesn't "work." Religions do this to large parts of the human population. Richard Dawkins does not. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Western Civilization obviously has Christianity and the Bible as its core founding religion and it's for this reason I often will refer to Biblical concepts. In order to study our own culture and what has happened to us over the decades, centuries and millenia, we must start at our culture's founding religion. This is not an attempt to be a "Christian apologist" or to try and convince you to go to church twice on Sundays. I only go to church for weddings and funerals myself and if we were studying a culture from the East, we'd probably be focusing on Buddhism or whatever religion <i>that</i> culture adhered to. In fact, it is from this very observance about how religions form cultures - and sometimes great civilizations (while other times not) - that we can start to map out a "blue-print" for what it takes to create a successful culture. For example - What features were present in Greece and Rome that helped them build such magnificent civilizations, while so many ancient African and North American cultures remained at what was essentially the Hunter-Gatherer stage?</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnHUo3S-9mSH5JuRYse-h00VtkGexMcJe2QRBwnab0NG-Saxq62Jp6JgDdaKo80Vlt1MKzMQ41DTeMp8mSd5CagxiAUC907PUjYciGY8o0rE2y7W-i_LeTtyyYwHk3BNYsIJ6I8odKXq8/s1600/Donovan_with_false_grail.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnHUo3S-9mSH5JuRYse-h00VtkGexMcJe2QRBwnab0NG-Saxq62Jp6JgDdaKo80Vlt1MKzMQ41DTeMp8mSd5CagxiAUC907PUjYciGY8o0rE2y7W-i_LeTtyyYwHk3BNYsIJ6I8odKXq8/s1600/Donovan_with_false_grail.jpg" width="400" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">Well, one significant feature of Western Civilization is its philosophical attachment to Absolute Truth through the Bible and its mono-theistic God, or, One Truth. The authority of the Bible, for example, was used to reign in the power of the king with the signing of the Magna Carta. Not even the king with his "divine right" could contradict the Bible. This concept of Absolute Truth in Western Civilization was present right from its beginnings up until the early 19th Century, when G.F. Hegel's "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" target="_blank">Hegelian Dialectic</a>" philosophically over-threw it. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">Back in the first section</a> of this chapter, we discussed how John Locke and the American Founding Fathers had an "ordering of the Truth." It was based upon the Bible and went like this:</span><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-UNNAke6HPWnN0VvN39G-UrreymIMcXvgzjGdnCCk9CF86sGMijOa_HZEYVqN3XQwAqIssFHQ_ailcTeRBYjrRUDCt-uZJWU75PdIVAKpe53Zsyhw7DDpxKnmlH9ua4BjKUZOnFmLjOY/s1600/holy-grail-randomrockercouk.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-UNNAke6HPWnN0VvN39G-UrreymIMcXvgzjGdnCCk9CF86sGMijOa_HZEYVqN3XQwAqIssFHQ_ailcTeRBYjrRUDCt-uZJWU75PdIVAKpe53Zsyhw7DDpxKnmlH9ua4BjKUZOnFmLjOY/s1600/holy-grail-randomrockercouk.gif" width="400" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">1 - God's Law/Absolute Truth</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">2 - Natural Law/Objective Truth</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">3 - Civil Law/Subjective Truth</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Hegel's dialectic, however, posited that "The Truth is Relative." What he did was make all three of the above truths "subjective truths," or the lowest and least to be revered of the truths as put forth by Locke. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Therefore, we can see what was meant when Harvard University was originally mandated to be "Protectors of the Truth" back in 1636 - they were to protect the higher truths from being torn down by lower truths. Further, we can understand how <a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/1/14/summers-comments-on-women-and-science/" target="_blank">by 2005, Larry Summers</a> was forced to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/21/AR2006022101842.html" target="_blank">resign as the President of Harvard University</a> for merely <i>speaking</i> the Truth (let alone protecting it): <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">That there are innate differences between the sexes.</a> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Now, let me ask you, if the president of the most prestigious university in the Western Hemisphere cannot speak the Truth about gender without getting so much grief that he must resign his post, what chance do you think either you or I have of getting the Truth from that university's studies, or for that matter, from all the less prestigious institutions of "higher learning" that have created the modern body of work on "gender?" If you were a researcher where people higher up the chain of power than you lose their job for making mere politically incorrect - yet truthful - remarks, would you really risk requesting a research grant "to find out the Truth" about a particularly unpopular subject? (Here's a good example: <a href="http://www.safs.ca/issuescases/lynched.html" target="_blank">Lynched by the Sisterhood</a>
by Jeffrey Archer)</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsQMH222fAssnEMc22NnMFkNyasCIJf94IsEIjbQLzwO7ZShDrLVYpotkAOD6Zbwi7rYRhfRFRvl8Fn1VVBDlCXCvpReC-7EyIg9aEx5w_aFX9vvNkjS-6WFtznQii4BabvLQ5KtmPduYF/s1600/The_death_of_the_peer-reviewed_article.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsQMH222fAssnEMc22NnMFkNyasCIJf94IsEIjbQLzwO7ZShDrLVYpotkAOD6Zbwi7rYRhfRFRvl8Fn1VVBDlCXCvpReC-7EyIg9aEx5w_aFX9vvNkjS-6WFtznQii4BabvLQ5KtmPduYF/s400/The_death_of_the_peer-reviewed_article.jpg" width="400" /></a><span style="font-size: small;">Don't get me wrong, it's not that I think all studies and research should be thrown out and ignored. Often times I will refer to this study or that study throughout the following pages - but they should always be taken with a grain of salt and sifted through for what is true and what is, quite frankly, bullshit. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">However, it would be foolhardy to simply assume that because a study has been "peer-reviewed" that it is unquestionably and reliably "the truth," because <b>academia no longer encourages the free thinking that lends credibility to peer reviewed research!</b> <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">Even the so-called STEM subjects are incredibly infected with politically correct thinking</a>. We may as well be living in Nazi Germany and asking a Jew to prove he
is discriminated against by only using Nazi Reviewed Research. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Reason, commonsense,
mankind's natural curiosity and desire for the truth should always trump academic research. In fact, over the years <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html" target="_blank">I have found so much faked research used for activist and propaganda purposes</a>, that it motivated me to start seeking answers on the subject of "the sexes" from other sources - like ancient history, religion, myth, and those dastardly misogynists of old. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">There is really only one example that needs to be given for why "peer
reviewed research" has absolutely zero credibility in the issues of
which we speak and write of.</span><br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="292" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZR4i9EPXCCLVcg1h29W0uAUMThvf-MeSybsSD44JBiKwklvHcudTo2Gs6EdXwj6U5EAgarMbBJ5GWp7PRcsl1X-7Ml3VIColqPa9fk_Me4TI0AQtu7OspaItuqCPd5Z0KlPIy8hxg2e8/s1600/Department+of+Women's%2BStudies.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;">The fundamental basis of feminism is that "gender is a social
construct;" that we are based upon "tabula rasa," the Latin for "blank
slate." It is upon this foundation that all else of feminism's ideology
and victimology is based upon. Since we are essentially the same, the
only reason that women did not figure prominently in history, or
science, or music, or philosophy, or pretty much anything else, is
because of the innately evil and misogynistic nature of men (which already
refutes tabula rasa in itself). Therefore, women are institutionally
discriminated against by the very fabric of civilization and society
itself, thus <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">affirmative action and breaking down gender barriers is completely justified</a>.</span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/marriage-20-versus-civil-unions-and.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/marriage-20-versus-civil-unions-and.html" border="0" height="276" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgs6UDU_4I_bc6MOxOuhkdTAXLpjK4i7Mu0eYWJIGJXKk3j00DCa8e2F2kiFm0oB1jU0AjKUCv6krP7eG9KI2Eip3QxUupjpDt0KEGDhyphenhyphenx3twB_rSF_76lINxpPgG6BnruVG1eyp448xTw/s1600/lgbt-feminism1-496x343.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Family Plot: The Future (Civil Unions & Shared Parenting)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">However, walking across the hall in our ivory towered institutions, we
can attend courses in Queer Theory where the fundamental basis for it
all is that homosexuality is a normal, biological condition - that gays
are "born that way." This is 100% the opposite of feminism's
fundamental premise of "gender is a social construct." Queer Theory
argues that since their LGBT "gender" is natural and biologically based, they are therefore discriminated against by virtue of their birth, and
suffer socially and in numerous other ways because of something over
which they had no ability to control.</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2061/5936/original.jpg?w=600&h" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="Thumbnail" border="0" height="283" src="https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2061/5936/original.jpg?w=600&h" width="400" /></a><span style="font-size: small;">Take your pick. If you support gay rights you are a cretin of a
misogynist - a sexist, really, for believing that the sexes are
different by virtue of their birth. However, if you support women's
rights and equality based upon the blank slate, you are a homophobe (a
hate-crime in Canada), because then you'd also believe that gays could be
"cured" of their homosexuality through laws and social conditioning in the same way that feminism has been trying to "cure" men of their masculinity for the past 50 years. I mean, if the male gender can be cured of its masculinity and made more feminine, why can't gays also be cured of their homosexuality and morphed into heterosexuals? Because, you know, equality. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">These two positions are 100% completely and irrefutably in direct
opposition of each other. This is just simple common-sense. You cannot
be walking east and west simultaneously. Yet, both Women's Studies and
Queer Theory have panels of academics judging whether the studies each
puts out are "the truth." In other words, they are both peer-reviewed
and found to be satisfactorily representing the truth. Well, the truth
cannot possibly be the same for both of them, so at minimum one of them
must be completely <b><i>wrong</i></b>. </span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_QaRLPtZCj5yiHm77Kwwy9MQjIOLrXqbRYkZ4E0fTN32RsBGJ55C4XDDIGZ7M1SaciPh1PdERtQk6IT3RckewhdfaVFYHlPyIGy8Pou2sbn3iGO4XPSKgfaw8_qZUBi_os0jqc1wz9pw/s1600/HG01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_QaRLPtZCj5yiHm77Kwwy9MQjIOLrXqbRYkZ4E0fTN32RsBGJ55C4XDDIGZ7M1SaciPh1PdERtQk6IT3RckewhdfaVFYHlPyIGy8Pou2sbn3iGO4XPSKgfaw8_qZUBi_os0jqc1wz9pw/s1600/HG01.jpg" width="400" /></a><span style="font-size: small;"> Not only does the above example prove that something is wrong with academia's "truth,' but <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">the idea of Evolution itself is incompatible with with the sexes being a "blank slate</a>." In fact, scientifically speaking, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">the entire <b>purpose</b> of <i>sexual</i> reproduction is to create "a difference"</a>. The differences helps us overcome environmental adversity. If we did not need this difference, we would most likely be reproducing <i>asexually</i>. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Therefore, our universities are knowingly and willingly promoting
falsehoods, and simply should not be trusted as reputable sources of
"truth."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">And I don't need a peer-reviewed study to prove it, do I?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span> </span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>“‘This is not to be wondered at,’ said Goethe; ‘such people continue
in error because they are indebted to it for their existence. They would
have to learn everything over again, and that would be very
inconvenient.</b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>“‘But,’ said I, ‘how can their experiments prove the truth when the basis for their evaluation is false?’</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>“‘They do not prove the truth,’ said Goethe, ‘nor is such the
intention; the only point with these professors is to prove their own
opinion. On this account, they conceal all experiments that would reveal
the truth and show their doctrine untenable. Then the scholars — what
do they care for truth? They, like the rest, are perfectly satisfied if
they can prate away empirically; that is the whole matter.’”</b>-- quoted from Johann Peter Eckermann’s conversation with Goethe, Feb. 1, 1827.</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>Q: "... but has any researcher made a serious longitudinal study on this?"</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>A: "Maybe you should do a longitudinal study on the overall effectiveness of always depending on longitudinal studies."</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</b>---------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">"Cigarette smoking has been shown to increase serum hemoglobin, increase
total lung capacity and stimulate weight loss, factors that all
contribute to enhanced performance in endurance sports. Despite this
scientific evidence, the prevalence of smoking in elite athletes is
actually many times lower than in the general population. The reasons
for this are unclear; however, there has been little to no effort made
on the part of national governing bodies to encourage smoking among
athletes." – <a href="http://blogs.plos.org/obesitypanacea/2011/11/21/cigarettes-may-be-useful-for-distance-runners-or-how-to-prove-anything-with-a-review-article/" target="_blank">PLOS</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjClKUSZ3GX5IPrN8YLac5JAeCDfo-8ff1lxuPqErUNvDyllOIBuFwJAQyxb-HCL6rumqFu-4rlCL0c7s7WEybO7rlMcgR-OYQZUtSeAvgmk-nGHSW84OCvjVHUfyDsFi9LMcnkwomlw1A/s1600/carlsberg3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjClKUSZ3GX5IPrN8YLac5JAeCDfo-8ff1lxuPqErUNvDyllOIBuFwJAQyxb-HCL6rumqFu-4rlCL0c7s7WEybO7rlMcgR-OYQZUtSeAvgmk-nGHSW84OCvjVHUfyDsFi9LMcnkwomlw1A/s1600/carlsberg3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"></span><span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that Albert Einstein did much of the groundwork for the
Theory of Relativity not while at a university, but rather while working
at a patent office? He also got mediocre grades when he was in school.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that neither of the Wright Brothers graduated from
high-school? Yet, they proved all of the academics of the day's "lift
equation" to be, obviously, wrong. <i>They also both never married.</i> Smart men indeed!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that Thomas Edison was considered to have an "addled" brain
because his mind wandered while in school? He likely would have been
given Ritalin today. He was pulled out of formal schooling after three
months and taught by his mother at home. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that Louis Pasteur was ridiculed by the medical community
for his "Germ Theory" and suggesting that surgeons should wash their
hands before cutting people open?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that the cure to scurvy was discovered in the early 1600's
by Samuel de Champlain, when his ship was ice-locked for the winter and
Indians brought the crew pine-needle tea which was rich in Vitamin C?
When he told of "the cure" back in Europe, he was scoffed at by the
intelligentsia for a cure from "savages." In 1753, James Lind first
proved citrus could cure the disease through experiments he described in
his book, <i>A Treatise in the Scurvy</i>, although, even then it took
several decades for people to believe him and implement the use of
citrus on ships. In fact, there were still a variety of other techniques
the "intelligentsia" believed to be correct instead of Vitamin C,
causing people to suffer and die from scurvy right through World War One
and beyond, until it was definitively proven to be a vitamin C
deficiency in 1932. </span><br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vfl4BGbMxoQ/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Vfl4BGbMxoQ?feature=player_embedded" style="clear: right; float: right;" width="320"></iframe><span style="font-size: small;">. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Did you know that in the past, before we had universities, the
intelligentsia were mostly to be found in religious institutions such as
the church or its monasteries? When we talk of the religious
persecution of those such as Galileo, it is <i>just</i> <i>as fair</i> to claim the <i>intelligentsia</i>
persecuted him (and other discoverers) as it is to claim religion did.
In fact, you can see this phenomenon everywhere. Rarely does the
intelligentsia discover anything or even really "do" anything except for
defend their position, while adding little of significance to it, which
real mavericks already paved the way for.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;">Academics have a vested interest in telling everyone that which they
have learned is 100% correct, and discrediting all those opposed to
them. After all, they tend to look <i>really</i> stupid when grade eight
drop-outs demolish their beliefs after they've spent a decade of time,
tens of thousands of dollars in tuition, and a lifetime of building a
social reputation based on academic "achievements" which really, someone
else achieved, and they only parrot and teach.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><u><b>Further Reading:</b></u> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.sciencefiles.net/do-we-need-gender-studies-or-womens-studies-departments-and-programmes/" target="_blank">Do We Need Gender Studies or Women's Studies Departments or Programmes? -- Science Files</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.returnofkings.com/66629/the-pursuit-of-truth-goodness-and-beauty" target="_blank">The Pursuit of Truth, Goodness and Beauty -- ROK</a> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.angryharry.com/Can-You-Trust-Academic-Research.htm" target="_blank">Can You Trust Academic Research? -- Angry Harry</a></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-08/major-medical-journal-retracts-numerous-scientific-papers-after-fake-peer-review-sca" target="_blank">Major Medical Journal Retracts Numerous Scientific Papers After Fake Peer-Review Scandal</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"></span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-31646438360035774632015-03-11T22:00:00.000-07:002015-08-23T11:22:16.492-07:00The Truth About "Misogyny"<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" height="375" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0bYsPJnmciac5TP9U14DBl6jBoCJ3Uk7CBlnn7Iy1emJP7YDjFvoVxKfausQRCjFxZwqqzLIVBg3MFewnO29ulGX8eDMy-kgJs-Ktgl0OxbDQCHAC3XpQCmbZw9C4WjBgSZqL3PRBZOI/s1600/He-Man-Woman-Haters-Club.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>“For a man to pretend
to understand women is bad manners; for him really to understand them is bad
morals.”</b> – Henry James</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Many people who read the following pages within <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><i>The Masculine Principle</i></a>
will reflexively be uncomfortable with what they find. "Why, it's
misogynist! The author must be living in his parents' basement and has
probably never been laid in his life! He must have a small penis! He
must be a dead-beat dad! He's just bitter! He certainly doesn't
understand women very much!" </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Well, no, no, no, no, no and no. I live in a
nice little one bedroom condo. I have slept with the mid-double digits
of women and even lived with a few of them, so while I am no stud, I am
no virgin either. My penis is average sized. I have luckily never been
married and I have no children. The only thing I am bitter about is how
the Truth has been hidden and manipulated to bring harm to men, women
and children, and I understand women and sexuality well enough to have
compiled this "book," rather than just fling about emotionally charged
insults. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">I started studying this subject back
in 2004 and when I fell ill in 2005, I found myself with a lot of free time while I was going through treatments. I
decided that I could either watch TV, or I could put the time to use and
learn something instead. At that point I started reading and
researching in earnest, often spending eight to ten hours a day on it.
Originally my doctors figured it would take around six to eight months
to get through the treatments and to the other side... but it took much
longer. Three and a half years, to be exact. So I got much deeper into
this than I had originally intended, and afterwards, well, I just kept
at it. It had become a habit, I suppose. Or perhaps it is better
described as being unable to look away from a horrific train wreck. I am
now well over a decade into my studies on this subject.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBb9rcVNMjrQOvVs_6U_-eh-ymGu4YT5H9lUBwVG7snpNF7scQpJTiITBpxb-Afwwvoj8mhLorvHFgKHemD3bm-Ot6xnXLHodWqO_om-ps90wV59KGF8VZXhsbGkrqNnEhAuitW4d06vI/s1600/bride.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Generalizing in a Politically Correct World"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>“It takes a man a
lifetime to find out about one particular woman; but if he puts in, say ten
years, industrious and curious, he can acquire the general rudiments of the
sex.”</b> – O. Henry, <i>Heart of the West</i>
(1907) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">There's
a difference between how a married man knows women and how a bachelor
comes to know them. The married man, through the course of spending his
life with the same woman, will naturally come to know her individual
quirks and personality flaws. We all have them, and so does his wife.
The married man therefore believes that <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" target="_blank">Not All Women Are Like That</a>. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The
bachelor starts out from the same place as the married man. He falls in
love with a woman, discovers her quirks and flaws, and as the
relationship spirals out of control he thinks to himself, "I must have
just been unlucky and ended up with a faulty one." And so off he goes
and finds another, thinking that she will be different. When the second
love ends the same way as the first, he starts to doubt himself. Maybe <i>he</i>
is the problem. After all, he is the constant factor in this equation.
And so, off he goes through life until he loves yet another, and <i>this</i> time he focuses on changing <i>his</i>
behaviour. Then he loves another, and another, and still, they all end
up being remarkably similar experiences - often even down to the very
words she says when in the same situation. </span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK3BKLrbikSE3O-Ou9fH0UJnNLeZpNvkI2FUftAfhp6ssr9qnd_P845PYnholVPLBEV8mfMZZ3TR6Smy9uvY0iitkNHjXG8S2tOSyLkRp-d7_L-4E6YkfUBR7Yyu9QgWI475K62LAZYpI/s1600/The+Femine+Mystique.jpg" width="196" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Useful Idiots Play Checkers, Marxists Play Chess"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Finally, he comes to the amazing conclusion that yes, something <i>is</i> wrong with them! All of
them! And thus, with enough notes to compare from various women he has
known intimately, a pattern begins to emerge, and once he begins to
identify it and map it out, he starts to see it everywhere. Further, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2006/01/first-thing-to-go-out-of-your-buddys.html" target="_blank">as he ages and his old friends disappear into the void of marriage</a>, he
begins to hang out with more and more bachelors, and as they compare
stories he discovers they<span style="font-family: inherit;">'v</span>e had similar experiences as him
throughout their lifetime too, which begins to solidify his
conclusions. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Marriage
hides the nature of women while bachelorhood exposes it as life goes
on. I've read before that if a man reaches the age of 38 without having
married, the likelihood of him <i>ever</i> marrying is negligible. This
is why. He's figured out "the game" in ways that not even men who have
been married multiple times ever will, and he knows it is all an
illusion - one that does not operate in his best interests. Marriage
hides the true nature of women as a sex from men, while bachelorhood
exposes it. The feminists have indeed destroyed "The Feminine Mystique"
in their bid to free women from men by destroying marriage.
The more men that remain bachelors, the more women will fall from
the pedestal they<span style="font-family: inherit;">'</span>ve traditionally been placed upon by men. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbw2lq_wME9i_mFisU-Ib62wA8xoDTRqM62W4gudfyN-zL1n_ztJhmLrbmLrKFhTU-TEHq6Wh3Oad7q2i3vEJKebKxjT0h58x9as0ZSP3xA0wgtFUS32xaBrtJhE-BAX6zGXyxLaxYNoQ/s1600/WhiteTigerDeformed1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="" border="0" height="300" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5043276800129349922" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbw2lq_wME9i_mFisU-Ib62wA8xoDTRqM62W4gudfyN-zL1n_ztJhmLrbmLrKFhTU-TEHq6Wh3Oad7q2i3vEJKebKxjT0h58x9as0ZSP3xA0wgtFUS32xaBrtJhE-BAX6zGXyxLaxYNoQ/s400/WhiteTigerDeformed1.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Andrea Dworkin Reincarnated???</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">It is not
hatred to recognize the true nature of woman any more than recognizing <span style="font-family: inherit;">that tigers</span> are carnivores instead of herbivores means that I hate <span style="font-family: inherit;">tigers</span>. It merely means that I recognize the Truth and will act
accordingly. What <i>will</i> make me hate tigers however, is thinking they are playful little kittens and getting my arm chewed off every time I <span style="font-family: inherit;">dangle a piece of yarn in front of</span> one<span style="font-family: inherit;"> because I don't unders<span style="font-family: inherit;">tand</span></span> their nature and why they behav<span style="font-family: inherit;">e</span> that way. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>Misogyny versus Misandry</b></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Much of feminist theory is based on
the belief that misogyny is inherent in men, and thus the dreaded
Patriarchy is a natural extension of this inbuilt negative attitude
towards women which men possess.</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">But ask yourself, is this really true? Is it true that men are <i>naturally</i>
misogynistic towards women? Is it true that most of the men you meet
think negatively of women? Is it true that when in the locker-room the
men conspire to hold women down? Is it true that businessmen would
secretly conspire to throw away their profits by paying men 30% more
wages than women, simply to keep women from reaching their true
potential? <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html" target="_blank">Is it true that 1 in 4 women will really be raped in university</a>, and therefore by extension that 1 in 4 men are rapists? Do
you really believe that 25% of the men you know are secretly raping
women? <i>Really?</i></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span></div>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDaGN_eCcZFW1Y5eZQ87M2R2J9QQBRARYiSf7lf42u2TtqDZh431DkWA-kdzPkAVokaCrgFCvxks3sukUOCv1vHAu2PvSLzTqFpO4b-Fg40am1-A3wWJehEWWI3j-xvApCirP_rtbgPFMC/s400/David+Futrelle.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "A Guide to Birdwatching"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">None of this rings true for me. In
fact, what I see are enormous amounts of men tripping over themselves to
praise women. I see men worshiping women as some sort of goddesses. I
see men apologizing for the most nonsensical and trivial things simply
out of fear of offending women. I see our world leaders praising women
while shaming men in order to win votes. I see men trying to one up other men, proving to
women that not a smidgeon of misogyny exists in their souls. I see men
constantly believing that it is <i>other</i> men who are treating women
badly, but certainly not his enlightened, sensitive and equitable self.
And those other men? Well, they <i>also</i> believe they are more enlightened than the rest of those misogynist men out there!<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">A few years back <a href="http://drhelen.blogspot.ca/2009/03/pjtv-growing-rift-between-men-and-women.html" target="_blank">Dr. Helen</a> did <a href="http://drhelen.blogspot.ca/2009/06/pjtv-happy-fathers-day-why-dads-matter.html" target="_blank">a couple of interviews</a> with Richard Driscoll, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Still-Understand-Richard-Driscoll-Ph-D/dp/0963412655" target="_blank"><i>You Still Don't Understand</i></a>. During the interviews, Dr. Drisoll cited a survey which illustrated that 14% of men were resentful or almost always resentful of women. <i>However</i>, the same survey also illustrated that 34% of women were resentful or almost always resentful of men. That is nearly two and a half times more women that are resentful towards men than is conversely true of men being resentful of women. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">. </span></span></span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHs1c2Apz2v639mMfKh24dKEDI_EbYu-4i_YYQy24D_NCr5ckbrDo1WrsNs0irVIIpVBfPZvDhHQuPyjbvs_UpyZBzsn2jTWBIP1RXoa4WQGQuN1a0aa1VHL2TZ1ACWI6L1giQS9nmbbw/s1600/WhiteTigerDeformed0.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="" border="0" height="289" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5043276435057129746" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHs1c2Apz2v639mMfKh24dKEDI_EbYu-4i_YYQy24D_NCr5ckbrDo1WrsNs0irVIIpVBfPZvDhHQuPyjbvs_UpyZBzsn2jTWBIP1RXoa4WQGQuN1a0aa1VHL2TZ1ACWI6L1giQS9nmbbw/s320/WhiteTigerDeformed0.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Yup, it's definitely Dworkin reincarnated!!!</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">Misogyny, as men are routinely accused of, simply is not as rampant as society claims. In fact, the hatred of men is far more prevalent than the hatred of women. "Misandry" still gets underlined by my spell-checker because it is a concept that hardly exists, even though the evidence of it is all around us - <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" target="_blank">if we only cared enough to look</a>. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">It is not in men's nature to be harmful towards females. Just the opposite. Men work like slaves to provide for them and often will even sacrifice their lives for them. Does that seem consistent with some inherent misogyny found within males to you? </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">One of the most significant things I learned in studying this subject was about <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">"all-female" populations in the Animal Kingdom and "the reason" why males exist</a>. For example, there are certain species of lizards where there are females, but they have somewhere in the past stopped producing males (or have never produced males to begin with). Females "are" the species (in all living things) because they are the ones who control reproduction. If there is only one sex, it <i>must</i> be female or the species will die out. Further, the reason <i>why</i> a species either creates or stops creating males, is in relation to what the females want. They create males to do things they cannot do or are unwilling to do themselves. In other words, on a very basic level in nature, the entire purpose of the male is to serve "the species," which is by default female. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" height="236" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqNUhn2SIVeSsqBbKPImzNA-rVhyphenhyphenFuMJYM0FqCzaZyCXze7ksJYeKspc3XYt4b0S6BZAPvGK0-pH9UGuDZwnGLVBhSF9m1xuq5aLOn620XhKuvFMuUe5Z-DMiPczgWqtvu6aNZ046o6QRN/s400/amazon.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Amazon Women (The Science of Why Males Exist)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">And this goes even deeper yet, down to our genetic and evolutionary level. These all-female populations can only exist and thrive in ecological niches. As soon as they have to compete with a species that has both males and females, they get run over and die out because they have little ability to adapt. It is the male that mostly evolves the species, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">because the male has far more variability</a>. What happens is that mutations in the species mostly happen to the males, and when a positive mutation happens, the female breeds with him and "saves" the evolution. So even on that level, you can see that the male serves the female. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">What is <i>really</i> amazing is how this exists in every living thing on earth, and a biologist will confirm it is so <i>except</i> that the same biologist will deny it exists in humans as he or she reflexively believes that it is men who hold all the power rather than women. Although, in their defense, it is somewhat true, because while we are of the animal kingdom, we are not animals. We are humans and we have <i>the ability</i> to live at a higher level than animals. What we did somewhere in the past was we re-ordered this, the only creatures on earth to have done so, and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">we rose up from being beasts in the field</a>. But even so, on a very deep level of our existence, males are still serving the needs of the females. The question becomes (or was in the past), are we going to serve women as animals, including all the harshness that comes with that brutal world, or will we do it as humans, and enjoy all the benefits that civilization bestows upon us?</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="font-family: inherit;">Misogyny in Religion, Myth and History</span></b></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.atlan.org/articles/" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.atlan.org/articles/" border="0" height="253" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi082a_fI7tbIWi3c076pj9V5kRIaRLPY9C1kT7GiNxQuhpz24SSf3ct4jvbl9-falG7BPo-2H-dfqpIBNWjkynmiOq5DmO34hxwE59T2OsAtccQk9DPKwC-C7HryQUre7gxWDHDeDeBEI/s1600/atlantis.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for Atlan.org's Free Articles about the Legend of Atlantis</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">A long time ago now, I found myself reading <a href="http://www.atlan.org/articles/" target="_blank">a website about the Legend of Atlantis</a>. This was not a wierd, way-out-there site, but rather it argued that Atlantis and the Garden of Eden were one in the same. In fact, it argued that all religious paradises and many of our ancient myths and legends were essentially about the same story: that all of our human ancestors had experienced a global, cataclysmic flood at the end of the Pleistoscene Ice Age, some 1<span style="font-family: inherit;">3</span>,<span style="font-family: inherit;">0</span>00 years ago, and all of our religions and mythical stories about paradise lost and a flood (or <span style="font-family: inherit;">sinking land</span>) are a "twinkling remembrance" of what happened to the humans who lived through that time. Thus, it explored many of the similarities between various religions and myths that existed around the globe. There <span style="font-family: inherit;">used to be a nice forum there where the author of the articles (and book) hung out <span style="font-family: inherit;">and </span>discussed various <span style="font-family: inherit;">theories of "The Fall of Man" and how it related to the earth's history geologically. It was a fascinating place, but unfortunately, <span style="font-family: inherit;">Prof</span>. Santos - who had spent over twent<span style="font-family: inherit;">y years studying this subject as a hobby - passed away suddenly from a heart attack, and the forum kinda fell apart after that. </span> </span> </span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2ceL6BQijVLjY-qq6BwQq9eZa3wBrp4bJNOVpBK8_hdXD_lPe2uO5xG7ZwfW8gbfI_izHtWd0YLbwHd9_6xDOHwG34cxP8MdEb9GYLZnIDEl_gH-Pn9R7rU3U-4cNQeiAOkVIXEE6Wt0/s1600/bible_en.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2ceL6BQijVLjY-qq6BwQq9eZa3wBrp4bJNOVpBK8_hdXD_lPe2uO5xG7ZwfW8gbfI_izHtWd0YLbwHd9_6xDOHwG34cxP8MdEb9GYLZnIDEl_gH-Pn9R7rU3U-4cNQeiAOkVIXEE6Wt0/s1600/bible_en.png" width="162" /></a><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">But <span style="font-family: inherit;">i</span>t was one of those experiences that just "clicked" in my mind, and I began to see things in a different way after reading it. For example, I started thinking, "If I were the last adult alive amongst 100 children and given the responsibility of passing on 'what I know today' to them<span style="font-family: inherit;"> - </span>while also recognizing the human trait of wishing away inconvenient Truths<span style="font-family: inherit;"> -</span> how would I go about this so it would last them for centuries into the future?" Well, I would write it down in an unchangeable religion. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">Shortly after, I watched a video of a university lecture which had a fellow who had studied the ancient Hebrew language and texts, and as he was interpreting parts of them, he noted the misogyny that was found in them. In fact, he was so embarassed by it that he offered an apology to those in the lecture hall. Some of the things he pointed out were that Sodom and Gomorrah, the two most wicked cities in the Bible, are the only two cities from the entire region which are referred to in the feminine. (As in, how French has masculine and feminine in their language). He further mentioned that the most evil of demons were always portrayed as female.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilK3ix5UwlZdPzB93DjPKN8dazO-zIKMKLhPb5pWNhG0psVQIGQa7BREYilNU4T7Xe1LDpWYELbWGZrKgHg5mhLmCJD7fJ3nyaSnXMOS94UWoJW25dPE2rgnfpJnllW0b9l39gJJDKHiP0/s400/2gy6fl3.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">There is also the story of Adam's first wife, Lilith. (Not all of the Ancient Hebrew Texts are in the Bible). There are two accounts of how humankind was created. In the first, man and woman were created at the same time, on the sixth day<span style="font-family: inherit;">:</span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b><span class="reftext">27</span><span class="highl">God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.</span> </b>-- <span style="font-family: inherit;">Genesis 1:27</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,'</b><span class="p"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> -- Matthew 19:4</span></span></span> </span> </span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">In the Hebrew texts, Adam and Lilith were equals and as such, she often challenged Adam's authority and rebelled against him. She would even complain to him during sex that she had to lie beneath him - which she didn't think fair because they were equals. Eventually Lilith left Adam, but from her sexual union with him she spawned many demons which went forth to plague mankind. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">When we get to the second story, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-garden-of-eden-absolute-truth-and.html" target="_blank">that of Adam and Eve in the Garden</a>, Eve was created <i>after </i>Adam - from <i>his</i>
rib - and when God ejected Adam and Eve from the Garden, he told her
when he cursed her that her desire will be for her husband and he will
rule over her, thus, completely the opposite of the equality that Adam
and Lilith had shared. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIZ0yhQDGqUrNQb41H1H9Xe3fBwqSlQpu35z2ssqbCqaXLBPZYUG-eklyaHVeCQ9J6ASrdPlnHn0FJj6eh31bICZ7TU4eM-2kOphnBrXHqb8o_0fsb-_LaBLmEpMeHdhdHRTDNiT0xjew/s1600/make-me-a-sandwich.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" target="_blank">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character (Would Make Me a Sandwich!)"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><span class="text Gen-2-20">"...But for Adam no suitable helper was found.</span> <span class="text Gen-2-21" id="en-NIV-52"><sup class="versenum">21 </sup>So the <span class="small-caps" style="font-variant: small-caps;">Lord</span> God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh.</span> <span class="text Gen-2-22" id="en-NIV-53"><sup class="versenum">22 </sup>Then the <span class="small-caps" style="font-variant: small-caps;">Lord</span> God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.</span></b><br />
<b> </b><br />
<div class="line">
<b><span class="text Gen-2-23" id="en-NIV-54"><sup class="versenum">23 </sup>The man said,</span><span class="text Gen-2-23">“This is now bone of my bones</span><span class="indent-1"><span class="indent-1-breaks"> </span><span class="text Gen-2-23">and flesh of my flesh;</span></span><span class="text Gen-2-23"> she shall be called ‘woman,’</span><span class="indent-1"><span class="indent-1-breaks"> </span><span class="text Gen-2-23">for she was taken out of man.”</span></span></b></div>
<b> </b><br />
<div class="first-line-none top-05">
<b><span class="text Gen-2-24" id="en-NIV-55"><sup class="versenum">24 </sup>That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.</span><sup class="versenum">25 </sup>Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.</b>" -- Genesis 2: 20-25</div>
<span class="text Gen-2-25" id="en-NIV-56"></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">These things were, of course, all very interesting. But what I found most interesting were the pr<span style="font-family: inherit;">ofessor<span style="font-family: inherit;">'s profu<span style="font-family: inherit;">se apologies for "misogyny." It made me step back and ask, "But <i>why</i> is that mis<span style="font-family: inherit;">ogyny in there? Doesn't anyone ever ask <i>that</i> question?<span style="font-family: inherit;">" </span></span></span></span></span>And apparently, no-one does! We just continue writing <span style="font-family: inherit;">it off to men's in<span style="font-family: inherit;">nately </span>evil, misogynistic <span style="font-family: inherit;">character - even though, as I pointed out earlier, if we opened ou<span style="font-family: inherit;">r e</span>yes and actually <i>looked</i> at the world around us, </span></span>we would see that men are far more prone to practice irrational and blind love of women than misogyny (Known as the equally obscure term to Misandry, as "Philogyny"). And, just as the men of the modern day always think it is <i>other</i> men who harbour misogynist attitudes towards women, we also believe our modern<span style="font-family: inherit;">, enlightened selves are better than those <i>other</i> misogynistic men who existed in the past. </span> </span></span></span><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXitpdvtTFpsPzmHBffcd1VUVTeg6NbOPfFUYFTPKng8sYv_aaMV6IRT1B4JQfRt6EUrPvmMMPBsrXz1l0lIkGsEVAXhrhc2yQf1UwxsY3ytrZv4Aqvh7NDOFRyvpim-d_UFMd6UCrLP4/s1600/colin_farrell_alexander_1_hi_rez.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXitpdvtTFpsPzmHBffcd1VUVTeg6NbOPfFUYFTPKng8sYv_aaMV6IRT1B4JQfRt6EUrPvmMMPBsrXz1l0lIkGsEVAXhrhc2yQf1UwxsY3ytrZv4Aqvh7NDOFRyvpim-d_UFMd6UCrLP4/s1600/colin_farrell_alexander_1_hi_rez.jpg" width="208" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">But, what do you do when Greece and<span style="font-family: inherit;"> Rome arise as two of the premier civilization<span style="font-family: inherit;">s in<span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span>history? And yes, you can point out their "misogyny," but you can't deny their excellence. It is said that when Alexander the Great was handing King Darius III of Persia his ass, Darius lamented, "<span style="font-family: inherit;">My men have become women and my women have become men." In other words, they embraced andro<span style="font-family: inherit;">gyny - and this is true, if you examine how their customs cha<span style="font-family: inherit;">nged over time. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">And look at what comes from Rome but the same warning we find about Adam and Lilith's equality: </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" height="310" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDINySRC-kySu4W0AbRsg4Pp79EnFN7kfO9RQhCClp8MppaJkhOHM01T2qzCqF7J1h7s5Vyu8z65100jcDCEHiB-Iikv4LJznic5qFZnq1JUl-qnvDMihW6CEIQmA9s31BVPiPL02bxyQ/s1600/feminazi.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"If you allow them [women] to pull </b><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>away restraints and put themselves on equality with their husbands, do yo</b><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>u imagine that you will be able to tolerate them? From the moment they become your fellows, they will become your masters."</b> -- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-history-of-rome-titus-livius.html" target="_blank">Cato the Censor</a> (There's a story similar to modern "Slut Walks" found in that link, by the way). </span></span></span></span></span></span></span> </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">I have also read of the effects of<span style="font-family: inherit;"> <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">hy</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">pergamy</a> and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">Briffault's law</a> in Rome, as<span style="font-family: inherit;"> it re<span style="font-family: inherit;">lated to a woman's dowry and how it changed over the course of history in relation to divorce laws. At first, when a divorce occurred, the husband would keep the dowry<span style="font-family: inherit;">, and divorce was low. Then the laws changed and after divorce, the <span style="font-family: inherit;">bride's father would <span style="font-family: inherit;">have the dowry returned to him - and divor<span style="font-family: inherit;">ce rose</span>. Finally, after divorce, the wife kept pos<span style="font-family: inherit;">session of the dowry herself, and from there we find that in Rome they said, "Women marry intending to divorce, and divorce intending to remarry." (Sound familiar? Ever heard of "starter-marriages?"). Thus, <a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_return_of_patriarchy" target="_blank">they had to pass draconian laws trying to force men to take them on as wi</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_return_of_patriarchy" target="_blank">ves</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"> because the men wanted nothing to do with them and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">their birthrates declined to a point where it was a je</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">opardy to the state</a>. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">We find the same tale in A<span style="font-family: inherit;">ristotle's <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-spartan-women-politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">Spartan Women</a>, </span>except in Sparta they further undermined hypergamy and Briffault's law through their inheritance laws<span style="font-family: inherit;">:</span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/11/whats-next-cries-of-sparta.html" border="0" height="272" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ-I0nOPI42S-5q410PxXbhRAg9pEP9fP9n1xsshnQgOWjPF_Itzn6B-ISD-6POTt4jN4B44sETzcRTEpKUV6rIagveWGN9oi6qZ231yxmBuIOHmBJHKU_hJRyfawRAfPIGsXokGCHi6c9/s1600/This_is_sparta.GIF" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Feminizing the Decline"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b><i>And nearly two-fifths of the whole country are held by women;</i> this
is owing to the number of heiresses and to the large dowries which are
customary. It would surely have been better to have given no dowries at
all, or, if any, but small or moderate ones. As the law now stands, a
man may bestow his heiress on any one whom he pleases, and, if he die
intestate, the privilege of giving her away descends to his heir. Hence,
although the country is able to maintain 1500 cavalry and 30,000
hoplites, <i>the whole number of Spartan citizens fell below 1000. The
result proves the faulty nature of their laws respecting property; for
the city sank under a single defeat</i><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i>; the want of men was their ruin</i>.</span><i><span style="font-size: 130%;"> </span></i></b></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">
.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">We see the same thing over and over again. In fact, some eight decades ago, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html" target="_blank">"Sex and Culture" by J.D. Unwin</a><span style="font-family: inherit;">, chronic<span style="font-family: inherit;">led the rise and fall o<span style="font-family: inherit;">f over 80 cultures and in each case he found that "misogyny" was present at the beginning and rise of the culture, while equality and the feminine principle dominated the decline<span style="font-family: inherit;"> and t<span style="font-family: inherit;">he eventual collapse. </span></span></span></span></span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">I believe one of the reasons we only find this sort of "misogyny" in religion and myth is because<span style="font-family: inherit;">, first of all, books like the <span style="font-family: inherit;">Bible are unchangeable be<span style="font-family: inherit;">ca<span style="font-family: inherit;">use they are philosophically based in Absolute Truth. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html" target="_blank">They are further found in myths and legen</a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/06/legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">ds</a> becau<span style="font-family: inherit;">se men, somewhere in the past, must have figure<span style="font-family: inherit;">d out that women will never allow the Truth about the<span style="font-family: inherit;">m to be openly discussed, so they pass it on in different ways - through the "twinkling remembrance" of our ancestors. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">.
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" border="0" height="296" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlrCcGEEJzYVzBxI8vf3_TKyzpdCB6Bt0dDc9tW56wokmn2qmbOgJ7nSN2IZzJKgTd5xu0Y-JkHN15L6Kx2DRKXOGQyAlGno9lSdXQZxYFFKPeHctp5xBakajeZZUBw9JVTV4a4QGaAN9m/s400/angry-woman-733632.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">Click Pic for "A Guide to Birdwatching"</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>“Men are not troubled
to hear a man dispraised, because they know, though he be naught, there's worth
in others; but women are mightily troubled to hear any of them spoken against,
as if the sex itself were guilty of some unworthiness.”</b> – John Seldon
(1584-1654)<span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">After all, when looking at the concept of All Female Populations in the Animal Kingdom, which we discussed further up, can't you see its relationship to <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">the legend of the Amazon Women</a>?</span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">
</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"There has never been a case of men and women reigning together,
but wherever on the earth men are found, there we see that men rule,
and women are ruled, and that on this plan, both sexes live in harmony.
But on the other hand, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">the Amazons</a>, who are reported to have held rule
of old, did not suffer men to stop in their country, but reared only
their female children, killing the males to whom they gave birth."</b> -- Spinoza</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">And can you see it further in some of our great feminist "thinkers?"</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a
decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an
evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the
population of males."</b> -- Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001 </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."</b> -- Sally Miller Gearhart, <i>The Future - If There Is One - Is Female</i></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">What happens throughout history is that women censor all of the negative
observations about them into oblivion, and men, in their desire to
serve and please them, will enable them<span style="font-family: inherit;">. </span>The only way to get things "through" and passed the burning desire
of the male to please the female is to enshrine it in something
absolute like the Bible, or hide it in myth or legend.</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="292" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVzC9NHO51jisjjmzwoU9M5NuqljWyGN7hxhm4RC5VqA2sO_V0NnaSR8jdFNW9QRcsEN6mrAmMizmwCetQqX2CQGu4mjABLi3T2soHv9KYjqWuW7Rt8lPyjjw7K6EBJhqzcf0wQ0hmHjY/s1600/imrs.php.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span id="goog_536606348"></span><a href="https://www.blogger.com/"></a><span id="goog_536606349"></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><b>Is the Truth Misogynist?</b></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
</span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">The term "misogynist" is one that indicates <i>emotion</i>. It means a
hatred or dislike of women. The academtards with subversive social
agendas have been trying to rejig the English language by insinuating
that misogyny means someone who doesn't believe in equality, or <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">voting rights</a>, or whatever other feminist jargon they tack onto it - basically insinuating that anyone who doesn't support their <i>political and social agenda</i>
is misogynist. But this is nonsense. Just because someone doesn't
believe children should have equal say as their parents does not mean
they <i>hate</i> children.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The "misogynists" of old, such as <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">Otto Weininger</a> or <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer</a> or <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-spartan-women-politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">Aristotle</a> or <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">the Bible</a> don't <i>hate</i>
women. They disagree with the feminist agenda, for sure, but there is
no "hatred" in what they say. They are merely trying to reveal <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">the Truth</a><span style="font-family: inherit;">.</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxUs5cN8aMHARkp5M_vvYvJjFmN6WLgauXbXNZGJiJ_N81O_Qd18T0EKSUX00tVAlhyJ-RvN_lmOB_sG7S8KIWc-mXeM_XKGGKUUl-SESGhy0CBe1GS9zbVTDBTPKceNmqOfxTATVt-jc/s1600/truth.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">The Truth has no feelings. It does not <i>feel</i> love or hatred. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The Truth has no agenda - unlike the multi-billion dollar feminist industry.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The Truth does not assign blame, nor does it concern itself with hurt feelings. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The Truth just <b>is</b>.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Often in the following pages you will see me refer to a "hierarchy" that
goes like this: </span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">God/Truth --> Man --> Woman --> Children</span></span>. </span></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGLkNLXA6ETUSc8wEJMLGRI73p0yaklBp9sWxFxqQg-gJToQsLdKrPaWqtjN4N1f41b7GhmT6eaYIQMkonIoY9MRHpZD_3SowfcuzO-qqYd3ti1YuqU8Y3BGvrmuBOgHNnhhi782EDF6U/s1600/parents-love.jpg" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">This "hierarchy" exists on many levels and does not indicate any
particular superiority, although those who believe in the religion of
equality are instantly incensed by it. It also works backwards in much
the same way that it works forward. For example, children are considered
more valuable than adults, and women are considered more valuable than
men. Further, children are at war with their parents, but parents are
not at war with their children. Women are at war with men, but men are
not at war with women. Men are at war with God/Truth, but God/Truth is
not at war with men. And it descends from here as well. Only when man is
in proper relation to the Truth, can he expect woman to be in proper
relation to him. This is something hard-wired into our biology and it
has been with us from the beginning. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Our civilization is a "machine" that
harnesses our sex drives and life forces for the good of us all. I don't
really believe that men are any more superior than women, but I don't
believe we are "equal" in all things either. I believe we both have
strengths and weaknesses. I believe that men and women possess <i>different kinds</i>
of power. I believe that men make very poor women and women make very
poor men. I think androgyny is the most destructive notion we've ever
unleashed on our great civilization, and I don't support the feminist
movement's agenda to further destroy us by brainwashing more of this
androgyny into society.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">If the Truth is misogynist by modern definition, so be it. I'll stand with the Truth proudly.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">
. </span>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
<i>.<br />
</i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />
. <br />
Related:<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92mKsjp_GdM" target="_blank">Lilith - Demon and First Wife of Adam</a> (Video - 10min) <br />
. <br />
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></div>
.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-22331059289103572582015-03-11T21:30:00.000-07:002015-04-21T05:33:33.196-07:00A Guide to Birdwatching<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<b>"A man strives to get <i>direct</i> mastery over things either by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is always and everywhere driven to <i>indirect</i> mastery, namely through a man; all her <i>direct</i> mastery being limited to him alone."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women, 1851</a>.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkKUgEAKzTOKmWYIDI6dYXncdxokAICORI6Pf__7l0veAnU3G9y4VEToT8-z8KU2YUPu37_Tv7s4t_OpPcnEbR6oww__zjmjMt_RT5v_xyBGHB6tN1J7tWSzg4Xrz7Fo0GeU8b9R7z97Y/s1600/IMG_1046.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkKUgEAKzTOKmWYIDI6dYXncdxokAICORI6Pf__7l0veAnU3G9y4VEToT8-z8KU2YUPu37_Tv7s4t_OpPcnEbR6oww__zjmjMt_RT5v_xyBGHB6tN1J7tWSzg4Xrz7Fo0GeU8b9R7z97Y/s400/IMG_1046.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Yup! That's actually me!</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Many men love to stroll through the lush forests of the Manosphere, as
there is much to see and behold. One can find all sorts of things, from
young saplings yearning to reach the open sky, to mighty sequoias
offering a sense of security in their strength, along with respite from
the outer heat within the ambiance of their shade.<br />
<br />
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
As one walks through this unique atmosphere, it is quite common to hear
the chirping of several different types of birds. The birds are part of
the forest and therefore I would like to provide the following <i>Guide to Bird Watching in the Manosphere</i>.<br />
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
One might spot an <i>Elusive Wife</i> perched on a branch overhanging
your path. You veterans know her well. She is the one who has the
perfect life; her marriage is free from strife, her children are raised
the perfect way, and you’ll see her in church twice on Sunday. She will
pleasure her husband anytime he desires, sex in their marriage is
still burning fires. “Her home cuisine is delicious,” she insists he
will say, and to top it all off, from this path she’ll never foray.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
The Elusive Wife is most often a traditional stay-at-home mom who
believes in the message of the manosphere. She’s the one who never lets any man
forget that "he should keep on looking because there are still good
women out there!" Her song goes something like this: "Look at me! Look
at me! This is how it can be! Look at me!"<br />
<br />
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgumcXkk5mHgRrjlxZ4vT2UZz-eTxPcUSpB1g4GgqKHSBBZyJaqZG-pxH-etIDqOJIlB2pH7wVw9aOyU545tMcHoVOHkBqCVj5YcbUZzJQMCPhKuzdcl9tjGUibMjg3KmEilZpk9UW6kzQ/s1600/beautiful-bird-on-branch-3.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgumcXkk5mHgRrjlxZ4vT2UZz-eTxPcUSpB1g4GgqKHSBBZyJaqZG-pxH-etIDqOJIlB2pH7wVw9aOyU545tMcHoVOHkBqCVj5YcbUZzJQMCPhKuzdcl9tjGUibMjg3KmEilZpk9UW6kzQ/s400/beautiful-bird-on-branch-3.jpg" height="320" width="400" /></a>
The Elusive Wife appears to support men's issues, but really, those more
jaded and experienced within "The Movement" will recognize that the
Elusive Wife is concerned about men mainly because she is scared
shitless of them waking up to the scam. She wants men to return to their
masculine role of pandering to women's every whim, slaving away like a
mindless drone for her and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.htmll" target="_blank"><i>her children</i></a>.
It is noteworthy that the Elusive Wife's husband never comes online,
gushing about his wonderful life with his wonderful wife. Nope, only
she speaks of how blissfully contented her husband is with her. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" target="_blank">He smartly (or cowardly) remains silent</a>.<br />
. </div>
</div>
<div>
The Elusive Wife says she is interested in men's issues, but what she
really wants is to ensure that men keep serving women. She does this
because, deep down, she knows she would be screwed if it were any other
way. She knows she is a preferred human and wants desperately to
maintain that concept. She has a manipulated man-slave at her finger
tips and she damn well knows what a good con-game women have been
running <i>for thousands of years</i>. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwhAi4oJaLHEuXEpt7G1STDKbb0OqlqohQmaYRqIPh_ib6Fq_JQ-X2LkgE3405-c2zWgSUmJihjMGtInJYyph3mp7sTEw7KEK0DSMJpfq6INILcgAb70K8hdQJH9f7IgRCVNC9BjyCMQM/s1600/FrigateBird-E08C2752-1600-M.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwhAi4oJaLHEuXEpt7G1STDKbb0OqlqohQmaYRqIPh_ib6Fq_JQ-X2LkgE3405-c2zWgSUmJihjMGtInJYyph3mp7sTEw7KEK0DSMJpfq6INILcgAb70K8hdQJH9f7IgRCVNC9BjyCMQM/s400/FrigateBird-E08C2752-1600-M.jpg" height="266" width="400" /></a>Another species which may appear is from the genus <i>Mountainous Mammarious</i>. You can tell a Mountainous Mammarious is in your neck of the woods because of her distinctive call, "DEE DEE! DEE DEE!"<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
</div>
She too fully believes in men's issues, and that's why she plunks her
self-described Victoria Secret satin pantied ass (page 9, item C), right
in the midst of as many men as she can find. She brightens up the
whole board with her cheerful song, "DEE DEE! DEE DEE!" which is
interspersed amongst every comment she makes.
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
She agrees with everything and befriends all. She often provides some
useful services to humanity, like informing men of what it is like to
grow breasts, menstruate, or have an ovary removed. The only thing she
complains about is how uncomfortable it is to always have her lacy,
Victoria Secret brassiere straps (page 11, item B) cutting into her
back, due to the imbalanced weight proportioned towards her front. You
see, she helps men better understand things from a woman's perspective.
She flits in and out of blogs and forums, always spreading her good
will towards her new found friends, and of course, announcing her
arrivals and departures with her cheerful song, "DEE, DEE! DEE, DEE...
Dee, Dee... Deeeee, deeeee....”</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhY4wHuepZxw3aXRq4hcKKLI3OD_WKEYkNnn7NqkXAX49hvlpYRZVJLjLl-faHTZ_0sqcZJy6lUdWYT0u0qahAzYmVV7KnkOkdD6VXJgqQax5XKAsCXqUvGE11q5dUW9e8PFSOIAuxV3Rg/s1600/prey-2011-2.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhY4wHuepZxw3aXRq4hcKKLI3OD_WKEYkNnn7NqkXAX49hvlpYRZVJLjLl-faHTZ_0sqcZJy6lUdWYT0u0qahAzYmVV7KnkOkdD6VXJgqQax5XKAsCXqUvGE11q5dUW9e8PFSOIAuxV3Rg/s400/prey-2011-2.jpg" height="265" width="400" /></a>
A third species of woman is rather an interesting one which is called <i>Meritorious Mediocrus</i>
in Latin. Meritorious Mediocrus is perceived as a great Amazon bird of
prey to many of those within men’s circles. Tales of her exploits
become legendary and her name is revered wherever she goes. Even in far
away lands, children are regaled with stories about the brave and
mighty Meritorious Mediocrus.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
</div>
There is a natural problem built within the species Meritorious
Mediocrus though, and this is why some experts wish to rename this bird
as <i>Annika Sorenstamus</i>. You see, Meritorious Mediocrus gets an
enormous amount of attention for placing 96th out of 111, simply for
being a woman. No-one knows who was 97th, 95th or even 5th - but
everyone knows when Meritorious Mediocrus places in the bottom 15% of
the field, and she receives gratuitous adulation for her
accomplishments.
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
We see this same phenomenon all throughout society. A woman accomplishes something "great" simply by <i>becoming</i>,
say, a firefighter. In fact, a newspaper story might appear on the
front page because of this particular example of a Meritorious
Mediocrus, and sumptuously entertain the readers with her heroism in <i>becoming</i>
a firefighter. A man, however, who is stronger, faster and has fifteen
years experience on her, will not receive any praise for his
"accomplishments" unless he charges fearlessly into a blazing orphanage
and single handedly rescues a dozen toddlers. Then of course, when he
is done, he sees a little girl crying that her kitten is still trapped
inside. So the male firefighter again gallantly dashes into the
inferno, intending to rescue the kitten, only for the entire building
to collapse upon him, killing him instantly. That story will make the
eighth page in the same newspaper. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The problem with Meritorious Mediocrus stems from her fame and influence
far outstripping her insights and accomplishments. The effect of this
is that the lower end of the spectrum tends to have a louder, more
influential voice than the higher end of the spectrum. And somehow,
there is just something not right about that. It’s like the natural
hierarchy of the universe gets turned upside down. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiwPv-fDSZRerwSBCxWLzPG_0YPUBqgo-LfkA-4NXGmW_vf_rhEgY9kqBBb0jViSGVpg4Utp8EE_q5RlMyADehCGRuzOfLAQwozoT_bRHBhNopzcSo8DkM0LqjxCagqt92VwtLxGDl75ZI/s1600/cheats-cuckoo.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiwPv-fDSZRerwSBCxWLzPG_0YPUBqgo-LfkA-4NXGmW_vf_rhEgY9kqBBb0jViSGVpg4Utp8EE_q5RlMyADehCGRuzOfLAQwozoT_bRHBhNopzcSo8DkM0LqjxCagqt92VwtLxGDl75ZI/s400/cheats-cuckoo.jpg" height="287" width="400" /></a></div>
The fourth type of bird one may encounter hails from the species of <i>Achievus Consensus</i>.
This bird's entire purpose in life seems to revolve around convincing
men that they will accomplish absolutely nothing unless they manage to
get women onboard. (She might cite examples of how men completely
failed to create a civilization because women didn't participate). As
absurd as it sounds to an outsider, Achievus Consensus has some kind of
magical hypnotism in her song that makes men agree that, indeed, no
flock of sheep can properly succeed without a sufficient number of
wolves in its midst.<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
Despite her hypnotic melody, however, when one digs deeper down it
becomes apparent that while Achievus Consensus knows a few peripheral
issues, when push comes to shove she knows nothing of substance.
Biologists often argue whether Achievus Consensus is from the greater
Cuckoo genus or if she is just a crossbreed of the Elusive Wife and the
Meritorious Mediocrus.<br />
. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
There is a good case to be made for the crossbreed theory of Achievus
Consensus in that she is sometimes very active like the Meritorious
Mediocrus while at the same time displaying some traits of the Elusive
Wife. She never lets you forget how much she is doing for your benefit
while at the same time reminding you that she, and other women, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" target="_blank"><i>are not all like that.</i></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I, however, tend to agree more with the theory that Achievus Consensus
is a sub-species of the Cuckoo because of her continual shaming
references to what other women, not her, think about our views. The
Cuckoo theory is further backed up in that the Achievus Consensus seems
stuck on the belief that men somehow have to convince women to let them
do want they want. Achievus Consensus talks like men are small
children who need to ask Mom's permission to play outside after supper.
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4Uy1Z6RqEf9Kn_mI_LfI4bwhygLlpJVQyJJJhxvxrCpLcUU29COq4RKJa3u2NG3RzkXzR83VGIYOhnL9TUR355XI02NUHsata8BDs__qb1v0kQIxpXhtFCs-y5wO_P2TBx0J0AmXNo8A/s1600/6684993481_370ab19099_z.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4Uy1Z6RqEf9Kn_mI_LfI4bwhygLlpJVQyJJJhxvxrCpLcUU29COq4RKJa3u2NG3RzkXzR83VGIYOhnL9TUR355XI02NUHsata8BDs__qb1v0kQIxpXhtFCs-y5wO_P2TBx0J0AmXNo8A/s400/6684993481_370ab19099_z.jpg" height="266" width="400" /></a></div>
Now, although I am describing several completely different species here,
one should not forget that they are still from the same overall family
within the animal kingdom. This reality is starkly revealed when a man
dares to challenge one of them. The flocking instinct of these
creatures automatically kicks in and they all gather together,
descending upon the transgressing man as if in a scene from Hitchcock's <i>The Birds</i>.</div>
<div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
Of course, men rarely stick up for other men at the best of times, so
the offending man is often left outnumbered. Even worse, some of the
other men in the near vicinity were lured in by the message of the
Elusive Wife, because she always sings of a dream which he once had, but
never attained. Other men are still thinking about the Mountainous
Mammarious' Victoria Secret satin panties, which he looked up online
after she let it "slip" that they were the ones one Page 9, Item C.
Several men will have enormous respect for the achievements of
Meritorious Mediocrus, thinking those achievements make her above
reproach, while others are still in a hypnotic trance from listening to
the song of Achievus Consensus, who has been admonishing them to get
women onboard so "they can accomplish something."
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO6oanoYAwzl7kOyDE7CtOVgJ6KtDGZ7yc8hk8Z20Gk58cnmOomiQSA-I7yFE3IUlMJzgYfetqTkii-FXDmqJZsEv4iN0WL6uoeAuu3UL6J88gHWNbMeQY5FQZT0J-KNw8baZXbaVxmhg/s1600/prometh.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO6oanoYAwzl7kOyDE7CtOVgJ6KtDGZ7yc8hk8Z20Gk58cnmOomiQSA-I7yFE3IUlMJzgYfetqTkii-FXDmqJZsEv4iN0WL6uoeAuu3UL6J88gHWNbMeQY5FQZT0J-KNw8baZXbaVxmhg/s400/prometh.jpg" height="264" width="320" /></a>
The result?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Well, no other man will dare speak up once he sees how all the birds
attack, as if eagles plucking at Prometheus' liver, and more, how few of
the other men will even try to shoo the eagles away.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
</div>
Soon, all the men are "kept in line" and with everything they write
there will be a subconscious concern that the women will be offended. In
a month or two, the men are posting less and less while the women are
posting more and more, until the few women begin dominating the
conversations of the many men.</div>
<div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0deMsLLSlcETtNLrWkjhhPnc4XnZDFDLLgh4qmCDYFRU6I0bzJHvic7s-lUQQinE3SKbjKWmPhwGXsBXB_j36swq7sQ_wIy69nPvNbzc_49fyVjAPc86gNWqcyTIy-8xS_DLmtamU87Q/s1600/MonstersIncForTheBirdsWallpaper1024.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0deMsLLSlcETtNLrWkjhhPnc4XnZDFDLLgh4qmCDYFRU6I0bzJHvic7s-lUQQinE3SKbjKWmPhwGXsBXB_j36swq7sQ_wIy69nPvNbzc_49fyVjAPc86gNWqcyTIy-8xS_DLmtamU87Q/s400/MonstersIncForTheBirdsWallpaper1024.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a></div>
<div>
Now, a men’s forum may try to counter this by creating a "sub-forum"
that only allows entrance to men, so they can speak freely without
concern of offending the women... but, come on now... a few women show
up on a men's forum, and that forces all of the men into a private room
in the back? How often have we seen that happen in society? I am
starting to find forums with too many women on them to be an excellent
way to gauge what happens in the greater society when women show up.
Once a forum has gotten that far, it is quite literally, <i>for the birds</i>. Society is no different. Have a look at our governments.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
There are two other types of birds that may appear as well.<br />
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtie3gpzSx-8ZjDOqKrjKliUI4rcpqaozfWihLK1gsbs334gsng9rmFOVb62IiyLogrtEjGEkKot_iT0WpPJxEGMhXtwV3pmXSh3RCx1siBph4cZbgpvC897p_-K_2jki7hdG-kbAVG7M/s1600/b9fe94ea7e8d26f61fd6b78434a19d3d.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtie3gpzSx-8ZjDOqKrjKliUI4rcpqaozfWihLK1gsbs334gsng9rmFOVb62IiyLogrtEjGEkKot_iT0WpPJxEGMhXtwV3pmXSh3RCx1siBph4cZbgpvC897p_-K_2jki7hdG-kbAVG7M/s400/b9fe94ea7e8d26f61fd6b78434a19d3d.jpg" height="272" width="320" /></a></div>
The first is the much touted <i>Odd Duck</i>. (She is easiest to notice
by the characteristics of reading much and talking little).
Similarities to her extend well out of the bird family and into other
parts of the Animal Kingdom. Take piglets, for example. Every litter of
piglets has a runt that is odd. However, it is the <i>other</i> piglets that make the runt to be odd. And so it is with the Odd Duck in the Bird Family. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" target="_blank">What makes her odd are the <i>other</i> ducks,</a>
and how her behaviour is different from the normal behaviour of ducks.
Therefore, in no way ought she be classified as an entire species of
her own. And thus, I feel justified in talking little more about Odd
Ducks.</div>
<div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<div>
The final bird one will encounter is the <i>Cawing Crow</i>. These birds
are hardly a rarity though, and you need not be within the rich
splendor of the Manosphere to find them. In fact, these birds are so
common that many men report sighting them in their own backyards!<br />
. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgesST8O4aXFvEWTr7oaZ03GOW4js2cZP-lwGmiNQQLoxuwu_hFCjrU64zsjjaSX17iJiFyjFCfm-z7nsrT8iBBkSfqS2y_AFNTFb41u512n5uDGl4e5gBVDJyy017pMZCpRyPMKwHf6kM/s1600/3973025491_3a6cda1d90_z.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgesST8O4aXFvEWTr7oaZ03GOW4js2cZP-lwGmiNQQLoxuwu_hFCjrU64zsjjaSX17iJiFyjFCfm-z7nsrT8iBBkSfqS2y_AFNTFb41u512n5uDGl4e5gBVDJyy017pMZCpRyPMKwHf6kM/s400/3973025491_3a6cda1d90_z.jpg" height="285" width="400" /></a> There is no beauty in the song of the Cawing Crow. You downright hate the sound; it's just so damn irritating! </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Everybody else hates the sound too, and that's why nobody in the
Manosphere complains much when you take out that weak, old BB gun which
your dad gave you for your 12th birthday and start taking potshots at
it. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"Ping!"</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
You bounce a BB off the Cawing Crow's tail feathers and she flies away. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
You would think that would be it, and the Cawing Crow would have learned
a lesson... but, alas, what do you hear out your window again
tomorrow?<br />
. </div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
"Damn irritating Cawing Crow," you exclaim, grabbing your BB gun as you rush out the door in your socks. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiw_MF-fg2sY5PhIMx2l3lEXTn8MM1LR8aQ8T4Hsxz2I61e7UQcrcDGdpQW3gOIMYGoOEKvB4qGeckAZbc6g0V7L6Bpxmy_B2XHc_90VSLzaogOHwVN1dE_Bp4rEtskT_Q3zkR7aeIHMtA/s1600/Kr%25E5kor_p%25E5_kornet%2540toj-02277.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiw_MF-fg2sY5PhIMx2l3lEXTn8MM1LR8aQ8T4Hsxz2I61e7UQcrcDGdpQW3gOIMYGoOEKvB4qGeckAZbc6g0V7L6Bpxmy_B2XHc_90VSLzaogOHwVN1dE_Bp4rEtskT_Q3zkR7aeIHMtA/s400/Kr%25E5kor_p%25E5_kornet%2540toj-02277.jpg" height="400" width="308" /></a>"Pow!" You let off a shot and see a few black feathers erupt into the
air as the Cawing Crow takes flight with a stinging in her side.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
The next day? Sure enough, there’s the Cawing Crow again, irritating you with a song akin to nails on a chalkboard. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"Pow! Pow! Pow!" </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
You hit your target with all three, but this time the Cawing Crow does
not fly away. She has learned that the BB's won't kill her but will just
bounce off her thick feathers, even if they do sting a bit. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Soon it becomes almost like a game between you and the Cawing Crow, and
she shows up daily knowing full well that she will be greeted by
multiple potshots at her. Yet, she keeps showing up, day after day. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
You have a BBQ one day in the backyard with several of your friends, and
they have heard your amazing tale of the Cawing Crow that never goes
away - so they each bring their own BB guns along to the BBQ. </div>
<div>
<br />
"Pow, pow, pow, pow, pow, PING!" Volleys of shots fly at the Cawing Crow, most hitting their mark, and yet, she <i>still</i> doesn't fly away! </div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-HJCF0EneyqRFd7NX-qy0FraLKH4yx5EDnuM_6cKXIryq8UU4yamwLvZkjrThW6kQQ5Or2J8BlSE6EEiJmiroW1HJWCgyyF1OVYVJo8Y682hVamJ9QjaLAn4dqMucDmi0QLYbdWsqmmQ/s1600/Crow+Target.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-HJCF0EneyqRFd7NX-qy0FraLKH4yx5EDnuM_6cKXIryq8UU4yamwLvZkjrThW6kQQ5Or2J8BlSE6EEiJmiroW1HJWCgyyF1OVYVJo8Y682hVamJ9QjaLAn4dqMucDmi0QLYbdWsqmmQ/s400/Crow+Target.jpg" height="257" width="400" /></a> "What's the point?" one might ask. "You're not accomplishing anything."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Well, there is a point. You are becoming one hell of a good shot, and
the Cawing Crow has helped you to become skilled at picking off a target
with that weak, old BB gun from a considerable distance.<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
Compared to the other birds, the Cawing Crow is at least serving a
purpose that is valuable to the MRM. I would rather have ten Cawing
Crows than one Elusive Wife, one Mountainous Mammarious, one Meritorious
Mediocrus and one Achievus Consensus.
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
At least with the Cawing Crow, you both know where you stand, and after a
while you have to grant the Cawing Crow a certain amount of respect,
if only strictly for the amount of abuse she is willing to take while
still coming back for more. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Hey, I never said that the Cawing Crow was the smartest bird, only that you have to respect its temerity to some degree. </div>
<br />
And this, gentlemen, brings us to the end of our <i>Guide to Bird Watching in the Manosphere</i>.
Be sure to keep your ears open for their songs and your eyes sharp to
spot their various distinguishing traits, so that you may pass on any
sightings to your fellow travelers in the Manosphere.<br />
.<b><span style="font-size: small;"></span></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html">Previous</a></span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> /</span><b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a></span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> /</span><b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html">Next</a></span></b></span> </span></div>
.<i><br />
</i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
<b> </b>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-29568936600644931752015-03-11T21:00:00.000-07:002015-04-24T13:29:53.287-07:00Male and Female: Equal But Different.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV1T78DS6tvVbRmjSV1aME0q2tjArP4TBezFL09FuIKhtu73R1is4hcnOexkrJu4G3PnojijYqUoKVLiiqq9hCO2jwxCINZ0AvzuJ9xcqy3t5BOKeKow9ncnMdaJBSgKyjOsv_7dF24LY/s400/Yin__Yang.bmp" height="301" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5171833344833256146" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Males and females are polar opposites. They are as up is to down as
night is to day. One thing that is common to all opposites is that by
the very nature of being opposite, <i>they must be equal.</i> If they
were not equal, it would be impossible for them to be opposite. In any
given year, at any spot on earth, there are an exactly equal amount of
daytime hours and nighttime hours. The same is true of males and
females; they are polar opposites and therefore are equal. However, we
are not talking about legal equality here, but rather the essence that makes “male” and “female” has equality unique unto itself.<br />
.<br />
<div>
In terms of intelligence, men and women are equal in that the average IQ
of all males is equal to the average IQ of all females. There is a
difference in how these equal intelligences are arrived at however.</div>
.<br />
Female intelligence is clustered around the mean far more than male
intelligence. There is far less variation in female intelligence. To put
it more simply, the female population’s intelligence tends to be
concentrated in greater numbers around the average IQ of 100, while the
male population has a greater range on <i>both</i> the high and low IQ
scale. A far greater percentage of female IQ’s reside between 90 to 110
than males, while conversely, males inhabit the extremes of IQ between
70 to 130 in far greater percentage than females. The more you go to the
extremes, the more it becomes virtually all male, in both high and low.<br />
<br />
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjReh9Nj1mmeiNEs6EBmrI2eHKabxOyTadkdelE1ldRM3Om0qTEiH-GTLZkC1tQvCXfwHGXoQhz4P_jdg3iMR5GjX2GcMkGn1ucslCsimXOQmrglkqTy5Q8LkgTQ06OSExF2RkDmTRQlh4/s1600/Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjReh9Nj1mmeiNEs6EBmrI2eHKabxOyTadkdelE1ldRM3Om0qTEiH-GTLZkC1tQvCXfwHGXoQhz4P_jdg3iMR5GjX2GcMkGn1ucslCsimXOQmrglkqTy5Q8LkgTQ06OSExF2RkDmTRQlh4/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5171833800099789538" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>When one takes <i>all</i> of the IQ’s of the female population into account to find an average IQ, and then takes <i>all</i>
of the IQ’s of the male population to find their average, the
collective IQ’s of the two sexes are virtually identical, even though
there are vast differences in their variability.<br />
.<br />
When one looks at “happiness,” we find the same thing as we find in intelligence. Researchers have discovered that when they ask men to rate the periods
of their lives where they feel satisfied or dissatisfied, they find that
men have a major “spike” of dissatisfaction commonly known as Mid-Life Crisis. But, when asking the females, what they find is that women do not have a
major mid life crisis like men; however, they have several “mini” mid
life crises that occur at various times in their cycle of life. <br />
<br />
When the researchers total up all of the time in a male’s life to find
his “average” happiness and compare it to the female’s average happiness
throughout her life, what they find is that both males and females have
almost the identical <i>average</i> amount of happiness in their
respective lives. However, the male’s midlife crisis is far more intense
than anything the typical female will ever experience – but, he only
goes through it once.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik0Ja4FSG6woc4jB1fxg54V4uUl0kaNf6N7xb2UI5_KYGHOBthBuQgto_FJ9ddWnJzMw5AGAnjhQH0ZKk-hJzFQ_cft2J6EfSXjGVEo4xHFpqvNj_dx0_Ih4yNLAKLyHy3NrbaHE_i2no/s1600/President_Barack_Obama.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik0Ja4FSG6woc4jB1fxg54V4uUl0kaNf6N7xb2UI5_KYGHOBthBuQgto_FJ9ddWnJzMw5AGAnjhQH0ZKk-hJzFQ_cft2J6EfSXjGVEo4xHFpqvNj_dx0_Ih4yNLAKLyHy3NrbaHE_i2no/s1600/President_Barack_Obama.jpg" height="200" width="160" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbms6jOgb6HhN2D-H-on5lYSNAxgykzJiuBWU4fWhpRLXn5A741sOCu43JkuY707tTfdcGcc8FZucIsg1MhydEjdoRX6OfPagEYEhraVRnxtwTLakYk2MaZnMGnEROK6BzgM3yrN34ZwI/s1600/_2100627.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbms6jOgb6HhN2D-H-on5lYSNAxgykzJiuBWU4fWhpRLXn5A741sOCu43JkuY707tTfdcGcc8FZucIsg1MhydEjdoRX6OfPagEYEhraVRnxtwTLakYk2MaZnMGnEROK6BzgM3yrN34ZwI/s1600/_2100627.jpg" height="200" width="149" /></a>It's true that most of the world's powerful people are men. Most world leaders, billionaires and corporate CEO's are indeed male. But so are the world's least powerful people mostly male - 85% of the homeless are men. More men rise to the top than women, but more men fail at life and fall through the cracks as well.</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZbcJ-Ys7RCisoPplfZ15jpbD87Z5v99C-1oXosRxuoD_HPBifdCOVvte4JEya7eiJWDcWVCcn8c_LSBulYSpmRshgScCk-SuCulSt40FT83SMmbVH2Rdup-OKGTFqAaAyRMBhospLchs/s1600/129958-004-C9B8B89D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZbcJ-Ys7RCisoPplfZ15jpbD87Z5v99C-1oXosRxuoD_HPBifdCOVvte4JEya7eiJWDcWVCcn8c_LSBulYSpmRshgScCk-SuCulSt40FT83SMmbVH2Rdup-OKGTFqAaAyRMBhospLchs/s1600/129958-004-C9B8B89D.jpg" height="200" width="151" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPROWHeeMrdmrwmc4vvA0sZGcKGBcMvMOgDRXpA514OcywCGVscCt346268f5SMjJKdMb14_8xZgoERY7e3nq8LJTYKjghUtyIeXJXk35K4IR94xknk0ZHogNt15Z5ElFJ_RGROkyNuNQ/s1600/gandhi1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPROWHeeMrdmrwmc4vvA0sZGcKGBcMvMOgDRXpA514OcywCGVscCt346268f5SMjJKdMb14_8xZgoERY7e3nq8LJTYKjghUtyIeXJXk35K4IR94xknk0ZHogNt15Z5ElFJ_RGROkyNuNQ/s1600/gandhi1.jpg" height="200" width="136" /></a><br />
If we look at sin, or good and evil, what would you expect to find except again the same phenomenon? The 9/11 Terrorists were reportedly male, but so were most of the firemen who sacrificed their lives saving others when the towers collapsed. Hitler and Ghandi were both males - the worst and best of humanity both in the same spectrum but at different ends, just like IQ.<br />
<br />
While men are certainly physically stronger than women, they are also
more likely to succumb to the top ten fatal diseases and on average die
seven years earlier than women. Who is stronger? The willow or the oak?
<br />
.<br />
When a boy is bad it is very noticeable and often in the form of an
outburst or some form of physical aggression. It is very hard to miss a
male’s evil because its nature is overt and it occurs as a “spike.” Male
aggression is stereotypically to hit, kick, shout or destroy something.
The boy may go through long periods of “nothing” followed by a spike
that is hard to ignore.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1gn_KWgeJYpfnOsc34lIWfHK78RUgOwHsxtia4mrwjW9d1AgNX114sawSPoEOQ8xyS_vcMPxpTJAP8L19rOV-LJltQZCO1lFXgwdiUbSzwaeXPmAPLxW7ooMycKoyJiSk3_uvdqeu_oI/s1600/two-gossiping-girls-11920226.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1gn_KWgeJYpfnOsc34lIWfHK78RUgOwHsxtia4mrwjW9d1AgNX114sawSPoEOQ8xyS_vcMPxpTJAP8L19rOV-LJltQZCO1lFXgwdiUbSzwaeXPmAPLxW7ooMycKoyJiSk3_uvdqeu_oI/s1600/two-gossiping-girls-11920226.jpg" height="175" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9EkojWus-SxavL051pnaGhfPCrOSDqVfBrCw1U-WgZN8gcEs710Jqn_r4PgnlJnV4n5CHFbAyYdUYR9K9MUZF3d4jGGZ41WwtsgVH3RS5vXRzNHZSHUvt23INTQ71Se7GjSoTMozfryk/s1600/boy_kicking_sand_castle1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9EkojWus-SxavL051pnaGhfPCrOSDqVfBrCw1U-WgZN8gcEs710Jqn_r4PgnlJnV4n5CHFbAyYdUYR9K9MUZF3d4jGGZ41WwtsgVH3RS5vXRzNHZSHUvt23INTQ71Se7GjSoTMozfryk/s1600/boy_kicking_sand_castle1.png" height="178" width="200" /></a>A girl, on the other hand, uses covert aggression. More commonly this is
known as “Social Aggression” or “Relational Aggression” and it is
stereotypically a female form of aggression. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" target="_blank">Its nature is to use gossip and social manipulation to hurt the targeted party</a>, and this necessarily
occurs over a longer period of time and is less visible than the male’s
aggression. <br />
.<br />
What we end up seeing is that male aggression occurs as a noticeable
spike that lasts only a short time while female aggression is less
intense <i>but lasts over a longer period of time. </i>When we average out the two forms of aggression, we again will find that both male and female are equal, but different.<br />
.
<br />
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizsTW2GfCZImRWQ0M1re1AODqHLiZqdMU3YvTdlydjOEc9sF7DFHcknCVSFg_DixXESTp7gE1VrWTi2f-uw-pR5H7cgZ1_cyRLqpCg7TC39orZB6mHf2TwNRSpm0gxx8pKGjBXJ01p1W8/s1600/4.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizsTW2GfCZImRWQ0M1re1AODqHLiZqdMU3YvTdlydjOEc9sF7DFHcknCVSFg_DixXESTp7gE1VrWTi2f-uw-pR5H7cgZ1_cyRLqpCg7TC39orZB6mHf2TwNRSpm0gxx8pKGjBXJ01p1W8/s400/4.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350665446504085810" style="display: block; height: 266px; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 400px;" /></a>The essence of “maleness” is that things occur with infrequent but large
“spikes” while the essence of “femaleness” is that things occur with
more frequent but less identifiable “rhythms.” When one averages them
out, men and women are equal yet they have gotten to their equal
averages by different means.<br />
<br />
Now, to the point of “equal but different,” it must also be noted that
male and female sex drives are equal but different in the same manner as
the above examples.<br />
<br />
Jack Kammer, in his online book, <a href="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/how-can-women-make-the-rules.pdf" target="_blank">If Men Have All The Power, How Come Women Make The Rules?</a> said it best, so I will steal his example:</div>
<div>
. </div>
<div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/how-can-women-make-the-rules.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/how-can-women-make-the-rules.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcgKgp2Qk0TMfpylQISVWB0PvJHuexhDbUdidgoNanDCWsBGQDDAbOPWR749x4stYhifT0RE5wMftsdxj0dRLkqWTwvof4xcVz1XyV_B5PYm2UTgQcpPv5ykv7qeBdHRAddQNZ5sxe6UQ/s400/Copy+of+207-44-ox-plow-nepal.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5171837038505130786" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for Free Book, "If Men Have All The Power, How Come Women Make the Rules?"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Male sexuality is like a pushy door to door salesman; it picks one
target and gets in your face so much that you simply cannot ignore it.<br />
<br />
Female sexuality, however, is like annoying junk mail. It is everywhere and steadily drones on and on at <i>everybody,</i> whether they are the intended target or not.<br />
<br />
While males may think about the sex act itself more than women, the
equal opposite is that women think about being “sexy” to the same
degree.<br />
.</div>
Males and females have <i>equal</i> sex drives but they work differently. Even physically, men and women are equally sexual. <br />
. <br />
Men have fewer but far more intense erogenous zones, while women have
erogenous zones located all over their bodies. In fact, it is fair to
say that a woman’s entire body is an erogenous zone that is dispersed
with lowered sexual sensitivity but over a greater area, making it equal
to the man’s. This is why women are so much more into “intimacy” and
the mental aspects of sex. Her entire body is involved in having sex
whereas only certain, but more intense, parts of the male’s body are.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/04/women-are-not-able-to-get-sex-on-demand.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2009/03/bonecrker-27-women-want-sex-more-than.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizRVUkLp8ziloNpByKUg9491nmaTeurfKHB8W1uIOwzVxU6Ivx0pkJ0w5fDrFyZcEDA0rWG7FzCFmPEAXEGoOeVIzoE5hk0oOKHVxVPmjK-1egktcXykeMoo12pjfmJODgwk6itZbwR_8/s320/japanese-penis-festival1.jpg" height="265" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5509129235835538210" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/04/women-are-not-able-to-get-sex-on-demand.html" target="_blank">Click Pic for "Women Want Sex More Than Men"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In the end of it all, men and women both have equal desires to have sex
and to be sexual creatures, although they are expressed in different
ways. Women have their biological clocks and get “baby rabies” that
demand of them to go out and get impregnated with the same intense
irrationalness that men display when they are willing to do anything to
copulate with a female - including the willingness to commit treason or
sell out one’s own mother.<br />
<br />
<b>"Contrary
to the general opinion, there is no difference in the total sexual
impulses of the sexes.../...Any such idea comes from a confusion between
the desire for a thing and the stimulus towards the active part in
securing what is desired.../...It is important to distinguish between
the intensity with which sexual matters are pursued and the proportion
of the total activities of life that are devoted to them and to their
accessory cares."</b> -- Otto Weininger, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank"><i>Sex and Character</i></a>, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfs" target="_blank">Male and Female Sexuality</a>. <br />
<br />
It is horribly inaccurate for one to say that only men want sex. It is
far more accurate to say that both men and women want sex equally. In
fact, the only imperatives of all living things is to: 1). Survive, so
that one can: 2). Reproduce. All other things are in support of these
two imperatives that are universal to all living things. Males and
females both have an equal desire to do this. Sex is the core of
existence itself.<br />
. <br />
We may think that we humans are smarter than animals, but when it comes
to sexual instinct we are animals that follow the same mating patterns
as most other species in the animal kingdom.<br />
.
<br />
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV5GyzH-ESuI3ss9O-C1gpQoxdCYDVvNCcbB3wNMEQc907-8_wmXlHF2LCMEC1C_Vgf3S2RdkY7126KYW2sULgQTL2bHOLm-9HRJ9cM8k28qqdzKFslaEyQMmWJqA1aHchcHw4y2JTYU4/s1600/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV5GyzH-ESuI3ss9O-C1gpQoxdCYDVvNCcbB3wNMEQc907-8_wmXlHF2LCMEC1C_Vgf3S2RdkY7126KYW2sULgQTL2bHOLm-9HRJ9cM8k28qqdzKFslaEyQMmWJqA1aHchcHw4y2JTYU4/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5171837364922645298" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>This has become even more evident since the sexual revolution arrived
and women became free from pregnancy via the pill, and free from the
social stigmas associated with being a “loose” woman.<br />
. <br />
One needs only to look at studies of sexually transmitted disease by
gender to see that STD’s affect a far greater percentage of the female
population than the male population. There is a reason for this: 80% of
the females are sleeping with 20% of the males, and those males are the
alpha males in society. Humans have reverted back to the mating
instincts found in most of the animal kingdom where the alpha males
breed most of the females, while the beta males breed with none.<br />
.<br />
Again, you can see that male sexuality and female sexuality are “equal yet opposite.”<br />
<br />
This “equal-opposite” aspect of sexuality is essential in understanding
patriarchy and why things were set up in certain ways, which I will
attempt to describe and explain in the next section.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
</div>
<div>
. </div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
. </div>
<div>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Further Reading: </div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.fredoneverything.net/SexAndSATs.shtml" target="_blank">Sex, Mathematics, And Political Correctness</a> -- by Fred Reed<br />
<br />
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2001/01/rats.html" target="_blank">Rats (Or, He Chases Her Until She Catches Him)</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/women-more-promiscious-at-sex-than-men-more-unfaithful/story-e6frfkp9-1111118269034" target="_blank">Women More Promiscuous at Sex than Men</a> <br />
<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<i>“‘Really, women’s desire is not relational, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2004/02/bonecrker-58-women-are-narcissistic-and.html" target="_blank">it’s narcissictic.’</a>
— it’s dominated by the yearnings of ‘self-love,’ by the wish to be the
object of erotic admiration and sexual need. Still, on the subject of
narcissism, she talked about research indicating that, in comparison
with men, women’s erotic fantasies center less on giving pleasure and
more on getting it. ‘When it comes to desire,’ she added, ‘women may be
far less relational than men.’” -- </i><a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/175364-Sex-and-Relationships-Bonobo-Sex-and-Ladyboners-Is-Women-s-Desire-Really-that-Confusing-" target="_blank">Sex and Relationships, Bonobo Sex, and ‘Lady Boners’: Is Women’s Desire Really That Confusing? – by Vanessa Richmond</a><i> </i><br />
<i>.</i><br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
From Belfort Bax's 1913 piece <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/FraudOfFeminism.htm" target="_blank">The Fraud of Feminism</a> pp.25-27</div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
Now let us consider the whole of the differentiations of the mental
character between man and woman in the light of a further generalisation
which is sufficiently obvious in itself and which has been formulated
with special clearness by the late Otto Weininger in his remarkable
book,<a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">"Geschlecht und Charakter" (Sex and Character)</a>. I refer to the observations contained in Section II.,<a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfs" target="_blank">Chaps. 2</a> <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfc" target="_blank">and 3</a>. </div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
The point has been, of course, previously noted, and the present writer,
among others, has on various occasions called special attention to it.
But its formulation and elaboration by Weininger is the most complete I
know. The truth in question consists in the fact, undeniable to all
those not rendered impervious to facts by preconceived dogma, that, as I
have elsewhere put it, while man has a sex, woman is a sex. Let us hear
Weininger on this point. <i>"Woman is only sexual, man is also sexual.
Alike in time and space this difference may be traced in man, parts of
his body susceptible to sexual excitement are small in number and
strictly localised. In woman sexuality is diffused over the whole body,
every contact on whatever part excites her sexually."</i> </div>
<div>
.</div>
Weininger points out that while the sexual element in man, owing to the
physio-logical character of the sexual organs, may be at times more
violent than that in woman, yet that it is spasmodic and occurs in
crises separated by intervals of quiescence. In woman, on the otherhand,
while less spasmodic, it is continuous. The sexual instinct with man
being, as he styles it, "anappendix" and no more, he can raise himself
mentally entirely outside of it. <i>"He is conscious of it as of
something which he possesses but which is not inseparate from the rest
of his nature. He can view it objectively. With woman this is not the
case; the sex element is part of her whole nature. Hence, it is not as
with man, clearly recognisable in local manifestations, but subtly
affects the whole life of the organism. For this reason the man is
conscious of the sexual element within him as such, whereas the woman is
unconscious of it as such. It is not for nothing that in common
parlance woman is spoken of as 'the sex.' In this sexual differentiation
of the whole life-nature of woman from man, deducible as it is from
physiological andanatomical distinctions, lies the ground of those
differentiations of function which culminate in the fact that while
mankind in its intellectual moral and technical development is
represented in the main by Man, Woman has continued to find her chief
function in the direct procreation of the race." </i><br />
<i>. </i><br />
<i>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</i><br />
.<br />
<i>"The central organizing principle of primate social life is
competition between females and especially female lineages... Females
should be, if anything, more competitive than males, not less, although
the manner in which females compete may be less direct, less boisterous,
and hence, more difficult to measure" -- The Woman That Never Evolved </i>-- by Sarah Blaffer Hrdy <br />
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
“<b>Study debunks stereotype that men think about sex all day long</b>”<br />
<br />
<i>[T]he research discredits the persistent stereotype that men think
about sex every seven seconds, which would amount to more than 8,000
thoughts about sex in 16 waking hours. In the study, the median number
of young men’s thought about sex stood at almost 19 times per day. Young
women in the study reported a median of nearly 10 thoughts about sex
per day.</i><br />
<br />
<i>As a group, the men also thought about food almost 18 times per day
and sleep almost 11 times per day, compared to women’s median number of
thoughts about eating and sleep, at nearly 15 times and about 8 1/2
times, respectively</i>. – <a href="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-debunks-stereotype-men-sex-day.html" target="_blank">Medical Xpress</a> <br />
<br />
(*** Please note, even though I posted this to show how stupid this meme
has become, one still has to realize the way feminist researchers came
to this "once every X seconds" BS is by taking the amount of hours one
spends in <i>a day</i> thinking about such things, then dividing it by
the amount of seconds in a day, and coming up with every seven or
fifteen, or whatever seconds, to make it seem like men are stunted
rapists thinking about sex constantly. What they are really saying is
that men thought about sex for 15 minutes, multiplied by X per day
(maybe three times, or six times a day), which is not surprising, and
then divided the total amount of those times into how many seconds are
in each day. It is totally bogus propaganda which was used to fuel the
rape industry. So men think about sex for 10 minutes at a time, 8 times a
day, while women think about sex 7 times a day for 5 minutes. Does that
really make men into walking hardons that are looking for easy rape
victims?) <br />
<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
From Otto Weininger's <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank"><i>Sex and Character</i></a>, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfs" target="_blank">Male and Female Sexuality </a><br />
<br />
<b>Woman is only sexual, man is partly sexual,</b> and this difference reveals itself
in various ways. The parts of the male body by stimulation of which sexuality
is excited are limited in area, and are strongly localised, whilst in the case
of the woman, they are diffused over her whole body, so that stimulation may
take place almost from any part. When in the second chapter of Part I., I
explained that sexuality is distributed over the whole body of both sexes, I
did not mean that, therefore, the sense organs, through which the definite
impulses are stimulated, were equally distributed. <b>There are, certainly, areas
of greater excitability, even in the case of the woman, but there is not, as in
the man, a sharp division between the sexual areas and the body generally.</b> <br />
<br />
The morphological isolation of the sexual area from the rest of the body in the
case of man, may be taken as symbolical of the relation of sex to his whole
nature. Just as there is a contrast between the sexual and the sexless parts
of a man's body, so there is a time-change in his sexuality. <b>The female is
always sexual, the male is sexual only intermittently. The sexual instinct is
always active in woman (as to the apparent exceptions to this sexuality of
women, I shall have to speak later on), whilst in man it is at rest from time
to time. And thus it happens that the sexual impulse of the male is eruptive
in character and so appears stronger.</b> <b>The real difference between the sexes is
that in the male the desire is periodical, in the female continuous.</b><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
<div>
. </div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.</div>
.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-63690073459286332002015-03-11T20:30:00.000-07:002015-08-09T12:51:46.484-07:00Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained) The following scenes and quotes come from <i>Legends of the Fall, </i>the movie
which cemented Brad Pitt’s status as a sex symbol throughout our
culture. Pitt’s character, Tristan Ludlow, had long flowing hair and
looked wild. He was the untamed one in the family, so tough that nothing
could hurt him; he and the grizzly once shared blood and now they were
one spirit.<br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VEz1RJljZbY/VHS2O1ZwgwI/AAAAAAAAlnw/yPAUP7y-PQI/s1600/Legends%2Bof%2Bthe%2BFall%2B-%2BTristan%2Band%2BOne%2BStab.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="172" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VEz1RJljZbY/VHS2O1ZwgwI/AAAAAAAAlnw/yPAUP7y-PQI/s1600/Legends%2Bof%2Bthe%2BFall%2B-%2BTristan%2Band%2BOne%2BStab.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEif7xN0t8LVXl7ZrR4PoGy0j2QWgjyat3EtWzaosVfwScml5uLRwt0S-9X72iLzMv5vcJ6FA3fIMgSEc5ZwbeeS8UNwf1_vI-dCoPt-WZsUNdTdTtJqFiQ5zaAFznY0Rh3OOoD4w2HAL5Rp/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEif7xN0t8LVXl7ZrR4PoGy0j2QWgjyat3EtWzaosVfwScml5uLRwt0S-9X72iLzMv5vcJ6FA3fIMgSEc5ZwbeeS8UNwf1_vI-dCoPt-WZsUNdTdTtJqFiQ5zaAFznY0Rh3OOoD4w2HAL5Rp/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+1.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
.<br />
A woman would likely be wise to stay away from such a man, this
character with a raw animal streak running through his soul… but yet,
there is a soft side to him, a sliver of emotion that he hides, and
reveals only to the women he loves.<br />
<br />
Yes, the quintessential love interest… <br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilbRg-eqhUDCPsVkPsGlupY2yDzTLcr5rU_926dDksnlc3tFy2m2lL_uXgNTg505cpb7TNY7VKEv2mqcbzBOtRV8AAtrQ29XLyGb4v0AmfRzz1xgHxjb5DW8gpGuJuAAle9Szd6z4ig6R_/s1600/tumblr_lzkc4sBbjE1qe06feo3_250.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="218" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilbRg-eqhUDCPsVkPsGlupY2yDzTLcr5rU_926dDksnlc3tFy2m2lL_uXgNTg505cpb7TNY7VKEv2mqcbzBOtRV8AAtrQ29XLyGb4v0AmfRzz1xgHxjb5DW8gpGuJuAAle9Szd6z4ig6R_/s1600/tumblr_lzkc4sBbjE1qe06feo3_250.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2RQk3UAgZxLMtZyGorf6IC9nUkGO1qA_8sn8vT7R2WnXMmE5QthR92jLKC1KTirg_9wVSN-BC42Gb2kMpKPuj9FTZpOaw9FUp_iugYeTNJOeOSlhIq0v1QbdvSh6rKBrvZgQnrrBsHt9Y/s1600/45a.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2RQk3UAgZxLMtZyGorf6IC9nUkGO1qA_8sn8vT7R2WnXMmE5QthR92jLKC1KTirg_9wVSN-BC42Gb2kMpKPuj9FTZpOaw9FUp_iugYeTNJOeOSlhIq0v1QbdvSh6rKBrvZgQnrrBsHt9Y/s1600/45a.jpg" width="200" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWZk30mpqFmGQM-361zGwCHjPB3IrvKcon7qdA635IC1NEC11006cwdjcpzonfBYT-L-35z_Z2XhRTJF_C12eqsFLn0ES6lNAPZsLbozGwnup8xzq5dKKjUTVuWUPR_MvtuMcoc_Akxk-3/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWZk30mpqFmGQM-361zGwCHjPB3IrvKcon7qdA635IC1NEC11006cwdjcpzonfBYT-L-35z_Z2XhRTJF_C12eqsFLn0ES6lNAPZsLbozGwnup8xzq5dKKjUTVuWUPR_MvtuMcoc_Akxk-3/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+2.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcZ73cjQO14FjJXmfN-r72ub-_3Ff0_AuAYwddqM4khXGSowhGw4qoqKEYm-bFQ_heTGu5Y_Z8tIdjQcrVRSKQyUncrbSWBlLyJ0-E89J7NO-sdU7K_2_RCd0o5yWgCUBETl9GCqAaNhFX/s1600/tumblr_mnbbk5fjJX1r3sbdso2_250.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcZ73cjQO14FjJXmfN-r72ub-_3Ff0_AuAYwddqM4khXGSowhGw4qoqKEYm-bFQ_heTGu5Y_Z8tIdjQcrVRSKQyUncrbSWBlLyJ0-E89J7NO-sdU7K_2_RCd0o5yWgCUBETl9GCqAaNhFX/s1600/tumblr_mnbbk5fjJX1r3sbdso2_250.gif" /></a>.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGHBy4QBx1KyPMDJbz4JBXJcCQprfTF81vMuEDrQvN4Ol-dZntuLRz4TkLkLyHsjX0FGHYgktsmLztLUSFvG-AE9kgX_8Fr_Lh9oQDPdh6vcpEXcOlgE6FU775zJ3XW-JeYw1USS4YbK9r/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGHBy4QBx1KyPMDJbz4JBXJcCQprfTF81vMuEDrQvN4Ol-dZntuLRz4TkLkLyHsjX0FGHYgktsmLztLUSFvG-AE9kgX_8Fr_Lh9oQDPdh6vcpEXcOlgE6FU775zJ3XW-JeYw1USS4YbK9r/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall.gif" /></a>The setting of the scene from which this quote comes is one in which
Tristan (Pitt) is sitting outside talking with his younger brother
Samuel (Henry Thomas), who is home from college with his fiancée
Susannah (Julia Ormond). Samuel, a virgin, shyly inquires of his more
experienced brother about the ways of sex and how to make sure he is
“good at it,” because Susannah has said she does not want to wait for
marriage…<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQo_5-DaB5CDEwvn9q3Kf6nAWA8Aid52h3eN6xnjXGLJX9bFoJRGH-yb_eDEkjHx2dsbzOSiyXXMXVetqw2Q3s9QAnOSHymaClpBjx-bNRcfzS-7GMncPVt3TSSKXhwjoT_G_AaiokAdk/s1600/dvd_mle010.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="179" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5177368755446108466" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQo_5-DaB5CDEwvn9q3Kf6nAWA8Aid52h3eN6xnjXGLJX9bFoJRGH-yb_eDEkjHx2dsbzOSiyXXMXVetqw2Q3s9QAnOSHymaClpBjx-bNRcfzS-7GMncPVt3TSSKXhwjoT_G_AaiokAdk/s320/dvd_mle010.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a><b><br /></b><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYRysX2B9ZQ0AAuch0EVRnLSrzyr2KuW_wYAeWqCI7csdmCnjSDqpeCCsMA6lhGHQQ1xSV9cPE3edHbSzXcdx5HShaAoQNXt8ZbAcyFYxZeegzi-uPqvHZOG2iVG-DWRHDcCtOZX2Kzz-O/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+2.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYRysX2B9ZQ0AAuch0EVRnLSrzyr2KuW_wYAeWqCI7csdmCnjSDqpeCCsMA6lhGHQQ1xSV9cPE3edHbSzXcdx5HShaAoQNXt8ZbAcyFYxZeegzi-uPqvHZOG2iVG-DWRHDcCtOZX2Kzz-O/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+2.gif" /></a><b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Tristan:</b><i> Samuel, God bless you. You are good at everything you do. I’m sure it’ll be the same with fucking.</i><br />
.<br />
<b>Samuel:</b><i> Tristan, really. We’re talking about my future wife.</i><br />
<i>. </i><br />
<b>Tristan: </b><i>Oh, you’re not going to fuck her?</i><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKY7la180NR1CaeDtCNK84-1fcAmMoy4Ku4g2KJXE9W32Y80rveuljHRl-WXEkqeXrkCtN2mMmEFiu3xVaL57gmSlxchqmSrsVm__k9vGWlfepbOlUv_-N0vkbmPgSqwUVSzn-L6U_jxe2/s1600/tumblr_mnbbk5fjJX1r3sbdso4_250.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKY7la180NR1CaeDtCNK84-1fcAmMoy4Ku4g2KJXE9W32Y80rveuljHRl-WXEkqeXrkCtN2mMmEFiu3xVaL57gmSlxchqmSrsVm__k9vGWlfepbOlUv_-N0vkbmPgSqwUVSzn-L6U_jxe2/s1600/tumblr_mnbbk5fjJX1r3sbdso4_250.gif" /></a>.<br />
<b>Samuel: </b><i>No! I’m planning to “be” with her.</i><br />
.<br />
<b>Tristan: </b><i>I recommend fucking.</i><br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgL0pLoryq6qhta5FRCQxE6nF3kXfQ1jKKY2y6pejpfrUHL-EaSQ-4advdF80X51umMC1Q-aUW2XC8DiGrvhmcrV1JWeVZo5UXGy6pgxILiw9CnGGiwV_4M8V2eRZKqGWH85q6KutGlZiw/s1600/dvd_mle014.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="180" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5177369408281137474" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgL0pLoryq6qhta5FRCQxE6nF3kXfQ1jKKY2y6pejpfrUHL-EaSQ-4advdF80X51umMC1Q-aUW2XC8DiGrvhmcrV1JWeVZo5UXGy6pgxILiw9CnGGiwV_4M8V2eRZKqGWH85q6KutGlZiw/s320/dvd_mle014.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6hIG4_QegyCww-OIuvfw9mqetok3ErdGdYcYVl6DpcC4DOoVwIJkI1Ruf5uVo2nR7_tTkGgkFPQNfSiM07FPoRzFwxsB8CiBqiqPhdVwtJuOWy0Trjg6s3wMk7tnDIOdBUlF2avnChY8E/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+4.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6hIG4_QegyCww-OIuvfw9mqetok3ErdGdYcYVl6DpcC4DOoVwIJkI1Ruf5uVo2nR7_tTkGgkFPQNfSiM07FPoRzFwxsB8CiBqiqPhdVwtJuOWy0Trjg6s3wMk7tnDIOdBUlF2avnChY8E/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+4.gif" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b></b><br />
<br />
<b>Samuel: </b><i>You’re impossible!</i><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV0DeJSMttgdfKdl9wlvv4dDvHK-EN55Sd2v7nwphlm-4ci3pzrAAbFDmYpoRwd7GBe7LAomBVQMnRkiYoqTyb6tS86y9zjskLj8TpjGR5_j6q6_OUN9FUKQsaICqDftctFAUhTgP1bS3p/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+5.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV0DeJSMttgdfKdl9wlvv4dDvHK-EN55Sd2v7nwphlm-4ci3pzrAAbFDmYpoRwd7GBe7LAomBVQMnRkiYoqTyb6tS86y9zjskLj8TpjGR5_j6q6_OUN9FUKQsaICqDftctFAUhTgP1bS3p/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+5.gif" /></a>.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6lCDO6vTUo4NKZezHLSV3j7dU3J2Qp5IJ1b0Mjt0SzT1bDxDHnO3J-1wKsNz1zxeBHyx90uhQEUd0cogckSCSBiwO_JEnhU6-lbsjpo2EhT_YFjKvwgPBK5vTMDCLP_-qtNa-e0smWfR-/s1600/tumblr_lzkc4sBbjE1qe06feo4_250.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="175" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6lCDO6vTUo4NKZezHLSV3j7dU3J2Qp5IJ1b0Mjt0SzT1bDxDHnO3J-1wKsNz1zxeBHyx90uhQEUd0cogckSCSBiwO_JEnhU6-lbsjpo2EhT_YFjKvwgPBK5vTMDCLP_-qtNa-e0smWfR-/s320/tumblr_lzkc4sBbjE1qe06feo4_250.gif" width="320" /></a><b>Tristan: </b><i>You brought it up</i><i>! </i><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
My goodness, Tristan!<br />
<br />
How could you talk about a woman in such a disrespectful way?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipMJj03M65sxLouDK4llujlkUCQ5ZyuSXBpaFYyBZFd_9yMQmebg3cwLbHjqnLp5m09cXz8D6P2zFEgJR9DhmUcu5nWbR1jQHwKMR14ZsWMbcMlQPktq8-KNYKWRXaOkMuGlDs1JpQMlo2/s1600/tumblr_mrz1fvIDC21rodtxdo9_r1_250.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="202" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipMJj03M65sxLouDK4llujlkUCQ5ZyuSXBpaFYyBZFd_9yMQmebg3cwLbHjqnLp5m09cXz8D6P2zFEgJR9DhmUcu5nWbR1jQHwKMR14ZsWMbcMlQPktq8-KNYKWRXaOkMuGlDs1JpQMlo2/s320/tumblr_mrz1fvIDC21rodtxdo9_r1_250.gif" width="320" /></a>That is not how Nice Guys™ talk about women! Nice Guys™ know that women
are delicate creatures whose sexuality must be respected. For her to
lower herself to a man’s level and have sex with him indicates that a
Nice Guy™ must worship her body, mind and spirit as the precious jewels
which they so obviously are…<br />
<br />
And how come women still find your character so sexy, Tristan? How can you suggest taking that nubile young woman and <i>fucking</i> her rather than “being” with her? I wonder how many women in the theatre smirked when they heard that line… <i>"I'd recommend fucking</i>."?<br />
<br />
What’s up with that?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha4b-qCUyKbIM1UazHhdojKSj-bQRanD21_t6vN8UhTZkFtPXzU2x0P8jBwOA04LdM-f680naYNf6ihZVTxoiKBs7Xqwmw1PyHBIgRVdIt1T1jY7KTN90drm5GU9yXyBSV1PW82-cD9Tdn/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Susannah+Watching+Tristan+-+GIF.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="217" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha4b-qCUyKbIM1UazHhdojKSj-bQRanD21_t6vN8UhTZkFtPXzU2x0P8jBwOA04LdM-f680naYNf6ihZVTxoiKBs7Xqwmw1PyHBIgRVdIt1T1jY7KTN90drm5GU9yXyBSV1PW82-cD9Tdn/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Susannah+Watching+Tristan+-+GIF.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgc2xEKauJ6eneJx2-ylHuLpkbxjiGokqnAswNLq3JijDj13rzeXjYZwcIh5ExXoPqq6iXS3qM6D9CbI4g1lEeJE3dKlKEBZrhxyFMqPOKH0xtUjz8pDwbJs62jqFjB7zaFSsLSoxNRMELK/s1600/40a.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="171" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgc2xEKauJ6eneJx2-ylHuLpkbxjiGokqnAswNLq3JijDj13rzeXjYZwcIh5ExXoPqq6iXS3qM6D9CbI4g1lEeJE3dKlKEBZrhxyFMqPOKH0xtUjz8pDwbJs62jqFjB7zaFSsLSoxNRMELK/s1600/40a.jpg" width="200" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
And to the readers of this fine blog who thought those lines were humor
directed at the males in the audience, I encourage you to unplug from
the fematrix and realign your mind with notion that the above scene, <i>including</i> the raw language, was in the movie <i>solely</i> for the women, with the intention of creating a character which females desire.<br />
.
<br />
<div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5177370340289040722" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgnGW596D6qir5rtPLY303DHItbU05mMAXyz7tZTrPJF49x22Eb8MCQ5zXIpCb4uQNfUWYUYX7V13P9fxvHwMurz0IHSWdKsB74pGcTrxks1PslicPfVoA0YuI35URI_l4jkWKP3c5ZPc/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Male and Female: Equal but Different"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Society would have us believe that it is the men in society that are sex
obsessed. Men are the ones who cannot control themselves. But remember, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">in the last section</a>
we discussed that men and women are polar opposites who are necessarily
equal but different, and thus women’s sex drives are also equal to
men’s, but different. </div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
While men may think about the act of sex on a frequent basis, women
equally think about being sexy to a similar degree. They actively put on
make-up, do their hair, wear push up bras and revealing clothes, and
they are continually concerned if their jeans make their ass look big
(no, your big ass makes your ass look big). The obvious motive of
“looking sexy” is to attract sexual attention. What did you think it was
for?<br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgha_5nVgITDEqw8slYMJ9AuGAwjagUez8L5xqKpIerTf54hyphenhyphen5ayWGRmgHrsw9eLWfkMxdG6MXcNiHPgjrjyYUMvsaD7Q_dWQIhpV0auYrvYuX_EsTUJXEZd_z47zchtDxdwVoH73znxT72/s1600/tumblr_mrz1fvIDC21rodtxdo7_r2_250.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="251" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgha_5nVgITDEqw8slYMJ9AuGAwjagUez8L5xqKpIerTf54hyphenhyphen5ayWGRmgHrsw9eLWfkMxdG6MXcNiHPgjrjyYUMvsaD7Q_dWQIhpV0auYrvYuX_EsTUJXEZd_z47zchtDxdwVoH73znxT72/s1600/tumblr_mrz1fvIDC21rodtxdo7_r2_250.gif" width="400" /></a>Women’s natural sexual desire, however, is to have sex with a male who
is dominant over them. They don’t want to sleep with a Nice Guy™ who
respects them; there is no excitement in that. They want a man who takes
control of them and fucks them. “Making love” is for suckers. Wimps
“make love” and talk about “being” with the glorious creature known as
woman. Women would rather be dominated and get fucked.<br />
<br />
We men rarely talk about sex, however. Men behave completely opposite of
women, who talk amongst themselves about the most intimate details of
the sex act, from their partner’s physical attributes and performance to
the daily ins and outs of their relationships. Men, on the other hand,
rarely discuss the actual details of sex nor do men relate the turgid
tale of the “mating dance” which got them into their sorry predicament
with a woman in the first place.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EKAr2sk4AQY/VHTKjVz4jXI/AAAAAAAAlpY/IrjrQqMP94I/s1600/24203-julia-ormond-nude-sexy-scene-1.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EKAr2sk4AQY/VHTKjVz4jXI/AAAAAAAAlpY/IrjrQqMP94I/s400/24203-julia-ormond-nude-sexy-scene-1.jpg" width="400" /></a>But women never shy away from talking about sex. Men fail themselves
miserably by allowing feminists to dominate all talk about sexual
relations between humans.<br />
<br />
Feminists, in their attempt to destroy civilization, have tried to take
this natural sexual phenomenon of women being attracted to domination
and twisted it into something which it is not. They have insinuated
there is something evil about the natural sexual interactions between
man and woman.<br />
<br />
One wonders how many of my good readers have ever picked up a romance
novel. Not many, I would guess, as this genre of literature is aimed
solely at a female audience. Romance novels are to women what Penthouse
magazine is to men: Pornography intent on titillating the natural
sexuality that exists within.<br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiI2PCk-kzxr7PxgEE7no1xt4XtpgDDLm-V5kVnmtKRbbqaizufo-KfH35pGZmm60WdO9ju3iiBa7R8Np5QL2NjrNdGyeil30EaqXzFoDqRNJdIk6QAbnFLpQIdi_PUfCLWlgSV7o8Wd1fB/s1600/Fifty-Shades-of-Grey-Film-t_720x1080.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiI2PCk-kzxr7PxgEE7no1xt4XtpgDDLm-V5kVnmtKRbbqaizufo-KfH35pGZmm60WdO9ju3iiBa7R8Np5QL2NjrNdGyeil30EaqXzFoDqRNJdIk6QAbnFLpQIdi_PUfCLWlgSV7o8Wd1fB/s400/Fifty-Shades-of-Grey-Film-t_720x1080.jpg" width="266" /></a>And who is the stereotypical masculine love object in the romance novels that women read? Well, here’s a clue… he is <i>not</i> a Nice Guy™!<br />
.<br />
No indeed! There is usually a Nice Guy™ somewhere in the story line – he
is the one who gets replaced by the dominant rogue who at first
infuriates the main character with his callousness, while at the same
time intriguing her.<br />
<br />
The plot builds as does the sexual tension between the main character
and the antagonist. He is a brute, an animal… uncontrollable. She is a
lady and does not consort with the likes of him – and yet, something
about his demeanor makes this man linger in her mind even when she is
not in his presence… and that makes her angry at him. She becomes
determined not to give in to the advances of this knave. She is a
princess, after all.<br />
<br />
The Harlequin climax arrives in a scene where the woman finds herself
alone with this bull of a man. There is passion, electricity… he makes
his move… she resists and pushes him away, but he is not willing to back
down so easily. This beast’s sexual desire for our fair maiden roars as
if it were an uncontrollable inferno. He grabs her roughly in his arms.
She feels his raw strength as he pulls her into his muscular chest and
lowers his mouth over hers.<br />
<br />
“No,” she mumbles half-heartedly, “I mustn’t!”<br />
<br />
Our rogue listens not, and continues ravaging our heroine with his lips
when she feels his strong hand cup her breast, causing her nipple to
harden beneath her thin blouse… <br />
<br />
She can resist no more; her own animal desires begin to overcome her
rationality. She gives in and lets this beast take her. Her clothing
comes of quickly and roughly amidst the passionate kisses… she is no
longer in control, the universe has overwhelmed her… she feels his
hardness enter her, penetrating both her body and soul as their passion
develops into a surreal experience that transcends life itself…
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
Yes, this is <i>women's</i> porn!<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" height="225" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Pcsbegp8NYQ/UtA65OsezXI/AAAAAAAAIC8/QPvUW2eETtk/s320/tumblr_lpg7g6f8am1qlx8buo1_500.png" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
.<br />
And in women’s porn, she gets dominated. In fact, by all legal standards
of the modern day, women’s porn involves being sexually assaulted <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/rape-fantasies.html" target="_blank">and then raped</a> by a man who ends up completely owning her entire existence.<br />
<br />
And women buy these books and read them for a sexual thrill – men don’t write this shit, nor do they buy it or read it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">This is the essence of female sexual seduction</a>:
He makes his move… she resists… he doesn’t take no for an answer… she
resists some more… his animal desire for her prevents him from stopping…
she says no again, but this time only half heartedly… he continues, and
she finally gives in and submits, so overwhelmed is she with desire
that things are completely out of her control.<br />
<br />
She gets dominated by a man who is superior to her.<br />
<br />
And notice that the dominate man is not “with” her.<br />
<br />
Nope.<br />
<br />
He fucks her.<br />
<br />
Perhaps this is why <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/Why-Do-Women-Fantasise-About-Rape.htm" target="_blank">the sexual fantasizing of being “forced” to have sex is so popular with women</a>. Being “forced” to have sex is essentially rape, and yet numerous women actually masturbate to the fantasy of this crime.<br />
<br />
Have you ever masturbated to the thought of your car getting stolen?<br />
<br />
The eroticism of being dominated and “forced” is that it allows the
submissive to do things they would not normally do – to come out of
their shell, as it were. She may deny that she is the type of girl who
will willingly do certain kinky things, but if she is being dominated
and is told to do them then she can partake in these deep desires
without having to blame herself for it – she was “forced” to do it,
after all. (This is the essence of most BDSM, btw).<br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxp4EM9i22PfBmvrZxop-BN0p1z2eOR83edPZA4FKyzfchxnfOYKVNRiOgnil1iwLWhMejhH8yx_2SkQKedSMdlN4_OnZLGKxyIMSzyi62eygEd4PjIosqa4uN_whCmEbpxuzLFJD1tvOT/s1600/Spanking76.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="262" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxp4EM9i22PfBmvrZxop-BN0p1z2eOR83edPZA4FKyzfchxnfOYKVNRiOgnil1iwLWhMejhH8yx_2SkQKedSMdlN4_OnZLGKxyIMSzyi62eygEd4PjIosqa4uN_whCmEbpxuzLFJD1tvOT/s1600/Spanking76.gif" width="400" /></a>Another favourite fantasy among women is getting a good spanking from her man.<br />
.<br />
Yes, the amount of ladies that are turned on by the thought of being put
over a man’s knee and having her bare bottom smacked is truly amazing.
And… how dominant of the man and submissive of her.<br />
<br />
All Pick Up Artists (PUA’s) know that women desire to be dominated –
this is the PUA’s entire game. The techniques may vary, but essentially
all successful PUA’s spend their time around a woman establishing
dominance over her.<br />
<br />
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ7lw4mwK04_2zDIP0tnx78Dg97xFnf5aE-LnrK9KebZ2Y2hfC_gG7BJfzG48kFPwjtEsBMkLJp_H0iX2QYAwPWBfaoYm6x6M944_qEycimJXeZ28tqx-D61HnI8miRbLpH3sUPDhF6dZv/s1600/x2_ec38d7d.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ7lw4mwK04_2zDIP0tnx78Dg97xFnf5aE-LnrK9KebZ2Y2hfC_gG7BJfzG48kFPwjtEsBMkLJp_H0iX2QYAwPWBfaoYm6x6M944_qEycimJXeZ28tqx-D61HnI8miRbLpH3sUPDhF6dZv/s200/x2_ec38d7d.jpg" width="235" /></a></div>
The PUA does not monkey around with “respecting” her and glorifying her
with trite comments of her being a “strong woman.” That’s what Nice
Guy’s™ do. The PUA lets a woman know pretty quickly that he wants sex
from her. He is a lover, not a friend. He finds something to tease her
about, putting her down in a fun way, to establish dominance. When they
walk off the dance floor, he puts his hand on the small of her back so
he can gently direct where she walks - taking control of her. He
basically spends his entire “game” displaying that he is superior to her
– be it physically, emotionally, cerebrally or whatever else. The PUA
knows that if she views him as superior to her, he can have her panties
around her ankles in no time.<br />
.</div>
<div>
</div>
In fact, the act of sex itself can be viewed as the ultimate act of dominance and submission between a man and a woman.<br />
<br />
Think about it. What could be more submissive than to be a woman whose
body is penetrated and humped madly until she is left full of a man’s
semen, essentially leaving her “bred.”<br />
. <br />
The sex act itself is domination and submission, and while a man may
find it erotic to look down and see the submissive woman he is screwing,
the equal opposite is that she finds it erotic to look up at the
dominant man who is screwing her. Notice that in the act of sex it is
usually considered to be the man that is “doing” her, rather than the
other way around.<br />
<br />
This is the essence of <i>hypergamy</i>. Hypergamy is basically a desire for dominance from one’s mate.<br />
<br />
Women are definitely hypergamous.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/generalizing-in-politically-correct.html" border="0" height="285" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5177373222212096386" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjh-3Ff9VukxPUybQrbh61ndD-UvEwylbmRLyBQr_3P6EeImfdonOb-vbv-8jVYmxAfN4CqqBCLJeOMCgmKdKRPPX_m6anKrGzE9PYkziSWo2gyF1CpZrSvC4T8vQALhiK8pC4NoteNmpk/s400/bill_hillary_hippies.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Generalizing in a Politically Correct World"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Don’t believe me?<br />
.
<br />
<div>
Have a look at the next 10 couples you meet.<br />
.</div>
<div>
Who is taller, the male or the female? You will notice that females
nearly universally date men that are taller than them. A 5’ 10” woman
will be dating a 6’1” male. A 5’ 6” woman will date a 5’ 8” male. But it
is pretty rare to find the 5’ 10” woman dating the 5’ 8” male.</div>
<div>
<br />
Who makes more money, the male or the female? You will find nearly
universally that the man makes more money than the female. Male lawyers
date female secretaries. Male doctors date female nurses. Male factory
workers date waitresses. This is nearly universal. What is hard to find
is the female doctor dating the male nurse, or the female CEO dating the
struggling male poet. </div>
<div>
. </div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" border="0" height="320" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5177373497090003346" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2MPr05OzyyBI9RgC-SpU_MQWC23JJrwURO3ze2PymZnFbVS-heq3fAPZ_TG3J9n542v8qlLPy8B06OU1t599hyKpGgDGp2gARBHIhdJpYj93aIfYsVM9FRT3wKHBigYc0cTjcTj4CFXg/s400/Princes.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Who is more intelligent, the male or the female? It is pretty common
even for females to admit that they must date men who are smarter than
themselves.<br />
. <br />
Why do women nearly universally list confidence as a sexually attractive
trait in a male? Because confident males are dominant males, that’s
why. Confidence is derived from the <i>power</i> one possesses.<br />
<br />
Females are <i>naturally</i> attracted to males that are dominant over them.<br />
<br />
Feminists are furious at this <i>natural</i> phenomenon in much the same
way they are furious that women are the natural bearers of children.
From their anger against heterosexuality, they've attacked <i>both</i> men and women by trying to criminalize human sexual behaviour, telling women the kind of sex they naturally desire, the
kind women themselves read and fantasize about it in Harlequin romance
novels, is in fact rape: <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggDW92K4e2HFqv4DVTNbZHIxvE86JZ8bfnSuL8-4VUcpZK1im8CHER827kWX91tOxv3-OCFBoygVZYPVPssWruPqp_KzcCWGESr4naxeSnkxQHsyLc20XIW2JMtipmWcbG0HGm9taFlLU/s1600/slide.001(1).jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="210" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5508995256970138914" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggDW92K4e2HFqv4DVTNbZHIxvE86JZ8bfnSuL8-4VUcpZK1im8CHER827kWX91tOxv3-OCFBoygVZYPVPssWruPqp_KzcCWGESr4naxeSnkxQHsyLc20XIW2JMtipmWcbG0HGm9taFlLU/s320/slide.001(1).jpg" style="display: block; height: 263px; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 400px;" width="320" /></a><b>“Compare victims’ reports of rape with women’s reports of sex. They
look a lot alike… [T]he major distinction between intercourse (normal)
and rape (abnormal) is that the normal happens so often that one cannot
get anyone to see anything wrong with it.” </b>– Catharine MacKinnon,
quoted in Christina Hoff Sommers, “Hard Line Feminists Guilty of
Ms.-Representation,” Wall Street Journal, November 7, 1991.<br />
<br />
<b>“And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average
dominant heterosexual [male], it may be mainly a quantitative
difference.” </b>– Susan Griffith, <i>Rape: The All-American Crime </i><br />
<br />
Without the typically virulent feminist anger, the following concept
could easily be described in an erotic way, suitable for a romance
novel:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBqMyJGriUWJEcBye-4uPZkr9tAORDRNJNSwMjKfB22ib5gOLcstRPlA-BtEhRT8U6S6KENG0EsNc0PkXVnRa79JrrOzzTsRRnB5cPPvBAuwQiDoAYV4-4EuTXhvTfX1AXfUxZq4zdWDFw/s1600/Intercourse.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="316" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBqMyJGriUWJEcBye-4uPZkr9tAORDRNJNSwMjKfB22ib5gOLcstRPlA-BtEhRT8U6S6KENG0EsNc0PkXVnRa79JrrOzzTsRRnB5cPPvBAuwQiDoAYV4-4EuTXhvTfX1AXfUxZq4zdWDFw/s1600/Intercourse.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<b>“Men’s sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they
can ‘reach WITHIN women to fuck/construct us from the inside out.’
Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires
women’s own. A woman who has sex, therefore, does so against her own
will. , ‘even if she does not feel forced.’” </b>– Judith Levine, (explicating comment profiling prevailing misandry.)<br />
<br />
Even the dominating act of a man filling a woman with his semen, the
very act that causes life itself, is sought to be criminalized and
degraded by feminists:<br />
. <br />
<b>“Women are kept, maintained and contained through terror, violence and the spray of semen…”</b> – Cheryl Clarke, “Lesbianism, An Act of Resistance,” in This Bridge Called My Back: Writing By Radical Women of Color<br />
<br />
How odd then that most women seem to downright prefer to have bareback
sex. Why, it is as if they actually enjoy getting this terrifying semen
inside their bodies!<br />
<br />
Yes indeed. And when a woman actually has good, enjoyable sex – the kind
that grips her body with a shuddering orgasm - this is apparently a bad
thing according to feminists as well:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMtlJHkzcMBtSdqrphgZdouiYp6M3lj7lmscV0t-OgbkgCp8yH95IRZkXnG_34dfA95hjhLrzff_xEfOzzvXgaFwWc0rQkN9XofFmtZAXUChdysj4KJyKrJNpDx4PlI3Mb8JRhgTMyxms4/s1600/Mila+Kunis+Orgasm.gif" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="248" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMtlJHkzcMBtSdqrphgZdouiYp6M3lj7lmscV0t-OgbkgCp8yH95IRZkXnG_34dfA95hjhLrzff_xEfOzzvXgaFwWc0rQkN9XofFmtZAXUChdysj4KJyKrJNpDx4PlI3Mb8JRhgTMyxms4/s1600/Mila+Kunis+Orgasm.gif" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">"Right there... oh yeah, just like that... Oh! OH! OOH! The Oppression!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>“When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression.” </b>– Sheila Jeffrys<br />
<br />
Perhaps she is eroticizing her own “oppression” because it is what
naturally gets her rocks off. Why is it chic and cool to keep a vibrator
in the nightstand, but “oppressive” and degrading to orgasm from the
natural act of sex?<br />
<br />
Men did not plant this idea in women’s head that they must be
submissive. In fact, since most men are beta-male Nice Guys™ who talk
and act respectfully to women while never getting laid by them, it is
pretty obvious that it is not men who are responsible for this
phenomenon of domination-submission that causes women to get turned on.
Most Nice Guys™ believe the exact opposite – that if he glorifies and
praises her, she will like him more. Wrong!<br />
<br />
No, men did not “force” women into submission – women <i>naturally</i>
desire men who are better than them. They want men who are taller than
them, who are smarter than them, who are richer than them. Women
sexually desire men who are more powerful than them – and this power
naturally exudes from a man who possesses it in the form of <i>confidence. </i><br />
<br />
Yes, hypergamy.<br />
<br />
This does <i>not</i> mean that <i>all</i> men make more money than women, nor that <i>all</i>
men are smarter or more powerful than women… it just means that a woman
does not find men who have failed to surpass her own power to be
sexually attractive to her. A 5’10” woman is obviously taller than a
5’8” man, but the odds are that she is not sleeping with short stuff.
She is most likely sleeping with the 6’1” man that lives next door to
him while the short man is likely dating a woman even shorter than
himself.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO3FDC0zhBqk-4PMves1jSonJa13RwijxS-zA8uy3bJk3ZL97Y43CuYstD1gxuvUxIh3vNrA9Vjl7y-0pGfOml7Jp_42PaH4fDKmH1G_rn4Pga7cJS-AfIqZrgfy-0NnJnM7guPxbl6IY/s1600/Spank+Me.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="157" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO3FDC0zhBqk-4PMves1jSonJa13RwijxS-zA8uy3bJk3ZL97Y43CuYstD1gxuvUxIh3vNrA9Vjl7y-0pGfOml7Jp_42PaH4fDKmH1G_rn4Pga7cJS-AfIqZrgfy-0NnJnM7guPxbl6IY/s1600/Spank+Me.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
Dominance has an equal opposite: Submission.<br />
<br />
In my next post, I will attempt to explain how hypergamy existed in the
past, and how it has been manipulated in the present as a weapon against
men, women and civilization.<br />
<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / </b></span><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Next</b></span> </a></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. <br />
<div>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<b>"It is almost a tertiary sexual
character of the male, and certainly it acts on the female as such, that she
expects from him the interpretation and illumination of her thoughts. It is
from this reason that so many girls say that they could only marry, or, at
least, only love a man who was cleverer than themselves; that they would be
repelled by a man who said that all they thought was right, and did not know
better than they did. <i>In short, the woman makes it a criterion of manliness
that the man should be superior to herself mentally, that she should be
influenced and dominated by the man; and this in itself is enough to ridicule
all ideas of sexual equality."</i></b> -- Otto Weininger, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">Sex and Character</a>, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfc" target="_blank">Male and Female Characteristics </a></div>
..http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-42876326554634308262015-03-11T20:15:00.000-07:002015-04-21T05:37:05.586-07:00Love is for Suckers... Blood Suckers.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyCf3civIx8xa67vN8ShlBBjfYBz0-PZ5FiMR8V9ftYab-t2xGXulDc_ug5oNW2SGvJGaWxt0uSK3poohwuh6_LaOIw3qZSBcHQPhQTcN7Pkwtzi0e9EgSvVX0LADmXgYtor4wcMnnar0/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" height="333" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182032441299058226" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">In the last section,</a> we discussed the phenomenon of women possessing equal sex drives to men, yet different by virtue of being <i>hypergamous.</i> <br />
<br />
The essence of hypergamy is that women are attracted to males who are dominant over them. Dominant males are Alpha males.<br />
<br />
But what is it really that “makes” an Alpha male? <br />
<br />
Is one “naturally” an Alpha male or does the Alpha male come into existence because of the sum of certain Alpha <i>qualities</i> that he possesses? <br />
<br />
I believe the answer is obvious. It is the nature of certain qualities,
or features that are Alpha related, which together add up to create an
Alpha male. Not all males who are strong and muscular are Alpha males
just because of that one feature they possess. In fact, some body
builders are the wimpiest mangina Beta males I have ever met. They
couldn’t get a woman naked if their life depended on it.<br />
<br />
All males possess both Alpha and Beta qualities. The more Alpha
qualities, the more overall Alpha-like that male becomes. The less Alpha
qualities, the more Beta-like he becomes. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiwM_DX4M4pQ2iXKW3ZIVnRVHsZWc8TQBZzae7D8t5DCtxEx1d-4boENFdx_3WiGJB2izB7Pl3wvLns84MN_VS-NxVzxCv2hRgTDjr3M5tEC1FSTzx3gu6qq-R_T8pH895eOSsrAHTZGz0/s1600/showposter.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragetts versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Often when it is discussed why males of the past were placed in
positions of headship in the family and society, we declare that it’s
because of men’s linear thinking ability. That his natural appeal to
reason and rationality makes him better suited for these positions as
opposed to women, whose multi-tasking brains are based more on emotion
than cold, hard logic. <br />
<br />
I don’t disagree with that assumption. However, I would like to propose
that there could also be a further motive for such a divide in gender
roles. <br />
<br />
Perhaps society was also structured in such a way to create more “Alpha
qualities” amongst the greater population of males, thus making a
greater range of the male population <i>sexually attractive </i>to the females. <br />
<br />
With mainly men in the workplace earning money instead of women, a
broader spectrum of the male population would appeal to females because
of the Alpha quality of money/resources they would possess. <br />
<br />
With mainly men in positions of power in society (government etc.), more
men would appeal to women’s sexual desires because of the power they
possessed. <br />
<br />
Who was it that said “Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.”? <br />
<br />
Why, it was Henry Kissinger. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7n8ipwNe_QO-1qfnz2sU4xdTs-hyMng5x4iiusp14-oGmJ4OcN1QUUypErQ7_hH3eyWLmZDBT38GqhLUn4mLIvlVK2EDq26xh0fS2YQ_KFpXjmkIdNnSF9Rl6CFun-_5wql8XihUPzRk/s1600/Copy+of+Henry_Kissinger.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7n8ipwNe_QO-1qfnz2sU4xdTs-hyMng5x4iiusp14-oGmJ4OcN1QUUypErQ7_hH3eyWLmZDBT38GqhLUn4mLIvlVK2EDq26xh0fS2YQ_KFpXjmkIdNnSF9Rl6CFun-_5wql8XihUPzRk/s400/Copy+of+Henry_Kissinger.jpg" height="210" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182033253047877186" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="400" /></a>Now I’m not sure, but somehow I don’t think that Kissinger is
particularly the type of man that could be considered classically
handsome. <br />
<br />
And yet, he managed to nail uber-fembot, Gloria Steinem.<br />
<br />
Poor little Ms. Steinem, despite all that pink slipper stomping, she was
still a slave to her biology. Ain’t Mother Nature a bitch?<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHlo5MSmsvbVzn4NRAlVdCLMxpGHL0UgoxiRSIuOaFsCqZbHVNXzT1j7hytwtGJLiOqcdoaeN_-uqAJ01cVTbqJfYZwXsRKrJNldQQCF8Kb8fUbXMkRRP2yU7pLMNCd-t1SH-BRHYTdD8/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182033759854018130" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Rotating Polyandry - And Its Enforcers" -- by F. Roger Devlin</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
You see, there is not much genetic diversity in the natural herd-like
system which works with women only humping the 20% of males that are
Alphas. There is plenty of diversity from the male side of the equation,
but little diversity from the female’s side.<br />
<br />
It seems that women’s sexual nature has compensated for this by use of <a href="http://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf">Rotating Polyandry,</a>
whereby women skip from Alpha male to Alpha male, ensuring that their
lifetime supply of 400 eggs get fertilized not by just one male but
several, in a rotating mating cycle. <br />
<br />
Rotating Polyandry is an interesting concept whereby the whole notion of
“love” is based on a mating cycle of a few years – enough for a woman
to be protected and provided for during the time when she is absolutely
the most vulnerable. This period would be when she gets pregnant, gives
birth, recuperates, and then nurses and cares for the child until it is
no longer solely dependent on her for survival. (I.e. The child can
walk, talk, and feed itself). This should all take around 4 years or so
from start to finish.* (See study at the bottom of this article).<br />
<br />
Then she moves on to the next male and repeats the process. (Sound
familiar?) By going to the next male, she would ensure some genetic
diversity amongst her offspring and thereby, increase her chances of
passing on her genes throughout the ages. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGik9snnOQkrK1eTJvg-q8dzzBCffdzXAkUkSKaIE84BZjWjhv9Z4DFjnBH6s2uE4Nh7ONx_apYnMkZrFU29TIXCLFlGH6SDnQoSjU45RA1tQQf6j_z1KUmn0YaZUyWcR-RtksV5iUU4I/s1600/remoras-and-sharks.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGik9snnOQkrK1eTJvg-q8dzzBCffdzXAkUkSKaIE84BZjWjhv9Z4DFjnBH6s2uE4Nh7ONx_apYnMkZrFU29TIXCLFlGH6SDnQoSjU45RA1tQQf6j_z1KUmn0YaZUyWcR-RtksV5iUU4I/s1600/remoras-and-sharks.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a>In fact, the whole way that love works seems to support this theory. Love to men is based on what he <i>gives</i>. Love to women is based on what she <i>gets</i>. Plus, it has been noted many times that women don’t really love men. Only gay men love men. Rather, women love being <i>loved.</i>
And since, to a woman, being loved means that she “gets,” it is fair to
say that women actually love money and the trinkets that being in love
gets them. <br />
<br />
Women’s love is parasitic. <br />
<br />
Men’s love is the host. <br />
<br />
And this would make sense. If women’s love is based on this parasitic
function to ensure her and the child’s survival, she would seek out the
male with the <i>most</i> power and the <i>most</i> resources. Males with these qualities are Alpha males. They are the prime targets for a woman to wish to be “in love” with. <br />
<br />
But anyway, back to the main point of why there might have been a sexual
reason for placing men in a position of headship in society and the
family. <br />
<br />
These positions that men have traditionally held, those of wealth
creation, of positions of power in society, that of the “head” of the
family and so on, are all positions that naturally add to the Alpha
qualities of males – all males. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiANS1uHCSPHdkLu2DNfZOD_ZsOfh3Ypa0py9JfGz6fN2gJgbz-IbBcN1cm8mYI1vc1JZFQQLxA25ADZ7eO2xSdABl9rCwCEpDkwfoStct3V-jEzptzladTka-Q4n7WKK2k0BmkDXVi03A/s1600/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+ofa+cart0afa03b.JPG" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiANS1uHCSPHdkLu2DNfZOD_ZsOfh3Ypa0py9JfGz6fN2gJgbz-IbBcN1cm8mYI1vc1JZFQQLxA25ADZ7eO2xSdABl9rCwCEpDkwfoStct3V-jEzptzladTka-Q4n7WKK2k0BmkDXVi03A/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+ofa+cart0afa03b.JPG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182034116336303714" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>Thus, with more males possessing Alpha qualities through their societal
role of headship, there are more males for the females to be sexually
attracted to. <br />
. <br />
Once this is accomplished, we achieve our genetic diversity amongst the
population by bringing more of the males directly into the breeding
process, rather than relying on women’s tendency for Rotating Polyandry.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRwF3AL3GSrc_wQhzx2-GNB3EIL0CDWj1KXW-VNxfrojepaHACJoHLkENAOmM0TMYTI8J4Gl8awwHIDGWLdQU9qg9EMNIj43wc1uzcjcxWUnjvMPt1-PIluOve70dmGMVWOUB5NoMN0NU/s1600/ccca.JPG" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRwF3AL3GSrc_wQhzx2-GNB3EIL0CDWj1KXW-VNxfrojepaHACJoHLkENAOmM0TMYTI8J4Gl8awwHIDGWLdQU9qg9EMNIj43wc1uzcjcxWUnjvMPt1-PIluOve70dmGMVWOUB5NoMN0NU/s400/ccca.JPG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182034657502183026" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>What this model does is it brings more of the males in society into
marriage by providing more females who are sexually interested in them,
and therefore more men in society also have children that are their own
and become motivated to work. <br />
<br />
Once men have their own children, men willingly become yoked to them and
will do whatever it takes to ensure their survival. This is what Daniel
Amneus calls “putting sex to work” in his free online book, <a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank">The Case for Father Custody</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN9J_LSYOuhkbMLhx_E7oDfcx0-JIYieerP8SM2W1-R6Dbsk6J-YauXJOwMOjc8I1aXwWGz7m7rbhssMhZhqcmyxctbDffGXPX1S4RCjHQqegya5fLW5BfEAqMaHs6_V6FFGoVZdjK65k/s1600/e9bf.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN9J_LSYOuhkbMLhx_E7oDfcx0-JIYieerP8SM2W1-R6Dbsk6J-YauXJOwMOjc8I1aXwWGz7m7rbhssMhZhqcmyxctbDffGXPX1S4RCjHQqegya5fLW5BfEAqMaHs6_V6FFGoVZdjK65k/s400/e9bf.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182035061229108866" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>With male headship in society and the family, more females are attracted
to more males and therefore more males get put to work.<br />
<br />
And, of course, due to the male’s<br />
linear thinking brain, which invented
everything around you with more than two moving parts, when all of the
men in society start working and inventing and so on, sooner or later
you will wind up with that great thing we call civilization. <br />
. <br />
Now, let’s go back to the concept of Rotating Polyandry and the parasitic nature of women’s sexuality. <br />
<br />
Women’s sexuality is designed to take resources from the male in order that she and her child might survive. <br />
<br />
Men’s “Alpha qualities” are based on his power and resources. <br />
<br />
The more that a man gives to a woman, the less he has himself. In a
sense, he gives his Alpha qualities to the woman and in doing so he
becomes more Beta. Slowly on, his Beta qualities will overcome his Alpha
qualities and the woman will find him less desirable compared to other
males out there who haven’t had the Alpha sucked out of them yet. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjVe8-sqVPcSeffW8LixWmvxV-kpelji7s7FokpNxOF1zsvs61xhIsAZEh8kUXRIDLqfP6v3Ia2Yrhq8mpUdNnEuT0k3gm6_5ymorfnuJb6IWhw4UNUfptMVQs0U3DMKbV4QKve1I-Qgg/s1600/bride.jpg" height="281" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Amazon Women (The Science of Why Males Exist)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
We see this phenomenon over and over again. Women are complete sex fiends while dating a man, then after marriage she becomes less interested in sex... Why?<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZZXwMAcTlOhoZsTUu2ufhtDUK_MDMXvJhR-n-vxbEvK_z_AM5uOzI2Zfd3U_JYSEbFOvPm0phZnUe57zPRirXOiuV4nteDuYcxqg3huJiiX5r2BMqfgm4T-KfZu0U0aPmHhG29od14i4/s1600/Nosex.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "You're Such a Tool!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Because she's now in possession of many of his Alpha
qualities. They were transferred to her via marriage. His paycheck becomes her equal possession whereas before marriage, this
resource was his alone. His ability to leave is gone, leaving him less negotiating power when she's being shrewish. It goes
on and on.<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy56yXgTOvq3wD0fwxCAnK1IqTfFVplpQ6Z8LRxOWfmIUMAPCfNxT9AzZh7x31DaOrADU5GXb5j5CwVGHXbOjhD28E-KH6kmnw9za1HnZ7xQLt6Xo0cZvy2YuYSeEiP9zE759xPXlsGQ0/s1600/Woman+getting+spanked.jpg" height="302" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
With men in positions of headship in society and the family however,
there are certain elements of his Alpha qualities that the woman cannot
suck out of him. No matter what, he will still be the breadwinner, he
will still be the one with power in society and he will still be the
dominant figure within the home. Certain parts of a man’s Alpha
qualities were protected from being gobbled up by the woman. <br />
<br />
Therefore, he still remains more Alpha in the woman’s eyes and thus her
sexual attraction for him remains greater. This would enable the
relationship to endure longer than it would naturally and this is
something that is needed for the full potential of the “putting sex to
work” concept to be realized. <br />
<br />
With the runaway feminism we see in the modern day, this destruction of men’s Alpha qualities is even further magnified. <br />
<br />
A woman earning $60,000/yr does not find a man earning $50,000/yr to possess an Alpha quality because of it. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAngQqFQWog4HGqXzBuQQV7vUqCs269JnwsDw5ShPfUlS8mje7rjZiFBMi7G3sYTP4JwG5NCoh3aiLbLw5eQ3TYK8kae-NqJIF3YZM2eqeaU5uUw7b2nLI0uZgY7h9SgQ4mK4vdYho_5Y/s1600/Go_to_Jail.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAngQqFQWog4HGqXzBuQQV7vUqCs269JnwsDw5ShPfUlS8mje7rjZiFBMi7G3sYTP4JwG5NCoh3aiLbLw5eQ3TYK8kae-NqJIF3YZM2eqeaU5uUw7b2nLI0uZgY7h9SgQ4mK4vdYho_5Y/s1600/Go_to_Jail.jpg" height="175" width="320" /></a>With the full force of the corrupted DV Industry behind her, the wife's
manipulation of State force far exceeds any physical dominance he
previously had. In fact, <i>she</i> is the physically dominant one
within this paradigm because State force allows her to push, kick, yell,
scream, threaten and intimidate with impunity. He must meekly cower and
accept it or the State will come in and beat the crap out of him on her
behalf. There is nothing too Alpha in regard to the man in this
situation at all. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqaW-9crt1GmLNdzf23yrkAa7kXEdEhOKzp8IDKS9Q1s6svX-yF5PSXD0ZUerMyi0O8kWXM16NeQxrvxQ6uqCzfK7JKB6audKdiOStzjncD5NyD2VqvfCKSoLDKGfgft7ANboJIreOw74/s1600/broke-monopoly-guy.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqaW-9crt1GmLNdzf23yrkAa7kXEdEhOKzp8IDKS9Q1s6svX-yF5PSXD0ZUerMyi0O8kWXM16NeQxrvxQ6uqCzfK7JKB6audKdiOStzjncD5NyD2VqvfCKSoLDKGfgft7ANboJIreOw74/s1600/broke-monopoly-guy.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
With the Divorce/Alimony/Child Custody Industry behind her, a man’s
paycheck (his resource dominance) becomes hers whether she keeps him
around or not. Another Alpha quality removed from men by feminism and
the State. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/03/fine-art-of-tv-repair.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/03/fine-art-of-tv-repair.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjysgNhLVwBsOUV_dZInu54NGnkSOvFNWJoZQW1MIhMiIP90i7Id_kzrDUJ5HueI2A0yF4ykodWNLe3L3Fe4Kat2xpKfZQiOzmMcIS9FK8n9h41TAMrxRFIUE_FIYzXt04-ATW-k2Xr3TU/s320/3.jpg" height="266" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5042218193770100754" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Fine Art of TV Repair"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
With the television running 24/7 in most homes, even men’s intellectual
dominance is under attack. Remember that most women declare they don’t
find men attractive unless he is smarter than her? Well, the only males
that are portrayed as intelligent on television are single men. Husbands
are portrayed as dumb oafs on TV and women are constantly encouraged to
scorn their husbands as too stupid to do anything right. Let’s not even
get into the subject of D’Oprah Winfrey. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQj_lKbBnknEituZDAlQtOM6q9LyW3pcdVZUviNbSt9NUZUuGuW_bSQRcJIHRA09kZp-hyAB4YyOJZhusWOO2s0yD9zt7cLgK4FUqf4nutWup2sQArRYA-ruJqMVEGwUnDf00UPObBj-s/s320/Dr+Phil.JPG" height="320" width="224" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
In fact, most of the Psychology and Therapy Industries support this “stupid husband” attack on men as well.
Virtually all couples/marriage therapists attack the husband by
default, declaring that the problems in the marriage are his fault
because he is too stupid to know how to read his wife’s ever changing
emotional state with ESP. She changes her emotional state more times
than her underwear, yet men are somehow stupid for not knowing that what
she wants now is entirely different than what she wanted a half hour
ago. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgI9t_IRfBfGueTEqQD77D7azl0CLUcK99TOYkRI3n3L4Wtz0MNJGOyoh8CQ5nJ3LCio0dnGGtnTLPZrU7UPWRBiVqTzrR4O7LwdN-EjJoOXzAew0CfDPfNtmaXXVNz5-RNxMzuNiNhMYad/s200/nothing-to-see-here-keep-walking.jpg" height="182" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "It's Not Marxism Because..."</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Feminism supports all of this nonsense because <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" target="_blank">they are married to Marxism</a>, which wishes to destroy Capitalism and civilization.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>“Overthrowing Capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole... patriarchy.” </b>-- Gloria Steinem <br />
<br />
They fully well know that destroying marriage will bring us back to this: <br />
. <br />
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWQ_MRyyx9CZwLiHagm77MtX0S9kIGPxFXTacnaUnwOtg13RPejyk0jKZtv6IC7Zsoqi_46wcUJz8qGgjUtKtSk0NWD2f0binHfsz_l5h-W4cvfA41PfdGMbw2wpI5y_KhS2q_RFiLuDM/s400/Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+Copy+of+cart003b.JPG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182036207985376930" style="cursor: hand; display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center;" /> . <br />
And they know that when society adheres to this sexual model, men won’t
be putting “sex to work” and our civilization will return to this: <br />
. <br />
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ76MU2zTzLZ6F-lXAZHl6NG4gQL5uFsPFv_frc1KmqIOgaWuuRJGay1vIWLzsLTatMnHb8dOgsPbF9Rkez_SVY5UmXYud5x_oXeoRBcS5noiX8BlXMhmIBO1WI9ZFSMWZrNXF-c5KWMU/s400/Apache-Grass-Hut.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5182036856525438642" style="cursor: hand; display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center;" />. <br />
But hey, that’s all fine and good - as long as there's gobs of commitment
free sex and women don’t have to feel "oppressed" in any way. <br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-keynesian-sexual-marketplace.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUQSgqb57-eMCdLgcl00yPDOURv3KtOA6DfLNOK5JTihetkFiOLqJ6lgGeDr-9433XSHGU_aHb5iD8qKR6josKusxg_6p3bf7BMv9N7W1iKO_QWGMJ-gA2tskG2WwlytpT-FnWMzRXh-s/s1600/28.jpg" height="320" width="400" /></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Keynesian Sexual Marketplace"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Marriage is already a natural “Beta Maker,” and presents many challenges to men and women’s sexuality.<br />
. <br />
Feminism took these problems and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-family-plot.html" target="_blank">intensified them to the point of the absurd</a>.<br />
. <br />
At least with savages practicing Rotating Polyandry in the past, once
the woman had parasitically sucked all the Alpha qualities out of a man,
the discarded male was at least free from her and could go about
rebuilding his resources and his life again.<br />
. <br />
Not so anymore with Feminism. Nope, now after a man is discarded, the
woman can keep a leech like sucker attached to him via the State, while
she finds another Alpha male to turn into a mere Beta.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html">Next</a></span></b></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
. <br />
<b>"When I started researching this book, I was prepared to rediscover
the old saw that conventional femininity is nurturing and passive and
that masculinity is self-serving, egotistical, and uncaring. But I did
not find this. One of my findings here is that manhood ideologies always
include a criterion of selfless generosity, even to the point of
sacrifice. Again and again we find that 'real' men are those who give
more than they take."</b> -- David Gilmore in his 1990 book <i>Manhood in the Making</i><br />
<i>. </i> <br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<i>.</i><br />
<b>Excerpt from The Handbook Of Evolutionary Psychology (2005)(pages 259-261) edited by David Buss.</b><i> </i><br />
<i>.</i><br />
<i>Comparative primate studies sometimes indicate that humans are
designed for monogamy. Among the monogamous white-handed gibbon
(Hylobates lar), the average body weight of an adult male is about 1,000
times the weight of the average male’s testes (Dixson, 1998). Among
humans, the average man’s body weight is about 1,300 times the size of
the average man’s testes (Schultz, 1938), a ratio similar to the
white-handed gibbon. In contrast, the more short-term-orientated common
chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) possesses extremely large testes with a
body-testes ratio of only 350 (Dixson & Mundy, 1994), and the
polygynous gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) has small testes with a body-testes
ratio of over 5,000 (Hall-Craggs, 1962). Contradictory evidence
regarding mating strategies exists in comparisons of primate seminal
volume, sperm structure, and sperm quality (Baker & Bellis, 1995;
Dixson, 1993; Moller, 1988). Overall, Dixson (1998) concluded that human
male reproductive physiology is consistent with both monogamous and
polygynous mating, providing only mixed support for the view that humans
are monogamous. Humans display extreme levels of altriciality compared
to other primates, requiring large parental investments and possessing
a relatively delayed adolescence (T.M. Mueller, 1999).</i><br />
<i>. </i><br />
<i> </i><i>Mate desertion is generally associated with lower infant
survival in foraging cultures (Hill & Hurtado, 1996), another
indication that humans are designed for monogamy. Finally, humans
possess several neurophysiological systems of attachment linked with
pairbonding and monogamy across species (Fisher, 1998; Hazan &
Zeifman, 1999; Young, 2003). <b>Fisher (1992) suggests that human
patterns of weaning, birth spacing, divorce, and remarriage all point
to a system of serial monogamy. It takes about 4 years to wean a child
in hunter-gatherer cultures, and birth spacing in a foraging
environment averages about 4 years (Blurton Jones 1986). Many divorces
occur between the fourth and sixth year of marriage (Fisher, 1989,
1992),</b> and men who practice serial monogamy are more reproductively
successful than men who stay married to the same woman for a lifetime.
Women who mate serially do not have reproductive advantage over other
women (Buckle, Gallup, & Rodd, 1996). </i><br />
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
. <br />
<u><b>Further Reading:</b></u><br />
.<br />
<a href="http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/science-cant-stop-proving-me-right/" target="_blank">Science Can't Stop Proving Me Right</a> -- Chateau Heartiste <br />
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
..http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-37813916554518213322015-03-11T20:00:00.001-07:002015-08-09T13:05:48.916-07:00The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative TruthAll truth to women is relative. It is men who seek Absolute Truth, or
rather, have a better ability to get closer to the Truth. Women find
truth through the consensus of the herd. If the herd believes 1+1=3,
then it is right because the herd believes it is so. If tomorrow, the
herd believes 1+1=1, then that will be right because the herd believes
it is so. This is why you see women are so much more attuned to changing
fashions and why it is often social proofing that decides for them who
is a sexy and desirable man. What the herd believes is right is the
"truth" for women. It is men who insist that 1+1=2, I don't care how
much you cows moo at me. <br />
<br />
<b>"... Women may have happy ideas, taste, and elegance, but they cannot
attain to the ideal. The difference between men and women is like that
between animals and plants. Men correspond to animals, while women
correspond to plants because their development is more placid and <i>the principle that underlies it is the rather vague unity of feeling.</i> When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy,<i> </i>because <i>women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions.</i> Women are educated--who knows how?" </b>-- G.F. Hegel<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="276" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1gB4leFd5mz0ngkYOkZy-BKNOCVURm_psDnEDwzMamB1eiRySa9akEkVwQEGLj8iTncpCpr8ltGmVv2oRtTTwN0ul4irsGqqFrsVP4h7EAwFFprEySvLocnUVyVA_QfeDW5PzvvHawc4/s400/GardenOfEden-large.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
This is very old and part of the human condition. In fact, the story of
the Garden of Eden is very much about the Absolute Truth being
over-ruled by the Relative Truth of Eve.There was only one rule in the
Garden… DON’T EAT FROM THAT TREE! There was only one truth that Adam
and Eve had to follow… and here is where it gets interesting, because
Eve was <i>deceived</i> but she was not particularly<i> lied</i> to. In fact, the serpent’s assertions are perfectly valid, although very craftily worded:<br />
<br />
- The serpent was right when he says “you will not surely die.” (He was
right, they did not surely die… After being tossed from the Garden,
God offered them a path to salvation and eternal life – if they chose to
follow God’s path).<br />
<div>
<br />
- The serpent was right, when they ate the fruit, their eyes <i>were</i> opened, and they did become like God and gain knowledge of good and evil.</div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYm2sO1vtgZjy6tTeMRrUFl_pxDSpwJIAf0223jv9oJA14YVZf_V06Qlt7zNpWURjD0H0F-TuahCFbkLB8mlC8gLTw_FNAL6Oh5JiYcV7KELgZ4_tXVvxNKezW_5KWiIgqk657w9vtO3r2/s1600/Rationalization+Hamster.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="325" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYm2sO1vtgZjy6tTeMRrUFl_pxDSpwJIAf0223jv9oJA14YVZf_V06Qlt7zNpWURjD0H0F-TuahCFbkLB8mlC8gLTw_FNAL6Oh5JiYcV7KELgZ4_tXVvxNKezW_5KWiIgqk657w9vtO3r2/s400/Rationalization+Hamster.gif" width="400" /></a>And then Eve’s female rationalizing hamster wheel starts churning, mired in Relative Truth.<br />
<br />
<i>“When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and
pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took
some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her,
and he ate it.”</i> </div>
<div>
<br />
Because it was good for food, pleasing to look at, and desirable for
gaining wisdom… Eve rationalized to herself why the Relative Truth <i>which she wished for</i> ought to be able to over-ride the Absolute Truth that existed.<br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Ahem… could placing the Relative Truth we create in our brains over the
Absolute Truth that exists in reality be the “original sin?”<br />
<br />
Also to note here in the Garden story is the difference between men and
women - because Adam, the
mangina, <i>simply went along with her - </i>and this is specifically what God holds him accountable for. </div>
<div>
.</div>
<div>
1 Timothy 2:12-14 RSV <i>“I permit no woman to teach or have authority
over men; she is to keep silent. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a
transgressor.”</i><br />
<br />
Adam <b>was not</b> deceived. He sinned <i>willingly.</i> Eve deceived
herself with her female driven hamster-wheel of a relative-truth laden
brain… but Adam was not deceived at all. He was standing right there
and was not deceived; Eve gave it to him, and <i>he was still without sin at this point</i> but like a mangina eager to please he said, “Sure thing, Toots!” and swallowed ‘er down whole.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5548328743345657842" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuX4ovRjQec1edbRUalB68kOCoOB-xa3efVt0B_DCOv3RjbXcexNmuo2inqJ9wleLCyxHkwZp9OT88AhAU1348v8fRuegYvSwEYoJdNiZj-fs8yRamnMiFovK3U3esZv_pOrdFIZ16LWg/s400/Blah+Blah+Blah.jpg" style="display: block; height: 267px; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 400px;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click PIc for "The Liberation of Men"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Adam sinned <i>willingly</i>, but Eve was deceived.<br />
<br />
To Adam he said, “<i>Because you listened to your wife</i> and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat of it,’… (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank">Man’s Curse</a>)<br />
<br />
It’s pretty clear.<br />
<br />
Between Adam and Eve, God expects a different level of cognition… God expected Adam to “know better” than Eve… <i>because Adam has the capability to know better.</i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s1600/Truth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="262" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s320/Truth.jpg" width="320" /></a>Of all of the things that were in the world during the Garden, the only
thing not directly from God… is Eve. She was created from Adam, who
was created in God’s image. Adam is a copy of God, and Eve is a copy of
Adam… Adam is “one step closer” to God/Absolute Truth than Eve is.<br />
. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
1 - Absolute Truth = God</div>
<div>
2 - Objective Truth = Man = Masculine Principle</div>
<div>
3 - Subjective Truth = Woman = Feminine Principle <br />
. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/09/zenpriest-27-ignoring-women.html" target="_blank">Everywhere in nature, the male is the reproductive servant of the female.</a>
However, while humans are of the animal kingdom, we are not animals.
It was when humans started putting the male principle in front of the
female principle that we stopped living like animals and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">rose up from being beasts of the field.</a><br />
.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Buddhism also acknowledges the way a woman's mind is mired in Relative Truth.<br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqjxT9oB0eXXwX3wiv-ROD79MawkySz3xidOfkpVWmpNlO2i_qAgkw7jl0Dwk6NLAnzQgVsgCelZ0tq4x_ZIcxNdL-5-vaUj_Qe_Flzg182P-Ex1-G5ui0dR6DcqzQS704U0Mkz8A-5ew/s1600/LittleRiver.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="296" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqjxT9oB0eXXwX3wiv-ROD79MawkySz3xidOfkpVWmpNlO2i_qAgkw7jl0Dwk6NLAnzQgVsgCelZ0tq4x_ZIcxNdL-5-vaUj_Qe_Flzg182P-Ex1-G5ui0dR6DcqzQS704U0Mkz8A-5ew/s400/LittleRiver.jpg" width="400" /></a><b>The course of a river and a woman’s mind both wander. Water is
malleable, it turns here and there when rocks and mountains block its
path. Women are like this. They are inconstant as water. Although they
know what is right, when they run into the strong will of a man, they
are checked and turn in bad directions. The right fades like a line
drawn on the water. Women’s nature is unsteady: though they see what
they should be, they soon become what they should not be. Buddhahood is
founded on integrity. Therefore, women, who are easily swayed, cannot
become Buddhas. Women have the “five obstacles” (inability to become
anything great) and <i>the “three followings” (follows first the father, then the husband, then the son).</i>
Thus in one sutra it is written: “Even should the eyes of all the
buddhas of the three worlds fall to the earth, women cannot become
Buddha.” Another text says: “Even if you can capture the clear wind, you
can never capture the mind of a woman.”</b> -- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/buddha-selected-writings-on-women.html" target="_blank">Buddha - from Selected Writings of Nichiren</a><br />
<br />
You can also see how women’s “truth” never really exists by the way they
relate to men sexually. Many men will notice this if they meet up with
an ex-girlfriend after a few years of not seeing her. She is an
entirely different person than who he remembered her as. It is as if the
girl he once knew was completely false and no longer exists.<br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicEmLPVdoBiezkC_ZDLtL_G6TUpMcWIrI7X1h72JsqVzAhpGdk72A1K9IpaMFhcjRtYoh69Au4Wb4SOOvQLIhkrIrBbX_StMnkCWWha7qWG_Hz_Tm1SOPX2qJW8AdqsZspbrI8xZTCXzg/s1600/empty%2520vessel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicEmLPVdoBiezkC_ZDLtL_G6TUpMcWIrI7X1h72JsqVzAhpGdk72A1K9IpaMFhcjRtYoh69Au4Wb4SOOvQLIhkrIrBbX_StMnkCWWha7qWG_Hz_Tm1SOPX2qJW8AdqsZspbrI8xZTCXzg/s320/empty%2520vessel.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Empty Vessels</span></b><br />
.<br />
Men and women are like empty vessels and water – the water conforms itself to the shape of the container holding it. In the same way, a woman conforms herself to the man she is with and takes on his truths, which makes her appear as his ideal mate - that is, until her <a href="http://toqonline.com/archives/v7n2/v7no2_Devlin.pdf" target="_blank">rotating polyandry</a> shifts her to the next man, then she takes on the new guy’s truths and conforms herself to him in the same way. <br />
.<br />
<b>"As a rule, the woman adapts herself to the man, his views become hers, his
likes and dislikes are shared by her, every word he says is an incentive to
her, and the stronger his sexual influence on her the more this is so. Woman
does not perceive that this influence which man has on her causes her to
deviate from the line of her own development; she does not look upon it as a
sort of unwarrantable intrusion; she does not try to shake off what is really
an invasion of her private life; she is not ashamed of being receptive; on the
contrary, she is really pleased when she can be so, and prefers man to mould
her mentally. She rejoices in being dependent, and her expectations from man
resolve themselves into the moment when she may be perfectly passive."</b> -- Otto Weininger, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">Sex and Character</a>, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#nwsu" target="_blank">Woman and Her Significance in the Universe </a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYDwrPc9Fz80OZ2cadsxfdb_mIFCuoaTkMZWMkY_dhj9he6Jwsda9ohuTPmtdxRUtjsTUzwfd6Xz2ynV4L05EVo406O7lW7ewH5r7BW7DHjGQzAzSCGuClGigVYxulu6puKjtsofLZWo0/s1600/glass-of-water.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYDwrPc9Fz80OZ2cadsxfdb_mIFCuoaTkMZWMkY_dhj9he6Jwsda9ohuTPmtdxRUtjsTUzwfd6Xz2ynV4L05EVo406O7lW7ewH5r7BW7DHjGQzAzSCGuClGigVYxulu6puKjtsofLZWo0/s1600/glass-of-water.jpg" width="137" /></a>For example, I’ve known one woman for many years now. When I first met
her, it was through snowmobiling. I was an avid snowmobiler and so was
her boyfriend. She was <i>really</i> into snowmobiling – just loved it… until after four years, she broke up with her boyfriend. She never went sledding again.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhozGAhn7F_M6f7JZ_hSILpngAUojlCOp2mnJHyLiFqV_zWLskjcskRqGDKMv2pO7J6edshTYzbyyzUZlgDdzGh0Jf7dre-Kg3gFPz0BX_HWzPP0y-TxJBVbLdtUaErDnjshbpDqArdi18/s1600/1262_P_1309727203255.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhozGAhn7F_M6f7JZ_hSILpngAUojlCOp2mnJHyLiFqV_zWLskjcskRqGDKMv2pO7J6edshTYzbyyzUZlgDdzGh0Jf7dre-Kg3gFPz0BX_HWzPP0y-TxJBVbLdtUaErDnjshbpDqArdi18/s1600/1262_P_1309727203255.jpg" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhG8pISlBguVqX8ld8Gudy90pLwdVri1jF8u86jMP3Hx0erIrxE1xAeoPQ5zWIhL1u_9MmgjfQqsdlqBjNL6c_aGmlGyRlwCx8jM6F4oMN9qnHyKojUBmtpshSJtwoSXAknjAl2c_dbkOk/s1600/sphere-fish-bowl-with-clean-water-Download-Royalty-free-Vector-File-EPS-55808.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="160" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhG8pISlBguVqX8ld8Gudy90pLwdVri1jF8u86jMP3Hx0erIrxE1xAeoPQ5zWIhL1u_9MmgjfQqsdlqBjNL6c_aGmlGyRlwCx8jM6F4oMN9qnHyKojUBmtpshSJtwoSXAknjAl2c_dbkOk/s1600/sphere-fish-bowl-with-clean-water-Download-Royalty-free-Vector-File-EPS-55808.jpg" width="200" /></a>The next guy she was with though, was <i>really</i> into drag-racing.
She ended up marrying that guy, and really got into drag-racing. In
fact, she ended up becoming the President of the Drag Racing
Association of the town she lived in… until she divorced the guy. Now
she couldn’t care less about drag-racing.<br />
<br />
The guy she is currently with is a sheep farmer and breeds border collies on
the side. Now she has a government job which monitors forage for sheep
farmers, and she is a member of the Border Collie Breeding Association
or something – they travel all around to dog shows etc. and she is <i>really</i> into it.<br />
<br />
<b>That woman is by nature intended to obey is shown by the fact that
every woman who is placed in the unnatural position of absolute
independence at once attaches herself to some kind of man, by whom she
is controlled and governed; this is because she requires a master. If
she, is young, the man is a lover; if she is old, a priest</b>.- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Schopenhauer, On Women</a><br />
<br />
Now, does such a woman actually have a personality of her own? No. She
finds her personality through her man. She has no “truth” of her own –
it is always relative and is always subject to change.<br />
<br />
This is one of the reasons women give men <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">fitness tests/shit tests</a>. They
test him for the strength of his character, and if they find him
suitable they will conform themselves to him. Thus, it is important
for men to know themselves, take a position, and staunchly never budge.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBOkFhZon2uULmNusMMPWAIkBclJKnJjeFNjR4x61RKMevZddTp9ow6XanErn5cOpTjphezWcqDFdGp0nQEev2Vzw8cRSAoKFSKMvOX9ecgpp5xXi9JrW7MEcHpev-E60EnkeuVGS8lnA/s1600/fencing1.gif" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Testing, Testing...1,2,3... Testing"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>XV. Maintain your state control</b><br />
<br />
<b>You are an oak tree. You will not be manipulated by crying, yelling,
lying, head games, sexual withdrawal, jealousy ploys, pity plays, shit
tests, hot/cold/hot/cold, disappearing acts, or guilt trips. She will
rain and thunder all around you and you will shelter her until her
storm passes. She will not drag you into her chaos or uproot you. When
you have mastery over yourself, you will have mastery over her.</b> — <a href="http://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Roissy’s Sixteen Commandments of Poon</a><br />
<br />
The problem comes in when we falsely believe that men and women are
equal, and thus let women “lead us.” They can’t, for they are full of
relative truth – their truth doesn’t exist, not for long anyway. It is
why women resent men so much who don’t take the lead. It may satisfy a
woman’s ego to have her husband grovel before her, but what she <i>needs</i> is for a man to be strong so she can conform herself around him. She needs his “truth” in order to find herself <i>through him.</i><br />
<br />
What’s going on in society is that <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">as a culture we have been failing feminism’s fitness tests</a> and have become weak men. <br />
<br />
A man should also never be afraid to lose a woman for once you are in that position, she is the leader and he is the follower.
If as a culture we are failing feminism's cultural shit tests, the
solution is to follow the Male Principle and say, "See ya toots!"<br />
<br />
Women are as independent as a tropical fern in a greenhouse in Iceland.<br />
<br />
If the men “leave” the women will follow, because female “independence” is an illusion.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. <br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<b>"</b><b>The most decisive proof for the correctness of the view that attributes henids
to woman and differentiated thoughts to man, and that sees in this a
fundamental sexual distinction, lies in the fact that wherever a new judgment
is to be made, (not merely something already settled to be put into proverbial
form) <i>it is always the case that the female expects from man the clarification
of her data, the interpretation of her henids</i>. It is almost a tertiary sexual
character of the male, and certainly it acts on the female as such, that she
expects from him the interpretation and illumination of her thoughts. It is
from this reason that so many girls say that they could only marry, or, at
least, only love a man who was cleverer than themselves; that they would be
repelled by a man who said that all they thought was right, and did not know
better than they did. <i>In short, the woman makes it a criterion of manliness
that the man should be superior to herself mentally, that she should be
influenced and dominated by the man; and this in itself is enough to ridicule
all ideas of sexual equality."</i></b> -- Otto Weininger, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html" target="_blank">Sex and Character</a>, <a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfc" target="_blank">Male and Female Characteristics </a><br />
.<br />
<b>“The woman follows the man. In her youth she follows her father and
elder brother; when married, she follows her husband; when her husband
is dead, she follows her son.” – </b>Confucius<br />
.
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-f0YX5MXhTUk%2FVRu3U-uzouI%2FAAAAAAAAD_c%2FVpPio3h7zBo%2Fs1600%2Fglass-of-water.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYDwrPc9Fz80OZ2cadsxfdb_mIFCuoaTkMZWMkY_dhj9he6Jwsda9ohuTPmtdxRUtjsTUzwfd6Xz2ynV4L05EVo406O7lW7ewH5r7BW7DHjGQzAzSCGuClGigVYxulu6puKjtsofLZWo0/s1600/glass-of-water.jpg" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-74593182937169916502015-03-11T19:30:00.001-07:002015-08-09T13:08:26.471-07:00The Myth of Tiresias and the Ten Pleasures of Sex.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzhO39qrtb-L2BkgP3j5dxls3uJUuq6c00sBZW8fUAUeJh0PY1DyQlxyUp2wKyzstfnpwdmqWSMljD-zbVUsOgKel-cv2kPGNJMkDMTRqql0Aii1Sf73oBrlaGp9Hj4DspSPfXpK_J_4u4/s1600/tiresias.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="315" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzhO39qrtb-L2BkgP3j5dxls3uJUuq6c00sBZW8fUAUeJh0PY1DyQlxyUp2wKyzstfnpwdmqWSMljD-zbVUsOgKel-cv2kPGNJMkDMTRqql0Aii1Sf73oBrlaGp9Hj4DspSPfXpK_J_4u4/s320/tiresias.jpg" width="400" /></a><i>Tiresias was a blind prophet of Thebes who told the truth about the
past, present and future, although those for whom he prophesied rarely
took what he said seriously. Aside from his clairvoyant powers, Tiresias
was also famous for being changed into a woman for seven years. </i>
<br />
<i><br />
There are several tellings of the myth of Tiresias, many of them
contradicting each other. The gist of the story is as follows: </i>
<br />
<i><br />
One day, the young Tiresias was walking along a path on Mount Kyllene, in the Peloponnese countryside, when he came
across a pair of serpents engaged in unashamed copulation. Condemning
them for their lust-fulness, he struck them with his walking stick.</i><br />
<i>. </i> <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<i>The
sensuous goddess Hera, wife of Zeus, was angered by Tiresias' actions, as
she heartily approved of sexual pleasures, even for animals. She
punished Tiresias in the worst possible way: by transforming him into a
woman, in both body and mind.</i></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAvApPVksCRaj9Y6kyN_Q1sTwE0YQrNDh_e94NYh5wlK9TQvL3VyVPzrvUzkuN5FvMlzSAMEctcK3pvMFeBVqXDGpJxnxk59q1t9q8HhjkZWwaD9Ov__hab3-GBFZFuLwzZsBJ462EF1bv/s1600/tiresias%252520krauss.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="322" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAvApPVksCRaj9Y6kyN_Q1sTwE0YQrNDh_e94NYh5wlK9TQvL3VyVPzrvUzkuN5FvMlzSAMEctcK3pvMFeBVqXDGpJxnxk59q1t9q8HhjkZWwaD9Ov__hab3-GBFZFuLwzZsBJ462EF1bv/s320/tiresias%252520krauss.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<i>After seven years as a woman,
ranging in roles from prostitute to wife & mother, Tiresias again
came across the serpents, but this time allowed them their carnal
pleasure. Hera was pleased and rewarded Tiresias by restoring his
masculinity.</i><i> </i><br />
<br />
<i>Some time later, Hera and Zeus were arguing about
who had more pleasure in sex, the man or the woman? Hera, the great
seductress, had always led Zeus to believe the man was superior in sex,
as well as in all other things. To settle their disagreement, they
summoned Tiresias, as he knew what it was like to be in both roles. As a
man who spoke the truth, he revealed womankind's greatest secret: on a
scale of ten, she gets nine parts of pleasure to his one. Hera was
furious at Tiresias and, despite Zeus’ protests, she struck him blind for
betraying womankind with the truth.</i><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
. <br />
I have spent the last few days studying and pondering on the story of Tiresias. One of the things I have been trying to find the answer to is what
Tiresias considered "the ten pleasures" (or parts) of sex, of which he
said man enjoys only one, while woman enjoys three times three, or nine
pleasures, although some versions say woman enjoys all ten.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" border="0" height="306" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwUUNF1DHWDXgDX_6Z9ehSl746Og27td3dakyAmOuFFCCKNNVLpIIR_jAtIPtohSShT-BV9Zox2kfi4teNe1MEYRXjk-1HSJm4m3yQQbgwJo6SPuQPpd5UNThNL_s4a7BJ9LJZuywfseM/s1600/He-Man-Woman-Haters-Club1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Truth About Misogyny"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
There seems to be no answer to this question. So far as I can tell,
there is no listing of the pleasures anywhere in the texts, just the
mention that there are ten. When surfing around the web to try and find
the answer, all I see are people claiming that it is literal sexual
orgasmic pleasure.<br />
<br />
Then the modern feminist narrative comes out
claiming that this was all from 'misogynist' Greece where they were
oppressing women. So it is all just nonsense in an attempt by the
Greeks to hold women down - everyone knows men enjoy sex far more than
women.<br />
<br />
But is this true?<br />
<br />
Having a look at the myth itself, we may find a clue.<br />
<br />
The reason
Tiresias is blinded is because he angered Hera for revealing womankind's
greatest secret: that she gains more pleasure from sex than men. Hera,
Zeus' wife and seductress, had led Zeus to believe that he was superior
to her in sex, as well as in all other things - it was part of her
seduction of him. <i>This</i> seems to be the theme that comes forth,
not whether the woman orgasms more than the man.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>"Woman does not betray her secret."</b> -- Immanuel Kant</span> <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" border="0" height="390" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmriPlNZMVgdU8PzLHuAz1NosE21hhDZTYnQYKbP2DZwoqQUGmeJ8yb5eXXLe6T0yBrAYdrFjU8-kWCG43_N87iKAghSFIvZiuX4H6bflFyF43XUx6M6DBmExa98aPSDsokwQ0TrPtf9s/s1600/Make+Me+a+Sandwich.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Social Strategy: Why Men Shouldn't Argue with Women."</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
It seems to me, that
either through subconscious deception or unconscious ignorance, the
women who join in this debate are coming from the same position as Hera
herself - denying that women benefit more from sex than men. "Woman does
not betray her secret" is something that many "misogynist" men
throughout history have pointed out, so, we should not dismiss them
lightly simply because women say we should. That is exactly what Hera,
the priestess of womankind and marriage herself, wanted to happen - and
the reason she was angered at Tiresias was for betraying her with the
truth!<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>"From woman you can learn nothing of women."</b> -- Nietzsche</span> <br />
<br />
What is woman's greatest secret then? And what was it about
sexuality that Tiresias was inferring women enjoyed, if it were not
literal orgasmic pleasure?<br />
<br />
So, I spent some time pondering what the ten pleasures (or
benefits) could be, and here are the things I suspect Tiresias was
referring to:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDCb827P4jCkrNed8QYk64uXooBJ75oAzFbEucUnpxIpdkClGCRGa_IwOZfVBIyUoeqvTs5I7tKHtSrVebS5_QcxWENYqQu1wnAX1PdaSmVD70JChlr_IZo34jcTznxS0xasc8BB0p9vM/s1600/pretty_woman-e1421340803590.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="172" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDCb827P4jCkrNed8QYk64uXooBJ75oAzFbEucUnpxIpdkClGCRGa_IwOZfVBIyUoeqvTs5I7tKHtSrVebS5_QcxWENYqQu1wnAX1PdaSmVD70JChlr_IZo34jcTznxS0xasc8BB0p9vM/s1600/pretty_woman-e1421340803590.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<b>1 -</b> <b>Use of Sex for Survival/Procurement of Goods from the Man</b>
- Even today, 85% of the homeless are men. Women "somehow" manage to
not fall through the cracks as easily as men when they fail at life.
What, oh what, could it possibly be that prevents this from happening to
women in the same degree as men, even though, as feminist academics
continually remind us, "women only receive $0.76 for every $1.00 that a
man earns"? When Tiresias was a woman, he was portrayed as both a
prostitute and as a wife and mother. (More on motherhood later in point
six).<br />
<br />
Also, women gain instant status upon marriage. While a man
has to work for 10-15 years to become a doctor, the woman he marries
instantly becomes part of his social class, no matter her education or
past efforts - which is pretty nice for her, eh? <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8bgZguvvZ_RZXpKmfbg6VEXXhJwcdwCkWEi2cWmrfRuIlKLfGHtLgVXDrg1VG6m1T6lBdULCZixg9bz2keZgZuX0tNq6cdLF1anROaeeQ0PiLEUW6Mtgo0HTXnoq2pmyn6AlqFCVKoiM/s1600/Chastity+Belt.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8bgZguvvZ_RZXpKmfbg6VEXXhJwcdwCkWEi2cWmrfRuIlKLfGHtLgVXDrg1VG6m1T6lBdULCZixg9bz2keZgZuX0tNq6cdLF1anROaeeQ0PiLEUW6Mtgo0HTXnoq2pmyn6AlqFCVKoiM/s1600/Chastity+Belt.jpg" width="187" /></a><b>2 - Sexual Gate-keeper</b> - A woman's sexuality is in demand and she
can easily replace a man - women have "orbiters' or "men in reserve"
who are waiting in the wings, hoping she will call on them - when women
leave a man, there is no shortage of men vying for her attention, trying
to replace the previous man. She plays the passive role, the male is
the motive, or active agent. There is enormous power that is conferred
upon her simply for being in this role. <br />
<br />
<b>3 - Sexual Power to Manipulate Man for Woman's Own Purposes - Power by Proxy - "Let's You and Him Fight"</b><br />
<br />
<b>"<a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-spartan-women-politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">Who cares whether women rule, or if they rule the rulers? The result is the same.</a>"</b>--
Aristotle.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYg4c9f3MCL-4PICm81PhE9mYdMj-GKmubepw_vrQwZiv6Znd_2edKED3A2YkBMEsVtX8qRch4ohOY-xgCB7uBMQUZkll2yzsvui1IOoSH6GO-THtYpAfHCo-naZdwvK1eHCnKeWZXvu8/s1600/Man+Changing+Tire+for+Woman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYg4c9f3MCL-4PICm81PhE9mYdMj-GKmubepw_vrQwZiv6Znd_2edKED3A2YkBMEsVtX8qRch4ohOY-xgCB7uBMQUZkll2yzsvui1IOoSH6GO-THtYpAfHCo-naZdwvK1eHCnKeWZXvu8/s1600/Man+Changing+Tire+for+Woman.jpg" width="320" /></a>Ask yourself, exactly how powerless is that woman on the
side of the road with a flat tire? Her "helplessness" inspires
countless men to pull over and change the tire for her, thus, her
"helplessness" is actually her power, and since it controls the power of
those "with more power," her power is greater. After all, her batting
eyelashes accomplish the same task as a grunting and sweating man does -
they both change the tire! <br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoEWo-U2R1xhG1IwqLdTk_M5slxCj4qwUflWCHK3mOJ5BOfEtXYxgCITZ-WprAJCn4WfCmmf9raoBEZEEs0QrSlvDwdC16wbgad7puMts6zxAIluAIXbvCWGbTnp8dA5v0zBqj7OeZ5RQ/s1600/Slut+Walk.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoEWo-U2R1xhG1IwqLdTk_M5slxCj4qwUflWCHK3mOJ5BOfEtXYxgCITZ-WprAJCn4WfCmmf9raoBEZEEs0QrSlvDwdC16wbgad7puMts6zxAIluAIXbvCWGbTnp8dA5v0zBqj7OeZ5RQ/s1600/Slut+Walk.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<b>4 - Social Power as a Gender</b> - Shaming and social manipulation
is an enormous part of female power. It derives from womankind's
sexuality and is not just expressed individually, but also in the
aggregate, from women as a whole in society. Everywhere in nature, the
male serves the female. (See point 6)<i> "Nature has given women so much power that the law has wisely given them little"</i> -- Samuel Johnson<br />
<br />
<b>5 - Male Protection & Sacrifice</b> - Helen of Troy's beauty was powerful enough to
launch a thousand ships, remember! Men will readily risk their lives to save
women. It does not occur nearly so frequently the other way around.
Think of the Titanic.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLbwdgXb9c6jsLxA_eHpSVW0VtA43eRpQZi41dzc2-s4qzTob0KMJtWNV4kSj3yGC-9upijN4GHKHr9AvUvgbAKOV6qGtAkQ2i-TOlnNIUDoTA8aV_tge1_RrLnFli5bKKwqGcoYoVG9I/s1600/10328033.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="175" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLbwdgXb9c6jsLxA_eHpSVW0VtA43eRpQZi41dzc2-s4qzTob0KMJtWNV4kSj3yGC-9upijN4GHKHr9AvUvgbAKOV6qGtAkQ2i-TOlnNIUDoTA8aV_tge1_RrLnFli5bKKwqGcoYoVG9I/s1600/10328033.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAEOeyjMBEZk0_gwoHpau7Musa_-ht-xjgtnfd7dwHLI05yHj-8wVzsaaQOLUh14dNdO8G7tDMuE70Yx48V10CBGFahyGbvL1DFYhTATZnDfzoKAMw1Z0WM1fWazZIEDoolSksLbK-bus/s1600/Leaving_the_sinking_liner.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAEOeyjMBEZk0_gwoHpau7Musa_-ht-xjgtnfd7dwHLI05yHj-8wVzsaaQOLUh14dNdO8G7tDMuE70Yx48V10CBGFahyGbvL1DFYhTATZnDfzoKAMw1Z0WM1fWazZIEDoolSksLbK-bus/s1600/Leaving_the_sinking_liner.jpg" width="165" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>"Nobody's a feminist when the lifeboats are being lowered."</i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW4qz4DzAqIV5PodRE8Ur4Z1Ngcb-Y0sSL_eXPijkQwbpG3ieJBxwiAOSrjH2045WxOqzrIrOf-7VlPpL4DV_Fdf5HeSGDu5BtJXYklepUY_MJXaBxaWQDN13F_QsKhXWSvdRvSHTof3g/s1600/pregnant.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW4qz4DzAqIV5PodRE8Ur4Z1Ngcb-Y0sSL_eXPijkQwbpG3ieJBxwiAOSrjH2045WxOqzrIrOf-7VlPpL4DV_Fdf5HeSGDu5BtJXYklepUY_MJXaBxaWQDN13F_QsKhXWSvdRvSHTof3g/s1600/pregnant.jpeg" width="231" /></a><b>6 - Fulfillment of Biological Clock</b>/<a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mp" target="_blank">motherhood</a>
- <a href="http://www.maicar.com/GML/Tiresias.html" target="_blank">Tiresias has three daughters: Manto, Historis & Daphne</a>
- While it is true that men also enjoy fatherhood, the parental
instinct is different between men and women. In women, the parental
instinct is due to her biological clock - it happens to her <i>before</i>
having children, and comes from somewhere within. With men, they do not
have a biological clock, or at least not one so strong as in women.
Men's parental instinct kicks in <i>after</i> the child has been born,
and they fall in love with it and will protect and provide their brains
out to ensure the child's survival. The only thing that could really be
said to be a "biological clock" in men would be their acknowledgement of
"time." What I mean is, a man who is 45 and has never had children
thinks of it in terms of raising a child to 18 years old (plus four to
six years of post-secondary education in, heh, institutions that don't adhere to the truth)
which places him into his mid-sixties before it is all over.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6JVx6TFq81c07BxrRpCErAf9GYpvMND_yo5WEGo8pTIQV2epxt_4KuC-R1DYfJYiKe6Eo2bpn1ibBuH_NOrGip6ssByKsYMUHsqCnaGxZ1jr6yjyw_qmRewkDrmff47s800gTNoJkGAc/s1600/Rose+Bloom+II.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6JVx6TFq81c07BxrRpCErAf9GYpvMND_yo5WEGo8pTIQV2epxt_4KuC-R1DYfJYiKe6Eo2bpn1ibBuH_NOrGip6ssByKsYMUHsqCnaGxZ1jr6yjyw_qmRewkDrmff47s800gTNoJkGAc/s1600/Rose+Bloom+II.gif" /></a>This is
much different than the way women's biological clock works, which is
much more like a flower, where the entire existence of the plant's
energy ultimately culminates in a bloom, demanding
reproduction takes place <i>when it is ready</i>. And, when she is
ready, she demands the fulfillment of her readiness immediately, thus
the female is the passive cell, while the male is the motile cell -
always at the ready to do her bidding. <br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html#mfs" target="_blank">"Contrary to the general opinion, there is no difference in the total sexual impulses of the sexes.../...Any such idea comes from a confusion between the desire for a thing and the stimulus towards the active part in securing what is desired.../...It is important to distinguish between the intensity with which sexual matters are pursued and the proportion of the total activities of life that are devoted to them and to their accessory cares.</a> </b> <br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6zECbV176l16wTlOpf287XWKMfdrMV19Qf1looO1xAdI_4amVNzwY3ZlN5YyHq48RG85MymvqbQPKNMkCP8JuTfGhRFPa7xB1HO3iCXf3eTLBB5L1CZZRe-KxknogiRW_nouxEA_iSOQ/s1600/leading2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6zECbV176l16wTlOpf287XWKMfdrMV19Qf1looO1xAdI_4amVNzwY3ZlN5YyHq48RG85MymvqbQPKNMkCP8JuTfGhRFPa7xB1HO3iCXf3eTLBB5L1CZZRe-KxknogiRW_nouxEA_iSOQ/s1600/leading2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<b>7 - The Pleasure of Letting Someone Else Lead</b> - The woman no
longer has to worry about making money, providing food and shelter and
so forth (or, at least not as much as when she is alone), allowing her
to focus her time and energy on the children she bears. Many people
reminisce of how good things were back at Mom & Dad's after they
have become adults. As children they might have resented it, but as
adults, they realize how fortunate they were, both in a literal/physical
sense, and also in a psychological sense. It was nice to not have to
worry where the food was coming from or if the heat will still be
working next month, wasn't it?<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" border="0" height="239" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGWCuFwLQ7F_NGglhEEZXL3enWzVdhHdKvyAbW_TQVgxKydsXbhOimUG_qy7tonAPxcngQntCu8YOsGbH7ujJEB2ArnNhocm1gtSlHDudNa5vVW4yCD95BuBxqcc9epMxR4UfjgUb2moM/s320/Al+Bundy.bmp" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>8 - The Tyranny of Weakness</b> (can shirk responsible and claim
victim-hood) - The Buck Stops Here. As man's subordinate in "misogynist"
cultures, any time that something goes wrong, all the blame ultimately
turns back upon the man. For example, if a man cheats on his wife, he is
a lout for doing so. And if a woman cheats on her husband, he is a lout
for not keeping her happy. "Heads she wins, tails he loses," or, <br />
<br />
<i><a href="http://quotationsbook.com/quote/40135/#sthash.iwirQ2Yu.dpbs" target="_blank">"The worst form of tyranny the world has ever known is the tyranny of the weak over the strong. It is the only tyranny that lasts."</a> -- Oscar Wilde</i>.<br />
<br />
This is still happening today, where everything in society that is not
to women's liking is blamed upon men, even though we are decidedly not
living in a patriarchy, but rather a matriarchy. (Over half of all
children go to bed at night without a biological father in the house.
Maria Shriver reports that America is "A Woman's Nation" because after
the 08/09 Great Recession, women now outnumber men in both university
degrees and in the workforce. Hannah Rosin of <i>The Atlantic</i>
further rubbed salt in men's wound by declaring "The End of Men." And
yet, heh, men are still to blame for everything wrong in the world
rather than women.) <br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjG40OzjPFQb_I9bgDiSHxvnGAWOGwT-lmI0FFLVzD8xVUHYp8jnD1cI0Z81zX-wKa-btzESSuYiuatoCRNOCyi3JI2sZ053itmYw0gnAMJQidHkpCsmiVhJQtytmDxXckjuW7D6iOr5m0/s1600/get-nude-and-send-me-pics.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjG40OzjPFQb_I9bgDiSHxvnGAWOGwT-lmI0FFLVzD8xVUHYp8jnD1cI0Z81zX-wKa-btzESSuYiuatoCRNOCyi3JI2sZ053itmYw0gnAMJQidHkpCsmiVhJQtytmDxXckjuW7D6iOr5m0/s1600/get-nude-and-send-me-pics.png" width="171" /></a></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGwCiUjPJBEMy91VbcFQ_9z5_fNwfgEEAbmzHlav280Nef4dNAFImjhw9vixcuQzkMduw2tUVT5Dx9I8kILsvkKbZmFZnJ_71xo6qiRFHVsFkcSgwvTIT86OnaYVXOKq516VmLLUSX5Ig/s1600/Birds+and+the+Bees.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "Testing, Testing, 1,2,3, Testing"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>9 - Sexual Pleasure</b> - for man and woman - the one pleasure
the man gets from sex. I hope this is self-explanatory enough for me to
not have to discuss<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank"> the birds and the bees</a> - this is not an X-rated
site, after all. However, if you're a beautiful, available
young woman, send me an e-mail along with several photos, and I'd be
willing to discuss it privately with you in greater depth.<br />
<br />
<b>10 - Duality</b> - Everything in regard to Tiresias is about duality,
or the completion of the Yin<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiG5340UwAR2AicP98eEYLYkaJ17zmII3-JkRVRJvgXNLWoZ3YSFpOhESEQxdI3Ze0IWPHO6uc_iYxPlsW0yhkuPeFVeUcZofiEHMPZePHlbuv2d577y7bnht3iE8xNfToqgWHV505_pUc-/s320/ying-yang1.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><b>Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
and Yang, of the two opposites becoming
one.<br />
<br />
Tiresias was both man and woman. He was rewarded with long life
(either seven generations or seven lifetimes), but starts his knowledge
when he was young - thus the duality of young and old is connected
through him. He was also granted the full memory of his life on earth
after he died and went to the underworld, thus connecting the duality of
life and death.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPBa9Frd5cxTvycmVCR0yVqsCTH72zTdwHYRFCNUAFrcY8zaJiVDRa96GIF-dkfIgcqYfUugJAcFS_K6PlRnre5GRLSGBd7UujMvXyKmqpe1yzEcYhMQ6Lan5UJX8Wixn4RZruPyWUZ1Q/s1600/blessed-mother-mary-jesus.jpg" width="221" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I suspect that of the ten pleasures, where man receives
one pleasure to woman's nine, the pleasure that neither receives is
duality - That is something that can only be achieved by embracing the
opposites within themselves; by the man embracing his masculinity and
the woman embracing her femininity. If men try to behave like women and
women try to behave like men, they become competitors rather than a
synergistic force that is greater than the sum of the two parts.<br />
<br />
Some stories, however, do say that woman enjoys all ten pleasures, and if we take that tack on duality, I have read before about the concept of duality existing in women when they have a son. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" target="_blank">The woman creates the son, who becomes the man who takes care of the woman.</a> This is why the mother & son, represented so often with the Virgin Mary, is such a powerful and recurring theme in various artwork throughout history. (The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world). <br />
<br />
Well, these are my suspicions of what the Tiresias Myth is about. Of
course, there is no way to prove it, and these are just my ponderings.
But I think this is a much better interpretation than thinking he meant
women get nine times the orgasmic pleasures which men do.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<b>"It is pathetic to note that in today's society, when a woman marries a doctor or a lawyer or a corporation executive, she automatically procures the same status and income which took her husband years of hard work to attain. No exertion is needed on her part, outside of buying the right clothes and applying cosmetics-in other words, slipping on the right mask. So a brainless bimbo who drapes herself on the arm of a movie star is accorded greater respect than a female librarian or scientist."</b> -- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/sex-ploytation-by-matthew-fitzgerald.html" target="_blank">Matthew Fitzgerald, Sex-Ploytation</a> (p.11)<br />
. .http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-65631875983310597882015-03-11T19:00:00.000-07:002015-08-09T13:14:28.307-07:00You're Such a Tool! (Briffault's law) <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" height="296px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnrxe3NmTtjp6gZoVdedB9eFHtnntv3ns_oao5gK7jLsiQFYrkgfKVReMdIPRh7ai7VpBuvVU4FcLvpKMUzQv674nEk-lsabcnxGo_tsk6Slp_Or39Qwl91Zg0ol9P2uRLnSs_fwPJHjU/s400/pregnant_woman_with_hammer_and_nail_11has0089rf.jpg" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Amazon Women (The Science of "Why Males Exist")"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>"Feminine traits are called weaknesses. People joke about them; fools
ridicule them; but reasonable persons see very well that those traits
are just the tools for the management of men, and for the use of men for
female designs."</b> -- Immanuel Kant, <i>Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View,</i> Southern Illinois University Press 1978, originally published in 1798<br />
<br />
One thing our society struggles with <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">as it continually fails feminism's cultural fitness tests</a> is the silly notion that men and women are "equal" and thus we are
essentially coming at each-other from the same point of view regarding
our interactions with the opposite sex. This is the wrong way of
thinking. We are not <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">"blank slates"</a> who are different merely because of
society's externally imposed social constructs upon us.<br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" height="290px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmeVipX3sPxU-RVnIdXWAexIy35cNhnJDAK3l_AcznPImoSoo-QTDpnhfpc-b-lgwQl4uxOIKnkmBQmderxGQITuO6ZW67lDfzsZIg-kcpjNKwONpIW9jktppDzlFH-Q5SHblggLhKgAo/s400/shark_kayak.jpg" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In fact, anyone who believes in evolution would scoff at the idea of men
and women being essentially the same. Natural Selection is what
"evolves" us. Sharks mate with the fastest swimmers and the sharks best
able to feed themselves. By selecting those with the genes which display
these traits, they continually evolve to become better swimmers and
better predators. Animals evolve to do the tasks which they are best
suited for. Thus, the sharks of today are likely "better" sharks than
the sharks of 10,000 years ago as the genes of those best at survival
continually get passed on more often than those who fail to survive.<br />
<br />
Between the sexes, we also evolve to do the tasks which we are best
suited for. You can see that men and women are physically different,
each being designed for what they do best. Certainly there are some
social constructs that society imposes upon men and women, but they are
based on our biological natures, not upon the blank slate. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGOFxfHkhKKXt6rWE1MztNij5BXGZe_X3Dw8nFPCp21JN8zfkIj1dyMENMh5yI-EgD-qzRKMpIaOAKdc8N48-UEvHUw2uPj2WUb_9-_vGejxN3fgnHKMconJSuw0S5lQz_SjHx0Oby1HM/s1600/Nude+Woman.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGOFxfHkhKKXt6rWE1MztNij5BXGZe_X3Dw8nFPCp21JN8zfkIj1dyMENMh5yI-EgD-qzRKMpIaOAKdc8N48-UEvHUw2uPj2WUb_9-_vGejxN3fgnHKMconJSuw0S5lQz_SjHx0Oby1HM/s1600/Nude+Woman.png" width="277" /></a></div>
In women's case, their entire bodies are designed for giving birth and
caring for children. They have wide hips to give birth and have breasts
to feed children with. Note that it is also these traits - women's
"curves" - that are a large part of what men find sexually attractive in
women. It is their "reproductive features" we find attractive. Further,
even a woman's mind has evolved to make her more suitable for rearing
children, thus a woman's "multi-tasking brain" is more suitable to care
for children - or to do other tasks while also caring for children. But
it goes even further than this multi-tasking feature. Women
are somewhere in between that of a man and a child. Often times, the men
of old observed women were merely children of a larger growth:<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRS3hJPYU952KXKKtn3rdheOEPDfeJM4kzwLjMQfZmdY7XhnFcpvGlJo8B3OWjrvD5xDLITB25QsxwQSyVTBHUrp-PCAcpGCDOGoJrYgYJow13DQgjfEo3TejgkyAJyaXZJ_wLRUoZKSs/s1600/parents-love.jpg" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our
early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are
childish, foolish, and short-sighted — in a word, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2010/10/letter-to-his-son-by-lord-chesterfield.html" target="_blank">are big children all their lives,</a>
something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in
the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day
after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider
what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her
place</b>." -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women </a><br />
<br />
Women have mentally "evolved" to be something intermediate between the
child and the man. We have all heard that women are more emotional than
men and are more "in tune with feelings" than men. And this is correct,
for tell me, how do infants communicate except through the language of
emotions and feelings? How does a baby indicate it needs to be fed? It
is through the emotional response of crying - certainly not by saying,
"Hey momma, bring those soft, round milk thingies over to my mouth."
Children communicate emotionally, and since women have evolved to become
"better carers of children," they have also evolved to be more in tune
to the language of children, which is emotion.<br />
<br />
<b>"... Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is
associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with
intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than
men at intuitive tasks, she added. <span style="font-size: small;">“<i>Intuition is thinking without
thinking.</i></span> <i>It's what people call gut feelings.</i> <i>Women tend to be better
than men at these kinds of skills which are linked with being good
mothers</i>,”..."</b> (<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-hardwired-difference-between-male-and-female-brains-could-explain-why-men-are-better-at-map-reading-8978248.html" target="_blank">Source</a>)<br />
<br />
We also often hear that girls mature faster than boys. This is also
true, and to refer back to Schopenhauer again, he acknowledges this as
well:<br />
<br />
<b>Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties
scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but
hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain
children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand,
cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and
prefer trifling matters to the most important. </b>-- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6Hh6FSVKfnlqZmUNE9FKmlSrRHjY3xJRJBw3TOtIMpYxBPcGlNaMZEk5eVlowVO3yRkL2WsdSKX721EqAZidAwZJrSuSmys7W8jzV4VkvZJqBmSXAGI17ohoXHbpBJy0FIIo-3N0N_4w/s1600/SitterPhoto3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6Hh6FSVKfnlqZmUNE9FKmlSrRHjY3xJRJBw3TOtIMpYxBPcGlNaMZEk5eVlowVO3yRkL2WsdSKX721EqAZidAwZJrSuSmys7W8jzV4VkvZJqBmSXAGI17ohoXHbpBJy0FIIo-3N0N_4w/s1600/SitterPhoto3.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
The reason girls mature mentally before boys again goes back to their
biological function as the bearers of children. Everywhere in nature,
when an animal is physically capable of giving birth it is also mentally
developed enough to care for its offspring - at least in the most
primal of ways. This is also true of human females. When they reach
puberty, they are mentally mature enough to give at minimum the basic
care to an infant to keep it alive. Even though we don't encourage girls
to have children as soon as they reach puberty, we do see in our
culture that adults begin to trust girls at the age of puberty for tasks
such as babysitting, thus lots of girls in the 12 to 14 age group begin
to earn some pocket money in this manner - they have become mentally
mature enough to adequately do the task. Why does Schopenhauer indicate
women reach the maturity of their reasoning and mental faculties at the
age of eighteen? Well, what would be the evolutionary advantage to women
growing out of this phase of relating to children and beyond it? There
is none.<br />
<br />
But then, what is it that men have evolved to become?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhb-j2C4GMl6h-u-RetebvishlHpdzuTnwNcADCGvp390y4XfHAJo8-Plf7Bq0YKLccuVzGua2xNXV6TxJCzTtsKysrNVs2x_pX_JqJHiMExKqekHeA9v4imSCxQiJorIQk8DnMM1bQJBY/s1600/The+Masculine+Principle.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhb-j2C4GMl6h-u-RetebvishlHpdzuTnwNcADCGvp390y4XfHAJo8-Plf7Bq0YKLccuVzGua2xNXV6TxJCzTtsKysrNVs2x_pX_JqJHiMExKqekHeA9v4imSCxQiJorIQk8DnMM1bQJBY/s1600/The+Masculine+Principle.jpg" width="257" /></a>Once we realize that everywhere in nature <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">the male is the sexual servant of the female</a>, it's pretty easy to see the plot of evolution: Men have evolved to become the best providers and protectors we can
possibly be in order to meet the needs of the female - especially during
her most vulnerable time, which is when she gets pregnant, gives birth,
recuperates, and then raises the child until it becomes self-sufficient
(ie. It can walk, talk and feed itself). This whole process takes about
four years to complete, and then her <a href="http://toqonline.com/archives/v7n2/v7no2_Devlin.pdf" target="_blank">rotating polyandry</a>
cycle kicks in and she discards the male in order to seek out a new man
to repeat the cycle again. This is the primitive method of assuring
genetic diversity amongst her offspring, which increases their overall
chance of survival.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" border="0" height="240" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168830234980415954" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg40s0fFxfqvCk7-Mth7jgLBUfWHcvwcsy4c_nRqj_o4hpUdNXN0dUPxxYmq9y2Vna1ydkh2vT2SHykoI3Om0TdZkNgGHR0tdr7wq4J5M3P45J1OmrZJQyKw0VS4eq3rBD8lR5Nbfg_3Q4/s400/RSCN0985.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
So aside from merely being sperm donors, men have also evolved into
being the best at what we do - and these are also the things women find
attractive in a man: our protecting and providing skills. We have
developed upper body strength which is vastly superior to the female's,
and so it is tall, strong, broad shouldered men which women find
sexually attractive. Men have developed linear thinking brains which
help us figure out how to perform specific tasks as efficiently and
productively as possible. No matter what men set out to do, aside from
raising children, women cannot compete with men on a level playing field
because we have evolved to best perform our tasks in order to make
ourselves useful to women. Most women admit that they are sexually
attracted to men who are more intelligent than they are - this does not
mean that all men are are smarter than all women, but merely that <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">each woman tends to seek out a man</a> who has higher intelligence than she possesses. <br />
<br />
But ultimately, men do all of these things in service of women, in the
hopes of gaining - or maintaining - her favour. However, the kink in
this plot is that women don't actually "love" men, only gay men truly
love men. Rather women love being <i>loved.</i> "Love" means different things to men and women. <br />
<br />
<b>"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. <i>Women crave for</i> <i>being loved, not for loving.</i> They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you <i>any </i>in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." </b>-- Florence Nightingale<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnKpPspUSy4es6ijOoCi-sMxHfi74k-jiCaG-SyIHECl2iZzAt1wu8Z_hZNZlV2J6gbXqW3YotPuLWweun_1aMYvOYN1BFrEIoSN_V6ZcTbkRSlCijaxf11w2F-nWNiHmE3MmjBjfVhcg/s400/438215-Plump-Cave-Woman-With-A-Club-Poster-Art-Print.jpg" width="297px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Think of a man as a stick in a woman's hand - a tool which she uses for
her own purposes. The woman with the biggest stick will fare better in
society than women with smaller sticks - or especially women with no
sticks at all. This is a further reason for women to give men <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">fitness tests</a> - to test how strong of a stick he is. If she finds him sufficiently strong, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">she will begin to conform herself to him</a>,
creating the illusion that she is his ideal mate so that he will begin
to fall in love with her and thus become useful to her as a "tool."<br />
.<br />
This is one thing that men must always keep in mind in his dealings with women. For women, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html" target="_blank">their love is parasitic</a> - it is based upon what she <i>gets</i> from a man. But for men, their love is <i>the host</i> to the parasitic nature of the woman - it is based upon what he <i>gives.</i> <br />
<br />
<b>"When I started researching this book, I was prepared to rediscover
the old saw that conventional femininity is nurturing and passive and
that masculinity is self-serving, egotistical, and uncaring. But I did
not find this. One of my findings here is that manhood ideologies always
include a criterion of selfless generosity, even to the point of
sacrifice. Again and again we find that 'real' men are those who give
more than they take."</b> -- David Gilmore in his 1990 book <i>Manhood in the Making</i><br />
<br />
Also, one must keep in mind that relationships don't mean the same thing
to women as they do to men. Relationships are a "tool" for women - they
get things from it, or rather from the man. <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/06/men-harmed-by-relationships-more-than.html" target="_blank">Women get over relationships far more easily than men do</a>. They are never as deeply "in love" with a man as a man is in love with the woman. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">Men and women are polar opposites</a>. We are two sides to the same coin, but those sides are not the same. Women have <i>more</i> emotions but they are <i>shallower.</i> Men have <i>fewer</i> emotions but they run <i>deeper.</i>
In an<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" border="0" height="212" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350665446504085810" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizsTW2GfCZImRWQ0M1re1AODqHLiZqdMU3YvTdlydjOEc9sF7DFHcknCVSFg_DixXESTp7gE1VrWTi2f-uw-pR5H7cgZ1_cyRLqpCg7TC39orZB6mHf2TwNRSpm0gxx8pKGjBXJ01p1W8/s320/4.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Male and Female: Equal But Different"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
evolutionary survival scenario, it makes sense too, that men
would love women deeper than women would "love" men. It is a man's deep
love that will make him sacrifice his produced goods and even his life
for the woman he loves. This rarely happens the other way around. While
there is an evolutionary survival advantage for the female to lose
interest in a man after completing her four year <a href="http://toqonline.com/archives/v7n2/v7no2_Devlin.pdf" target="_blank">rotating polyandry</a>
cycle, there is no similar advantage for the man to lose interest. In
fact, just the opposite. It is in both her and her offspring's advantage
to have the man still hopelessly in love with her, providing and
protecting his brains out while she slyly seeks out her next suitable
mate before giving the present "tool" his walking papers. <br />
Everything a man does in a relationship is in her benefit. This is the basis of <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">Briffault's law.</a><br />
<br />
<b>“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the
animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association
with the male, no such association takes place.”</b> -- Robert Briffault, <i>The Mothers</i>, I, 191<br />
<br />
It is also important to note <a href="http://www.stickmanweekly.com/ReadersSubmissions2009/reader5546.htm" target="_blank">the corollaries to Briffault's law:</a> <br />
<br />
<b>1 - Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.<br />
<br />
2 - Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return
for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male
has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)</b> <b><br />
<br />
3 - A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future
association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of
time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the
degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).</b><br />
<b>. </b>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_mut0HjLw8vkh8fnR6FoJLlDWEWTMs61EDWyR-sWGyDu9NhTAGhYdLdkDUsaMBbtKC2-K5K-Ru4n_6vXLa5_I2yUfH9fhnH_tp_dWAXpr26D-dVYhfov0if9tTzu8AU09pJ_H6cM92AQ/s400/no-no-no.jpg" width="353px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Briffault's law is the reason the most important word a man must learn
in his relationships with a woman is "No!" If a man keeps nothing for
himself and simply gives it all to her, she has no reason to continue to
associate with him. No matter what he does, it soon will become "What
have you done for me lately?" He <i>must</i> keep the benefits he
bestows upon her under his control, and learn to say no often, as she
will naturally try to get him to pass them on to her. No, I won’t spend
$100 for roses on Valentine’s Day. No, we’re not going to Hawaii for a
vacation (unless you are paying, Toots!) No, you cannot move in with me.
No, you cannot move in now that you’ve been evicted – that is what your
girlfriend’s couch or your parent’s spare room is for. NO! We won’t get
be getting married. No! You are not going on the pill so we can have
bareback sex. No! No! No! No! No! <b><span style="font-size: small;">NO!</span></b><br />
. <br />
<b><i>There were only a few thousand divorces annually in the
mid-nineteenth century when divorce cost wives their children and Dad’s
paycheck.</i> This family stability began eroding as later nineteenth
century divorce courts, under pressure from the rising feminist
movement, began awarding child </b><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFyOscbIyyb52oevK0b7qesN_vM7WzXV215EGnXNRq-0JJ9-QnPBXGW6e35mi5dPl4WK4mHBZ8bm_HF7CwZYFfkACuqcBeN6cnlH_3DZXXwuC7FA3yf-le2CQy1MYINj8pODh3H2srGeQ/s1600/Rotating+Polyandry.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "Rotating Polyandry & Its Enforcers"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>custody to mothers.</b> -- Daniel Amneus, <a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank">The Case for </a><br />
<a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank">Father Custody</a>, p360<br />
<br />
<b>“Between 1870 and 1920 the divorce rate rose fifteenfold, and by 1924 one marriage out of seven ended in divorce”</b> — James H. Jones, <i>Alfred Kinsey: A Public/Private Life</i> (New York: W. W. <span style="font-size: small;">Norton, 1997), p.292. <br />
<br />
Women's attitude to men is easiest to
understand by comparing it to our attitude towards a job. Whether we
love our job or not, most of us think we must have one. We often think a
bad job is better than not having a job at all. No matter how much we
may love our job, we'll jump ship and go with a better one if it's
offered. And no matter how good our job may have been for us in the
past, if something happens that upsets us, the love has probably gone
forever. We don't ever think we are owed for the past.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">
</span>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf" border="0" height="297" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEio75ELnVPUJ26uUkTUk-88t8ul-vQopXP5-Z6Ka23HINI8aH_7a1Enh2zCqI7LTILjnETSNvzlRJbZ87DV1MBPF3mX2q8PxOCRV4_zVwrj85_xAGjRxfG8_JBzkJPC_yaA6d8VUPqgz-s/s1600/Woman+at+Work.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for the Free Online Book, "The Predatory Female" -- by Rev. Lawrence Shannon</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><span style="font-size: small;"><i>"What do women have jobs for? </i></span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><span style="font-size: small;"><i>To entertain themselves while they aren't working" </i></span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><span style="font-size: small;"><i>- <a href="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf" target="_blank">The Predatory Female</a></i></span></b><br />
<br />
Women never want to be without a "tool" in society, for it is through
her man-tool that she accomplishes what she needs in society - thus,
women are like monkeys and never let go of one branch until she has
gotten hold of the next. This is why you usually find that at the end of
her relationship with a particular tool, er, man, there is always
another man hanging around somewhere in the wings. Female "independence"
is an illusion.<br />
<br />
What women's independence actually means is that they
want the freedom to change from one tool to the next without
consequences. Men would view independence in a much different manner. In fact, Buddhism acknowledges the three phases women go through of
using men as "tools" for their own designs during their lives:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-nnj8GLtgUkUgUjlgvjvYvKNtBgvwwkwaN0gWom_veWUqYqV3hKXMnNnNoES1Q3mOE3W58-m8TKRiMECMtnMzqapKxzIOW9ChmWf83EHMGNneOZaKjnV805Amccie62ccRrjUNE-Jkus/s1600/screwdriver.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-nnj8GLtgUkUgUjlgvjvYvKNtBgvwwkwaN0gWom_veWUqYqV3hKXMnNnNoES1Q3mOE3W58-m8TKRiMECMtnMzqapKxzIOW9ChmWf83EHMGNneOZaKjnV805Amccie62ccRrjUNE-Jkus/s1600/screwdriver.jpg" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkg0UKGpsFXyS-5iiQWb03LN24mrEmTnX37BRARmZAgCtwDgbErqRPRoEKdurjHLqvbXKFWCSu8NH57X-hAYkoyiwYRb4uSiEHHapENFQdzFx-2_Se7YNR0dZUlatQKGsix2qeIbUkg1g/s1600/hammer-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="188" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkg0UKGpsFXyS-5iiQWb03LN24mrEmTnX37BRARmZAgCtwDgbErqRPRoEKdurjHLqvbXKFWCSu8NH57X-hAYkoyiwYRb4uSiEHHapENFQdzFx-2_Se7YNR0dZUlatQKGsix2qeIbUkg1g/s1600/hammer-1.jpg" width="200" /></a> <b>Women have the “five obstacles” (inability to become anything great) and <i>the “three followings” (follows first the father, then the husband, then the son).</i></b>-- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/buddha-selected-writings-on-women.html" target="_blank">Buddha - from Selected Writings of Nichiren</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaD4wVIZYuLpRyrIlah68blpCaisz9UEQNAFLSqI_1oaMigEN9Q5hooKMtDNmqS89LILGdhsfbqPrrKk8ldKlG7vBorgmLyW1BibsA4oz7vkDVIvw5opMCnuefHr-yBy4LgRNaR55Ok44/s1600/image_18305.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaD4wVIZYuLpRyrIlah68blpCaisz9UEQNAFLSqI_1oaMigEN9Q5hooKMtDNmqS89LILGdhsfbqPrrKk8ldKlG7vBorgmLyW1BibsA4oz7vkDVIvw5opMCnuefHr-yBy4LgRNaR55Ok44/s1600/image_18305.jpg" width="200" /></a>In her youth, a woman gains her power through her father - he is the
"tool" that serves her and represents her in society. In adulthood, she
gains power through her husband, who spends his life's energy providing
for her and the offspring they produce together. In her old age, she
gains her power through her son. In each case, she uses a man as her
tool to deal with society. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fish-and-bicycle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fish-and-bicycle.html" border="0" height="193" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgp-W9vpVV3Npx3XKkaW5g7RuJbC6BcWI_2uhy0_9tQtJyjo18Ie7C8M1JIgEf0oEWPaHWCR2_GynCp-asQmKAs_slIO3m4GU5Wes-R17o_mW6CedSHI-opYWOdvtvG9CFzALATqCnYdeo/s200/FishOnBicycle.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Fish and The Bicycle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I can certainly attest to the last one about the son with my own mother.
Since my father died a few years ago, it is now me who my mother uses
to navigate life. When she has a problem, she comes to me to deal with
it. If she suspects the mechanic at the shop is trying to rip her off,
it is me who goes there to talk with him. When she needs to make a
financial decision, it is me who she seeks advice from and who she hands
over the authority to make ultimate decisions. Since she lost my father
as her "tool," she transferred the responsibility to me. She is not
independent as a man would be. I'm not upset about it. It is the natural
order of life. And since she didn't stuff me into daycare to have
strangers raise me, but rather did a good job for me as a true mother
when I was young... and because she did not selfishly destroy our family with
divorce, but stayed with my father for 48 years (and I'm sure not all of
those years were easy ones), I am willing to let her use me as her
"tool" in her old age <i>because she deserves it</i>. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcjF9vvz2SM" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcjF9vvz2SM" border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMSGWc0LYX3NsTxi9O63Ak0dujLed0YqpNGSLLPjWatsEMjhvYpcz-nDI4LwdZxJRTA06WyCd6kQJWBoOK7CdG54ayMsFwt-2qsDwTHOFUChlpuhpnHUmoo_Fl7IoLxQ2QmGDwv8B5hbQ/s1600/nomaam2.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Ballad of NO MA'AM" (Song/Video - 3min)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">We are failing feminism's cultural fitness tests</a> because we are not
asserting our authority and telling women, "NO! You can't use me as your
tool for free. We are humans, not monkeys." <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html" target="_blank">And since men's love is "the host" for women's "parasitic love,"</a> it is essential that the host
leads the parasite, rather than the other way around. When the parasite
leads, it destroys both the host and the parasite, but when the host
leads, both organisms can survive. <br />
<br />
<b>NO! </b>Learn to say it, and learn to say it often. <br />
<br />
You don't even have to be rude about it. You could also say "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcjF9vvz2SM" target="_blank">NO MA'AM!</a>" <br />
<br />
Women are as independent as a tropical fern in a greenhouse in Iceland.<br />
<br />
If the men “leave” the women will follow, because female “independence” is an illusion.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html">Next</a></span></span></b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. </span></span> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;"><b>“The woman follows the man. In her youth she follows her father and
elder brother; when married, she follows her husband; when her husband
is dead, she follows her son.”</b> – Confucius</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;">.</span></span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: large;">***</span> </span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;">. </span></span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img alt="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/advice-to-married-couples-plutarch.html" border="0" height="200" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5544757091049201682" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPZdQh3cNCW4Bfv8I04DhoAfMlONLTJEthX0Stjd1pZqVqTvQQLxIg2wh5msV_M8PQZZV_KvkwCQ34pbg1d-GvbS3DcMkw2ljJ7qVAlbtFhnPqx8-QxApjwmZiZX_P2VMMqXq7wXuJugQ/s200/marriage.jpg" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="148" /></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "Advice to Married Couples"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: small;">36. Mothers appear to be more fond of their sons, because those sons
are able to help them, and fathers of their daughters, because
daughters need their help. Maybe also it is out of compliment to each
other that both parties desire to be seen making much of that which is
more akin to the other. This, perhaps, is a trait of no importance, but
there is another which is charming. I mean, when the wife's respect is
seen to incline rather to the husband's parents than to her own, and
when, in case of anything troubling her, she refers it to them and
conceals it from her own people. If you are thought to trust, you are
trusted; if you are thought to love, you are loved. -- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/advice-to-married-couples-plutarch.html" target="_blank">Advice to Married Couples, by Plutarch</a></span> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;">. </span></span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: large;">***</span> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"></span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;">.</span></span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/sex-ploytation-by-matthew-fitzgerald.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sex-ploytation.pdf" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpkTAlfmEjrdE4n8m8ejXB9dkZ-ECfpcn6sKjafR1qVw5WNjGI774wbhSK8j_bgwdx186oIPHaZk35HK4RBIObvO1iAwQux_s0wWWMA_Ln3u0jLwSNc5eSLdtxJZ218LdUydnq47c2DlOg/s200/Sex-Ploytation+--+Matthew+Fitzgerald.jpg" width="123" /><span style="font-size: small;"></span></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">Click for "Sex-Ploytation"</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: small;">"I ran into a friend from college I hadn't seen in years. He was a stud back then, and it looked like he still had it. He told me he'd never gotten married, and I asked him why. He said he was looking for a really nice, cute, girl-next-door who wasn't looking for a guy as a meal ticket. I said, `Oh. That explains it. You'll be single forever."' -- <a href="http://the-light-house-keeper.blogspot.ca/2015/05/sex-ploytation-by-matthew-fitzgerald.html" target="_blank">Sex-Ploytation</a> (p.36)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;">.</span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html">Next</a></span></span></b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. </span></span> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. </div>
</div>
.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-34532831035541968532015-03-11T18:30:00.000-07:002015-04-21T07:48:00.380-07:00Rites of Passage - Making Boys into MenQuite often when we think of “Rites of Passage” the image of a primitive
society performing some bizarre ritual comes to mind, such as the
Vanuatu Land Divers.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="itemtitle">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgIf-eXHRXZJOkFEVQYo7HnYR5cLxV6p1AVfEeh84VUkiWxFGq6I-75sqk9yCqMVSy6uWgxpdXu44GNj4VJIzz5dXgYvWZ0Vmsg9jqPVP55wLdJaIWRx9J0WmOjKOPNibEd2GwWR0c8Ao/s1600/ayof-image-21_794222i-tm.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgIf-eXHRXZJOkFEVQYo7HnYR5cLxV6p1AVfEeh84VUkiWxFGq6I-75sqk9yCqMVSy6uWgxpdXu44GNj4VJIzz5dXgYvWZ0Vmsg9jqPVP55wLdJaIWRx9J0WmOjKOPNibEd2GwWR0c8Ao/s400/ayof-image-21_794222i-tm.jpg" height="306px" width="400px" /></a><i>"Both a harvest ritual and a rite of passage amongst the tribes of
the small pacific island of Vanuatu, land diving is now a tourist
phenomenon. The men who live on Pentecost Island in Vanuatu, climb a
rickety 98-foot-tall (30-meter) tower, tie vines to their ankles and
dive to the ground, falling at speeds around 45 mph (72 kph). When a
dive goes correctly, the person gets close enough to touch his shoulders
or his head to the earth. However, unlike bungee jumping, these vines
aren’t elastic and a miscalculation in vine length could lead to broken
legs, cracked skulls, or even death. Boys once they have been
circumcised at about age 7 or 8 begin participating, though they usually
are permitted to jump from a shorter tower. As a boy makes his first
dive, his mother holds an item representing his childhood. When he
jumps, she throws the item away. Divers also refrain from sex the day
before they jump — legend says it will cause the jump to go badly." -- </i><a href="http://listverse.com/2009/12/28/10-bizarre-rites-of-passage/" target="_blank">10 Bizarre Rites of Passage</a><br />
. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
I, however, would argue that rites of passage are actually more of a sign of an <i>advanced</i> society. It is patriarchy that builds civilization. Patriarchy is the idea of "putting sex to work," which is based on the <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" target="_blank">ancient contract of marriage.</a> The ancient contract of marriage is an <i>economic</i> contract whereby a woman "sells" her sexual reproductive abilities to a man (ie. the children of marriage are <i>his</i> children, not hers) in return for <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">the superior protection and providing abilities</a> a man can, and will, procure once yoked to <i>children of his own.</i> What does this have to do with rites of passage, you ask? Well, in order for men to be attractive to women, a man must <i>surpass</i>
the female so that he has some tangible benefit to offer the female
which she either cannot do herself, or is unwilling to do herself, and
therefore fulfill <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">Briffault's law</a>:<br />
<br />
<b>“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the
animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association
with the male, no such association takes place.”</b> -- Robert Briffault, <i>The Mothers</i>, I, 191<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1NZMIeNZq8FlNlYQ7XlvhoLqS8mN_3xYxUW0x6CKbad-cl4oh-rsbkJx5grl-hu33Gz9UM8FYz1NYCYeS_uHNGylM-kSRAXSWWkbUFj2pn3AVVioQbgnCgrzHoMjQx4JWHik7rQpjwNc/s1600/Mother+Scolding+Child.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="http://www.menstribune.com/feminist.htm" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1NZMIeNZq8FlNlYQ7XlvhoLqS8mN_3xYxUW0x6CKbad-cl4oh-rsbkJx5grl-hu33Gz9UM8FYz1NYCYeS_uHNGylM-kSRAXSWWkbUFj2pn3AVVioQbgnCgrzHoMjQx4JWHik7rQpjwNc/s1600/Mother+Scolding+Child.bmp" height="201" width="320" /></a>It is the nature of the female's mothering instinct to be 100%
totalitarian. Small children need this type of totalitarianism or they
would soon get themselves into all sorts of trouble. Thus every boy
starts off life completely dominated by a female and it takes a decisive
change to escape his mother's gravity field and grow into a man so that
the next generation of women will have <i>men</i> to marry. For all the
ballyhooing in the media of "the man-child" and for all the haughty
snipes of women at males to "be a man," they don't seem to understand
that in order to be a man, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/have-you-ever-seen-herd-of-bulls.html" target="_blank"><i>he cannot behave like a woman</i></a>. Our thoroughly
feminized society has relentlessly propagandized us to believe "the
right way" for humans to behave is "the female way" while at the same
time has attacked and derided everything that once defined masculinity
as "macho" and unfavourable.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEin5E9ug_GfDNVhxZHGozP1eT115x-hJldlSZEJj7fM4d6gJ9FSsxbAklRAggMyBvR4Tp9DTXK6ok9i_0F7S2Dx2RFpMQB4Ab27rAGZtubztBs4WeO_FAhJ4-YJF0Cs2G3erFIbxRExvyA/s1600/the-big-bang-theory-spanking-o.gif" height="225" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Just as children are not equal to adults, men are not equal to women - a
"man," who is a man in the true sense of the word, has surpassed the
level of women and has grown beyond it. This fulfills <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">Briffault's law</a>
and also enforces the <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">hypergamy</a>
which women need to be exposed to in order to be sexually attracted to a
man. Thus, a family hierarchy develops - and this hierarchy works... we
know it works because we have historical evidence of it working for centuries in our very own Western Culture - the family
as based upon the Bible.<br />
<br />
<br />
Man --> Woman --> Children<br />
<br />
It's the natural order of things. Women take care of themselves and
children, and men take care of themselves, women and children. It does
not work in reverse. <br />
<br />
Lots of women spit and fume about this, but what they are forgetting
when they are told Biblically to submit to their husbands, is that
husbands are also commanded to submit to God, or to <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">The Truth</a>. And as Jesus pointed out, <a href="http://hancaquam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/to-rule-is-to-serve.html" target="_blank">to rule is to serve</a>. Thus, this is the proper ordering of human existence if we are to <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">live above that of the beasts of the field.</a> Only when a man lives in proper accordance to The Truth can he expect a woman to be in proper relation to him. <br />
<br />
God/Truth --> Man --> Woman --> Children<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtNbONmsd5SaJtwFp1Y2f3amaJAOlWtXDjMWCKHA4lGqinEDFQTwb2hp9wG6Sz5L5123eOhyphenhyphen-zSL82zyRPrEnaE2BXD6mB5vYhhrodzEpx3gbQ_VPoTOZV_6I6f8zZ_8X3qEbyo5pZamw/s1600/parents-love.jpg" height="320" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In reality, <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esEqualityNotAchievable.htm" target="_blank">there is no such thing as equality</a>.
All relationships are hierarchical in one way or another. Sometimes
they change, or often what is going on underneath is entirely different
than what appears on the surface. The men who stood on the deck of the
Titanic so that their women could survive is an example of how the
underlying hierarchy is often different than the social appearance of
hierarchy.<br />
<br />
<b>"But what difference does it make whether women rule, or the rulers are ruled by women? The result is the same." -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">The Politics of Aristotle, The Spartan Women</a><br />
<br />
"Equality" really only has meaning in relation to the sphere of human
law - <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">in the realm that all people are equal before the law in regard to their rights as put forth by the American Founding Fathers</a>: The rights
to self-ownership, life, liberty and property. Certainly not the "right"
to a job, an education or free healthcare.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnrxe3NmTtjp6gZoVdedB9eFHtnntv3ns_oao5gK7jLsiQFYrkgfKVReMdIPRh7ai7VpBuvVU4FcLvpKMUzQv674nEk-lsabcnxGo_tsk6Slp_Or39Qwl91Zg0ol9P2uRLnSs_fwPJHjU/s400/pregnant_woman_with_hammer_and_nail_11has0089rf.jpg" height="296px" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "You're Such a Tool (Briffault's law)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
"Men" are not on the same level as women. When men consider themselves
"equal" to women, they are resented and disrespected by women. The sexes
are different, and thus need different things from each-other. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">Women need men to be their tool in society</a>,
and therefore men have to bring something to women that women cannot do
themselves. (Watch how birds court each-other) Thus, if he remains
"equal" to a woman, she has no use for him. A "man" has to graduate <i>beyond</i>
the level of women - if he doesn't he will be completely flattened
by women when he encounters them. It is women's natural right to be in
authority over children but it is not right for women to be in control
over men. If a man behaves as a boy and relates to his wife as "Is it OK
for me to be me, Mommy?" he is not a man equal to women - he is beneath
them. This is what happens in many marriages today - the husband ends
up treating his wife as his mother, and as such she begins to resent
him. How can something that is her own creation (a boy, a child) be
equal to its creator? <br />
.<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>"Mothers find in their children
satisfaction for their desire to dominate, a possession, an occupation,
something that is wholly intelligible to them and can be chattered
with: the sum of all this is what mother love is; it is to be compared
with an artist's love for his work. Pregnancy has made women kinder,
more patient, more timid, more pleased to submit; and just so does
spiritual pregnancy produce the character of the contemplative type,
which is closely related to the feminine character: it consists of male
mothers." -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/a-collection-of-writings-on-women.html" target="_blank">Freiderich Nietzsche</a><b> </b></span><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgftwuIFs15IzwuJycg21sz6L_iv5RYV41ggZ5I6hJNokWIJEGHneuW3kiuoFMCmmoJfhw2aNiY1-tOjtfpVFKRNIXZHdKAvm3csm3R55UaRApKWWAfvgDvO6EMGMYAzY0-u7tTcWlmhE8/s1600/016922-3d-transparent-glass-icon-symbols-shapes-female-symbol2-sc48.png" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Only when boys separate from the totalitarian power of the Mother and
grow into men do they truly have a sphere to address women and from
which women respect them as men. However, women instinctively try to
prevent boys from leaving their field of power - children are women's
"possessions" and who wants to lose a possession? To mother, he will
always be "her little boy." Also, it is not wrong for it to be a
struggle to escape the totalitarianism of mother, for manhood not "won"
is not manhood at all. Women cannot show boys how to become men because
it is an entirely foreign concept to them - just as children cannot show
adults how to behave because adulthood is something children simply
don't understand. Women are instinctively uncomfortable with competition
and conflict, which might cause people's feelings to get hurt, and
thus, they try to prevent boys from growing away from their field of
influence and into men.<br />
<br />
<b>"Women and men want very different things and therefore very
different worlds. Men want sex, freedom, and adventure; women want
security, pleasantness, and someone to care about (or for) them. Both
like power. Men use it to conquer their neighbors whether in business or
war, women to impose security and pleasantness. ... Just about
everything that once defined masculinity is now denounced as 'macho,' a
hostile word embodying the female incomprehension of men. ... Men are
happy for men to be men and women to be women; women want us all to be
women."</b> -- <a href="http://www.fredoneverything.net/Feminization.shtml" target="_blank">Fred Reed </a><br />
<br />
Women want us all to be women - or children - because that is what they
understand. They have no comprehension of "men" or what it takes to be a
man. Children deprived of their fathers through divorce are horribly
abused in this way, for they get "aborted" at the female/child stage of
development and have far greater challenges "growing into men" and
learning how to address women in any other way than seeking the approval
of mother. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlFzCZAdtwId6tFrTaPHkDIS9WiEGo22RQb4gU4FYV0C0cL2oWIxNJnFLHk4dIdsLiFzMvATthiVmrfP7gKW2nXNGLRNcO5EEuj_KipUf42kryFq4cobWZ8gJhDXNVeLtHFdJetHc5frI/s400/camping.jpg" height="321px" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "A Guide to Birdwatching"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Along with the thorough feminization of our culture, so have we removed
many of the aspects that used to make boys into men, and in turn we are
finding that there are less and less "men" for women to want to
associate with. Once a woman enters into a male institution, it
immediately becomes feminized - thus we now even see that girls are
allowed into the Boy Scouts. Men and boys need to have places separate
from women where they can meet and be men, free from female influence.<br />
<br />
Learning self-reliance and self-confidence is essential for boys. Thus
things such as camping and learning how to build fires from scratch are
good builders of character for young boys. Women are creatures who
depend upon others, but men are creatures who must depend solely upon
themselves. Not only must they depend upon themselves, but they must
also be able to depend on themselves in excess, or <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">they will not become sufficient "tools" for the next generation of women.</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/ritalin-and-abusive-schools.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.angryharry.com/esWellDonetheGirls.htm" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsbyXEO8Tx-JBJOQyFH4eSddGOZUkxGVNOMbtuCW4rYAeIg6oBjTDwmjRx38vUdQlKLLRdDCHWGnZDvjGDzqLLEoI0irk5UjQAWkZpFBNX0CSpTnxb9QM9uk3OLhyphenhyphenMfDjpi7YY8ePsb_M/s1600/ritalin1.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Clic Pic for "Ritalin and Abusive Schools"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In our feminized school systems, when children play sports like soccer
they no longer keep score so that the children's feelings will not be
hurt by being "losers." This again undermines masculinity. When I was a
kid, I played on a soccer team and we were <i>the worst</i> team in the
league. I don't think we won a single game all season - but our coach
did a very good job with us in teaching us how to lose gracefully. <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2004/07/pook-31-let-yourself-fail.html" target="_blank">It builds a boy's character to lose and accept it.</a>
Many endeavors a man takes on in life will not be successful, but
learning how to lose gives him the confidence to try anyway... and if he
keeps on trying because he is not afraid of losing, sooner or later he
will find success. Our schools are "aborting" boys development by
robbing them of the opportunity to lose - and when they can't figure out
why boys aren't developing properly, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/ritalin-and-abusive-schools.html" target="_blank">they fill them with Ritalin</a> rather than addressing the fact that boys and girls are different, and need different strategies to develop.<br />
<br />
Learning to deal with the bully is also a rite of passage for many boys.
I remember as a young boy when my father taught me how to stand up to
the bully. I had gone to a private Christian school as a child and there
was this one kid named Peter who was constantly bullying me. He was two grades
higher than me and bigger than me. One weekend we were at a church
camp-out, shortly before my 11th birthday, and Peter started picking on
me and shoving me around in his usual way. I remember I went running
back to find my Dad and told him what was going on.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVmbfgHnkdc_iWp84qbMWLJUFU_FOkQNKh1YWAi3rbXQbKmGPeGsPp383TYF9sQbXtofSBkzn9UQL3ccUpxwhigtmNWmRpBf01K6QXTM-48fxsfGfHpBcVGDQseRFKHra6xiMT6POIo1Q/s1600/nelsonthreaten.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVmbfgHnkdc_iWp84qbMWLJUFU_FOkQNKh1YWAi3rbXQbKmGPeGsPp383TYF9sQbXtofSBkzn9UQL3ccUpxwhigtmNWmRpBf01K6QXTM-48fxsfGfHpBcVGDQseRFKHra6xiMT6POIo1Q/s400/nelsonthreaten.gif" height="292" width="320" /></a>My dad told me, "Boy, there's just some times that you are gonna have to take care of these things on your own." <br />
<br />
I still remember his words, and in fact, have followed lots of them to this day. <br />
<br />
- Always <i>walk</i> from a fight, but never run. <br />
<br />
- There's a time for talking, and then there's a time to stop talking.<br />
<br />
- Once you get into a fight, fight to win. But even if you don't win,
you've got to show him (and the others) that when they mess with you
there's going to be consequences. <br />
<br />
I recall him providing me with a strategy too. "There's nothing 'fair'
about this fight. This kid is two years older than you and he's bigger
than you. If you have to knee him in the nuts, then do it, and start
punching him - and don't stop until he's on the ground." <br />
<br />
I remember walking back out to where all the kids were playing, and
that's how it worked out. He started shoving me around again, and I
kneed him right in the nuts, and punched him in the head about five or
six times as he was going down, then I turned and walked away. Everyone
was shocked. <br />
<br />
When I walked back amongst the row of RV's, as soon as I rounded the
corner, there popped out my old man (he must have been watching). I was
trembling like a leaf. He just put his arm around me - never said a word
to me about it, neither good nor bad - just walked with me. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNMCHxxxmQlz73yUty1JgnsIta9MxJGyl2mijv0hIrbALNBvenwJ9ui7h8d6OuIGPS9xxq8YFp63leZKa6XAi1mtUEmEmXFxWPghR65-vllcjQQjbrixdvmbu9yApZ6tN_Nb_SEpgvAuA/s1600/8651926.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNMCHxxxmQlz73yUty1JgnsIta9MxJGyl2mijv0hIrbALNBvenwJ9ui7h8d6OuIGPS9xxq8YFp63leZKa6XAi1mtUEmEmXFxWPghR65-vllcjQQjbrixdvmbu9yApZ6tN_Nb_SEpgvAuA/s1600/8651926.jpg" height="243" width="320" /></a>Today, here in Canada, there is a great big "anti-bullying" campaign
going on. All the kids are encouraged to wear pink shirts to symbolize
they are against bullying, there are bullying "hotlines" set up, and
every time there is a conflict between two kids, the mothers are called
in to the principal's office to "work things out." Apparently, at<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt9X9B_7aZ57wcvJw7ZwRLsqw02NJT8MxAt3A5yqqYxpk8EesHdm9YBhSu9o0QuA60sRfy1cshuuGylQGF9LMQYSlNkXBVK82GjHZ7mRZIyEXPNLUmvIoWnxvp81xBv81uiBb33ECS6xE/s1600/Sissy+Boy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt9X9B_7aZ57wcvJw7ZwRLsqw02NJT8MxAt3A5yqqYxpk8EesHdm9YBhSu9o0QuA60sRfy1cshuuGylQGF9LMQYSlNkXBVK82GjHZ7mRZIyEXPNLUmvIoWnxvp81xBv81uiBb33ECS6xE/s1600/Sissy+Boy.jpg" height="320" width="218" /></a>some
school in Toronto, there's a ten year old boy who decided he was gay
(how can you decide you are gay when you are ten?). In order to keep
this "gay" ten year old from being bullied, the school has appointed a
teacher to walk around with him full-time to keep him safe. The old
"schoolyard rules" have been completely abolished and we are raising our
boys to be feminized sissies, not independent men confident in their
own abilities. <br />
<br />
Being bullied is part of life for men and it is important for them to learn how to stick up for themselves. <br />
<br />
Re-framing this culturally, the boys of today are similarly being
bullied by feminists. It's a similar 'fair' fight. They're bigger,
smarter and they fight very dirty. And this is something this generation
of boys needs to sort out themselves, because the older guys will not
be around forever. Perhaps following <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">the Masculine Principle</a> and passing
feminism's cultural <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">fitness-tests</a> might be the new Rite of Passage for the boys and men of today and tomorrow.<br />.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-KFCB23I4_UE%2FVRtHcFnUzuI%2FAAAAAAAAD9Y%2FG_F33ClZZKQ%2Fs1600%2FMother%252BScolding%252BChild.bmp&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1NZMIeNZq8FlNlYQ7XlvhoLqS8mN_3xYxUW0x6CKbad-cl4oh-rsbkJx5grl-hu33Gz9UM8FYz1NYCYeS_uHNGylM-kSRAXSWWkbUFj2pn3AVVioQbgnCgrzHoMjQx4JWHik7rQpjwNc/s1600/Mother+Scolding+Child.bmp" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-89448523850771502232015-03-11T18:00:00.000-07:002015-07-05T14:55:14.754-07:00Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
.<br />
<b>***Foreword***</b> <i>This piece is directly related to the previous two articles titled "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">You're Such a Tool!</a>" and "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" target="_blank">Rites of Passage - Making Boys into Men</a>". To fully understand the significance of the following concepts, those articles must be taken into account.</i> (While this article can stand alone, it is also the "climax" of a three part series - which is part of <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Chapter%202%20-%20Sexuality" target="_blank">a chapter</a> of <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank">a book</a>. There's much more context to this article than what appears here by itself). <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span> </div>
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5hyC9h4AyxIjxtdW2HvgCZAv0Osum__wd2iyifOer0-2qUiBehs0YkMzAsaaXhKk8Ar7VP4KBsAtz0wKxolPY7Osp_BSNPypSC4A4FBRfNk03EELVIBSwXsSEdIjsBFWA7Lh2mpiNnNg/s1600/teenager-with-gestures-search.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5hyC9h4AyxIjxtdW2HvgCZAv0Osum__wd2iyifOer0-2qUiBehs0YkMzAsaaXhKk8Ar7VP4KBsAtz0wKxolPY7Osp_BSNPypSC4A4FBRfNk03EELVIBSwXsSEdIjsBFWA7Lh2mpiNnNg/s400/teenager-with-gestures-search.jpg" width="266px" /></a></div>
At first it may seem like an assault against your good senses to think
of adult women as mere children or teenagers. How could they be? They go
through life and mature just like men do, don’t they? Once they are
thirty or forty, don’t they behave as adults just as thirty or forty
year old men do? Actually, there is much evidence to the contrary.
Perhaps men are so keen to believe that women mature the same as them
(throughout their entire lives) because in the early stages of our
lives, females do actually mature faster than males. <br />
<br />
<b>”The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it
in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and
mental faculties scarcely before he is eight and twenty; woman when she
is eighteen; but hers is a reason of very narrow limitations. This is
why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what
is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing
for reality, and prefer trifling things to the most important.”</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)</a> <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" border="0" height="147" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnrxe3NmTtjp6gZoVdedB9eFHtnntv3ns_oao5gK7jLsiQFYrkgfKVReMdIPRh7ai7VpBuvVU4FcLvpKMUzQv674nEk-lsabcnxGo_tsk6Slp_Or39Qwl91Zg0ol9P2uRLnSs_fwPJHjU/s200/pregnant_woman_with_hammer_and_nail_11has0089rf.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "You're Such a Tool!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The reason why females mature faster than men is not some particular
triumph for them, despite how women seem to enjoy throwing this little
tidbit of information around. As I described in my piece <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">"You're Such a Tool"</a>,
what it really has to do with is women being the biological bearers and
caretakers of children. They mature faster than males because once they
become fertile after puberty, they must also have the mental capacity
to care for the children they might bear. Nowhere in nature is there a
female organism that is capable of giving birth to offspring which is
not also developed enough yet to care for the offspring. This not only
manifests itself in hips capable of giving birth and breasts able to
produce milk, but also in a mental maturation that enables them to
provide basic childcare. You will notice as well, even in our present
society, it is when girls reach around the age of twelve that they begin
taking up babysitting and it is around puberty when adults begin
entrusting young girls to care for infants alone. This merely coincides
with female biology, as it is also at that age when girls become
physically capable of bearing children, and their mental maturity
matches their biological maturity.<br />
<br />
The difference between men and women in maturity, however, is that while females mature earlier in life, they also <i>stop</i>
maturing at around the age of eighteen, as Schopenhauer aptly observes.
And while men don’t catch up to women’s maturity until they reach
around age twenty-eight, after that <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2005/01/eotm-sexual-psychology-part-3-40-to.html" target="_blank">the men keep maturing</a> - often throughout their entire lives. William James describes the same process of maturation in <i>Principles of Psychology</i>, where he states: <br />
<br />
<b>"We observe an identical difference between men as a whole and women as a
whole. A young woman of twenty reacts with intuitive promptitude and
security in all the usual circumstances in which she may be placed. Her
likes and dislikes are formed; her opinions, to a great extent, the
same that they will be through life. Her character is, in fact,
finished in its essentials. How inferior to her is a boy of twenty in
all these respects! His character is still gelatinous, uncertain what
shape to assume, "trying it on" in every direction. Feeling his power,
yet ignorant of the manner in which he shall express it, he is, when
compared with his sister, a being of no definite contour. But this
absence of prompt tendency in his brain to set into particular modes is
the very condition which insures that it shall ultimately become so much
more efficient than the woman's. The very lack of preappointed trains
of thought is the ground on which general principles and heads of
classification grow up; and the masculine brain deals with new and
complex matter indirectly by means of these, in a manner which the
feminine method of direct intuition, admirably and rapidly as it
performs within its limits, can vainly hope to cope with." -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/from-principles-of-psychology-by.html" target="_blank">William James, Principles of Psychology</a> <br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1Z9x9BQVbP1ipKlaBWw_wv-eI22Bs8RkE5k_60LJcsGX-SZ0J1-h0g3JFiBFxRTUTW_plelANbbKURtYYoRS9Qnvc6EYFGlsd6jI4DjfTCLIxGc3khXUaSVftByFqhtZaSGHVyeVB9aU/s1600/boxedwine.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1Z9x9BQVbP1ipKlaBWw_wv-eI22Bs8RkE5k_60LJcsGX-SZ0J1-h0g3JFiBFxRTUTW_plelANbbKURtYYoRS9Qnvc6EYFGlsd6jI4DjfTCLIxGc3khXUaSVftByFqhtZaSGHVyeVB9aU/s1600/boxedwine.jpg" /></a></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0i6-md-KojtX1smztpLSqtNp33iPMybPBihNRMUdsl_odwm9b6b5tBRfl-svGXGx0JI83kaFypPwLVdq9VBzwv15yXgjsA2lB8syFyjDlZW1S_GklJMXHM5J2OCMWKh1lPcsGvCkzPtc/s1600/balvenie-50-year-4-thumb-800x1479-52287.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0i6-md-KojtX1smztpLSqtNp33iPMybPBihNRMUdsl_odwm9b6b5tBRfl-svGXGx0JI83kaFypPwLVdq9VBzwv15yXgjsA2lB8syFyjDlZW1S_GklJMXHM5J2OCMWKh1lPcsGvCkzPtc/s1600/balvenie-50-year-4-thumb-800x1479-52287.jpg" width="172" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Balvenie 50 Year Old Single Malt Scotch</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
It becomes like comparing three-month fermented wine served in a box of
Chateau Cardboard to single malt scotch aged for decades in an oak cask. As such, women do mature faster than males but stop maturing at around
the mentality of an eighteen year old (or also, I suppose, to the
maturity of a 28 year old man), leaving the woman as literally, the most
responsible teenager in the house.<br />
<br />
It is interesting to note as well
how many men claim that it is at around age 27 or 28 that they begin to
“figure things out” in regard to women, or at least much more so than
they did earlier in life. <br />
<br />
<b>”Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our
early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are
childish, and foolish, and shortsighted – in a word, are big children
all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man,
who is a man in the strictest sense of the word. Consider how a young
girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it;
and then consider what a man, with the very best of intentions, could do
in her place.”</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)</a> <br />
<br />
The reason why women stop maturing at around the age of eighteen also
has to do with their biological destiny as child-bearers and caretakers
of children. As Schopenhauer notes, women can toy and coo with a child
all day long and seemingly enjoy themselves, while what could a man do
in their place? Women, as they are wont to brag to us, are also more
“emotionally tuned-in” than men are. Women’s emotional proclivities are
directly related to her childrearing duties which biology has assigned
to her. Babies, for example, communicate <i>solely</i> through emotion
and even as children grow into toddlers and then children that
communicate with words and language, a lot of their communication is
still through emotion, and so women are at an intermediate stage of
development between that of a child and an adult man, or in other words,
they are teenagers. <br />
<br />
Furthermore, in regard to women’s emotional state, it ought to be noted that one cannot be emotional <i>and</i>
rational at the same time, so it is not that females are both more
emotionally in-tune while remaining rationally above it all. Just the
opposite is true. <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esMenareMoreIntelligentthanWomen.htm" target="_blank">The more you “emote,” the less you “think.”</a> Take someone suffering from road-rage, for example. The emotions of anger so cloud the driver’s brain that he can even <i>unthinkingly</i>
commit acts of violence, only to deeply regret it later when his
emotions have subsided. As women are generally in a much more emotional
state of mind than men, so do they not use reason and rationality to
guide themselves as much as men do. <br />
<br />
<b>***NOTE: In regard to these concepts, there's an addition to this article at the bottom of this page.***</b> <br />
. <br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>What’s Mine is Mine and What’s Yours is Ours</b></span> <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiM2XX6RI5_DmpD4CHVXVVkPYMkGHtiVfkytydCEzjKa-ZBSPsuwSZCguVxnndYXyX0-6XS_aguYLxLpaMPxNqK65_lA6GWqK43P7zRS4s6dYmfGOgXE9IrY_zzEkXaVm6YsDFOUVs86sQ/s1600/What's+Mine+is+Mine+and+What%27s+Yours+is+Ours.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="280px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiM2XX6RI5_DmpD4CHVXVVkPYMkGHtiVfkytydCEzjKa-ZBSPsuwSZCguVxnndYXyX0-6XS_aguYLxLpaMPxNqK65_lA6GWqK43P7zRS4s6dYmfGOgXE9IrY_zzEkXaVm6YsDFOUVs86sQ/s400/What's+Mine+is+Mine+and+What's+Yours+is+Ours.JPG" width="400px" /></a>What husband doesn’t come to understand this is the true nature of
marriage after a time? But ultimately, is this not merely the same
attitude that teenagers take within the family?<br />
<br />
Think about how a teenager refers to the family sedan, which the parents paid for, as <i>our</i> car. But the i-pod which he purchased with money he earned part-time at McDonald's is <i>his</i>
i-pod. Is not the teenager’s/child’s default that his parent’s
possessions are “ours” while those possessions he purchased with money
he earned himself are “his,” and his alone? This directly mimics even my
own parent’s marriage, where my father worked his entire lifetime to
pay the bills for the family and put a roof over our heads, but when the
kids were off to school and my mom took up working, the money she
earned doing so was “her money.” It did not go into the family pot as my
father’s income did, but became her own “special money” in almost the
same way that a child’s allowance or earnings are “his money.”<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>(Right Now I Feel Like)...</b></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8LAXOQpflhK-OCUJYLyQFhHaoEURKm-QLt3XdP5SRxdjt4Fv9Y6HzGENRX_6yhtCJWhZ77_a21wutcdwpI5DY_erkoxETKisiJ0JFsnRD5BVvZRfG_08i2YJ5PJg2H5fxIZUx-dHA0uI/s1600/It's+a+Woman's+Prerogative+to+Change+Her+Mind.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8LAXOQpflhK-OCUJYLyQFhHaoEURKm-QLt3XdP5SRxdjt4Fv9Y6HzGENRX_6yhtCJWhZ77_a21wutcdwpI5DY_erkoxETKisiJ0JFsnRD5BVvZRfG_08i2YJ5PJg2H5fxIZUx-dHA0uI/s1600/It's%2Ba%2BWoman's%2BPrerogative%2Bto%2BChange%2BHer%2BMind.jpg" /></a></div>
Perhaps you have heard the old saying, “It’s a woman’s prerogative
to change her mind…” This is something we usually write off as a cute quirk of
female behaviour (<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/10/bonecrker-47-living-in-la-la-land.html" target="_blank">even though it often causes untold damage to others</a>), but
think for a moment how this resembles the behaviour of children & teenagers.
Ask a child what they want to be when they grow up and they will tell you “a
fireman,” then ask them a week later and they will say “an astronaut.” Young
people will do this right through high-school and on into university where they
almost assuredly will change their major at least once, not to mention that
after getting their degree, the odds are there will be more changes in their
plans once again.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If I were a parent who had a teenager that told me they
wanted to be a doctor in the future, I would do well to insert the phrase “Right
now I feel like (I want to be a doctor),” in front of every choice the teenager
has claimed they made. Certainly, I wouldn’t 100% take them at their word and
start depleting my resources in an attempt to help them become a doctor,
because in a month or two, the teen will tell me they no longer want to be a
doctor but have decided on the career path of Famous Rock Star instead.<br />
. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One of the sad facts of entering adulthood is that you are
forced to make choices which you must stick to in order to be successful in
your ventures. The person who decides early to stick to a career as an
auto-mechanic will likely be much more successful in life than his peer who
spends age 18 to 24 pursuing a career as psychologist, then quits and spends
another 6 years attempting a career as an electrician, only to quit again to
gain qualification as an accountant. Part of “adulthood” is about making
choices that you stick to for the long term, so that those ventures have enough
time to bear fruit. Those who change their minds too often rarely harvest the
fruits of their labour. In other words, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2004/05/bonecrcker-153-people-can-choose.html" target="_blank">making a choice to go in one direction often closes the door to other choices</a>. We allow children the latitude to
change their minds as they grow-up, but after a time we start to insist they
make a choice and stick to it.<br />
. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" border="0" height="187" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9GBEwFsl_uYqcIaKVQzTKaShanIdq3_hp85Q0jdOxBNACcE4iQU3RM5TOna7B7QkkNQqXASTM25uquwpTHqF0YYReP0Vhc_PWubHFI-HVpz2afX-VSzOLXnpfPP0xRbRqXJZfdD-ijV0/s1600/no-doctor.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Marketplace"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Women as well change their minds like teenagers do. Sure,
she might decide that (right now she feels like) she wants to be a doctor, but
<a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esIstheTrainingofWomenDoctorsAWaste.htm" target="_blank">as evidence has shown</a> in the medical profession, most women who train to be
doctors spend less than a decade working full-time in said profession before
quitting and deciding that (right now she feels like) she wants to be a mother.
Afterwards, most of these women decide that (right now she feels like) she only
wants to work as a part-time doctor. Of course, as time goes on, she has less
and less experience than the male doctor who never “took a break” to explore
other <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">choices</i> life had to offer and
he quickly outpaces her in that field, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank">even without the Patriarchy conspiring behind the scenes to hold her back</a>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="228" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOcjHby5k-o9emYJHktLgBUnk8u12mVvIZ4OijVpaOyrwktnn6cbs-yPGOwiQi48-HXKpMok-kHGPp-9ou0cZie22sFlVnaFZ0joTOc87rpyzuEDOwzFg7gjErZo_g1bVCY9OqvyX_X6s/s1600/Woman+Changes+Her+Mind.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
When a woman tells you she will love you forever, insert the
phrase (Right now I feel like) before it, so you get the proper translation
into <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2004/08/pook-58-womanese.html" target="_blank">Womanese</a>:
“(Right now I feel like) I will love you forever. All evidence
shows that this should include vows made at the altar as well, since the
vast majority of divorces are initiated by women rather than men.<br />
. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Q: “Do you take this man as your lawful wedded husband, to
have and to hold until death do you part?” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
A: “(Right now I feel like) I do!”<br />
. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Sure women stick to their choices better than children do,
but they don’t do it as well as men do either. In other words, women’s
behaviour exists somewhere in between the child and the man… kinda like a
teenager. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><br />
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Women’s Fitness-Tests are Similar to the Boundaries Which Children Seek</b></span> <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpodtX2jFuCbnZUCoJWJ9qiOHu5g576Bjat-bH9y98IyFp0-iy_WVCkc4PGUNM8iJf9FaygNcnzNHzic-BqwkOcqTi1q_Ma49FXQpQV-mZap3O4O0ApH4bAINFQSDo2eDPum2O_UC50Xc/s1600/clear_boundaries.jpg" width="243" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Anyone who has raised children knows that children seek boundaries and
are happiest when they find such boundaries exist and understand there
are consequences when they cross them. A child who does not have
boundaries set by his parents will in the short term get his way, but
will ultimately come to resent everything around him and become
miserable. <br />
<br />
Women are not much different. They will instinctively <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" target="_blank">fitness-test</a>
a man with all kinds of irrational and basically abusive behaviour, to
test the steel content of his balls by his ability to pass such tests
and not put up with her crap. If the man passes her tests, she calms
down and is content to live within the boundaries of behaviour which he
sets for her. Once she knows there are boundaries and her man is willing
to enforce them, she knows that her man is a capable provider and
protector and she can relax and feel confident following his lead. <br />
<br />
The behaviour of children seeking boundaries set for them by their
parents and the fitness-testing behaviour of women with their lovers is
remarkably similar.<br />
<br />
(Related Study Illustrating that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-better-to-be-right-than-happy-20131217-story.html" target="_blank">Women Crave Boundaries</a>) <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Men Love Women, Women Love Children, and Children Love Puppies</b></span> <br />
<br />
There is an “order” to how love works and the order works only in one
direction. You can see hints to this in the Bible, where husbands are
commanded to love their wives while wives are commanded to “honour”
their husbands in return. Children as well are commanded to honour their
parents. Love is a hierarchal beast that descends downward. The only
way it works in reverse is via honour and respect, because the
reciprocal “love” is never equal.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRS3hJPYU952KXKKtn3rdheOEPDfeJM4kzwLjMQfZmdY7XhnFcpvGlJo8B3OWjrvD5xDLITB25QsxwQSyVTBHUrp-PCAcpGCDOGoJrYgYJow13DQgjfEo3TejgkyAJyaXZJ_wLRUoZKSs/s1600/parents-love.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRS3hJPYU952KXKKtn3rdheOEPDfeJM4kzwLjMQfZmdY7XhnFcpvGlJo8B3OWjrvD5xDLITB25QsxwQSyVTBHUrp-PCAcpGCDOGoJrYgYJow13DQgjfEo3TejgkyAJyaXZJ_wLRUoZKSs/s1600/parents-love.jpg" width="318" /></a></div>
A child will never love its parents in the same fashion that parents
will love their child. You will readily see parents willing to sacrifice
for their children – sometimes with their very lives – but rarely will
you see the same in reverse. In fact, even in society as a whole, we
consider it to be “the right thing” when a father or a mother sacrifices
their life in order to save the life of their child. The whole of
raising children to adulthood involves enormous sacrifice on the part of
the parents in the form of time, frustration, freely giving resources,
the denial of the parent’s dreams, and so forth. It is never returned to
the parents on an equal basis, not even when the child reaches
adulthood, for by that time the child will likely have children of his
own to whom he bestows most of his love upon. Although having children
is a one-way-street of parents sacrificing for the betterment of their
child, they are still instinctively compelled to do so even though,
rationally speaking, it is not in the best interests of the parents.
What parents can expect in return is that their children <i>honour</i>
them and respect them for their sacrifices – but their love will never
equal that which their parents have for them. It is just not part of the
natural order of life.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" border="0" height="153" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgIf-eXHRXZJOkFEVQYo7HnYR5cLxV6p1AVfEeh84VUkiWxFGq6I-75sqk9yCqMVSy6uWgxpdXu44GNj4VJIzz5dXgYvWZ0Vmsg9jqPVP55wLdJaIWRx9J0WmOjKOPNibEd2GwWR0c8Ao/s200/ayof-image-21_794222i-tm.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In the same way, a woman’s love for a man will never be equal to a man’s
love for a woman. The natural order and a woman’s hypergamous nature
dictate that <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" target="_blank">the man must be on a “higher level” than the woman.</a>
A man can love a woman just as a woman can love a child, but the
reciprocal love is returned only in the form of honour and respect. Just
as a child instinctively expects its parents to take care of them, so
does a woman instinctively expect her man to take care of her. It is a
one-way street. A woman will never be able to equally return a man’s
love for her. At best, she can honour and respect him for what he does
for her. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh46-6grIpQsvpFFFEcUW0QN0mgEbNuhHBpXBY4_TzLwIwnycesoDXRBVeM58KFKX2XlKwqLGuN63LI-2W2MWatEHM60_e-Q5i3vmuoUSP5qDWkdtkMi0-XrrCzXXCZCpiqzTr-cXcoFNQ/s1600/Modern+Marriage+in+One+Picture.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh46-6grIpQsvpFFFEcUW0QN0mgEbNuhHBpXBY4_TzLwIwnycesoDXRBVeM58KFKX2XlKwqLGuN63LI-2W2MWatEHM60_e-Q5i3vmuoUSP5qDWkdtkMi0-XrrCzXXCZCpiqzTr-cXcoFNQ/s1600/Modern+Marriage+in+One+Picture.png" width="400" /></a></div>
In fact, in the form of romantic love, you will find that women are not
so much in love with the man as an individual person, but rather they
are in love with <i>the relationship.</i> The man is merely a
role-player and is easily replaced by another taking on the role. If any
man expects to be an “equal partner” with his wife, he will soon find
his woman disrespecting him and seeking out a man who is decidedly <i>not</i> her equal to lead her. <br />
<br />
<b>They are the <i>sexus sequior,</i> the second sex in every respect,
therefore their weaknesses should be spared, but to treat women with
extreme reverence is ridiculous, and lowers us in their own eyes. When
nature divided the human race into two parts, she did not cut it exactly
through the middle! The difference between the positive and negative
poles, according to polarity, is not merely qualitative but also
quantitative. And it was in this light that the ancients and people of
the East regarded woman; they recognised her true position better than
we, with our old French ideas of gallantry and absurd veneration, that
highest product of Christian-Teutonic stupidity. These ideas have only
served to make them arrogant and imperious, to such an extent as to
remind one at times of the holy apes in Benares, who, in the
consciousness of their holiness and inviolability, think they can do
anything and everything they please.</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)</a> <br />
<br />
You cannot expect a woman to be your true confidant, your soul-mate, and
your respite to lean upon during the stormy times in life. <i>That is your role for her benefit.</i>
It does not work in reverse, for as soon as you believe it can work
that way, she will lose confidence in your ability to lead her and begin
to resent you. She will go about illustrating her resentment by making
your life as miserable as she possibly can. <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2002/02/zenpriest-59-most-important-lesson-man.html" target="_blank">This may be one of the hardest lessons for a man to learn in life</a>
because it turns the whole notion of modern love as an equal
give-and-take relationship upon its ear. The implications can be rather
depressing, as it means that on a certain level a man will always be
alone. A parent who expects their child to also be their equal friend to
lean upon for support, will also find himself sorely disappointed with
the results. The child instinctively expects the parents to be superior
and to cater to his needs. Expecting the reverse will only result in a
resentful child and a heartbroken parent. The same order must be
maintained between a man and a woman, lest she become resentful and seek
out a man who actually <i>will</i> lead her. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Terrible Twos</b></span> <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEintepTitEFRIgqTVW1OA_OWH1pO7I7VFwoVrHbkfBi3Bv6M4ssFU8FskiJhRbppW1taj3y2X9OhNV0_HpuQaniPimSh-A4F4hU8RqXPDY21qedYR1Tvc06HgohBL8IONsGndbdQkEdnmI/s1600/Temper+Tantrum.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEintepTitEFRIgqTVW1OA_OWH1pO7I7VFwoVrHbkfBi3Bv6M4ssFU8FskiJhRbppW1taj3y2X9OhNV0_HpuQaniPimSh-A4F4hU8RqXPDY21qedYR1Tvc06HgohBL8IONsGndbdQkEdnmI/s400/Temper+Tantrum.jpg" width="363px" /></a><i>”If one looks around at today's culture and takes note of all the
destructive effects of the female attitude of entitlement, then went on
to devise social controls which would prevent such destructive effects
in the future, I think you would end up with social values very much
like the ones currently labeled "patriarchal."</i><br />
<br />
<i>Rather than viewing feminism as "conditioning" women to behave in
completely self-centered ways, I see it more as a case of feminism
regarding the socialization process which countered the natural tendency
of all organisms toward selfishness - as "oppression."</i><br />
<br />
<i>Every parent who has had daily involvement in raising a child is
familiar with the stage called "the terrible twos." This is the stage
during which the naturally selfish infant is forced to come to terms
with the fact that their desires will not always be met and their will won't always prevail. I have no doubt that if the child were able to
express what it knows in its "special infantile way of knowing", that it
would consider the imposition of external values on it to be
"oppression."</i><br />
<br />
<i>The vast majority of women I have met have seemed to be stuck
emotionally at about age two. Any frustration of their desires would
result in a tantrum. In many cases these were more subtle than throwing
herself on the floor and thrashing around, but it was a tantrum
nonetheless. So, rather than saying that feminism "conditioned" women to
behave in an immature, selfish, and totally self-centered fashion, I
would describe it as feminism destroying the social value system and the
process of conditioning women out of their infantile and narcissistic
world view.”</i> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/08/zenpriest-21-terrible-twos.html" target="_blank">The Wisdom of Zenpriest</a> <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Your Bratty Little Sister</b></span><br />
<br />
<b>”... Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; … A man of
sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and flatters them,
as he does with a sprightly forward child; but he neither consults them
about, nor trusts them with serious matters; though he often makes them
believe that he does both; which is the thing in the world they are
most proud of; for they love mightily to be dabbling in business (which
by the way they always spoil); and being justly distrustful that men in
general look upon them in a trifling light, they almost adore that man
who talks more seriously to them, and who seems to consult and trust
them; I say, who seems; for weak men really do, <i>but wise ones only seem to do it</i></b>. ..."<b> </b>-- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/10/letter-to-his-son-by-lord-chesterfield.html" target="_blank">Lord Chesterfield, Letter to His Son (1748)</a> <br />
.<br />
In the sense of seduction, a man is well advised to treat a woman as if she were his <a href="http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/11/09/everything-she-does-is-cute/" target="_blank">bratty little sister:</a><br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfBV838Rf2A1_sYee5hUScvIlxR3dJi8ODcKB5hKMLRd7dK-D1nsiT-ZWX8kzHjxZ5CVGx6Crp9CNLORzAZxGurQZkNF734pYH1nPxAyNJSIqeyqfadjGXzKbo81rxN0WJqnMScH67M3w/s1600/brat+girl+1.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfBV838Rf2A1_sYee5hUScvIlxR3dJi8ODcKB5hKMLRd7dK-D1nsiT-ZWX8kzHjxZ5CVGx6Crp9CNLORzAZxGurQZkNF734pYH1nPxAyNJSIqeyqfadjGXzKbo81rxN0WJqnMScH67M3w/s400/brat+girl+1.jpg" width="266px" /></a><i>”…The more you patronizingly treat women like bratty kid sisters, the
more their vaj takes over their critical thinking skills. It all
harkens back to the one fundamental principle guiding male-female
relations: Chicks love submitting to powerful men. And what is a bigger
demonstration of male sexual power than believing that a woman is so far
beneath you that she is the equivalent of a child, hardly deserving of a
serious answer or an emotional investment?</i><br />
<br />
<i>So what does “everything she does is cute” mean in practice? It means
not getting riled up when she tests you. It means not explaining
yourself when she stamps her wee feet and wags a finger at you. It means
never acting apologetic when she’s upset with some mysterious
infraction you’ve committed. Keep in mind that when a woman gets upset,
at least half the time she’s not really upset with whatever misdemeanor
she’s accusing you of; she’s just upset that your behavior caused a
temporary reversal of gina tingle induction.</i><br />
<br />
<i>The “everything she does is cute” game tactic is defined more
precisely as an inner game refinement. When you start thinking of women
as adorable brats who know not what they do, you start treating them in
ways consistent with your beliefs. With enough reprogramming in the
right direction (i.e. kicking the supports out from under her pedestal),
soon the words coming out of your mouth will be effortless verbal
expressions of what you actually feel. And therein lies the secret to
being a natural — naturals truly believe the charmingly jerkoff things
they say to women.”</i> -- <a href="http://heartiste.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Chateau Heartiste</a> <br />
. <br />
(Also see <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2004/07/pook-16-lesson-thirteen-charm-is.html" target="_blank">"Lesson Thirteen: Charm is Treating Women Like Little Girls"</a> -- The Book of Pook)<br />
.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Conclusion</b></span> <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQj_lKbBnknEituZDAlQtOM6q9LyW3pcdVZUviNbSt9NUZUuGuW_bSQRcJIHRA09kZp-hyAB4YyOJZhusWOO2s0yD9zt7cLgK4FUqf4nutWup2sQArRYA-ruJqMVEGwUnDf00UPObBj-s/s1600/Dr+Phil.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQj_lKbBnknEituZDAlQtOM6q9LyW3pcdVZUviNbSt9NUZUuGuW_bSQRcJIHRA09kZp-hyAB4YyOJZhusWOO2s0yD9zt7cLgK4FUqf4nutWup2sQArRYA-ruJqMVEGwUnDf00UPObBj-s/s400/Dr+Phil.JPG" width="280px" /></a>Despite what most relationship “experts” try to tell you, the key to a
successful relationship is not about open, honest communication.<br />
<br />
It is true, there must be a form of “mutual respect,” but the respect
cannot be equal in all ways. A parent can respect a child and respect
the child’s needs, but for a parent to treat the child as an equal would
be a grave mistake. In a similar way, a man can respect a woman, but if
he deems to treat her as his equal, she will soon come to resent him
and leave to seek a man who actually portrays himself as superior – as a
leader – to her. She seeks this instinctively. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">She is like water seeking a strong man to act as the container which will shape her "truths."</a>
In the realm of seduction, a woman also seeks out a man who is able to
behave in a superior fashion to her, so even if you are not yet
convinced that women are as mere children but only of a larger growth,
you would be well advised to <i>treat her as one</i> if only from the standpoint of keeping her romantically interested in you. <br />
<br />
When a man marries a woman, he doubles his duties while halving his
rights. This was true even in the days of Marriage 1.0. It is a large
responsibility involving much effort to take on a wife, just as it is
for one to take on raising children. You cannot expect children, or
women, to fulfill your needs for emotional intimacy nor to be “someone
to lean on” during times of strife. Just the opposite, for that is <i>your</i> duty as a parent and also as a husband. <br />
<br />
Most of our modern laws, and nearly all of the “experts” in the social
sciences, have done everything they possibly can to undermine a man’s
ability to properly “husband” his wife. The current state of affairs
completely upsets the natural hierarchy between man and woman. In the
same way that it would be nearly impossible for parents to properly
raise children if the government passed a plethora of laws
deconstructing parent’s natural roles and restricting them from setting
boundaries for children, so it is increasingly difficult for a man to
properly fulfill his leadership role <i>that women instinctively seek and need.</i>
When children have legal authority over their parents, chaos will
ensue, just as in Marriage 2.0 where women hold supremacy over the
husbands, the practice of matrimony will only harm and bring resentment
to all parties involved, making one ill-advised to seek such an
arrangement in life. <br />
<br />
<b>“Feminism starts out being very simple. It starts out being the
instinct of a little child who says ‘it’s not fair’ and ‘you are not the
boss of me,’ and it ends up being a worldview that questions hierarchy
altogether.”</b> -- <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/home-front/275587/psychology-gloria-steinem/suzanne-venker#" target="_blank">Gloria Steinem</a>, in the two hour HBO special on the life of Gloria Steinem entitled, <i>"Gloria: In Her Own Words." </i><br />
.<b><span style="font-size: large;"></span></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html">Next</a></span></b></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<b>***An addition to this article***</b> I kind of get a kick watching this article get linked to on Reddit. It causes quite a bit of controversy and has a <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillDebate/comments/1gdlt8/the_elephant_in_the_room_for_me_is_the_view_on/cajc62x" target="_blank">lot of people</a> <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/1gk7xx/serious_post_can_someone_give_a_rebuttal_to_the/" target="_blank">pretty angry</a>, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/1blkgk/should_i_really_adopt_this_attitude_if_i_want_to/" target="_blank">especially women</a>. Some of their arguments are pretty silly though. The most glaring one is people calling what Schopenhauer says as "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">science from the 1850's</a>." Umm, Schopenhauer is a <i>philosopher</i>, <a href="http://www.safs.ca/issuescases/lynched.html" target="_blank">not a scientist</a>.
Learn the difference.<br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXWS5FxpQH0fSCK5oIOu86ayUcLV01NJeF8bfEqGsHqG3nOP-xLuO6gtG2lRMJiyAaXq4vvCY6BgFv76n0no-BB-LW2SeQdEK_JNQjgeEyBD0ZIAW46VfazFFtC5_CJjLQlzZcpwLPtyk/s1600/angry-woman2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXWS5FxpQH0fSCK5oIOu86ayUcLV01NJeF8bfEqGsHqG3nOP-xLuO6gtG2lRMJiyAaXq4vvCY6BgFv76n0no-BB-LW2SeQdEK_JNQjgeEyBD0ZIAW46VfazFFtC5_CJjLQlzZcpwLPtyk/s1600/angry-woman2.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Your Friendly, Neighbourhood Social Justice Warrior!</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Also, there is one ridiculous person in there
(who goes to every reddit around to repeatedly complain about this
article - for over a year now!) who continually points out that I linked to <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/" target="_blank">Angry Harry</a>,
"who is just another blogger like me," and points out that AH's
"source" for "the more you emote, the less you think" is the Daily Mail.
She does not point out, however, that the Daily Mail's article she is
referring to is cited by "peer reviewed research," done by a feminist,
no less, and Angry Harry merely read the research and translated what
she said. Furthermore, Angry Harry has <i>multiple</i> degrees, a Ph D. in Psychology and the others I believe are related to childhood education - making him <i>extremely</i> qualified to critique the research and comment on what it means. Angry Harry <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esWhyDidTeachersAdoptPoorTeachingMethods.htm?note" target="_blank">often has written</a> about <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/Learning-to-Read.htm" target="_blank">how the school system</a> has been rejigged <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esStopHelpingBoys.htm" target="_blank">to favour girls over boys</a>, and it is his area of expertise to note <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/Dr-Lewis-Wolpert-The-Differences-Between-Men-And-Women.htm" target="_blank">the different brain functions of the sexes</a>. <br />
.<br />
Further,
you will quickly see how angry women get about this discussion, but not
men - except for the mangina's and white knights trying curry favour
and approval from anonymous females on the internet with whom they have
absolutely no chance of getting sex from - yet they still feel compelled
to grovel like servile worms in front of them. My goodness, I half
expect that if women gave those men a dull, rusty pocketknife, they
would castrate themselves to gain the ladies' approval. But, to note, I
have not yet seen one single man get angry
that this<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgntSlZA0_iY7Xd-aja20Nt4zKolRF0XhVkRcwfCJsYwNuT4qfmvWeoxxearlBDPE6i9uYmGvyW4SHYfFg7CPcNaV_Ltx-5qIjpoAoSFy8_lOpNWSpzPebhQHJVjNf1a-eJzzRpKXA615o/s1600/Dull,+Rusty+Pocketknife.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgntSlZA0_iY7Xd-aja20Nt4zKolRF0XhVkRcwfCJsYwNuT4qfmvWeoxxearlBDPE6i9uYmGvyW4SHYfFg7CPcNaV_Ltx-5qIjpoAoSFy8_lOpNWSpzPebhQHJVjNf1a-eJzzRpKXA615o/s1600/Dull,+Rusty+Pocketknife.JPG" width="320" /></a>article blatantly suggests men are more immature than women
from pretty much the age of 12 to 28. (It also says males are valued less than females in society). I mean, no teenage boy nor man in
his twenties takes <i>any</i> offense whatsoever to the suggestion that
they are not as mature as their female peers, yet women and their
enablers are having virtual heart-attacks over the suggestion that men
may have some kind of advantage over females - somewhere.<br />
<br />
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">“Men are not troubled
to hear a man dispraised, because they know, though he be naught, there's worth
in others; but women are mightily troubled to hear any of them spoken against,
as if the sex itself were guilty of some unworthiness.”</b> – John Seldon
(1584-1654)<br />
<br />
And, to note, <a href="http://www.education.com/reference/article/Ref_Boys_Girls/" target="_blank">it is virtually accepted scientifically that girls do</a>, indeed, mature faster than boys, both physically and mentally. (Which already <i>proves</i> the male and female brain are <i>not the same</i>).
Physically, for example, in puberty girls mature faster than boys in
such things as height. But as we all know, while boys start their growth
spurt later than girls, boys grow to be significantly taller than
girls. Furthermore, males also do not fully fill-out muscularly until
they reach their late twenties. However, an 18 year old female is pretty
much at her peak of physical development at that age, and by her late
twenties is beginning to decline. <br />
. <br />
As such, those who
are angry at this article are, on the one hand, acknowledging the
superiority of women (they mature faster than boys) but then complaining
- <i>screeching like children actually</i> - that there is some advantage which males will gain later in life. In other words, they are trying to show the <i>superiority</i> of the female brain, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">not its <i>equality</i></a>.
If a female brain matures faster than a male's, and also, ends up
having no disadvantages but only (at the minimum) equality with the male
brain thereafter, then it is quite obvious that they are claiming the
female brain is <i>superior</i> to the male brain, because if it matures faster, and is also in every way just as capable, then it is superior because it only <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">has advantages, but not corresponding disadvantages</a>. This reminds me of a verse from Angry Harry's marvelous poem, <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esIfIOnlyHadaV.htm" target="_blank">If I Only Had a V</a>:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNyc5P_zXAYgSxWvy9VYTqbAngjPKa0qbbJyiK6JOjNR0J7AExq9E-rho5Pz18kBptsFsTVjx89eL16GF_Kblc6qL_4tFLgbaEzQhtN-jthY_1ldYgdoaT40MzLEV-HAjUejkctSzHweE/s1600/Man+Woman+Child.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNyc5P_zXAYgSxWvy9VYTqbAngjPKa0qbbJyiK6JOjNR0J7AExq9E-rho5Pz18kBptsFsTVjx89eL16GF_Kblc6qL_4tFLgbaEzQhtN-jthY_1ldYgdoaT40MzLEV-HAjUejkctSzHweE/s1600/Man+Woman+Child.jpg" width="305" /></a><i>If I only had a V</i><br />
<i>I would use it expertly</i><br />
<i>To generate equality</i><br />
<i>That somehow always favours me</i><br />
<br />
Boy, I wonder how loud the childish squealing would get if I pointed out <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/wrinkle-in-time.html" target="_blank">other philosophers and writers from the past</a>
who argued things such as women's height being between that of a child
and a man, or that their facial features and skin are intermediate
between a child's and a man's... <br />
. <br />
As someone who grew
up through the brunt of feminism's sickness in the 1970's, 80's and
90's, I cannot begin to tell you how many times I have heard of <a href="http://blogs.plos.org/obesitypanacea/2011/11/21/cigarettes-may-be-useful-for-distance-runners-or-how-to-prove-anything-with-a-review-article/" target="_blank">the superiority</a>
of the female brain's multi-tasking abilities. "Nyah nyah nyah nyah
nyah," the females taunted, from teenagers to old women to fat orca's
with TV talk shows. (They are still doing it today in their "<a href="http://shriverreport.org/special-report/a-womans-nation-changes-everything/" target="_blank">A Woman's Nation</a>" and "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/" target="_blank">End of Men</a>" articles). Never once has it been acceptable to
point out that men's linear thinking brain is the one that is capable
of intense and deep concentration, precisely because it <i>does not</i>
multi-task, and thus why virtually all of the world's inventions with
more than two moving parts have come from the hands of men, plus the
majority of great musicians, artists, philosophers and so on. Women's
multi-tasking brains are like the phrase "a jack of all trades, but master
of none." It helps them do other tasks while also tending to children.
(Most women spent the majority of their entire adult lives either
pregnant or caring for their children until very recently in human
history). For every advantage there is a disadvantage. For every cloud,
there is a silver lining. A Ferrari would be a scream for Sunday afternoon drives, but when Monday morning comes around and you need to <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2005/03/eotm-secret-of-life-shut-up-and-shovel.html" target="_blank">Shut Up and Shovel the Fuckin' Gravel</a>, you'd probably rather have an old pick-up truck.<br />
.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipKpaEmlHFOmj4yp5JEVXqjwxFNu5ABvkj6mMlSrfQm1BngDpq4fx6EgivEFILy7EahximbGA1qhR3LosJKj1BrX7A0C2y0qqjllF3DejRjQTTVntt4IbEJ5T9VcnUKARpAgT3qdIMeYM/s1600/Ferrari+Sexy+Woman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipKpaEmlHFOmj4yp5JEVXqjwxFNu5ABvkj6mMlSrfQm1BngDpq4fx6EgivEFILy7EahximbGA1qhR3LosJKj1BrX7A0C2y0qqjllF3DejRjQTTVntt4IbEJ5T9VcnUKARpAgT3qdIMeYM/s1600/Ferrari+Sexy+Woman.jpg" /></a><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2005/03/eotm-secret-of-life-shut-up-and-shovel.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2005/03/eotm-secret-of-life-shut-up-and-shovel.html" border="0" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6F8rYo-W8K-5qxnpx_hJxpgry9-y5TTAhfhdfsd8hk9vdsbIXAVtw5L0oo0sKfiQEbwmvP0zHXVe4Bm9ojzBsowb4Me7fW_nCnhbbeJ9Xvn1lZQ_0EEplAZO0_2zBhDrUyv__XzHeZFY/s1600/Shut+Up+and+Shovel+the+Fuckin'%2BGravel.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click the correct vehicle to use for "The Secret to Life: Shut Up and Shovel the Fuckin' Gravel!" -- by Zenpriest</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
.<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />
. <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1jxha-CM987xWrnutqvLSB-GwhTVhB1jtnPRPguG0DySIc-vTaKuvCzJ26gf0MhyhUvqg6N_goi-C6bEhgWsXsN6Wzw4pHDa9ZrDp55dMkOb7qW7xaDXjeJaD920177x-_t4mtgoWJdM/s1600/Male+and+Female+Brain+Wiring.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1jxha-CM987xWrnutqvLSB-GwhTVhB1jtnPRPguG0DySIc-vTaKuvCzJ26gf0MhyhUvqg6N_goi-C6bEhgWsXsN6Wzw4pHDa9ZrDp55dMkOb7qW7xaDXjeJaD920177x-_t4mtgoWJdM/s1600/Male+and+Female+Brain+Wiring.jpg" width="263" /></a></div>
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-hardwired-difference-between-male-and-female-brains-could-explain-why-men-are-better-at-map-reading-8978248.html" target="_blank">The Hard-Wired Difference Between Male and Female Brains Could Explain Why Men Are Better At Map Reading</a> - </span>Researchers found that many of the connections in a typical male
brain run between the front and the back of the same side of the brain,
whereas in women the connections are more likely to run from side to
side between the left and right hemispheres of the brain. <i>This
difference in the way the nerve connections in the brain are “hardwired”
occurs during adolescence when many of the secondary sexual
characteristics such as facial hair in men and breasts in women develop
under the influence of sex hormones, the study found</i>. The
researchers believe the physical differences between the two sexes in
the way the brain is hardwired could play an important role in
understanding why men are in general better at spatial tasks involving
muscle control while women are better at verbal tasks involving memory
and intuition.<br />
<br />
... Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is
associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with
intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than
men at intuitive tasks, she added. “<i>Intuition is thinking without
thinking.</i> It's what people call gut feelings. <i>Women tend to be better
than men at these kinds of skill which are linked with being good
mothers</i>,” Professor Verma said.<br />
<br />
(Note that male brains run front to back, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">thus not crossing logic with emotion as with women</a>). </div>
.<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<u><b>Further reading:</b></u><br />
.<br />
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2005/01/eotm-sexual-psychology-part-2-puberty.html" target="_blank">Sexual Psychology: Puberty to 40</a><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> - Eye of the Mind</span><br />
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny" target="_blank">Neoteny</a> - the U of Wikipedia </span><br />
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: medium;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html">Next</a></span></span></b></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
..http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-80869002932979574482015-03-11T17:00:00.000-07:002015-04-30T08:44:27.688-07:00The Amazon Women (The Science of "Why Males Exist")<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqNUhn2SIVeSsqBbKPImzNA-rVhyphenhyphenFuMJYM0FqCzaZyCXze7ksJYeKspc3XYt4b0S6BZAPvGK0-pH9UGuDZwnGLVBhSF9m1xuq5aLOn620XhKuvFMuUe5Z-DMiPczgWqtvu6aNZ046o6QRN/s1600/amazon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqNUhn2SIVeSsqBbKPImzNA-rVhyphenhyphenFuMJYM0FqCzaZyCXze7ksJYeKspc3XYt4b0S6BZAPvGK0-pH9UGuDZwnGLVBhSF9m1xuq5aLOn620XhKuvFMuUe5Z-DMiPczgWqtvu6aNZ046o6QRN/s400/amazon.jpg" height="236" width="400" /></a><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"There has never been a case of men and women reigning together,
but wherever on the earth men are found, there we see that men rule,
and women are ruled, and that on this plan, both sexes live in harmony.
But on the other hand, the Amazons, who are reported to have held rule
of old, did not suffer men to stop in their country, but reared only
their female children, killing the males to whom they gave birth."</b> -- Spinoza</span> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The
legend/myth of the Amazons is one that I always find particularly
interesting. They are mentioned by both the Greeks and the Romans and
are thought to have lived either in present day Turkey, the Ukraine or
Libya. Perhaps they even lived in Minoan Crete.<span style="font-family: inherit;"> In some stories, they killed all the males and went to
neighbouring tribes once a year to have sex & get pregnant with the
next generation. The resulting male children would either be killed,
sent back to their fathers, or left to fend for themselves in the wild.
In other stories, after being victorious in war, they would not kill all
of the men but rather, take some of them back as slaves with whom they
would have sex once or twice a year. One thing is certain, they did not
much care for males! </span></span><br />
. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">I
think this legend reveals something which
exists deeply within nature itself, namely, that if females do not find
males useful, they are actively hostile to those males and eject them
from participating in their society, which is mostly made of females.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQqtnrdHwfnDc1BiB5JaJg_A-51_rdvVnz6Ta7nNi_O4qgM-I-Ku27OZc-ToMDIsT2fi8neTwJaK_KaC8k0DU06E401Gv0CKBLd4-uGiy_4kpN5MTzxa2yFbS0OM1xwaHaFbMH7HoLxPc/s1600/Why+Males+Exist+-+Fred+Hapgood.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQqtnrdHwfnDc1BiB5JaJg_A-51_rdvVnz6Ta7nNi_O4qgM-I-Ku27OZc-ToMDIsT2fi8neTwJaK_KaC8k0DU06E401Gv0CKBLd4-uGiy_4kpN5MTzxa2yFbS0OM1xwaHaFbMH7HoLxPc/s1600/Why+Males+Exist+-+Fred+Hapgood.jpg" height="320" width="211" /></a><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">What
got me thinking about this subject lately is I was recently doing some
research on "Why Males Exist." In fact, I was looking up a book of the
same name, titled <a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Why-Males-Exist-Inquiry-Evolution/dp/0688035469" target="_blank"><i>Why Males Exist: An Inquiry into the Evolution of Sex</i> </a></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Why-Males-Exist-Inquiry-Evolution/dp/0688035469" target="_blank">- by Fred Hapgood</a>. In doing so, I came across an article called <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">"Mysteries of the Male", by Dr. John Launer, of QMJ: An international journal of medicine</a>.
This article really hit me hit me between the eyes when it started
talking about "genetic-rape." I mean, the definition of rape has
certainly been expanded over the years to the point that it means
nothing like its original meaning, but "genetic-rape"?</span><br />
<br />
<b>"...we will see [the purpose of males] as an evolutionary compromise poised
half way between invasion and alliance, parasitism and
symbiosis, or genetic rape and informed consent. There
is already much evidence to show how females resist the process
physiologically
(for example by stripping male gametes of all
extra-nuclear DNA) and how males try to control reproduction against
their females’
will (for example, by killing off competitor sperm or
genetic material in the female genital tract, or alternatively killing
the competitors and their offspring directly)."</b> -- <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer, Mysteries of the Male, Oxford Journals, Medicine, QMJ: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 98, Issue 12, Pp. 919-920</a>.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">I
really had to question why this was referred to in such an inflammatory,
political charged manner as "invasion, genetic rape and informed
consent," and why Launer goes on to portray the female cell resisting
the males' attempts to reproduce with females against their will. "Wow!"
I thought to myself, "this guy is saying that at the very basic,
fundamental level, all <i>things</i> male are rape-related, with the female cell the victim, resisting the attempt."</span> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>"All men are rapists and that's all they are."</b> -- Marilyn French, Feminist Authoress; (later, advisoress to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">. </span></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAOoqjYqZtRuoES44EFOgxDhkF1t8fHJ5n_d27UqLizBLGtYSHFaWJlmnJ5KU3le5k-R7wTz2n1fJTyyLal_wnHU4VxbHOR7nJCGol-JGSYq-988w2VkG246SX_t9HwMd_wxBAdIGzLMzw/s1600/Rape.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAOoqjYqZtRuoES44EFOgxDhkF1t8fHJ5n_d27UqLizBLGtYSHFaWJlmnJ5KU3le5k-R7wTz2n1fJTyyLal_wnHU4VxbHOR7nJCGol-JGSYq-988w2VkG246SX_t9HwMd_wxBAdIGzLMzw/s400/Rape.jpg" height="262" width="400" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Now,
I get it what Dr. Launer is talking about. While I am no biology major,
I have read enough about reproduction over the years to know that two
males' sperm simultaneously inside a female will fight against each
other, trying kill each other off in order be the one that "gets to the
prize," and also, females secret certain acids that attack sperm cells,
killing off many of the weaker ones. I get it, but it was the rape
terminology that threw me for a loop.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">What
is also going in in the reproductive process, and isn't mentioned, is
the male cells are fighting and competing to provide the female cell
with their <i>best</i> and <i>strongest</i> manifestation, all the while
the female cell is as actively hostile to as many as she can be, in a
manner that also supports only the <i>best</i> and <i>strongest</i>
managing to reproduce with her. In other words, <i>genetic hypergamy</i>, with
the female trying to ward off all but the very best, with whom she
eventually will submit and reproduce with. So, in other words, all of
this competition and cellular "violence" is done in such a manner to
ensure the female cell's wishes, not the male's. They all want to be
"the one," while she only wants "the best one," and she is actively
hostile to all the others below that. Hypergamy at a cellular level.</span></span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">. </span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">Near the beginning of his article, Dr. Launer gave examples of animal species that had virtually useless males:</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: small;">. </span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></span></span><b>"...the males of many species
are useless at doing anything except sitting around,
getting fat at the females’ expense, and—in the words of Richard
Dawkins—duffing
up other males.<a class="xref-bibr" href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full#ref-2" id="xref-ref-2-1"><sup>2</sup></a> Among some animals, such as elephant seals, the vast majority die as wasteful, disappointed virgins.</b><br />
<br />
<b>Given the cost of males, it is perhaps not surprising that there are at
least 40 species where the female kills the male during
or after sex. In the case of the praying mantis, she
literally bites his head off as part of foreplay, and he carries on in
a delighted reflex of posthumous orgasm. Females of
other species are equally imaginative: male scale insects have been
demoted
to microscopic excrescences on their females’ legs,
while female angler fish carry their mates on their backs as tiny
dwarves."</b> -- <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer, Mysteries of the Male, Oxford Journals, Medicine, QMJ: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 98, Issue 12, Pp. 919-920</a>.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjH3ACw3ZfPhWisrBpGEABUkk9_g5WSpO7oG0SdpH4wyqyxFDP3_fcv6hDg41JXOGku3LjqHZo7FaID8hWEldlygkQ0eqOuFmpfzvLBpN9R52Co7Iw1x8Z10rWi0oe6ou4gq0efbQVqQ00/s1600/drone-and-worker-brood.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjH3ACw3ZfPhWisrBpGEABUkk9_g5WSpO7oG0SdpH4wyqyxFDP3_fcv6hDg41JXOGku3LjqHZo7FaID8hWEldlygkQ0eqOuFmpfzvLBpN9R52Co7Iw1x8Z10rWi0oe6ou4gq0efbQVqQ00/s1600/drone-and-worker-brood.jpg" height="266" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Deformed Drone Cone in a Beehive</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
And there is no doubt that this is true. We see the same thing in a
beehive, where the male drones are utterly useless to the hive, save but
for when it produces a queen which needs fertilizing. For the rest, the
drones don't do any work, ruin parts of the hive with their special
form of comb, and suck energy and food. For this reason, beekeepers will
actively try to control the drone population in the hive to increase
honey production. <br />
<br />
Launer concludes his article with noting that scientific advances in
cloning, and the inevitable lifting of legal constraints, will enable
human women to do away with men altogether, so long as men don't destroy
the world first, and he seemingly applauds the end of his own sex.<br />
<br />
<b>"Assuming that the minor technical problems of gene damage during cloning
can soon be overcome, and that legal constraints
will in time be removed—assumptions that seem
reasonable by any standard—it is possible that the women of our species
will
soon have the overall choice of doing with very few
men, or with none at all. If, in the mean time, they can prevent males
from destroying any environment in which to survive,
they might be forgiven if they choose to follow the path that has
already
been pioneered by the bdelloid rotifers. Attempts to
understand maleness or to redress its difficulties will then become
entirely
academic.</b><i>" </i>-- <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer, Mysteries of the Male, Oxford Journals, Medicine, QMJ: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 98, Issue 12, Pp. 919-920</a>. <br />
<br />
And we're back to the legend of the Amazons where the females killed off the males, aren't we? Everything is a full cycle.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1S2tguIgULPdVHAVLNUHV_f8JuY6y28BQNHrq4KZUbKW9VAkOXdx4EjCynTTc6RtmZZwGLPMxe36kOh00Aarky2EsdSFPLXn1_dJvkf07tBEY2re9nV7otB60mDSyT-4HAnraW0Pj0y_P/s1600/amazons.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1S2tguIgULPdVHAVLNUHV_f8JuY6y28BQNHrq4KZUbKW9VAkOXdx4EjCynTTc6RtmZZwGLPMxe36kOh00Aarky2EsdSFPLXn1_dJvkf07tBEY2re9nV7otB60mDSyT-4HAnraW0Pj0y_P/s320/amazons.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
It appears Dr. Launer has the pleasure of holding the company of radical feminists in his camp too! <br />
<br />
<b>“I haven’t the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white
hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of
reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty
examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In
addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for
generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don’t mean that. Yes, I
really do.” </b>-- Robin Morgan<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></span><br />
<br />
<b>"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."</b> -- Sally Miller Gearhart, <i>The Future - If There Is One - Is Female</i><br />
<br />
<b>"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a
decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an
evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the
population of males."</b><i> -- </i>Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001<i> </i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoelN7pAmdC-8NAuKGg9Oyoml6LlJOXx3YClehfVWeQjNQZbdH-P75P9dxS45dt8abfdLvuy_qNLTOHgOiFgeQ5qme2bKDUEqnY2ICmnpmKCPGJrlxNRnuUnbPRUZfm-zzflQnDB1xOvg/s1600/whiptail.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoelN7pAmdC-8NAuKGg9Oyoml6LlJOXx3YClehfVWeQjNQZbdH-P75P9dxS45dt8abfdLvuy_qNLTOHgOiFgeQ5qme2bKDUEqnY2ICmnpmKCPGJrlxNRnuUnbPRUZfm-zzflQnDB1xOvg/s1600/whiptail.jpeg" height="295" width="400" /></a>As I stated at the beginning of this article, I had been searching for the book <span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Why-Males-Exist-Inquiry-Evolution/dp/0688035469" target="_blank"><i>Why Males Exist: An Inquiry into the Evolution of Sex</i> </a></span><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Why-Males-Exist-Inquiry-Evolution/dp/0688035469" target="_blank">- by Fred Hapgood.</a></span>
</span>Although the book is somewhat dated (1979), its general thrust is that
females either create or stop creating males entirely for the purpose of
serving the needs of the species, which is by default female. You see,
there are certain species in which there are females but no males, such
as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Mexico_whiptail" target="_blank">New Mexico Whiptail Lizard</a>.
However, the problem with such species is that the lack of males gives
them little ability to adapt, and so they only live in ecological niches
where they don't have to compete with other species. As soon as they
are forced to compete with a male-female species, the
all female species quickly gets run-over because they have an inferior
ability to adapt. Several species, therefore, have the ability to either
create or stop creating males, according to their environmental
circumstances. Dr. Launer himself confirms that such species exist in
his article:<br />
. <br />
<b>"...alternative methods of reproduction include budding, hermaphroditism and
isogamy (i.e. two individuals,
not distinguished as males and females, combining
their genes). There are asexual variants among all sorts of creatures,
including
jellyfish, dandelions, lichens and lizards."</b> -- <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer, Mysteries of the Male, Oxford Journals, Medicine, QMJ: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 98, Issue 12, Pp. 919-920</a>.<br />
<br />
As well, he asserts that some species will alter their reproductive strategies if circumstances demand it:<br />
<br />
<b>"Many species alternate between sexual and asexual reproduction, either
on a regular basis or occasionally, as the circumstances require."</b> -- <a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer, Mysteries of the Male, Oxford Journals, Medicine, QMJ: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 98, Issue 12, Pp. 919-920</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://cadelllast.com/" target="_blank">Mr. Cadell Last</a>, founder of the website <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/" target="_blank">The Advanced Apes</a>, has recently written an article titled <i><a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/the-aftermath-of-sex-or-why-males-exist/" target="_blank">The Aftermath of Sex (Or Why Males Exist)</a></i>. Mr. Last also confirms that there are indeed such species that can reproduce sexually without having two sexes: <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW9eefrvbuSa8CXe_Q2f04MRa5rzo3vcLlkm9CMJwNqm9vQZ3sjZCLMO68KqckBqFaZ4tYg2zaewBtk-DQvILDYe4xolytdYthUQw6-uxvHgBBStEguTvrQBkehxVtSOnUIPx0OWGHers/s1600/Isogamy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW9eefrvbuSa8CXe_Q2f04MRa5rzo3vcLlkm9CMJwNqm9vQZ3sjZCLMO68KqckBqFaZ4tYg2zaewBtk-DQvILDYe4xolytdYthUQw6-uxvHgBBStEguTvrQBkehxVtSOnUIPx0OWGHers/s1600/Isogamy.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a><b>"You do not <i>need</i> two sexes to sexually reproduce. For example, some fungi are perfectly happy as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isogamy">isogamous</a> organisms. Isogamous means that they can share their sex cells with any other member of the same species."</b> -- Cadell Last, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/the-aftermath-of-sex-or-why-males-exist/" target="_blank"><i>The Aftermath of Sex (Or Why Males Exist)</i></a>, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/" target="_blank">The Advanced Apes</a><br />
<br />
In another article of Mr. Last's, titled <i><a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/why-have-sex/" target="_blank">Why Have Sex?</a></i>, he further confirms the notion that when under environmental stress,
organisms will change their reproductive strategies to better adapt:<br />
<br />
<b>"Asexual reproduction is easy, but it is also problematic because
adaptations are slow to take hold in a changing environment. Asexual
organisms are basically clonal populations. Their only variation comes
from random mutation. In contrast, sexual reproducing organisms can
utilize recombination (50% of each sexes genome) to create novel
genomes. This novelty is the variation natural selection needs to
produce new successful adaptations to changing environments. In fact,
many asexual species start reproducing sexually when under extreme
environmental stress for this reason."</b> -- Cadell Last, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/why-have-sex/" target="_blank"><i>Why Have Sex?</i></a>, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/" target="_blank">The Advanced Apes</a> <br />
<br />
However, he contradicts my above hypothesis of such species being by default, "female."<br />
<br />
<b>"There are no “males” and “females”. That seems like a more effective
system than the male/female system where half of the population is
genetically off limits."</b> -- Cadell Last, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/the-aftermath-of-sex-or-why-males-exist/" target="_blank"><i>The Aftermath of Sex (Or Why Males Exist)</i></a>, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/" target="_blank">The Advanced Apes</a><br />
<br />
Instead, male and female are defined by the size and number of gametes:<br />
<br />
<b>"The very definition of male and female, at its fundamental level, is
defined by the differences between gametes. Females have large and
relatively few gametes (e.g., eggs). In contrast, males have small and
practically infinite gametes (e.g., sperm)."</b> -- Cadell Last, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/the-aftermath-of-sex-or-why-males-exist/" target="_blank"><i>The Aftermath of Sex (Or Why Males Exist)</i></a>, <a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/" target="_blank">The Advanced Apes</a><br />
.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLqcloH-zwh3T-Mfdxeo1KXJsp0DOmwW2zVyosD-3ta_iasjoJLMAenNkiqTg8XXMH6kd1K3Ad-Dc9DhUtoLgOPdIZI5ClfCJaDDNflbvF6ywtjKj8gh10MbB4wJKMpW_jp8RwC9fNp9cJ/s1600/tumblr_lo0n8ew7lT1qjyasqo1_1280.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLqcloH-zwh3T-Mfdxeo1KXJsp0DOmwW2zVyosD-3ta_iasjoJLMAenNkiqTg8XXMH6kd1K3Ad-Dc9DhUtoLgOPdIZI5ClfCJaDDNflbvF6ywtjKj8gh10MbB4wJKMpW_jp8RwC9fNp9cJ/s320/tumblr_lo0n8ew7lT1qjyasqo1_1280.jpg" height="285" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">RAPE!!!</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
To me, this seems to be merely a matter of semantics. (The large and few
gametes eventually produce self-sustaining organisms, while the small
and plentiful gametes merely exchange genetic information). Pretty much
everywhere we confirm that the sex which gives birth is the female one.
By this definition, if there is only one sex, then it must be that a
species in which every organism can give birth must be an all female
species. Males do not give birth. Anywhere. Period. Females do.
Everywhere. I suspect a change in definition such as this has to do
with the political correctness which pervades all of our educational
institutions, but I will delve into that aspect of science in another article rather than stray off topic in this one.
One thing which is clear is that when under environmental stress,
several species will switch from asexual to sexual reproduction, and the
purpose of this is to "serve the species."<br />
. <br />
The Feminist Dictionary also more or less agrees with the above scientific notions. <br />
<br />
<b>"***MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category
of female. The first males were mutants... the male sex represents a
degeneration and deformity of the female.'"</b> -- From:<b> </b><i>'A Feminist Dictionary'</i>, ed. Kramarae and Treichler, Pandora Press, 1985<br />
<br />
<b>"***MAN: ... an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched ... a contradictory baby-man ..." </b>-- From:<b> </b><i>'A Feminist Dictionary'</i>, ed. Kramarae and Treichler, Pandora Press, 1985<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp378kwg4PrE0CVjI8LpArKWQ8jrH_bzN18n_ID_Ajqop2LYjcNo_nVStiNg39yo2-fuIks5jLMW1Cne0PL8OJ_5TGpCaPiNFGi7ozaPI-8Ar-CXZnOgmmr32Dt3xRLzCflP3YhyphenhyphenPlPiE/s1600/Elephant+Seals+Fighting.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp378kwg4PrE0CVjI8LpArKWQ8jrH_bzN18n_ID_Ajqop2LYjcNo_nVStiNg39yo2-fuIks5jLMW1Cne0PL8OJ_5TGpCaPiNFGi7ozaPI-8Ar-CXZnOgmmr32Dt3xRLzCflP3YhyphenhyphenPlPiE/s1600/Elephant+Seals+Fighting.jpg" height="240" width="400" /></a>Returning to the example of the useless male elephant seals Dr. Launer
gave us in his article, where most of them died as virgins, it is
necessary to note that Launer makes some great leaps from cellular
biology, described as "genetic rape," to the useless elephant seals, and
then to the human males which he seemingly wishes will be done away
with as soon as technology will allow. In this train of logic, he has
left out some important yet politically incorrect factors, such as the
dreaded, evil patriarchy. The male elephant seals are obviously not
rapists if the vast majority of them die as virgins. If they were
rapists at the fundamental level, they would simply take a female and
rape her to ensure their genetic success. Instead, they are fought off
by the females themselves and are further stymied in their reproductive
goals by the "alpha male" elephant seals, who further don't allow them
to breed with the females. In this process, we see the entire situation
is designed to only allow the best males to breed with the females, much
the same as at the cellular level where most of the male cells are killed off
by other male cells or are actively resisted by the female cell, only
allowing the best and strongest to exchange genetic material with the
female. This entire process serves the reproductive goals of the female
rather than the male. This confirms the notion <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Briffault" target="_blank">Robert Briffault</a> put forth back in 1927 with his book, <i>The Mothers</i>:<br />
<br />
<b>“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the
animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association
with the male, no such association takes place.”</b> -- Robert Briffault, <i>The Mothers</i>, I, 191 <br />
<br />
The reason those male elephant seals are useless is because they have
failed to provide a benefit to the females, therefore the females do not
associate with them. There is much more benefit for the female to
associate with and pass on the genes of the strongest and best males,
while rejecting and ignoring all the rest, making them "useless."<br />
<br />
In the comments section of Cadell Last's article, <i><a href="http://theadvancedapes.com/the-aftermath-of-sex-or-why-males-exist/" target="_blank">The Aftermath of Sex (Or Why Males Exist)</a></i>,
Mr. Last disappoints me by condemning "the patriarchy" along the lines
of the politically correct feminist narrative, rather than putting the
pieces of the puzzle together:<br />
<br />
<b>Quote: <i>"It's interesting that many human cultures place such high value on the male."</i> </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>"Yes, I think this is a product of patriarchy. In a sense that is
ironic because patriarchy evolves to gain complete control of female
reproduction (monopolizing a scarce resource)." </b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHUg-Sj-sKbswM2GiRS2CXevLyxmYgQN-VXD3bLUf8LNhL5AhENxuGLflmOiW1hwAMY2vdRGzMZcTgo_QCEyYBOlrdFAIYe_mlJOhZH4ukhMLx4Fk8WbjdmvA5OUDiWcKWdlxkG5zSOZU/s1600/pregnant-women.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHUg-Sj-sKbswM2GiRS2CXevLyxmYgQN-VXD3bLUf8LNhL5AhENxuGLflmOiW1hwAMY2vdRGzMZcTgo_QCEyYBOlrdFAIYe_mlJOhZH4ukhMLx4Fk8WbjdmvA5OUDiWcKWdlxkG5zSOZU/s1600/pregnant-women.jpg" height="225" width="400" /></a>First off, female reproduction is not "scarce." It is everywhere! Even rats are doing it in the garbage bins behind your local 7-11. If female reproduction was not everywhere, life on earth would quickly die out. What is scarce is <i>the male</i> who reproduces. As with the useless male elephant seals, most males <i>do not</i> reproduce while most females <i>do</i>. The female has a virtual 100% monopoly on reproduction in most of nature, not the male. "Patriarchy" is an attempt to <i>equalize</i>
the reproductive process between males and females. It is an attempt to
take those useless males and make them productive by attaching them to
the reproductive process, of which they are normally rejected from. In
fact, in all of nature, the <i>only</i> species which tries to equalize the reproduction of the male and female is <i>the human species</i>. <br />
<br />
This is not something necessarily derived as a social construct from
such things as religion either, for there are indications that "pair
bonding" is something which evolved naturally amongst the higher primates, rather
than being forced upon them: <br />
<br />
<b>"The finding corroborates an influential new view of early human
origins advanced by Bernard Chapais, a primatologist at the University
of Montreal, in his book “Primeval Kinship” (2008). Dr. Chapais showed
how a simple development, the emergence of a pair bond between male and
female, would have allowed people to recognize their relatives,
something chimps can do only to a limited extent. When family members
dispersed to other bands, they would be recognized and neighboring bands
would cooperate instead of fighting to the death as chimp groups do."</b><i> -- </i><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/11/science/11kin.html?_r=0" target="_blank">Nicholas Wade<i>, New View of How Humans Moved Away from Apes, </i>The New York Times, March 10, 2011 </a><br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvEQj6jzbD5NWwBKq9ujIzkTbrFEoexXRZoFYPJAMI0pd4mdkc143nug9aSkCfFMRvOxvEOUJbFI6EjAN9AYW5uB8rC2N9CqNaveyIdhWnG0rIhRHAIdNYgCf86EoKUAPgd1-BTcYG3JyY/s1600/love_hd-normal.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvEQj6jzbD5NWwBKq9ujIzkTbrFEoexXRZoFYPJAMI0pd4mdkc143nug9aSkCfFMRvOxvEOUJbFI6EjAN9AYW5uB8rC2N9CqNaveyIdhWnG0rIhRHAIdNYgCf86EoKUAPgd1-BTcYG3JyY/s320/love_hd-normal.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a></div>
In humans, the biggest "tool" which Nature has bestowed upon us is our
superior brains. The problem is that this tool takes a long time to
develop, and, unlike most other species, human offspring are born
virtually helpless, being unable to walk, talk or even feed themselves.
The emergence of pair-bonding between human males and females brought
those "useless males" more directly into the reproductive process than
even the previous "alpha males" who were the sole breeders of the entire herd
were. This pair bonding brought the males into directly provisioning <i>benefits</i>
for both the female and the offspring she (and he) produced. Pair
bonding between the male and female stopped the tendency of males to
"duff each other up" and rather, enticed them to co-operate with each
other by bringing them directly into the reproductive process. You can
see that this process endorses the views of Robert Briffault, quoted
above, who declares that males must bring a benefit to the female in
order for her to associate and reproduce with him. This is
similar to how birds court each other, with the male enticing the female
by bringing provisions for nest building, or by being the flamboyantly
coloured of the sexes, so as to attract the attention of predators away
from mother and offspring. Daniel Amneus, Ph D, calls this "putting sex
to work" in his online book, <a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank"><i>The Case for Father Custody</i></a>.<br />
. <br />
What is perhaps a social construct derived from Patriarchy is the
suppression of the desire to change mates on a rotating polyandry cycle:<br />
<br />
<b>"...humans possess several neurophysiological systems of attachment
linked with pairbonding and monogamy across species (Fisher, 1998;
Hazan & Zeifman, 1999; Young, 2003). <i>Fisher (1992) suggests that
human patterns of weaning, birth spacing, divorce, and remarriage all
point to a system of serial monogamy. It takes about 4 years to wean a
child in hunter-gatherer cultures, and birth spacing in a foraging
environment averages about 4 years (Blurton Jones 1986). Many divorces
occur between the fourth and sixth year of marriage (Fisher, 1989,
1992),</i> and men who practice serial monogamy are more reproductively
successful than men who stay married to the same woman for a lifetime.
Women who mate serially do not have reproductive advantage over other
women (Buckle, Gallup, & Rodd, 1996)."</b> -- Excerpt from <i>The Handbook Of Evolutionary Psychology</i> (2005) (p. 261) edited by David Buss. (Italic emphasis added) <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjVe8-sqVPcSeffW8LixWmvxV-kpelji7s7FokpNxOF1zsvs61xhIsAZEh8kUXRIDLqfP6v3Ia2Yrhq8mpUdNnEuT0k3gm6_5ymorfnuJb6IWhw4UNUfptMVQs0U3DMKbV4QKve1I-Qgg/s1600/bride.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjVe8-sqVPcSeffW8LixWmvxV-kpelji7s7FokpNxOF1zsvs61xhIsAZEh8kUXRIDLqfP6v3Ia2Yrhq8mpUdNnEuT0k3gm6_5ymorfnuJb6IWhw4UNUfptMVQs0U3DMKbV4QKve1I-Qgg/s1600/bride.jpg" height="281" width="320" /></a>The social construct of <i>lifelong</i> monogamy rather than serial
monogamy is one that resulted in the phenomenon of adolescence or,
extended childhood, which is further used to develop both the mental
capacity of humans as well as their socialization, rather than setting
them out to fend for themselves once sexual maturity has been developed,
as occurs in most of nature. In other words, "patriarchy" (or
fatherhood) is an essential component to what separates us from the rest
of the beasts of the field. In fact, it is fair to say that patriarchy
is what has led to the development of civilization itself - by taking
those "useless" males' energy, and putting it to productive purposes in
order to protect and provide, so that females will wish to associate
with males and allow them into the reproductive process. <br />
. <br />
Further, you can see that since men are more reproductively successful
within the serial monogamy paradigm than they are in lifetime monogamy,
while females do not derive a reproductive advantage in serial monogamy,
<i>it is the female</i>, not the male, that gains the most benefit from
the monogamy which is enforced by Patriarchy. Since, as per Robert
Briffault above, the female does not associate with males unless there
is a benefit to herself, females were <i>complicit</i> in forming the dreaded
Patriarchy and enforcing its moral codes in society. This also confirms
another article which I have written called, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-myth-of-tiresias-and-ten-pleasures.html" target="_blank"><i>Tiresias' Story - The Ten Pleasures of Sex</i></a>,
wherein the myth of Tiresias reveals "womankind's greatest secret,"
namely that rather than being put upon by having sex, females derive
many more benefits from sex than males do.<br />
<br />
Now, you may be wondering what all this has to do with the Amazons which
this article originally referred to. It has to do with a full cycle
being achieved, where once the purpose of males (to benefit the
female) is fulfilled and women no longer derive benefits from males,
they will do away with males altogether just like the Amazon women did,
or as do organisms that can switch between asexual and sexual
reproduction in order to overcome environmental circumstances.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVzwwyi5COgOUldBfAeKmQB22OKQHyRIq55eT0sRHM4mSuMX7OiFscaAfw9Tju657kXg0UX0UIFUYwGHcBb3syyrzeMuWTOTMIHeQEvDpmIZii6x2HHWGGFS8n8HC_LonkAuuMmBiuXNo/s1600/Sex+and+Culture+-+JD+Unwin.jpg" height="320" width="207" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for a Review of Sex and Culture</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
This cycle can be confirmed by the work of Oxford anthropologist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Unwin" target="_blank">J.D. Unwin</a>, who some eight decades ago wrote <i>Sex and Culture</i>,
and documented over 80 cultures which confirmed that the rise of
civilization corresponds with sexual restraint and "putting sex to work"
and declines under the androgyny and the sexual freedom civilization's
prosperity itself delivers. In the beginning, the duality of sexuality
(male and female gender roles) is used to overcome environmental
adversity and as the adversity disappears, so does sexual restraint and
the need for gender roles... which causes the fall of the civilization
and thus again creates the adversity which demands gender roles be
enforced.<br />
. <br />
When females can derive benefits elsewhere rather than
directly from the male, such as from forms of welfare and protection
provided by the government, they start doing away with males and revert
back to a lower form of reproduction - more like the useless elephant
seals, where most die as virgins who spend their lives "duffing up other
males."<br />
. <br />
Correspondingly, this mimics the social setting of the inner
city ghetto, where most children are born to single mothers out of
wedlock and are supported by welfare rather than productive work, while
the males sit on the street corners engaging in all sorts of violent and
destructive criminal behaviour in the hopes of appearing "alpha"
enough to be permitted some breeding opportunities with the welfare
moms. Certainly this is a sign of social <i>decay</i>, rather than the
triumph of ridding society of marriage as so many feminists have desired
over the past decades. It is all part of a cycle: Under the prosperity
of including males in reproduction, civilization builds itself up until
it becomes prosperous enough to no longer need males, but no longer
including males in reproduction causes society to decay until it
destroys itself, creating the adverse conditions which require males to
be included again. <br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdkji7oLggt9MuHmsO-X9vCPBCf4kBn2ps7uccE8KRtYWNJ872ZmmMLIQ2EtOPeiwCZXSWwrULVwdTAC00He1Kwlee0CsGOoUBgiDAnKVEHwklG__4cA3YYBKvm7XVRf7CHF3W4xkuJgoR/s1600/10+male-female-brain.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdkji7oLggt9MuHmsO-X9vCPBCf4kBn2ps7uccE8KRtYWNJ872ZmmMLIQ2EtOPeiwCZXSWwrULVwdTAC00He1Kwlee0CsGOoUBgiDAnKVEHwklG__4cA3YYBKvm7XVRf7CHF3W4xkuJgoR/s400/10+male-female-brain.jpg" height="215" width="400" /></a></div>
I am sure that you have all heard about the superiority of the female's
"multi-tasking brain." There are some advantages to such a brain, for
sure - especially in regard to performing certain tasks while also
caring for children. Most women were either pregnant or caring for their
offspring throughout most of their adult lives until fairly recently in
human history, so it makes sense that their brains would have evolved
in this manner. The male brain, however, is more linear and focused
(while excluding other distractions), allowing the male to <i>provide a benefit</i>
which females cannot do themselves. A woman's brain operates more under
the principle of "a jack of all trades but master of none," whereas the
male brain specializes intensely and solves complex problems or invents
things which circumvent problems. This is why virtually all things
around you with more than two moving parts were invented by a man, not a
woman. It was not the dreaded, evil patriarchy which held women back,
but rather, that women's mental nature itself is not as suited for
breaking ground as the male's is.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Montagu,_4th_Earl_of_Sandwich" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Montagu,_4th_Earl_of_Sandwich" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLI76jyDX_1I1X19m8PUc7kp-gVDZQfU2nuwKVtuBLLLYM_JIpz2i-GjucTSaZUZ0mxGj-DYgjMR1c16g7lKVEmdgEKULRoO1Gu1i-KtEfKlVU7S6ctLr9nyfNpG35xm5fdXoTVuKdnpQ/s1600/how_to_make_me_a_sandwich.jpg" height="258" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Sandwiches were invented by John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich (Click Pic)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzeUhMJbXTMW_O0ojlcH3zIPVrq8aftMH2ThyphenhyphenrEEMPiEv8x7pi6IIjh2WnABahzLMGMuzTKHzhqlrjZbtyEU42V2UN0BvN5nqgwsT1_p0ObWBobsMeE6-hjbt8eKs5bSszkqv16JitwDc/s1600/Chamberlen_forceps_(Malden_found_1813)_in_K._DAS_after_Kilian.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzeUhMJbXTMW_O0ojlcH3zIPVrq8aftMH2ThyphenhyphenrEEMPiEv8x7pi6IIjh2WnABahzLMGMuzTKHzhqlrjZbtyEU42V2UN0BvN5nqgwsT1_p0ObWBobsMeE6-hjbt8eKs5bSszkqv16JitwDc/s1600/Chamberlen_forceps_(Malden_found_1813)_in_K._DAS_after_Kilian.jpg" height="200" width="150" /></a>You can see this in an industry which has been female-dominated for
millenia: Midwifery. Throughout the entire history of midwifery, while
under female domain, there were scant few improvements and many midwives
were still practicing mysticism and animalism in their craft. When
males entered into the sphere, forceps were soon invented to aid in the birthing
process, which saved countless lives. The same is true in such spheres as philosophy, music and art.
It was not patriarchal oppression which prevented women from partaking
in these areas of study. Most upper-class women were educated in such
areas as music and art, yet the greatest composers and artists were
consistently male. In the area of philosophy, so few tools are needed (a
brain, observational abilities and an optional pen and paper) that
there is no excuse like "oppression" to justify women's absence from it.
People have been Jews in Nazi concentration camps and philosophized.
Hitler himself wrote <i>Mein Kampf</i> while in prison, as well, Antonio Gramsci's <i>Prison Notebooks</i> were obviously written while he was incarcerated. There are
reasons other than "patriarchal oppression" for women's glaring absence
in these realms.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOkSNPhX1gB9BMBHM4hmXp9aFGEC6TZCdczgKNlkiSWjVRWs13j8uIsoCAIb4ru-ZtWoFf5t0rD4eR6xHufpEg8lubiKtS_jDbvuEubIR65lMOvdQfJx2aYge7GSP16ON4zN6iQLt2mTU/s1600/sandwich-hunt.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOkSNPhX1gB9BMBHM4hmXp9aFGEC6TZCdczgKNlkiSWjVRWs13j8uIsoCAIb4ru-ZtWoFf5t0rD4eR6xHufpEg8lubiKtS_jDbvuEubIR65lMOvdQfJx2aYge7GSP16ON4zN6iQLt2mTU/s1600/sandwich-hunt.jpg" height="125" width="200" /></a>. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikumtpAIpllgYkt4Ei0ocjjiI1R_hoEcOodjadtqzj1E-yO4CI6LdTHKJlvqqKzjCxamWBDDCfSSrGk-1kGfn3CW0OcteZvLajVLJAoDYOF5fL_iwE72AGkQs_Z2D3RV0R5gphz_bZd5Ss/s320/caveman_and_woman1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikumtpAIpllgYkt4Ei0ocjjiI1R_hoEcOodjadtqzj1E-yO4CI6LdTHKJlvqqKzjCxamWBDDCfSSrGk-1kGfn3CW0OcteZvLajVLJAoDYOF5fL_iwE72AGkQs_Z2D3RV0R5gphz_bZd5Ss/s320/caveman_and_woman1.jpg" height="320" width="256" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikumtpAIpllgYkt4Ei0ocjjiI1R_hoEcOodjadtqzj1E-yO4CI6LdTHKJlvqqKzjCxamWBDDCfSSrGk-1kGfn3CW0OcteZvLajVLJAoDYOF5fL_iwE72AGkQs_Z2D3RV0R5gphz_bZd5Ss/s1600/caveman_and_woman1.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOkSNPhX1gB9BMBHM4hmXp9aFGEC6TZCdczgKNlkiSWjVRWs13j8uIsoCAIb4ru-ZtWoFf5t0rD4eR6xHufpEg8lubiKtS_jDbvuEubIR65lMOvdQfJx2aYge7GSP16ON4zN6iQLt2mTU/s1600/sandwich-hunt.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a>This has been the story of human sexual relations and "feminine-ism"
since the beginning and we were living in caves. When the cave-woman
heard a rustling outside, she stood behind her caveman and used him as a
shield to make sure it wasn't a dangerous sabre-tooth tiger. Once the
caveman had secured the territory outside of the cave, the cave-woman
took over that safe space, tending the hearth and foraging for nearby
berries, while shooing the caveman away to <i>further</i> go out into the
wild and figure out how to hunt the wooly mammoth, then bring her back
some juicy mammoth tenderloins for dinner. When the man has safely
conquered food production, she again takes over that realm and pushes
the man even further into the hinterland, demanding that he provide some
other benefit to her which she does not already possess, and so forth
and so on. We see this everywhere. In the development of the West, it
was mostly the males who pioneered forth into the wilderness alone.
There was nothing stopping women from discovering what was on the other
sides of those hills, all they had to do was 'go,' yet it was almost solely the males who found out the answer.
Once the West had been tamed, the women flocked in afterwards. The same
happens in the workplace, which not too long ago was very difficult, dangerous and
downright hostile to humans. Once males conquered it enough to make it
"safe," the females poured in and claimed they were "oppressed" for not
being allowed to participate in the past, and the males made room for
them and accommodated their wishes.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhngg9XQi6WPSlKUnbXUAzwe1jEA9Va_9m8TsDLSHpMOHY9XPxZENq52iECCToIRKdTFvc1dq-73JU3pENLhZgpZeCvCOcDJ992T-pOW-d9HttQc_bbjNPCaFCL9fnU0gvyFE8m5DEJjiK1/s1600/Electomagnetic+Pulse.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhngg9XQi6WPSlKUnbXUAzwe1jEA9Va_9m8TsDLSHpMOHY9XPxZENq52iECCToIRKdTFvc1dq-73JU3pENLhZgpZeCvCOcDJ992T-pOW-d9HttQc_bbjNPCaFCL9fnU0gvyFE8m5DEJjiK1/s320/Electomagnetic+Pulse.jpg" height="306" width="400" /></a>This is the irony that escapes Dr. Launer, as he declares that males are
so useless that scientific advances in genetics and cloning will soon
allow females to rightly do away with males altogether. The problem is, these
scientific advances which will allow this are the <i>result</i> of
males, not females! Should human females do away with males, as Launer
seems to encourage, the very technology used to do so will stagnate and
decay, which will again create the adverse conditions which demand the
need for females to create males again. Dr. Launer's logic almost seems
to follow along the lines of technology advancing to such a degree that
it can create a global EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) which wipes out all
of the technology on earth, <i>including the technology which created the EMP,</i> then declaring it a triumph of technology! <br />
.<br />
Some advance!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzSRcen3bIolKxyjHtaHbcNcqvJ_fBxM6Lq5VAeN35D6y2BH7HGaZnA2x00y0ZZXFbkwBbco00HGS3M6qShtA9vzcbhR1u_8_Vkuzlbu5kRBFLUuNftt9-0FiRaEjEbOmrNEA8NsngN6Q/s1600/Woman+Churning+Butter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzSRcen3bIolKxyjHtaHbcNcqvJ_fBxM6Lq5VAeN35D6y2BH7HGaZnA2x00y0ZZXFbkwBbco00HGS3M6qShtA9vzcbhR1u_8_Vkuzlbu5kRBFLUuNftt9-0FiRaEjEbOmrNEA8NsngN6Q/s1600/Woman+Churning+Butter.jpg" height="267" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyckbBMvJ6OcKySy56eIGbBo2gQXwHHcQPiMD3ASOct7s6SN4zoUApiI3fhhu8JlNYb_VIJTqBb0cqFrwtSKdq0TOZQM0zN2o6YDCGwhLd9tLPK1kQmoBaFPNu7XE1pr3TGnVvGWovPeQ/s1600/thepill.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyckbBMvJ6OcKySy56eIGbBo2gQXwHHcQPiMD3ASOct7s6SN4zoUApiI3fhhu8JlNYb_VIJTqBb0cqFrwtSKdq0TOZQM0zN2o6YDCGwhLd9tLPK1kQmoBaFPNu7XE1pr3TGnVvGWovPeQ/s1600/thepill.jpg" /></a>Contrary to popular belief, feminism did very little to "liberate" women. Rather, <i>the technology <b>created by men</b></i>
is mostly responsible for women's improved conditions. The chores of
the household were greatly reduced because of <i><b>man</b></i>-made technology,
such as the dishwasher, refrigerator, electric stove, and washer/dryer
units neatly stored in closets. Before these inventions, women would
have spent a full day's labour merely chopping wood, starting fires,
boiling water, packing ice, churning butter and scrubbing clothes on the washboard. Since
all of women's traditional work could now be done with the flick of a
switch, it freed<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6DZPinxhXmZurxUcL7HhENEJZ3jldrrarzb9kgkLmYGWF4o38eztfk6kf6M3XwQzUEctTyV30WAPiiLVzwy8vo4myRUJ8wy4k8VxlEdVatYubr_QOn_VGlACaLi4XXH3NL1UW0CPNAX4/s1600/off_switch.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6DZPinxhXmZurxUcL7HhENEJZ3jldrrarzb9kgkLmYGWF4o38eztfk6kf6M3XwQzUEctTyV30WAPiiLVzwy8vo4myRUJ8wy4k8VxlEdVatYubr_QOn_VGlACaLi4XXH3NL1UW0CPNAX4/s1600/off_switch.png" height="200" width="137" /></a>up women's time so they could enter into other fields
of work during the day. Women are not constantly pregnant from their
teenage years to the end of their fertile years because of technological
advances men created to benefit women, such as the birth-control pill
and safe abortion techniques which freed women to look for other directions
in life rather than simple motherhood. Feminism did comparatively
miniscule things to liberate women. The only thing they really "freed"
were their bossoms from their burning bras. <br />
<br />
There is quite some danger in blindly following science which has
absorbed falsehoods from political movements masquerading as legitimate
study, such as Women's Studies. The best thing that could be done for
humanity to ensure our technology and science continues to advance is to
make sure that males <i>survive</i>. Creating the technology for humans
to revert back to forms found in lower, less complex organisms, is
hardly an achievement worth pursuing. The Amazon women obviously didn't
survive and dominate the earth either. If they had a superior system,
they would still be here.<br />
<br />
<b>"If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."</b> -- Red Green <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />
. <br />
<u><b>Further Reading:</b></u><br />
.<br />
<a href="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/12/919.full" target="_blank">Dr. John Launer's article, "Mysteries of the Male,"</a> referenced the book, <i>The Red Queen</i>, by Matt Ridley. <a href="http://femalemisogynist.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/the-red-queen/" target="_blank">FemaleMisogynist has also written a short blurp on <i>The Red Queen</i></a>.<br />
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<a href="http://blog.jim.com/science/high-reproductive-variance-among-males/" target="_blank">High Reproductive Variance Among Males</a> - Throughout most of human history, almost all women reproduced but only
one male in three reproduced. During the neolithic, from agriculture to
the start of the bronze age (very rough dates) one male in seventeen
reproduced – sixteen males died without children, one male had seventeen
wives, concubines, and slave girls. After this roughly four thousand
year period of very extreme inequality, it returned to its long term
norm, one male in three – all races, all cultures, all societies, and it
is been at roughly its long term norm for the past four thousand years
or so. <br />
.
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-lsuCXzfDy7Y%2FUhZsdQLa2RI%2FAAAAAAAAAI0%2FtYdE9EJoMaM%2Fs320%2Fcaveman_and_woman1.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikumtpAIpllgYkt4Ei0ocjjiI1R_hoEcOodjadtqzj1E-yO4CI6LdTHKJlvqqKzjCxamWBDDCfSSrGk-1kGfn3CW0OcteZvLajVLJAoDYOF5fL_iwE72AGkQs_Z2D3RV0R5gphz_bZd5Ss/s320/caveman_and_woman1.jpg" --><!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-vESmGS8oacU%2FVUJA9LlQ77I%2FAAAAAAAAFWk%2FrPseXcwuV88%2Fs1600%2Fsandwich-hunt.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOkSNPhX1gB9BMBHM4hmXp9aFGEC6TZCdczgKNlkiSWjVRWs13j8uIsoCAIb4ru-ZtWoFf5t0rD4eR6xHufpEg8lubiKtS_jDbvuEubIR65lMOvdQfJx2aYge7GSP16ON4zN6iQLt2mTU/s1600/sandwich-hunt.jpg" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-28796908806926932992015-03-11T16:45:00.000-07:002015-05-01T18:49:50.142-07:00Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://ytimg.googleusercontent.com/vi/Go2Ccw1G25o/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Go2Ccw1G25o?feature=player_embedded" style="clear: right; float: right;" width="320"></iframe></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Question: How Do Porcupines Mate?</b></span><br />
<b>.</b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Answer: Very Carefully!</b></span> <br />
.<br />
The Gender War has been going on for a long, long time now - since the
beginning of time, really. Perhaps sometimes it calms down and becomes a
mere "Battle of Sexes," while at other times it turns into a more
serious "war," but this antagonism between the sexes always exists.<br />
<br />
In
fact, one might say it is the very purpose of "the sexes." They are <i>
supposed </i>to test each other as
a way of seeking out superior genes. It's
what happens nearly everywhere there is <i>sexual</i> reproduction, from
simple organisms right up to the complex ones. When there is sexual
reproduction there is a measure of hostility between the sexes as they
compete and weed out one another, each seeking their own best interests.
It's a messy but effective way of overcoming adversity - <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">which is often why a single sex species will change itself into a two-sex species</a>, to
overcome environmental adversity or other hardships which requires rapid adaption.
Once the adversity has been conquered, these "inter-sexual" species will revert back
to single sex again.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4sTrmM5WT35gJIUcc_d4eYViFHp2raoLx754_Q9irtm4b0hTejVj-JKB3eQZJgJ9IwSpsIuGIDqn4eJAAre1M-vrQJFjVdtjxL78i-jnos0lgVncZyX_avhImaoUnRuwR4ViOZl62hiI/s1600/profile.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4sTrmM5WT35gJIUcc_d4eYViFHp2raoLx754_Q9irtm4b0hTejVj-JKB3eQZJgJ9IwSpsIuGIDqn4eJAAre1M-vrQJFjVdtjxL78i-jnos0lgVncZyX_avhImaoUnRuwR4ViOZl62hiI/s1600/profile.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
What I find is there is also a higher level where this takes place.
Even in humans, which are complex enough to probably not change back
into a single-sex species (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">unless we arrange it ourselves scientifically</a>), there is also a cycle to the sexes coming together and
later repelling from each other, which follows the basic theme of how
simple organisms can change from single-sex to two-sex species and back
again. This cycle is manifested in humans by the way
civilizations rise and fall based upon restraining or freeing our
sexuality. When civilizations begin and then rise, they are patriarchal
in nature - the sexes work together in defined gender roles which aid
them in overcoming adversity. Once the adversity is overcome and life becomes easy within a prosperous civilization, the sexes begin to androgynize which
causes them to repel from each other.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvciiVo1QuuYRBM9uuIFNy7UJIPQMluLTf8w1JvgKeiCxHXwyIOo4U6JjwMtJdhL1KEpleOENq8eLWPSQ5iJOi7c75sGVBxqvAsjt_mX98044PAVlIMttFyT5eazfj2TpHTkoQImgwL40/s1600/The+Fall+of+Rome.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvciiVo1QuuYRBM9uuIFNy7UJIPQMluLTf8w1JvgKeiCxHXwyIOo4U6JjwMtJdhL1KEpleOENq8eLWPSQ5iJOi7c75sGVBxqvAsjt_mX98044PAVlIMttFyT5eazfj2TpHTkoQImgwL40/s1600/The+Fall+of+Rome.jpg" height="182" width="320" /></a>Once the females need males less for survival,
sexuality becomes less restrained, birth rates decline, the civilization
decays then crumbles, and out of the ashes adversity is once more
created and the sexes will again form gender roles to overcome it. Over and
over. Throughout recorded history. <br />
.<br />
Sex is related to nearly everything around us. It is an enormous force; an instinct
second only to basic survival. The birdsong you hear is about sex. The
frogs croaking, the flowers blooming, the fireflies producing their
glow... you name it, sex is everywhere. One thing I find interesting
about studying this is that evolutionary wise, in most species males are
indeed quite high energy and functionally useless aside from
fertilization purposes, but also it seems most scientists endorse the
idea that the more males help the female with reproduction (do something
with their sex drive besides simply copulate), the more "properly
evolved" it appears the male of the species becomes. For example, male
birds are considered "less useless" because they bring things to the
female to nest with while his colourful plumage distracts predators away
from her and the eggs. Beavers are the mammal equivalent, for they also
help building a home and controlling the immediate environment to aid
the female and offspring.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeb34_TdjcK3WKjPVCWIEmZCUineg_6TZ8mrJHdQDMOowfqejp9SmXHpodeFDUHN5G_vo3rFX-DHTy188V4-e08yh2GSBqkiYfBRLO-E-H8FmZ3D_-c16bptsPp8UVzC0IX14T-A6QdmA/s1600/78633826.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeb34_TdjcK3WKjPVCWIEmZCUineg_6TZ8mrJHdQDMOowfqejp9SmXHpodeFDUHN5G_vo3rFX-DHTy188V4-e08yh2GSBqkiYfBRLO-E-H8FmZ3D_-c16bptsPp8UVzC0IX14T-A6QdmA/s1600/78633826.jpg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
If this is indeed the case, that the more
productive the male's sex drive is outside of mere fertilization the
better, then it appears that human males have evolved to be <i>the best</i> of the evolutionary concept of sex. Only in our species - under
patriarchy - is the entire male sex put to use to aid females and their
offspring. If the birdsong you hear and the blooms you see are related
to sex, then the roads you drive on, the houses you live in, the
electricity that powers our cities and the airplanes that fly in the sky
are the "birdsong" of the male sex drive in humans. Human males compete
amongst each other to create or produce in the outside world, so that
females will find them useful and include those males in the reproductive
process. From there, he continues creating or producing for the rest
of his life to support the female and her offspring. On all of earth,
there is not a species like humans where males are so intensely involved
in the long term care of their offspring <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDfOuW59UyzuzXFsVGPCuD4XX42EqslJWDaSzRNe-RV1vPbv-YG-YuXL9caxehdpV-510H2knO2s9RQMIpOGotQFyjbTEDyM_D8_wo5LdPRbWupYpG3nDt5jKzlsstTi-8NxwLvOwKvIQ/s1600/fatherhood1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDfOuW59UyzuzXFsVGPCuD4XX42EqslJWDaSzRNe-RV1vPbv-YG-YuXL9caxehdpV-510H2knO2s9RQMIpOGotQFyjbTEDyM_D8_wo5LdPRbWupYpG3nDt5jKzlsstTi-8NxwLvOwKvIQ/s1600/fatherhood1.jpg" height="131" width="200" /></a><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjVe8-sqVPcSeffW8LixWmvxV-kpelji7s7FokpNxOF1zsvs61xhIsAZEh8kUXRIDLqfP6v3Ia2Yrhq8mpUdNnEuT0k3gm6_5ymorfnuJb6IWhw4UNUfptMVQs0U3DMKbV4QKve1I-Qgg/s1600/bride.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjVe8-sqVPcSeffW8LixWmvxV-kpelji7s7FokpNxOF1zsvs61xhIsAZEh8kUXRIDLqfP6v3Ia2Yrhq8mpUdNnEuT0k3gm6_5ymorfnuJb6IWhw4UNUfptMVQs0U3DMKbV4QKve1I-Qgg/s200/bride.jpg" height="175" width="200" /></a>I suspect that in humans, this male utility was intensified somewhere
in our evolutionary past when females began ovulating covertly rather than openly
signalling through sight, smell, or other means that they are in estrus.
Males are always "at the ready" to serve the females' sex drive, thus
the urgency of the male sex drive. When the female is ready to be
fertilized, she wants it now, and the males must be prepared to do so
when she demands or he gets left out of the game. But, in most living
things, the male is only summoned by the female at certain times during
her reproductive cycle - for the rest, neither cares too much about the
other. In humans, since we have developed few clear signs for when
females are ovulating, the males are kept at the females' bidding nearly
all of the time. <br />
. <br />
Furthermore, the females, not the males, control nearly everything about
the way in which we evolve and even how our species structures itself.
Males who do not co-operate with the female agenda do not get chosen for
reproduction, therefore, all the "power" in a species ultimately lies
with the female.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQqtnrdHwfnDc1BiB5JaJg_A-51_rdvVnz6Ta7nNi_O4qgM-I-Ku27OZc-ToMDIsT2fi8neTwJaK_KaC8k0DU06E401Gv0CKBLd4-uGiy_4kpN5MTzxa2yFbS0OM1xwaHaFbMH7HoLxPc/s1600/Why+Males+Exist+-+Fred+Hapgood.jpg" height="320" width="211" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Amazon Women"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>"If one were building a myth around the nature of males, the center
of the drama would be the moment when females took over the reproductive
cycle, monopolized it, and left males with nothing to do but compete
for their favor. When that happened females effectively emerged in
control of male evolution, for it was only those males that met their
terms and danced to their tune that were able to reproduce. Conceivably
this need not have happened; had the males organized themselves, and
agreed to ignore all the females, then eventually the females would have
had to come looking for them. They might thus have gotten the females
to do <i>all</i> the work, from accumulating the protein to arranging
the mating (although actually if the males really had tried a trick like
that the females might just have evolved a bisexual lifestyle and
dispensed with males altogether). </b><br />
<b></b><br />
<b></b>
<b>But in reality gender solidarity was never an option; sexual
creatures, as pointed out earlier, have an individualistic, anarchistic
bent and seldom engage in compacts that entail sacrificing for the
common good. (For example, there is no known case of a predator species -
humans perhaps aside - successfully adopting a quota system, even
though these can increase prey yields considerably.) Instead males
compete with each other for the available females."</b> -- Fred Hapgood, <i>Why Males Exist; An Inquiry Into The Evolution Of Sex</i>, William Morrow and Company, Inc. New York, 1979, pp. 96-97 <br />
<br />
Females have a social power which males do not have. Much of this power
is based upon the denial of having such power, but this is the "female
way." The female reproductive cell's power exists in the fact that all
of the male cells are trying to stand out and "be the one" for her to
mate with. She is passive, he is active - and she tests them all to see
which meet her standards, and is actively hostile to those who do not.
Further, even male competition is done to satisfy her sexual desires. <br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp378kwg4PrE0CVjI8LpArKWQ8jrH_bzN18n_ID_Ajqop2LYjcNo_nVStiNg39yo2-fuIks5jLMW1Cne0PL8OJ_5TGpCaPiNFGi7ozaPI-8Ar-CXZnOgmmr32Dt3xRLzCflP3YhyphenhyphenPlPiE/s1600/Elephant+Seals+Fighting.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp378kwg4PrE0CVjI8LpArKWQ8jrH_bzN18n_ID_Ajqop2LYjcNo_nVStiNg39yo2-fuIks5jLMW1Cne0PL8OJ_5TGpCaPiNFGi7ozaPI-8Ar-CXZnOgmmr32Dt3xRLzCflP3YhyphenhyphenPlPiE/s1600/Elephant+Seals+Fighting.jpg" height="240" width="400" /></a><i><b>"[Regarding elephant seal mating behavior, where females will
copulate with lesser males, then 'bawl out' so dominant males will come
to chase the lesser male away then mate
with her immediately afterwards] Recently these "protests" have been studied
intensively by Cathleen Cox and Burney J. Le Boeuf. They found that
males mounting estrous females are more than twice as likely to be
driven away by other males when the female protests than when she
remains silent. Thus the picture that emerges is that </b></i><b>the females have a
substantial degree of control over the fertilization process, and that
they use this control, at least in part, to play males off against each
other.</b><i><b> </b></i><br />
<i><b><br /></b></i>
<i><b>Why do they do this, if they do? What could be the point? Perhaps the
single observation that can be made about the range of ways one male is
chosen out of the many that are called is that physical exertion is
almost always involved, or demanded. It might be that the female is
interposing a test that prevents her mating with gross misfits, from
pairing her genes with genes that are defective. </b></i><br />
<i><b><br /></b>
<b>The case that fits this suggestion best is male competition among
those creatures in which the males have only one gene set instead of the
usual two. A male of such a species has only one source of genetic
information. If one of his genes is defective he must rely on it, use
it, and express it, regardless. Mating among the social insects - a
prime example of these one-gene-set males - is just as strenuous as
among the larger-bodied species we have been reviewing. In some cases a
queen flies to great heights so that only the fastest, highest-flying
males can reach her; in others she might crawl along the ground,
requiring the males to search for her over periods of as long as several
weeks."</b></i> -- Fred Hapgood, <i>Why Males Exist; An Inquiry Into The Evolution Of Sex</i>, William Morrow and Company, Inc. New York, 1979, pp. 117-118 <br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDvIWEXVBI3e2OtdxZ5mQKxfcKTDp58eE4E35xo5xrHfIitek22UDyOJyQldf0q_Kn2GOGg4-cxN4TodykzrHi0GYc9dfvAccDUIZ7hd4bGfqMOxdCEdttSebeW0U5450qvkhX7tYNn3M/s1600/test_strength.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDvIWEXVBI3e2OtdxZ5mQKxfcKTDp58eE4E35xo5xrHfIitek22UDyOJyQldf0q_Kn2GOGg4-cxN4TodykzrHi0GYc9dfvAccDUIZ7hd4bGfqMOxdCEdttSebeW0U5450qvkhX7tYNn3M/s1600/test_strength.jpg" height="200" width="160" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKdYMP0WF2CKgRuZ3gzECjztSaYPuuH0N8b3o2rN57b_TWJRduo-ASAoZrRWUsvhxpfEACI2eiYraSf-wcbMofXuZeN3OiqrUlGDgTqApbKFnczes-zZXv-rXBkEamk0c7BWkt0NTCERg/s1600/test_your_strength!_5.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKdYMP0WF2CKgRuZ3gzECjztSaYPuuH0N8b3o2rN57b_TWJRduo-ASAoZrRWUsvhxpfEACI2eiYraSf-wcbMofXuZeN3OiqrUlGDgTqApbKFnczes-zZXv-rXBkEamk0c7BWkt0NTCERg/s1600/test_your_strength!_5.gif" height="320" width="258" /></a>"Testing" males by being difficult or hostile towards them is a natural
part of being a sexual female. As was pointed out earlier, on some
level, the actual purpose of two sexes is to overcome adversity, thus
its nature will always involve testing and and a degree of hostility. It
will never end. It is <i>supposed</i> to work this way. The phrase "he
chases her until she catches him" comes to mind, for this is the
embodiment of female-male<br />
sexual relations.<br />
<br />
Further, if the entire population of
males were able to meet her tests, the female would merely raise the bar
higher so that only the top males pass the test... and if too many pass
that test, she will raise the bar again, and again, and again, until
she weeds out the top males from the lesser ones. The female, being in
control of reproduction, doesn't get aroused sexually by males who don't
chase her and pass her tests - it's actually what turns her on, so to
speak.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/bad-boys-alphas-assholes-nice-guys-and.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEL2vmxmc_vdpQR844AnWTgoATRLpW916TtQXW2J3m672UdRTCsh0UxhUGhVs0vlJ0bR_E6bswKbQYKnGw4p2WlnXmjLe-LQJWA0Uu1bBhF2GKC9ZFOuct2bFmTovOFwBhhhvRh_RROYA/s1600/Honesty.jpg" height="223" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Bad Boys, Alphas, Assholes, Niceguys and Players"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
Also to note, the female's position is <i>naturally</i> on the
deceptive side while the male is trying to be as "true" as possible.
There is no point in him feigning he doesn't have power like the female
does. He is competing to be "the best" and if you are the best, there is
no point in pretending you aren't from his point of view. It would be
counter-productive to be anything less than your best.<br />
.<br />
Here's a study on the mating dance of rats that shows very well the concept of "He chases her until she catches him.":<br />
<br />
<br />
<b><i>"According to Ogas and Gaddam, we can learn some important lessons
about female sexual behaviour from observing rats in the laboratory. </i><br />
<br />
<i>They insist that if you put a male and female rat in close proximity
to one another, the female will start to come on to the male, performing
actions associated with sexual interest — running and then stopping to
encourage the male to chase her. </i><br />
<br />
<i>But after a bit of kiss-chase, the female rat stands still, adopting a
submissive stance until the male takes action. They also claim that
almost every quality of dominant males — from the way they smell to the
way they walk and their deep voice — triggers arousal in the female
brain, while ‘weaker’ men, who are not taller, have higher voices or
lower incomes, excite us less.</i><br />
</b><br />
<b>
<i>What they seem to be suggesting is that the cavemen were right all
along and that what women really want is to be dragged by the hair, all
the while feigning reluctance, by macho men waving clubs."</i> </b>-- <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1394595/Has-equality-destroyed-sex-life-A-controversial-book-claims-feminism-rise-new-men-killed-womens-libidos-.html" target="_blank">Has Equality Destoyed Your Sex Life? -- by Linda Kelly for MailOnline</a><br />
.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Human Mating Dance</b></span><br />
.<br />
It is appropriate to describe our mating behaviour as a "dance," for that is sort of what it is. In dancing, the male role leads the female - if they mix up this dynamic the dance simply does not work. It doesn't mean the male role is superior to the female role however, for at the outset it is the woman who controls whether she will engage in the dance or whether she'll sit it out completely. <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2001/01/180-seconds.html" target="_blank">Women decide within the first few minutes of meeting a man whether he's worthy to dance with or not</a>, and the first steps are hers, to try to initiate action on the part of the male. As with many things between males and females, you can see how "the hierarchy" of what appears on the surface is different from the underlying, mostly hidden and reversed hierarchy that exists underneath:<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/finding-small-pool-of-interested-women.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/finding-small-pool-of-interested-women.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvnWuvwpWuaJz6Mud6ijtxOXVxqXVn4Q5_H9Hd_rOyFu_2gHBYSU1iqpyFNwpnS-_9PN1zfdbW9aESybmlLkZaqrji2Sarp8ONVBpq05vas0prqDSe4Zx42bMnNiZ5BFRXwdg3BdYtypA/s1600/Charlotte-Waiting-for-the-Prince-charlotte-la-bouff-34926828-1920-1072.jpg" height="222" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Finding the Small Pool of Interested Women"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><b>“Women chat happily, send sexually explicit signals and encourage the
man’s attention, even if they have absolutely no interest in him. This
gives a woman time to assess a man, say [Karl Grammer of the Ludwig
Boltzmann Institute of Urban Ethology in Vienna, who studied 45
male-female pairs of strangers in their teens and early twenties]…
Importantly, the women also seemed to control the encounter – what the
women did had a direct effect on what the men did next. ‘You can predict
male behaviour from female behaviour but not the other way around,’
says Grammer”</b></i> – <i>New Scientist Magazine</i> (London), February 14, 2001<br />
.<br />
So, the first thing she does is signal openess to the men in the room to attract their attention. Then she begins to weed out the lesser men from the better prospects. As the dance continues, she focuses more and more on those she would like to have approach her. Although she gives out covert signals, <i>a normal man won't approach unless he's invited to do so</i>. These are what Pick-up Artists (P.U.A.'s) call Indications of Interest (I.O.I.'s). <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5I9qmx-yZHhNPEY0JTbmT4PfzdCVFmb1C7341ST_woGAZ7nkcTQpIjY3eEJYEo1EMjJJp4jPar5aNI0lkK1lKBcLaN4b1i2oA795Bd3aaDrm-ybSl8EhJTrRNu8vlbWNc4ozRmhB5NTU/s1600/Eye+Contact.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5I9qmx-yZHhNPEY0JTbmT4PfzdCVFmb1C7341ST_woGAZ7nkcTQpIjY3eEJYEo1EMjJJp4jPar5aNI0lkK1lKBcLaN4b1i2oA795Bd3aaDrm-ybSl8EhJTrRNu8vlbWNc4ozRmhB5NTU/s1600/Eye+Contact.gif" height="111" width="200" /></a></div>
What's the best way to make yourself stand out to a woman in this manner? To pass this first test? It's with <i>eye contact</i>. People don't make eye contact with strangers - especially women, who know this is an invitation to sexual interest. It’s also not an ambiguous thing. She isn’t just looking back….she’s
LOCKING gazes with you. Often, she is running her eyes up and down your
body before returning her gaze to you and doing all sorts of other body
language signals. If you talk to her, her response isn’t all business
but she’ll probably try to engage you in further small talk or even
flirt with you.<br />
<br />
Without the gaze, she probably just walks up and goes,
hmm, he’s cute, and then goes on her merry way.<br />
<br />
But, with the gaze,
especially if you nod, smile or even wink, that changes things. It
elicits behavior from her. An uninterested woman will actually be quite
terse with you (99% of them), break eye contact with you, snap
at you (wench), and rapidly leave. Truthfully, though, you won’t know it
until you see it. But once you see it, you’ll always be able to see it.<br />
.<br />
<i><b>"Cary (1976) discovered that the woman, through eye contact,
controlled the course of interaction with a male stranger, both in the
laboratory and in singles' bars. Perper (1985) gave a detailed
description of courtship, stressing an escalation-response process in
which women play a key role in escalation or deescalation. The steps in
this process are approach, turn, first touch, and steady development of
body synchronization.</b></i><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghsIbznnj5QXhE0c6-xbS0gf27zy1YZsRV4V9m3EN95RVzH_1TwR4RPllCaRAbAPLZzNyD3hS0ctjbMgPVaijVc7dRlYrrOdgjsbUWVtF3YHv81wSgd-0y-kwHdaGPjDqyqn3fuib9lRQ/s1600/giphy.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/eye-contact-game/" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghsIbznnj5QXhE0c6-xbS0gf27zy1YZsRV4V9m3EN95RVzH_1TwR4RPllCaRAbAPLZzNyD3hS0ctjbMgPVaijVc7dRlYrrOdgjsbUWVtF3YHv81wSgd-0y-kwHdaGPjDqyqn3fuib9lRQ/s1600/giphy.gif" height="143" width="200" /></a><i><b> </b></i><br />
<i><b>Although these reports are clearly valuable, most researchers
addressed courtship very generally, and some failed to recognize the
importance of the female role in the courtship process .What was needed
was a more complete ethogram of women's nonverbal courtship signals. To
compile such a catalog of flirting behavior exhibited by women involved
in initial heterosexual interaction, more than 200 adults were observed
(Moore, 1985) in field settings such as singles' bars, restaurants, and
parties.</b></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i><b>Research has shown, therefore, that the cultural myth that the man
is always the sexual aggressor, pressing himself on a reluctant woman,
is incorrect."</b></i> -- Courtship Signaling and Adolescents: "Girls
Just Wanna Have Fun"? Monica M. Moore, Ph.D.Department of behavioral and
Social Sciences, Webster University. <br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-sexes-approaching-each-other.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-sexes-approaching-each-other.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1epD7nlGlwfq9Idcwuym8gwktNbxNy4541vBqL_51IrGziMi16twoXAfFrll17EZrZ6YqxANEDDDZiEzmYL6WBh31Mte9JTOiTSOQRPazWqYIU6m_psNAku4IkS3mAayMaStRWDId49g/s1600/Clipboard01.jpg" height="216" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Sexes Approaching Each Other (Eye Contact, Escalating)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
After the woman has signaled to the man she wants him to take action, the man must take the lead. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">She is hypergamous, remember</a>, and she's looking for a man to display his superiority to her <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">so she can conform herself around him</a>. Women have the submissive role, but it's hard to submit to a marshmallow. If you pass the tests they'll slow down and get less frequent, but she'll still test again from time to time to see if her man is still strong or if he needs to be replaced. <br />
.<br />
All women test - it's infuriating but it's a fact of life. But how does one pass these irrational tests where it seems she's basically demanding you serve her toasted ice?<br />
<br />
Well, for the small tests (or the initial posturing of dominance for the male in the relationship), the best way to pass them is to simply not take her seriously and pretend <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" target="_blank">she's a little girl</a> who's hardly worthy of your attentions.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-first-date-at-your-place.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-first-date-at-your-place.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrvl7d4UA-4d1Mt0G-lVNW8vzdtjHha1PuP4b6501kEp2B90VEySkAuK_WZXv2YOM6D9pfX3T7_QnpEmBrv_jkoRNhP_Y00fe4BsTtenAEyPBW9l6kBjFtWIFMQfXbLFdcdQhDG4VZFYQ/s1600/Lottie-Waltzing-with-Naveen-charlotte-la-bouff-25786067-600-299.gif" height="198" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "That First Date at Your Place"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i>"Whenever you find yourself wondering what to say or how to act, and
wanting to avoid screwing up because you think this girl is THE ONE</i><i>,
imagine how you would treat the hottest babe in your zip code--who
happens to be your little sister. You'd tease your little sister, right?
You'd laugh at her and call her on it every time she tried to get YOU
to behave the same way she gets all the other guys to worship her and do
her bidding. When she was acting exceptionally princess-like, you'd tell her of your surprise that she'd wear such a tight skirt when it </i><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/principles-of-seduction.html" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/search/label/Principles%20of%20Seduction" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKh-bJzt4INo_h1pG7oL08Ih10ACjgOO3Wa1_puOWUL7QTAILQH3I4G50MH3q0-AHd5wOCY6eliIcKgr_dz5kBhNxnR7l-ypnxxUzjJAa3gW4uO6P6T9V0qkPyn3w57AI3z1LEbtuLYGI/s1600/Make+me+a+sandwich+1.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/principles-of-seduction.html" target="_blank">Click for "The Principles of Seduction"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i>made her ass look so fat, or a hairstyle that made her ears stick out.
Then you’d tell her you liked the way her nose wrinkled up when she got
mad, and would she bring you a soda from the kitchen? If you don't think
this works, you've never tried it."</i> -- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/women-teasing-tests-one-itis-and-hope.html" target="_blank">Women, Teasing, Tests, One-itis and Hope</a> <br />
.<br />
For the more serious types of tests however, (ie. wanting to move in with you after dating for only two months, then pulling a week long hissy fit when you say no) you've got to give some sort of response which is firmer. They want to know the steel
content of your balls. To pass the test, your response needs to be some
version of, "I’m going to do whatever I choose to do, whether you like it
or not, and for no better reason than I want to…..and if you don’t like
it, you can just leave because, quite frankly, there are other women
waiting for me to get rid of you so they can have a turn."<br />
<br />
But... there are relatively normal, reasonable tests... and psychotic,
raving lunatic tests. If you ever get a psychotic, raving lunatic test,
don’t address it - just dump her with no further explanation. Simply
walk away from her and never speak to her again. If you pass
normal tests, all testing should cease for awhile. If instead she
escalates the testing, the more she escalates, the more you should
consider dumping her.<br />
<br />
Examples of lunatic tests:<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/most-women-dont-want-man-who-isnt-choosy.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/most-women-dont-want-man-who-isnt-choosy.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBOkFhZon2uULmNusMMPWAIkBclJKnJjeFNjR4x61RKMevZddTp9ow6XanErn5cOpTjphezWcqDFdGp0nQEev2Vzw8cRSAoKFSKMvOX9ecgpp5xXi9JrW7MEcHpev-E60EnkeuVGS8lnA/s1600/fencing1.gif" height="225" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Most Women Don't Want a Man Who Isn't Choosy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
She accuses you of cheating<br />
<br />
She steals from you<br />
<br />
You go to the bathroom at a bar, restaurant etc. and you come back to
find her flirting with another guy, she hits on another guy while you
are around or tries to provoke a situation between you and another guy<br />
<br />
She makes a scene out in public<br />
<br />
Calls the cops on you for any reason whatsoever<br />
<br />
Well, you get the picture. <br />
.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Western Culture's Inability to Pass Feminism's Cultural Fitness Tests</b></span><br />
.<br />
As I mentioned at the top of this page, these "fitness tests" not only occur <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">on the cellular level</a> and in the mating behaviours of the various species which reproduce <i>sexually</i> - including humans - but they also appear on the macro-scale. Our civilizations keep rising up under
defined gender roles, collapsing under androgyny, and then rebuilding themselves
again because of the adversity which gets created from the collapse.<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://virtual-independence.blogspot.ca/2015/01/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-lunch.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://virtual-independence.blogspot.ca/2015/01/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-lunch.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1044Tlaqf35taY7r-lYkVQqoUr5Fev94Ik8OCiYC0OByuhFHW1bidyeDOSOm6hldUuyuXRXOyqlSe6mKbTfr6qq9bS4XACt696cx08whSgq2R_j68MPMbgnqsuzfq_UW4xuQEbAptTaU/s200/no_free_lunch-772769.jpg" height="200" width="196" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
It's become quite obvious that Western Civilization is in serious trouble. The "Nanny State" has grown to enormous dimensions and <a href="http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2014/jan/24/mark-warner/warner-says-us-government-largest-entity-world/" target="_blank">the 'limited' government of America's Founding Fathers has become the largest employer</a> in the nation. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">Our birthrates are decidedly negative</a> and our debt is mathematically unsustainable. We've killed countless <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-womans-right-to-choose.html" target="_blank">millions of babies with abortion</a> and now are left wondering how we're going to be able to afford to support our enormous population of aging Baby Boomers with the far smaller (and poorer) younger generations.<br />
<br />
The Eskimos, you know, used to send the elderly off to meet the Great Walrus on an iceflow.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIhnpz_e82eFUlEoFKiCP-vkw1_o0DHRuaJ_RYQAw5vK5I8XHKMT7ugfgOt9G3Bf7zLDZfa2CKX6dZXfTRw-KIP0LquVEkcH2q3p6JE8M40PhwRg8-AuSCrYsT0BZDsEykjztNvCpvpic/s1600/IceFlow.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIhnpz_e82eFUlEoFKiCP-vkw1_o0DHRuaJ_RYQAw5vK5I8XHKMT7ugfgOt9G3Bf7zLDZfa2CKX6dZXfTRw-KIP0LquVEkcH2q3p6JE8M40PhwRg8-AuSCrYsT0BZDsEykjztNvCpvpic/s1600/IceFlow.jpg" height="320" width="320" /></a><br />
<br />
No population can survive if it starves the younger and productive generations to feed the elderly and unproductive generations. This too is just simple math. We are in some deep, deep doo-dah because of our destruction of the nuclear family.<br />
<br />
<b><i>“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts
as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the
wars of the world.” </i></b>-- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/thomas-jefferson-selections.html" target="_blank">Thomas Jefferson</a> <br />
<br />
We are dying because we've ignored the sometimes unpleasant but very neccessary <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">Objective Truth of the Masculine Principle</a>: That there's no such thing as <a href="http://virtual-independence.blogspot.ca/2015/01/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-lunch.html" target="_blank">a Free Lunch</a>! <br />
<br />
And yet, we keep doing more of the same.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/history-of-rome-by-titus-livius.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/history-of-rome-by-titus-livius.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAUtovGaqLEYAijQbJfWgyIBEyeapz-dhJT6RWQSMrZnO8wx6MSYbv3EcXZrE1I7Ry6iHeb3heVKqK0zjvPqla1143f2gfVgvEi5OJdZkGOm0DHQ6399xGs1tu2JWRMtAaWWAvd1sckug/s1600/SlutWalk-007.jpg" height="240" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The History of Rome" -- by Titus Livius (59BC -17AD)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
For example, we know that the more women compete with men in the workplace, the lower our birthrates will continue to decline. But out of fear of yet another feminist hissy fit (ie. The Slut Walk fiasco), we not only praise the fact women earn 60% of ALL university degrees, but we are allowing them to push forth an agenda to affirmative action themselves ahead of men in the one area males still dominate: <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">STEM subjects.</a> <br />
<br />
We hear every day on the TV and from our politicians that it's a travesty women make up such small percentage of corporate executives and government leaders, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">all the while ignoring that the nation's garbage collectors are nearly all male too,</a> as well as 85% of the homeless.<br />
<br />
Obviously, the entire mantra of feminism is, <b>"Only the kinds of equality that somehow always favours me."</b><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjid2nm6MnDTtEs_43n-81CIZctCGXKl1iuUeYfV1rLklLPN4tP77zsifWp5pJmwznQnWJw790PUq-4KUXdrcfz5EUqQn6nODfnM_Xi79mnPRGQx9nWKtszA7QQuTqmFThCG4a9nJBaguU/s1600/resized_the-most-interesting-man-in-the-world-meme-generator-i-dont-always-tell-my-girls-what-to-do-but-when-i-do-its-to-make-me-a-sandwich-89475e.jpg" height="400" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" target="_blank">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
This quite frankly DOES NOT WORK! And our inability to tell women to shut it and make us some damn sandwiches is, literally, going to kill us.<br />
.<br />
<b>...<i>in those states in which the condition of the women is bad, </i></b><i><b>half the
city may be regarded as having no laws.</b></i><b> And this is what has actually
happened at Sparta; the legislator wanted to make the whole state hardy
and temperate, and <i>he has carried out his intention in the case of the
men, but he has neglected the women, who live in every sort of
intemperance and luxury.</i></b> <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
---</div>
<b>"...<i>the influence of the Lacedaemonian women has been most mischievous</i>.
The evil showed itself in the Theban invasion, when, unlike the women of
other cities, <i>they were utterly useless and caused more confusion than
the enemy."</i></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
--- </div>
<b>"...But, when Lycurgus, as tradition says, wanted to bring the women under his laws,</b><b> <i>they resisted, and he gave up the attempt."</i></b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">The Politics of Aristotle, The Spartan Women</a> <br />
<br />
As a culture, we've been failing the fitness tests our women have been giving us. <br />
. <br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFhuwPkWIJwBnNraj3ybRHaZNJo2j-1L9Azaa11Qy7rLRyc6O0lKIK_CIBQ_YBWSB0s7lOhT0Z3oWEN2MJhpxXHRwOz8QuNbvbRdNlaNnkyvD9a2KCxf95wDqpnrnhTyzwCrhZTB7AULI/s1600/fail.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFhuwPkWIJwBnNraj3ybRHaZNJo2j-1L9Azaa11Qy7rLRyc6O0lKIK_CIBQ_YBWSB0s7lOhT0Z3oWEN2MJhpxXHRwOz8QuNbvbRdNlaNnkyvD9a2KCxf95wDqpnrnhTyzwCrhZTB7AULI/s1600/fail.jpg" height="150" width="200" /></a></div>
<i>QUOTE: "...I think they may be wrong when they go on to say
[marriage 1.0] was good for “civilization” too. Perhaps the inability of
Western cultures to pass the shit test of feminism comes directly from
allowing too many Betas to breed in the past and pass their passive and
compliant genes down through the gene pool."</i><br />
<br />
I sometimes suspect <i>this</i> is what we are supposed to “do.” Pass the cultural fitness test…
there's something better on the other side, something we're supposed
to find out – maybe it will change us, but we are never
going to get there until we pass these fitness tests <i>that keep destroying us.</i><br />
<br />
Many messages have been sent to us, obviously trying to warn us about
“something.” These things are, I think, “<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" target="_blank">twinkling reminders of humanity’s past.</a>” The story of Pandora’s box… the legend of Atlantis… <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-garden-of-eden-absolute-truth-and.html" target="_blank">the Garden of Eden</a>…
Jason and the Argonauts… Egypt’s Punt… They are all of a similar theme,
containing similar messages or warnings etc. They are talking to us
from the deep, deep past. Perhaps if we pass these cultural fitness tests and stop destroying ourselves like pathetic lemmings, our
civilization will develop enough to finally “figure it out.”<br />
<br />
What “it” is, I don’t know. Maybe it’s a better way of living. Maybe
without civilization always collapsing and needing to be rebuilt, we'll figure out how to get out of the solar system - maybe we'll find
other lifeforms because our technology won’t reset 500 years back in
time if we prevent the continual collapse of civilization.<br />
<br />
I know it sounds kinda New Age, but, imagine how different the world
would be today if say, Rome had never degraded its principles, and it
had never fallen. How advanced do you think our technology might be today
if Rome had survived and they kept pushing forward, advancing
and learning, all the way up to the present day? I suspect I might be
taking my hover-craft to the corner store instead of my crappy old car.
Who knows? Maybe we “figure something out.” But it does seem like we
keep getting sent “warnings” from the past where our ancestors are saying to us
“watch out” and “fix this problem.”<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rising-up-from-being-beasts-of-field.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYuYWWU3J1gJWVKMIDTpmzWtFhNjMRcO0PXyTUYkXC4p7H7BB_WsHFeKChCLsACVsNgBjfUMJ-XidRktlK75kt6xupfkB2icSdO4MCCAuIL2Nym_fnQRiYYDKj-I4MFU_YllPDeE5m_XY/s320/Beasts+of+the+Field.jpg" height="320" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5548318782632636898" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="284" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I’ll tell you one thing what I see: Our “moral codes” try to tell us
not to behave like animals. That means not succumbing to our base
passions, such as monkey sex without responsibities. Do not kill, do not
steal, do not commit adultery, do not covet etc. etc. – all things that
animals do, but which humans are told not to do. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank">The “Point” is to rise up from being beasts of the field</a> – of not living like animals and basing our decisions in passion, but rather using our ability to "rise up" and use our reason instead.<br />
<br />
If the point is to be anti-animal and pro-reason, then I wonder what
would happen when we finally figure out how to stop destroying ourselves
by succumbing to our base animal natures, of which our sex drives are
most likely the strongest, and the way women stop men from “thinking”
and rather living by pure passion. Maybe if we overcome this
lemming tendency that has plagued us for thousands of years, there is
something else on the other side.<br />
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fish-and-bicycle.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
.
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-48fIVWapDLU%2FVRDV9umCbcI%2FAAAAAAAADpc%2Fq6WDltoTlWM%2Fs1600%2Fgiphy.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghsIbznnj5QXhE0c6-xbS0gf27zy1YZsRV4V9m3EN95RVzH_1TwR4RPllCaRAbAPLZzNyD3hS0ctjbMgPVaijVc7dRlYrrOdgjsbUWVtF3YHv81wSgd-0y-kwHdaGPjDqyqn3fuib9lRQ/s1600/giphy.gif" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-66621317240989937582015-03-11T16:30:00.000-07:002015-05-28T10:13:22.252-07:00The Fish and The Bicycle.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgp-W9vpVV3Npx3XKkaW5g7RuJbC6BcWI_2uhy0_9tQtJyjo18Ie7C8M1JIgEf0oEWPaHWCR2_GynCp-asQmKAs_slIO3m4GU5Wes-R17o_mW6CedSHI-opYWOdvtvG9CFzALATqCnYdeo/s1600/FishOnBicycle.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="193" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgp-W9vpVV3Npx3XKkaW5g7RuJbC6BcWI_2uhy0_9tQtJyjo18Ie7C8M1JIgEf0oEWPaHWCR2_GynCp-asQmKAs_slIO3m4GU5Wes-R17o_mW6CedSHI-opYWOdvtvG9CFzALATqCnYdeo/s200/FishOnBicycle.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<i>”The most insidious effect of affirmative action quotas is a kind of
psychic castration… the removal of the source of a man’s identity. By
contriving the nonsense that women can do whatever a man can do (which
they obviously can’t), they’ve leveled men’s purpose to the extent that
men effectively have no purpose. The equivalent would be to remove
women’s wombs, and render them sterile.</i> <br />
<br />
<i>It’s not just messing with the laws of supply and demand and cheating
men out of their rights… its about annihilation of identity and
purpose.”</i> -- <a href="http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/01/06/quantifying-the-cost-of-quotas/#comment-125614" target="_blank">codebuster, from a comment at The Spearhead</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhodpipEMux7Uz9GfZy_NoO_vdCbZgrpPvdjTAKhC8BKM4qYgGD2RQXqyQZDUEOhS7DZ4-3z5N-LkVZUAHq4Oub1b6K7pgrpDXx50W0-GJKpf_TtUViAOlBypsZczajLTDJbtu98vbOZ80/s1600/original.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhodpipEMux7Uz9GfZy_NoO_vdCbZgrpPvdjTAKhC8BKM4qYgGD2RQXqyQZDUEOhS7DZ4-3z5N-LkVZUAHq4Oub1b6K7pgrpDXx50W0-GJKpf_TtUViAOlBypsZczajLTDJbtu98vbOZ80/s200/original.jpg" width="200" /></a><br />
<br />
<i>”I remember the first time I saw the slogan "A woman without a man is
like a fish without a bicycle", I knew my face had just been spit in.
Men were not just useless to women, we were irrelevant. We had no
purpose in a woman's life, and did not belong in her world at all. It
was a message of hate, dismissal, and refutation. But, I also saw it as a
warning of what was to come. It was like seeing clouds on the horizon,
and knowing that it is time to get under cover because a storm is
brewing. And, since it was obviously smearing shit in my face, it was
going to be a shit storm.”</i> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/08/hate-bounces.html" target="_blank">zenpriest, Hate Bounces</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiA_dOeGp1Tyy4avpu7heTvBNfLfWseS4caCsvpQHsxw8kQ822bXmqFxlzv7exPU6Bfqg2XjRo9I7oFYHJW0yUuULH_1z_MtqSFTr19mG4O8hFcw0FeScr0xzafok8T1G2t-qVQxdZHyg/s1600/Bicycle+Fish.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiA_dOeGp1Tyy4avpu7heTvBNfLfWseS4caCsvpQHsxw8kQ822bXmqFxlzv7exPU6Bfqg2XjRo9I7oFYHJW0yUuULH_1z_MtqSFTr19mG4O8hFcw0FeScr0xzafok8T1G2t-qVQxdZHyg/s320/Bicycle+Fish.jpg" width="320" /></a><i>”The problem here is women are totally lying about wanting to be
empowered. To have power, one must have independence and be
self-reliant. This is the exact opposite of what women and children have
been for most of human history. Instead of being independent and
self-reliant (ie having power) they have been dependent and relied on
men for everything. In return, there is a bunch of stuff they are
expected to give men…..certain roles they must perform for the system to
work.</i><br />
<br />
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
</div>
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
<i>Now, a handful of women have always been an exception. I can totally
see how more women would want to have power by becoming self-reliant and
independent. BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT THEY ARE DOING! Instead, they want to
be empowered but still rely and depend on men for everything. They think
they can do this by creating various ways and means to force us to take
care of them, both as individuals and a society, without giving
anything in return. They don’t want marriage but they still want money
from men via alimony and child support. They want to vote but don’t
exercise wisdom in what they vote for. They want jobs but are pathetic
as employees, but God forbid you fire them, you’ll get sued (plus they
will trade sex for promotions).”</i> -- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-most-feminacentrist-statement-of.html" target="_blank">The Most Feminacentrist Statement of the Twentieth Century</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvu_v-0livlDrbKVOQj3Y_XW6MDEnJMB0a_iOJePuJ_tioJTtLioTBamyFgBJ1jZRH22cDoCsgXgER9HmgUPW7i8DdwfbNQRmhzyemuAW_MoUAD1kRJZNh1-Z6-Vyfcl4e6nBNiJ1MwtU/s1600/cowboy-playing-around-on-a-bicycle-while-holding-fish-and-a-fishing-rod-on-a-ranch-with-a-dog-walks-along.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvu_v-0livlDrbKVOQj3Y_XW6MDEnJMB0a_iOJePuJ_tioJTtLioTBamyFgBJ1jZRH22cDoCsgXgER9HmgUPW7i8DdwfbNQRmhzyemuAW_MoUAD1kRJZNh1-Z6-Vyfcl4e6nBNiJ1MwtU/s320/cowboy-playing-around-on-a-bicycle-while-holding-fish-and-a-fishing-rod-on-a-ranch-with-a-dog-walks-along.jpg" width="211" /></a><i>"...Traditionally, the raw sexual and economic facts of marriage have
been politely concealed by superadded ideas such as romantic love and
gallantry. In the years following the Second World War, such antiquated
fashions were with increasing rudeness torn from the sexual act by
fraudulent sex "scientists" and pornographers. But the economic
realities have not similarly been dragged into the light of day. On the
contrary, our prosperity has made it easy to downplay them even more
than in the past.</i><br />
<br />
<i>An example of such polite concealment is found in the traditional
etiquette with respect to greeting newly married couples. It was
customary to say "congratulations" to the man, but never to the woman;
to the bride one offered only "best wishes." The pretense was that the
man was receiving an unmerited windfall. The reality, of course, is that
the man assumes the principal burden in marriage. For women, it is an
economic bonanza. </i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHL6qc4W2SnMB8sYlHnGpbk7_6_x7O9DWCy4EMI8XpO7i0H6qlNlaJ-MT1gBUvc2RRoNGtPimenhJ5djYXozoVD7hM-8IFG84tDduQqKNYId_AgVXvGdm1e9AvHL6STfLvgkYFWwaIJgk/s1600/Fish+Bicycle.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHL6qc4W2SnMB8sYlHnGpbk7_6_x7O9DWCy4EMI8XpO7i0H6qlNlaJ-MT1gBUvc2RRoNGtPimenhJ5djYXozoVD7hM-8IFG84tDduQqKNYId_AgVXvGdm1e9AvHL6STfLvgkYFWwaIJgk/s320/Fish+Bicycle.jpg" width="320" /></a><i>One factor in the disintegration of marriage and sex roles is that,
spoiled by prosperity, women actually came to believe the chivalrous
pretense and forgot the underlying economic reality. They expect men to
be grateful for the opportunity to support them. ... It is a case of
gallantry being abused by its beneficiaries. Under such circumstances,
men cannot simply go on behaving in the old manner as though nothing
were wrong. It is incumbent upon them to fight back against the forces
arrayed against them, in part by emphasizing some home truths about the
economic realities of marriage. Perhaps it is time for young men to stop
paying for dates and coyly explain that they are "saving their wallets"
for marriage. If that sounds cynical to a traditional sensibility, my
answer is that such cynicism may simply be the price for reestablishing
the natural family as the basis of our civilization."</i> -- <a href="http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/devlin_home_ec_02.htm" target="_blank">F. Roger Devlin, Home Economics II</a> <br />
<br />
<br /></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXzBzAN1AARIeavi8i5PlC7AW6OfsKcO6sMHrpIOmcc79diSy1uECDA0jDnDmL19Sdbk0goszSrzkjbtqd08-dxp5YeFaZxuopCY1Z55CNs4DlrH6JsyDKGcFMrTq4M9OdhZcSsN0166E/s1600/Tropical+Fern+in+a+Greenhouse+in+Iceland.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXzBzAN1AARIeavi8i5PlC7AW6OfsKcO6sMHrpIOmcc79diSy1uECDA0jDnDmL19Sdbk0goszSrzkjbtqd08-dxp5YeFaZxuopCY1Z55CNs4DlrH6JsyDKGcFMrTq4M9OdhZcSsN0166E/s320/Tropical+Fern+in+a+Greenhouse+in+Iceland.gif" width="320" /></a><i>”In truth, women are no more “independent” than they ever were, but
because they’ve transferred the job of protecting and caring for them
from the men they personally know to the State, they can pretend to
themselves that they no longer need men. Modern women are as
“independent” as a tropical fern in a greenhouse in Iceland. All that’s
changed is that men, who still do all the dirty, dangerous jobs that
must be done, and pay all the taxes and alimony and child-care payments,
and fight the wars, etc. etc., that enable women to have the
comfortable world they want, no longer get the respect we used to get in
return. In the long run, this is a recipe for disaster. We may be
stupid, but we’re not harmless.”</i> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2010/08/philalethes-27-in-battle-of-sexes-if.html" target="_blank">Philalethes #27 – In the Battle of the Sexes, If She Wins, She Loses</a> <br />
<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfD35LORbfjCNl64xCuM7A-ftZlc9UdaesFvv-WRwxtbSv8s-MHty3VMlgdJEO6bPHYeP0tP0V-PMeIUaDyhr4TzDMZAS-aPlMofOOMaXZWjCoHsNz30VHuOQFBCxAP6XxrMvVizSZmyQ/s320/Fish_Without_a_Bicycle_by_violett_violett.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Amazon Women (The Science of Why Males Exist)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i>”Women only have what rights we give them. The real core of the
problem with women is other men. The men who open their wallets in a
snivelling desire to get laid. The men who pass foolish draconian laws
to solve problems that don’t exist. The men who promote women in return
for sexual favours. The men who marry obviously inferior women. And most
of all, the men who swallow the most outrageous of lies, rather than
bother to think critically about what is happening both to them and
everyone around them.</i><br />
<br />
<i>The bottom line is women have no real power, no intrinsic power. They
are totally, completely and permanently dependant on men for power.
This situation is deeply rooted in our biology and is not going to change
just because some wacko broads think it should. We created this hobgoblin
ourselves, feed it and keep it alive despite its obviously odious
nature. The very moment we stop, it will evaporate in a puff of smoke.
Women know this. Their biggest fear is we will wake up and know it too.</i> -- <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-most-feminacentrist-statement-of.html" target="_blank">The Most Feminacentrist Statement of the Twentieth Century</a><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVXVAV4sGIXAJ_B-fodP0tVATmXEC0EP-B7XQut0miFSizJEkXy5amEcwmbKBtdo_VOT453ENPzJevpq43ixKI82BsNuEwbbiCjjWEg80pc0NWFV3jKNhAGoc8SEWhJUXOsTIS6UMQCZQ/s320/Bike+Fishing.jpg" width="196" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Liberation of Men"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<i>”…there is no equity between the sexes. They are indispensable one to
another, but one is the leader and the other led. The ram is the master
of the ewe; the reverse would be an aberration and monstrosity. The
pride of the American women will bring about a reaction; for whatever
these ladies are they owe to man. If the latter wearies of his
generosity and leaves them to their own merits, the expiatory plunge
will oblige them to measure the immensity of their ingratitude.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Nature has willed the subordination of woman. Civilized man dignifies
his companion, submits willingly to grace, sweetness, frailty, creates
for her the right to protection, gives her a privileged place. But the
condition is such that, if she denies the benefaction and claims to
have earned what has been given to her and to be indebted to no one, her
benefactor may bring this course to an abrupt end.</i> <br />
<br />
<i>The illusion consists in this: superiority constitutes a moral duty
on the part of the superior towards the inferior, but inferiority does
not constitute any legal right on the part of the inferior over the
superior. Generosity is beautiful and noble, but it is optional; the
cripple who demands that he should he carried dispels one's desire to
aid him. Man enjoys protecting woman, but when woman imperatively
summons him to serve and protect her, he whom an entreaty would have
softened loses his inclination at once.</i> <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiml983cWAhys2jXU92s3YZGtnqUuy9YwFwjHHxVvH7KJrazLGE2Je1GXDSjrXoJ27DU4KH1jPw0mMw1_fpMF14uGYV1Kh7P53w5ZNOph7UjQGng2nP-LCx5nUzabeGnTaHA2ght5F3lZI/s1600/fish-on-a-bicycle-o.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiml983cWAhys2jXU92s3YZGtnqUuy9YwFwjHHxVvH7KJrazLGE2Je1GXDSjrXoJ27DU4KH1jPw0mMw1_fpMF14uGYV1Kh7P53w5ZNOph7UjQGng2nP-LCx5nUzabeGnTaHA2ght5F3lZI/s1600/fish-on-a-bicycle-o.gif" /></a></div>
<i>By substituting the legal sphere for the moral sphere, the
emancipation of women will desiccate society, as legal charity destroys
real charity, as love by command would sterilise the marriage-bed. -- In
asking more than civil equality and economic equality, women are playing
a dangerous game. Equality in services will be demanded of them, and
this will serve them right.”</i> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2003/01/intimate-journal-of-henri-amiel-august.html" target="_blank">The Intimate Journal of Henri Amiel, August 8, 1876</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<i>"...That woman is by nature intended to obey is shown by the fact
that every woman who is placed in the unnatural position of absolute
independence at once attaches herself to some kind of man, by whom she
is controlled and governed; this is because she requires a master. If
she is young, the man is a lover; if she is old, a priest</i><b>.</b>"<b> -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer - On Women (1851)</a> <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/testing-testing-123-testing.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html">Next</a></span></b></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
..http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-17113104477434501842015-03-11T16:00:00.000-07:002015-10-12T08:52:49.914-07:00Social Strategy: Why Men Shouldn't Argue With Women.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBtMKK4S07lXKl_C6QvmjPWzrwI-7Ow3BP2Q0B7SOc5bseEhat8ZT52wcz8Sa1b37yVEfI3mSoUUW8Aol_UazgHYZAB9zm7psl8f30yUJPIdCHdSpnAzROsl9Vhjj9lOJ21RXSQpGI3Iw/s1600/Don't+Argue+With+Women.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="293" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBtMKK4S07lXKl_C6QvmjPWzrwI-7Ow3BP2Q0B7SOc5bseEhat8ZT52wcz8Sa1b37yVEfI3mSoUUW8Aol_UazgHYZAB9zm7psl8f30yUJPIdCHdSpnAzROsl9Vhjj9lOJ21RXSQpGI3Iw/s400/Don't+Argue+With+Women.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/dominating-clock.html" target="_blank">Dominating Clock</a></b></span> -- by Mathieu of Boulogne, 1295 A.D.<br />
<br />
<b>This female clock is really driving me mad, for her quarrelsome din
doesn't stop for a moment. The tongue of a quarrelsome woman never
tires of chiming in. She even drowns out the sound of the church bell.
A nagging wife couldn't care less whether her words are wise or
foolish, provided that the sound of her own voice can be heard. She
simply pursues her own ends; there's not a grain of sense in what she
says; in fact she finds it impossible to have a decent thought. She
doesn't want her husband to be the boss and finds fault with
everything he does. Rightly or wrongly, the husband has no choice: he
has to put up with the situation and keep his mouth shut if he wants
to remain in one piece. No man, however self disciplined or
clear-sighted he may be, can protect himself adequately against this. A
husband has to like what the wife likes, and disapprove of what she
hates and criticize what she criticizes so that her opinions appear to
be right. So anyone who wishes to immolate himself on the altar of
marriage will have a lot to put up with. Fifteen times, both day and
night, he will suffer without respite and he will be sorely tormented.
Indeed, I believe that this torture is worse than the torments of
hell, with its chains, fire, and iron.</b><br />
<br />
Men and women are after different things when they “debate.<br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnsKkXY8FJnKZrcWaZKzvFC9AYiXfUBcSPke0v37zFW11mY3d1_xIE8-Bp-8eOkg5bp_s_mN_ej3hqWfvsSbh2OltrHYfDMaWEPLryD5XG-8QebTyDL5zbTL_PaZqrhiyDC1iCvpaPZGY/s1600/Man+and+Woman+Arguing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnsKkXY8FJnKZrcWaZKzvFC9AYiXfUBcSPke0v37zFW11mY3d1_xIE8-Bp-8eOkg5bp_s_mN_ej3hqWfvsSbh2OltrHYfDMaWEPLryD5XG-8QebTyDL5zbTL_PaZqrhiyDC1iCvpaPZGY/s400/Man+and+Woman+Arguing.jpg" width="386" /></a>Men tend to, but not always, hold the truth to be the decider of the
debate. (Manginas excepted – thus the name). The man who illustrates the
truth the best, is generally considered the winner of a debate.
Women, not so much. And don’t forget, women scoff at our “school yard
rules.” Nothing seems sillier to a woman than the male “code.” When
women fight/argue, there are no rules she adheres to. Women decide who
“wins” a debate by who has been the snotty-mouthiest and by who
emotionally manipulates the other into submission. The truth matters
not a bit to women.<br />
<br />
<b><i>"If men are always more or less deceived on the subject of women,
it is because that they forget that they and women do not speak
altogether the same language, and that words have not the same weight
or the same meaning for them, especially in questions of feeling.</i>
Whether from shyness or precaution or artifice, a woman never speaks
out her whole thought, and moreover what she herself knows of it is but
a part of what it really is. Complete frankness seems to be
impossible to her, and complete self-knowledge seems to be forbidden
her. If she is a sphinx to us, it is because she is a riddle of
doubtful meaning even to herself. She has no need of perfidy, for she
is mystery itself. A woman is something fugitive, irrational,
indeterminable, illogical, and contradictory. A great deal of
forbearance ought to be shown her, and a good deal of prudence
exercised with regard to her, for she may bring about innumerable
evils without knowing it, capable of all kinds of devotion, and of all
kinds of treason, "monstre incompréhensible,'' raised to the second
power, she is at once the delight and the terror of men."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/intimate-journal-of-henri-amiel_20.html" target="_blank">The Intimate Journal of Henri Amiel, Dec. 26, 1868</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh55RGduC_Fl_o83sXRTilpn3JmxG-n35Se6GJJo3pkGaicK9U2_CZk3fFQzYd0pBRpwrM8UVyo2sTk6daGQayml5OhyH1SaJHXn1VxYFJ9EklyHdYcBjOmt3AzW5_2j-ABcgPgeN2YVbg/s1600/Make+Me+a+Sandwich11.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="252" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh55RGduC_Fl_o83sXRTilpn3JmxG-n35Se6GJJo3pkGaicK9U2_CZk3fFQzYd0pBRpwrM8UVyo2sTk6daGQayml5OhyH1SaJHXn1VxYFJ9EklyHdYcBjOmt3AzW5_2j-ABcgPgeN2YVbg/s1600/Make+Me+a+Sandwich11.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Here's a comparisson that might make it more clear how this works: <br />
<br />
Men love to watch sports. They will spend hours watching men kick balls,
shoot pucks, pot golf balls etc. etc. They will memorize stats, and
they will see strategy everywhere in a game of sports. Men positively
thrive upon these things. <br />
<br />
But women? <br />
<br />
Not so much. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjatVRqqR-84b6RfCKMKfVKHljZR2loL1Y4g5YbB5pmXDebtewuLkXwKJGJiMZH1XSlbSlJWu3_SCm3NCq3JcYE5DuLcJ8mDieIS_uLo0ygxGAawKBLYRDMUbpoE3ExEBVR0PsyurBqRps/s1600/soapoperas-logo.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjatVRqqR-84b6RfCKMKfVKHljZR2loL1Y4g5YbB5pmXDebtewuLkXwKJGJiMZH1XSlbSlJWu3_SCm3NCq3JcYE5DuLcJ8mDieIS_uLo0ygxGAawKBLYRDMUbpoE3ExEBVR0PsyurBqRps/s400/soapoperas-logo.gif" width="284" /></a>However, when women watch Soap Operas, they do the same things as men
watching sports – except they do it for <i>social strategy</i>. Women see
social strategy everywhere in soaps… how Kathy manipulated her love
interest David into lying to his wife Ruth, causing them to have a big
argument, driving David right into Kathy’s loving arms… and the affair
begins.<br />
<br />
Social Strategy. <br />
<br />
That's why soap operas are popular with women. It's what Cosmo magazine is chock full of: How to socially manipulate people. <br />
<br />
Socially manipulating people is what women <b>do.</b> <br />
<br />
In fact, it is one of the only things they do.<br />
<br />
"Truth" as men know it does not exist in the same way for women. Women
are "herd creatures" and thus women find "truth" or right and wrong
through the consensus of the herd. It is what the herd believes is
correct that women believe is "truth." Thus you see women are much more
attuned to eternally changing notions such as fashion, or how they use
social proofing - the consensus of whom the herd finds a sexually
desirable man - to decide for their individual selves which man they
find sexy. Men simply "know" what they find sexy in a mate, but women
find men sexy because of other women's sexual preferences.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhk4uvsBXJjHHCH2xQ2wp6YgTiQjn4eyNB751WvVTXkB6G0-znwNkIo740KQGLYzkay2yoscxr8bYPcRQ03oJ7BHPFqlM0_osCwUhB_NUEI-zvHA7m-ROPquQWguWZ1knHcySorZqfDubY/s1600/Women+Can't+Do+Math.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="313" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhk4uvsBXJjHHCH2xQ2wp6YgTiQjn4eyNB751WvVTXkB6G0-znwNkIo740KQGLYzkay2yoscxr8bYPcRQ03oJ7BHPFqlM0_osCwUhB_NUEI-zvHA7m-ROPquQWguWZ1knHcySorZqfDubY/s1600/Women+Can't%2BDo%2BMath.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<b>"... Women may have happy ideas, taste, and elegance, but they cannot
attain to the ideal. The difference between men and women is like
that between animals and plants. Men correspond to animals, while
women correspond to plants because their development is more placid
and <i>the principle that underlies it is the rather vague unity of feeling.</i> When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy,<i> </i>because <i>women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions.</i> Women are educated--who knows how?" </b>-- G.F. Hegel<br />
<br />
When women argue, they are not trying to find the objective truth but
rather are after manipulating the other(s) into feeling unified with
them towards their opinion. If the herd believes 1+1=3, then it is
correct - because the herd believes it is so. If tomorrow, the herd
believes 1+1=1, then that will be correct - because the herd believes it
is so. It is men who insist upon the objective truth - based on
principle and universality - and continue to argue 1+1=2, no matter how
much you cows moo at me. Women are not after finding the correct
answer, but rather they are after manipulating others into <i>feeling</i>
they are right and their opponent is wrong. In other words, they are
socially manipulating their opponent when they argue, rather than
seeking the actual, objective truth.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>- The consciousness of how one stands
with other people occupies a relatively larger and larger part of the
mind, the lower one goes on the scale of culture. Woman's intuition, so
fine in the sphere of personal relations, is seldom first-rate in the
way of mechanics. Hence Dr. Whately's jest, "Woman is the unreasoning
animal, and pokes the fire from the top."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/from-principles-of-psychology-by.html" target="_blank">William James, Principles of Psychology</a></span> <br />
<br />
I think one of the absolute best things men can do with women is follow
the advice of so many of those “misogynists” of old, and view women as <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" target="_blank">“the most responsible teenager in the house.”</a> <br />
<br />
Of course, it is not actually that they <i>are</i> children.
It is more likely that they do not develop the same sense of
principle and justice to navigate the world, because society enables
them not to have to. Regardless of whether they are or not, I think in
almost every aspect – from seduction to simple conversations – a man is
advantaged by continually reminding himself that “women are
teenagers.” They exist somewhere in between child and man.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLj_4biSkHUGgWd93oUkDynlbcwt5P6gxxXTMEtlg4YXIelmta9kLXKnGcStj_X-nBD3DIrC06TH2ZFh1UJ00CC88qVLPLibaBx4-rKISQmYP9f3Hf1yOY2iM6rPjic2dN1YBH-jU_rC4/s1600/Pool+Hustler+-+Dissembler.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLj_4biSkHUGgWd93oUkDynlbcwt5P6gxxXTMEtlg4YXIelmta9kLXKnGcStj_X-nBD3DIrC06TH2ZFh1UJ00CC88qVLPLibaBx4-rKISQmYP9f3Hf1yOY2iM6rPjic2dN1YBH-jU_rC4/s1600/Pool+Hustler+-+Dissembler.jpg" width="400" /></a>This does not mean a man can be foolish and disregard women as harmless children, for as Schopenhauer observes, women are naturally furnished
with the tools of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissimulation" target="_blank">dissimulation</a>
- the behaviours akin to a pool hustler - and this feature is innate
in women and is found as easily in the stupid as well as the very
clever. Men should be very guarded when in an argument with someone who
naturally dissembles. <br />
<br />
<b>"So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character
of women is that they have no “sense of justice .” This arises from
their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and
reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not
destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on
cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an
ineradicable tendency to lie. </b><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipU83alEYbL2pxI2xiaWrOwX5XOVnj5VTk5BREGGcJhRmdAt4258WH-Rbl0TQ6PbYLROC45_CgEh6nY10ZAOrD-42Qp9VYd9mBKYEsF8Eolcj6qOthoNjpGqne5DB7E3dFV5pC9g7i-0M/s1600/il_570xN.499066026_2kkf.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipU83alEYbL2pxI2xiaWrOwX5XOVnj5VTk5BREGGcJhRmdAt4258WH-Rbl0TQ6PbYLROC45_CgEh6nY10ZAOrD-42Qp9VYd9mBKYEsF8Eolcj6qOthoNjpGqne5DB7E3dFV5pC9g7i-0M/s320/il_570xN.499066026_2kkf.jpg" width="255" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieRRHQ3ALdszzVsb7OVJC0vNiDpuntqkJr6OtGzRG65Q55DTC6TBNteZo-5U75mnNyIRdQlSps0M_u78xgKhFIzyuaA1p6eLL3dOIMUV92JwMJgN8WabUThagUMZ2TG6f28oJu0rLEOjw/s1600/no-justice-4802.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieRRHQ3ALdszzVsb7OVJC0vNiDpuntqkJr6OtGzRG65Q55DTC6TBNteZo-5U75mnNyIRdQlSps0M_u78xgKhFIzyuaA1p6eLL3dOIMUV92JwMJgN8WabUThagUMZ2TG6f28oJu0rLEOjw/s1600/no-justice-4802.gif" width="200" /></a><b>For as lions are furnished with claws and
teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and
the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman
for her protection and defense with the faculty of dissimulation</b><b>
and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily
strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence,
dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the
very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women
to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn
to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so
that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights.
Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is
perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation
in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with
them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that
it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery,
ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often
found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally
questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/on-women-by-arthur-schopenhauer-1851.html" target="_blank">Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women, 1851</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg70PxsnNhztEV9vHekMmKrfWg68EHOT34dL_77l7BKcIRHPBPrdspi5CE_Nyy8K0FGOMtDR1RN2IOjsNHpY7kryd13pJ3udkM0gxNaq_YcHTw4V25Iqs0JM6lBnpATjsEJtCsNZ3ET9h4/s1600/the-little-rascals-clubhouse.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg70PxsnNhztEV9vHekMmKrfWg68EHOT34dL_77l7BKcIRHPBPrdspi5CE_Nyy8K0FGOMtDR1RN2IOjsNHpY7kryd13pJ3udkM0gxNaq_YcHTw4V25Iqs0JM6lBnpATjsEJtCsNZ3ET9h4/s1600/the-little-rascals-clubhouse.jpg" width="400" /></a>I can well understand why in the old days, when there were such things
as "gentleman's clubs," that even all of the staff were male. Once a
woman enters into group of men, the group automatically becomes
feminized.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgan32-_OhseOxc_bIjzq3JvdelDYdxstrddwVfWVRcxSxByOKYl9T3NW3wtevbb0XWidSPfL1gcsyWiNZ8rlUp-vltr-L1q4EW_WvnujMg8eVNpMzJHBZiwlKDC6uqFiVn4ghjsp4vvNk/s1600/HeManWomanHaters.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="301" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgan32-_OhseOxc_bIjzq3JvdelDYdxstrddwVfWVRcxSxByOKYl9T3NW3wtevbb0XWidSPfL1gcsyWiNZ8rlUp-vltr-L1q4EW_WvnujMg8eVNpMzJHBZiwlKDC6uqFiVn4ghjsp4vvNk/s1600/HeManWomanHaters.jpg" width="400" /></a>It also makes perfectly good sense to me why religions such
as Christianity try to remove women from philosophizing about their
doctrines and they state that women are not allowed to speak in the
church nor hold office or authority over men. They naturally lead away
from the Truth. Just because a woman says something that makes sense
once, is no guarantee that the next thing out of her mouth also makes
sense... and they all, by human nature, put the female's needs before
the male, and manipulate away from the Truth with the ease, taking men
along with them like the Pied Piper. Buddhism also says that <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/buddha-from-selected-writings-of.html" target="_blank">women cannot become Buddhas</a> for much the same reasons. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="312" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK3HDRc5DActjtv3f5QaZyrdlVT_3uOLhzns2v25JVik68UFSOtiffvIN2r392Gy3JTCAFvoATJpU1KizFXcnGhIVgXO3IxLWZeF-7JzCqEXqqHzBhmwUEaZeE6Vnrbq1E0_7CuVLgiew/s1600/Gentlemen's%2BClub.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
When discussing matters, <i>men and women are not even after the same things.</i> <br />
<br />
Because women are based in <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">relative truth</a>,
it doesn’t matter how often you pin them down, as soon as you do they
create a new truth in their minds and just carry on – because her
goal is not to find the Truth at all, but that is what the man she is
arguing with is after and he <i>thinks</i> she is after Truth too. <br />
<br />
Truth, as well as morals, are only important to women when it suits
them. The instant the Truth conflicts with their agenda, they have no
problems at all changing it and carrying on – because what they are
really after is manipulating you. The most manipulative is “the winner.”
The one who manipulates the most crapola upon the other is the one
who walks away being “right.”<br />
<br />
Truth matters not a bit in deciding who was “right.” <br />
<br />
You can catch a woman dead to rights in a lie, like a child with cookie crumbs still stuck on the corner of her lips <i>insisting</i>
she wasn’t in the cookie jar – it simply does not matter to them.
They just create a new truth in their heads and carrying on as if
nothing matters.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaXInW5cyAxXWYGQ56XjbqZF4FETWEjfBb4c3h2uNx-iNtmS8n7ps7HtLRHltfI71yA2qi-sxK3ReUasFpc4bjWpnPjNdptugE2XEvbYVOFk6N1_7JORRTPOIJuNigRLx63frlHdXtdOQ/s1600/girl-speech.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaXInW5cyAxXWYGQ56XjbqZF4FETWEjfBb4c3h2uNx-iNtmS8n7ps7HtLRHltfI71yA2qi-sxK3ReUasFpc4bjWpnPjNdptugE2XEvbYVOFk6N1_7JORRTPOIJuNigRLx63frlHdXtdOQ/s400/girl-speech.jpeg" width="400" /></a><b>"...it is just such responses — citing a single, artfully
mischaracterized example to “refute” a carefully made argument — that
long ago led to the bit of male traditional wisdom that advises, “Never
argue with a woman.” Because women don’t ordinarily engage in
discourse to discover the truth — as men do, not always, but men can be
held to it if confronted, while women will dodge (a.k.a. “change the
subject”) — but merely to “win.” And “all’s fair in war and love.”
“Love” here defined as any encounter between the sexes, and “all’s
fair” because that’s how women fight"</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/07/philalethes-8-when-cow-rides-bull.html" target="_blank">Philalethes #8 - When the Cow Rides the Bull, Priest, Watch Your Skull</a>. <br />
<br />
There’s really no point in trying to “convert” them. It matters not
a bit to convert such a creature any more than it does good to
convince three year olds Ron Paul is the right candidate for
President. <br />
<br />
Even the women that have been “converted” are simply incapable of rising
above these things, and as soon as circumstances change, making her
previous stance unsuitable for her, she rearranges the truth and
carries on as if she has no clue to what you are talking about – nor
can you hold her to what she said yesterday. So, what’s the point? <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" border="0" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6d6dkNQ6urK2K5wX9dRevlM2yz4FJ3RQdKZk_ecZYUk84vBgfkBnJiEUu-5wVev2rTed83vCasqPraXUSO5H8DjGxr-CBmWpl1F-QDjQ6bwocL3BXpvofuQxjjWQ7CdWQvcg3wFukLTM/s1600/prey-2011-2.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "A Guide to Birdwatching" </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
There was a very well-known <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" target="_blank">Meritorious Mediocrus</a>
in the MRM a few years back. She had everyone bamboozled that she was
“not like that.” She spoke and blogged and moralized and agreed and
agreed and agreed… and all the men were happier than pigs in shit that
there was, finally, such a good example of woman… they didn’t have to
take women off the pedestal – not all of them, anyway. "Phew!"<br />
<br />
However, suddenly a lot of shit hit the fan. (I don’t know the details,
just bits and pieces which are not important). She got herself onto
the divorce-conveyer belt.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaOROpO1uQHqEWJGSJ8e2oeKYRZ9owdcZtJleCiJBGutjV7jCSDvnczoKvk6JTx_buGejL8dZZYHDjZ3cPgrwDcNTEnfFEdZQhMrOVNjnF_4e_q4bV-vdXZ_lvEVKMXO9Iw2uY9wvWfiM/s1600/screen-shot-2013-09-06-at-2-41-37-pm.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="115" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaOROpO1uQHqEWJGSJ8e2oeKYRZ9owdcZtJleCiJBGutjV7jCSDvnczoKvk6JTx_buGejL8dZZYHDjZ3cPgrwDcNTEnfFEdZQhMrOVNjnF_4e_q4bV-vdXZ_lvEVKMXO9Iw2uY9wvWfiM/s1600/screen-shot-2013-09-06-at-2-41-37-pm.png" width="200" /></a>“Shared- Parenting? Huh? What you talkin’ about, Willis? Unreasonable child support? But I neeeeeeeeed it!” <br />
<br />
Yeah, uh huh. What a waste of time and effort for all the men who
pedestalized her. She was no different than the rest and her
“principles” were subject to change simply upon the convenience of where
she was in life.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>-
For woman the temptation to misuse cunning (for example, to deceive)
corresponds to man's temptation to misuse power. The fact that the
woman's guilt is always more strongly emphasized than the man's is
basically an indirect compliment to the woman, an admission of the
degree to which she is the stronger sex in cunning.</b><b> </b>-- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/womanman-from-kierkegaards-journals.html" target="_blank">Woman/Man - from Kierkegaard's Journals</a> </span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" border="0" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhG8pISlBguVqX8ld8Gudy90pLwdVri1jF8u86jMP3Hx0erIrxE1xAeoPQ5zWIhL1u_9MmgjfQqsdlqBjNL6c_aGmlGyRlwCx8jM6F4oMN9qnHyKojUBmtpshSJtwoSXAknjAl2c_dbkOk/s320/sphere-fish-bowl-with-clean-water-Download-Royalty-free-Vector-File-EPS-55808.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Even in relationships with men, women are completely malleable. The girl
you dated at 21, who screwed you over at 23, is not even the same
person when you speak to her again at 28. This is because women are <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">“like water seeking a container to give them their form.”</a> Each time a woman gets together with a new man, it is based upon <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">hypergamy</a> – he becomes her new hero, and thus she completely adapts her morals and character to be <i>his</i>
view of the ideal woman. When she grabs hold of the next branch, erm,
man, all of her morals and character again change to adapt to be the
new man’s ideal woman. When you look at it that way, how can one then
ever assess a woman’s “true character?” <b><i>It doesn’t exist.</i></b> <br />
<b><i></i></b><br />
<b><i>
</i></b>There is no point in arguing with them, and there is no point in
having their input into Men's Issues.Having a woman "help" with Men's
Issues is like having a five year old "help" you put up wallpaper. No
thanks!<br />
<br />
<b>"...the influence of the Lacedaemonian women has been most
mischievous. The evil showed itself in the Theban invasion, when, unlike
the women of other cities, they were utterly useless and caused more
confusion than the enemy." -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">The Politics of Aristotle: The Spartan Women</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjINpbptT4HLNVgDd93BZmiYPSwGZvugU_DGGXGcYYX4IU6zdjApuS1djl4w_dhWymd-5v3AVNs9GcFqQhNmY0qhQEEE-xDZejNK2ougtHWNPYRErLtA_yzBl4b7v-jg6vLKF17S53Hh7o/s1600/No+Women.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="339" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjINpbptT4HLNVgDd93BZmiYPSwGZvugU_DGGXGcYYX4IU6zdjApuS1djl4w_dhWymd-5v3AVNs9GcFqQhNmY0qhQEEE-xDZejNK2ougtHWNPYRErLtA_yzBl4b7v-jg6vLKF17S53Hh7o/s1600/No+Women.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
It is best for men simply to take a position and staunchly never
budge. Do not bother explaining yourself to women; it is futile.
Either they find your logic to be sound and they will conform
themselves around you, or there is no further hope in converting her
to your way of thinking. A man has to come from the attitude of "it's
my way or the highway." A woman - or especially her friends - may call
this asshole behaviour, simply because you are not willing to grovel
like a servile worm for her approval, but deep down every woman <i>loves</i> this about a man. There is a difference between being an <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2009/03/bonecrker-25-on-asshole-game.html" target="_blank">asshole</a> and being <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2009/03/bonecrker-22-choose-confidence.html" target="_blank">confident</a> and assertive. <br />
<br />
We have entirely different strategies and entirely different views of
reality. It’s best to just chase them off so the men can get back to
business. <br />
<br />
<b>Interview with a Womenfirster: Phyllis Schlafly</b> <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi95uaDDQPuPtfGBwR2e8x181Um_Vn3hzqwtA8c6UFGkIMnOqpNYfMV3XjLTpmhD55X1sMM-VeFoL1mbSBV77Z06SQQJwq0XSbNkFCddvDKM-fQY6gVYAiXXQztOSTYebyIKudsoRKefYI/s1600/Girl+Ninjas+Making+Sandwiches.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" target="_blank">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>Jack Kammer: What if I was the kind of man, like a lot of men who
have confided to me, who is sick to death of the corporate world and in a
heartbeat would stay home to take care of their kids because they
love them so much and they know the business world is a crock?</b> <br />
<br />
<b>Phyllis Schlafly:… That’s their problem. As I look around the world
about me, I just don’t find there are many [women] who want the
so-called non-traditional relationships.</b> – a radio interview, WCVT-FM (now WTMD), Towson University, Maryland, January 5, 1989 <br />
<br />
Off to the koffee-klatch with you and the other clucking hens!<br />
.<b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fish-and-bicycle.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html">Next</a> </span></b></div>
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<u><b>Further Reading:</b></u><br />
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/tom-prys-wife-by-charles-lamb-1775-1834.html" target="_blank"><b>Tom Pry's Wife</b> -- by Charles Lamb, (1775-1834)</a><br />
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/part-two-imperialism-or-mistake-about.html" target="_blank"><b>Wisdom and the Weather</b> -- by G.K. Chesterton</a><span style="font-size: small;"><br />.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>
- Woman's reflection is almost overpowering to her; this is why it is
so dangerous for a woman to reflect. A woman's reflection usually goes
like this: if she has won on one point or another, she is so overcome
herself that she cannot avoid gazing at her victory - and then she
stumbles.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b><br />
.
The man is more essentially character; and character consists not so
much in winning as in continuing after having won, keeping in
character. The woman endures something and counts on the approaching
moment when she can take a deep breath. This moment is precisely the
danger. Character is essentially continuity. -- </b><a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/womanman-from-kierkegaards-journals.html" target="_blank">Man/Woman, Kierkegaard's Journals</a><b> </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. <b><br /></b></span>
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-YZuA7ew89gk%2FVSQYz3do7MI%2FAAAAAAAAEeU%2F97TgxU0GHIE%2Fs1600%2FHeManWomanHaters.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgan32-_OhseOxc_bIjzq3JvdelDYdxstrddwVfWVRcxSxByOKYl9T3NW3wtevbb0XWidSPfL1gcsyWiNZ8rlUp-vltr-L1q4EW_WvnujMg8eVNpMzJHBZiwlKDC6uqFiVn4ghjsp4vvNk/s1600/HeManWomanHaters.jpg" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-74537042567138266552015-03-11T15:30:00.001-07:002015-10-18T22:14:42.215-07:00The Suffragettes versus The Republic. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmg2mjrodfM_ECV5J1-DotdyJy4tz9Bg-rcy2XU7yavZNm7IMhMcYq7xS_R0iEQilt7s6gFnZgqkqzRnD2R2mkxGZ4k9XQCcYCydisekwLCa6abtZoJvZ-GLw6mRIGwjCvKtfqEDXGApo/s1600/picture-32.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmg2mjrodfM_ECV5J1-DotdyJy4tz9Bg-rcy2XU7yavZNm7IMhMcYq7xS_R0iEQilt7s6gFnZgqkqzRnD2R2mkxGZ4k9XQCcYCydisekwLCa6abtZoJvZ-GLw6mRIGwjCvKtfqEDXGApo/s1600/picture-32.png" width="400" /></a>Feminism started as an organized movement in 1848 at the Seneca Falls Convention on Women's rights, which had an attendence of around 300 people. It was here that the <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i> put down the foundations of women's demands. It's principle author was Elizabeth Cady Stanton and it was signed by 100 people: 68 women and 32 men.<br />
<br />
I'm going to post this in full, since I will be referring to various aspects of it in later sections:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Declaration of Sentiments, Seneca Falls, N.Y., 1848</b></span><br />
.<br />
<i>When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a
position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one
to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the
causes that impel them to such a course.<br /><br />We hold these truths to
be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure
these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from
the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it
to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new
government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
safety and happiness.<br /><br />Prudence, indeed, will dictate that
governments long established should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind
are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right
themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But
when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism,
it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards
for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the
women under this government, and such is now the necessity which
constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled.<br /><br />The
history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on
the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment
of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted
to a candid world.<br /><br /><b>Sentiments:</b></i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK58slIU-czToDtQ3EhIgP0_OiQ-2QwfOeQVuhDyWLnIVRk3ebjSG0jNnoDKA8HPAruXNpCNVgXO5by-aKBqCNge1mwsqSDSl4g21BPGwgq-jFeqScpkNatWXrke5q4Xd8LIhFeXp-LaI/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK58slIU-czToDtQ3EhIgP0_OiQ-2QwfOeQVuhDyWLnIVRk3ebjSG0jNnoDKA8HPAruXNpCNVgXO5by-aKBqCNge1mwsqSDSl4g21BPGwgq-jFeqScpkNatWXrke5q4Xd8LIhFeXp-LaI/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" /></a><i><b>1</b> - He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.<br /><br /><b>2</b> - He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.<br /><br /><b>3</b> - He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men - both natives and foreigners.<br /><br /><b>4</b>
- Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective
franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of
legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.<br /><br /><b>5</b> - He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.<br /><br /><b>6</b> - He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.<br /><br /><b>7</b>
- He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit
many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her
husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise
obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her
master - the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to
administer chastisement.<br /><br /><b>8</b> - He has so framed
the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce,
in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be
given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of the women - the
law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of a
man, and giving all power into his hands.<br /><br /><b>9</b> -
After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the
owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which
recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.<br /><br /><b>10</b>
- He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from
those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty
remuneration.<br /><br /><b>11</b> - He closes against her all the
avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to
himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.<br /><br /><b>12</b> - He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her.</i><br />
<i><b> </b></i><br />
<i><b>13</b>
- He allows her in church, as well as State, but a subordinate
position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the
ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in
the affairs of the Church.<br /><br /><b>14</b> - He has created a
false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of
morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude
women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account
in man.<br /><br /><b>15</b> - He has usurped the prerogative of
Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of
action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.<br /><br /><b>16</b>
- He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her
confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make
her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.</i><br />
<i>. </i> <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYKXBawKHlTfBo1BcX6E5YYKm1zfYGMYoacf76ufhgC6_xhCAG03o5j9ha_B5BbeBCtssUc1niEP2tmoryMlDVLKSGAYcRKeR01OJWdBaqn8KObducAgGmnuq6qnLI61eRV5nG-GQfOlk/s1600/Declaration+of+Sentiments.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYKXBawKHlTfBo1BcX6E5YYKm1zfYGMYoacf76ufhgC6_xhCAG03o5j9ha_B5BbeBCtssUc1niEP2tmoryMlDVLKSGAYcRKeR01OJWdBaqn8KObducAgGmnuq6qnLI61eRV5nG-GQfOlk/s1600/Declaration+of+Sentiments.jpg" width="333" /></a><i>Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of one-half the people of
this country, their social and religious degradation—in view of the
unjust laws above mentioned, and because women do feel themselves
aggrieved, oppressed, and fraudulently deprived of their most sacred
rights, we insist that they have immediate admission to all the rights
and privileges which belong to them as citizens of these United States.<br /><br />In
entering upon the great work before us, we anticipate no small amount
of misconception, misrepresentation, and ridicule; but we shall use
every instrumentality within our power to effect our object. We shall
employ agents, circulate tracts, petition the State and national
Legislatures, and endeavor to enlist the pulpit and the press in our
behalf. We hope this Convention will be followed by a series of
Conventions, embracing every part of the country.</i><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">*** </span></div>
. <br />
Despite being later known as the "suffragettes," at the time of the <i>Declaration of Sentiment's</i> signing, "the vote" was considered the most controversial of the sentiments, in-so-far as it even made some of the signers hesistant to endorse the document in its entirety.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" border="0" height="187" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMqf7yA8Bz9URw6KdwmiqH8wzwfeWFsYzimgLgUI0cWIxZ3wRcpeD7CKCWECgNhlMamCv0M_dbQjttFGcvJrPI9tnzVQiMJUVgKA1imyGLX2wm7M21HvqsRvNBrOC_BjDaLSucu7yh9Z0/s1600/He-Man+Woman+Haters+Club.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Truth About Misogyny"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I can see people's reactions already,, "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" target="_blank">Aha! Proof of the misogynist old days!</a>" <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiamTXdYoMFk4PG_83vuZqVIlu82b0GwaTEMIAcNEKu8aRZsH0M1iKk9ojqAT0pBzFJX34QCWfzZZdLDPlHstsQBvpmqJeVu8sKGB72Jq1oK17lr65pEv3mkuOrXhA1US3wrkGFGz9GqM/s1600/Rev_war_Soldier_2.60190002_std.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiamTXdYoMFk4PG_83vuZqVIlu82b0GwaTEMIAcNEKu8aRZsH0M1iKk9ojqAT0pBzFJX34QCWfzZZdLDPlHstsQBvpmqJeVu8sKGB72Jq1oK17lr65pEv3mkuOrXhA1US3wrkGFGz9GqM/s1600/Rev_war_Soldier_2.60190002_std.jpg" width="257" /></a>No, it wasn't really "misogyny" that was behind it - not entirely anyways. You have to keep in mind that this was 1848 and America's War for Independence had finished only 65 years earlier. It was about as fresh in the minds of the people as the Second World War is to us in the modern day. Many people's parents had lived through the American Revolution and their grandparents had fought in it. The people of that time were quite aware of the principles behind the Declaration of Independence and the nature of their rights under the framework of a <i>Constitutional <b>Republic</b></i>.<br />
<br />
Thus, the very first of the sentiments - <i>that man has never let woman exercise her <b>inalienable right</b> to the elective franchise</i> - is making a patently false claim.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8igcZFzFMNCMZfU_zH4xiPpQzryA7WX8cztF88y11Op4C83lS1cHM-lK-hbXllS4cMQbt4GxBiNUOoo5vWQ030xL1-G082Xb7ttxwrQJxE75VA5r1oPoVAqcUBcVfLkZS7i21gskx4q0/s1600/Thomas_Jefferson_by_Rembrandt_Peale,_1800.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8igcZFzFMNCMZfU_zH4xiPpQzryA7WX8cztF88y11Op4C83lS1cHM-lK-hbXllS4cMQbt4GxBiNUOoo5vWQ030xL1-G082Xb7ttxwrQJxE75VA5r1oPoVAqcUBcVfLkZS7i21gskx4q0/s1600/Thomas_Jefferson_by_Rembrandt_Peale,_1800.jpg" width="268" /></a></div>
<b>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness<i>.</i></b> -- The Declaration of Independence<br />
<br />
Voting is <b>NOT</b> an "unalienable" (<a href="http://mddall.com/sbss/0912.htm" target="_blank">inalienable?</a>) right - which means a natural right, or, what it means to be a person. Voting is a <i>legal</i> right, and nothing more - it's like being able to obtain a driver's license once you reach the age of 16. <br />
<br />
<b>"While natural rights are innately part of being
human, and exist prior to any culture or society, legal rights are those
that are acknowledged and protected by a given government. So, in the
Founders’ understanding, natural rights would include the right to life
itself, the right to think for oneself, the right to self-defense, and
the right to keep what one has worked honestly for, among others. <i>Legal
rights would include the right to vote</i>, the specific methods by which
fair trials are conducted, and copyrights and patents–all of which might
be defined and protected in different ways in different countries or
states, based on their particular customs and beliefs."</b> -- <a href="https://www.docsoffreedom.org/readings/equal-and-inalienable-rights" target="_blank">Documents of Freedom</a><br />
. <br />
When the Declaration of Sentiments was created in 1848, universal <b><i>man</i></b>-suffrage wasn't even in place yet. Landless white men didn't get the vote until around the Civil War and black men got suffrage in 1870. In Canada, <a href="http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=his&document=chap1&lang=e" target="_blank">universal male-suffrage was granted in the 1850's, but then rescinded with property restrictions being re-introduced in the 1860's</a>. Also, certain other groups were often denied the vote for a variety of reasons, such as Catholics (because of their allegiance to the Pope). Plus, some states had granted women the right to vote already - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States" target="_blank">New Jersey, for example, allowed women to vote from 1790 to 1807</a>, whereas in the colony of Canada, <a href="http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=his&document=chap1&lang=e" target="_blank">New Brunswick <i>rescinded</i> women's right to vote in 1848</a>. This quite clearly indicates that women having the vote was not an unpracticed concept. <br />
. <br />
<b>"Voting was long a limited privilege, as Harvard historian, Alexander Keyssar shows in his book, "The Right to Vote." In 1790, most of the original 13 states restricted the vote to white males who either owned property or paid local taxes. Perhaps 60-70% of white men could vote, Keyssar says. By the Civil War, most property restrictions had disappeared.</b><br />
<br />
<b>But there was constant tension between the demands to expand the electorate and more restrictive pressures: selfish fears by ruling elites. But even in 1824, not all states allowed citizens to vote directly for president; some state legislatures still selected presidential electors. </b><br />
<br />
<b>Later, war often served to expand voting. Congress passed the 19th Amendment (guaranteeing women's right to vote) in 1919, <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/Men-Are-Worthless.htm" target="_blank">partly because women had helped so much in World War I</a>. </b><br />
<br />
<b>In the Vietnam War, Congress lowered the voting age to 18; it was hard to ask soldiers to die if they couldn't vote. After the Civil War, blacks received the right to vote via the 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870."</b> -- <a href="https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1683&dat=20041028&id=OqgaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4734,2088531&hl=en" target="_blank">Robert Samuelson, "An Inalienable Right to Vote - Right?", Milwaukee Journal Sentinal, Oct. 28, 2004</a> <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEht1rm3FeNEPdAInSJIOQa-95QGIClDWChO71vIpc4Y5IbDaIIpL2LTXVtJpq-LmOd93CKCOebqNU0JVaLG2Ag_w4xdorPOTrqWvwS0hXDxWAw-H84XRXe1Wet9mdRg2nwZ4ttu39MqPLI/s1600/Suffrage_universel.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEht1rm3FeNEPdAInSJIOQa-95QGIClDWChO71vIpc4Y5IbDaIIpL2LTXVtJpq-LmOd93CKCOebqNU0JVaLG2Ag_w4xdorPOTrqWvwS0hXDxWAw-H84XRXe1Wet9mdRg2nwZ4ttu39MqPLI/s1600/Suffrage_universel.png" width="310" /></a></div>
It's odd that all of the talk about "suffrage" is in regard to "<i>women's</i> right to vote," when the fact is that during the entire 19th Century, there was a long, ongoing debate about suffrage in general. <br />
<br />
The fact is, the USA was not founded as a democracy in the first place - and universal suffrage was certainly not the intention, although that's what we more or less have ended up with.<br />
<br />
Shortly after the US Constitution was completed, a woman asked Benjamin Franklin what kind of government they had created. His reply to her was, "<a href="http://www.c4cg.org/republic.htm" target="_blank"><b>A <i>republic</i>, if you can keep it.</b></a>"<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguoRobJ2X7fQ0P9bsWdI5T0lAGBlobjmKURDBXBlDJtFuVQnr1_YfJh7ICU3AVLNB6I6h2UD6N4r3P5c10JghEXKrZijNFCAwu7c6izh452FHrjsg-aSods5JYrXMjq1fibI6jGUPWaFs/s1600/rule_of_law.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguoRobJ2X7fQ0P9bsWdI5T0lAGBlobjmKURDBXBlDJtFuVQnr1_YfJh7ICU3AVLNB6I6h2UD6N4r3P5c10JghEXKrZijNFCAwu7c6izh452FHrjsg-aSods5JYrXMjq1fibI6jGUPWaFs/s1600/rule_of_law.png" width="200" /></a>Although a republic means government that derives authority from the people (<i>res publica</i> in Latin), it does so by <b>the rule of law</b>, not through<b> </b>democracy. In fact, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/04/republic-versus-democracy.html" target="_blank">America's Founding Fathers mentioned the word "democracy" nowhere in their founding documents</a> - although they did discuss it elsewhere afterwards. Democracy is mob-rule and has only the majority's consensus to decide right and wrong - without lawful principles protecting the minority.<br />
<br />
<b>"It had been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable
would be the most perfect government. Experience had proved that no
position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the
people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of
government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity."</b> – Alexander Hamilton, June 21, 1788<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiO3yeoDRxaZCkYdcGt4bLwW_Gv9q0KPYG8HhjBmlPNoOH08Sz-WKlixsHZ01Gbol-r130vLZXqSmJt4IWGAv5RixTnCpVCPChEH-z2h3hSFYLB_sOaO_Z_nqrQJEtehdF2EfxRvZeThY5p/s1600/Two+Wolves+and+a+Sheep.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiO3yeoDRxaZCkYdcGt4bLwW_Gv9q0KPYG8HhjBmlPNoOH08Sz-WKlixsHZ01Gbol-r130vLZXqSmJt4IWGAv5RixTnCpVCPChEH-z2h3hSFYLB_sOaO_Z_nqrQJEtehdF2EfxRvZeThY5p/s400/Two+Wolves+and+a+Sheep.jpg" width="320" /></a><b>"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."</b> – Benjamin Franklin <br />
.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Consent of the Governed </b></span><br />
. <br />
Sentiments #2 and #3 are also directly related to the vote:<br />
<br />
<i><b>2</b> - He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i><b>3</b> - He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men - both natives and foreigners.</i><br />
<br />
These two charges are indeed true - although it must be noted that as shown above, many men also had to submit to laws in the formation of which they had no voice. And for that matter, you nor I had much of a say in the creation of the Constitution either, nor the plethora of laws that are on the books - I didn't vote to have murder and theft be against the law, did you?. If we had to have each person approve the law before we can expect them to submit to it, we would be holding referendums on a regular basis simply to keep laws valid that were in place before the current generation of people were even alive - and we don't do that, do we?<br />
<br />
We have <i>principles </i>which are regarded to be timeless. Since we have the inalienable right to life, we don't allow murder. Since a man has the right to keep what he has honestly worked for, we have principles regarding private property and theft. We don't need to keep voting on these things because they are timeless principles. The reason why the Founding Fathers attached these inalienable rights to "the Creator" (The Absolute) is because what God gives only God can take away. If we ever remove "the Creator" from these documents, I sincerely hope they will declare I get my rights from the Easter Bunny rather than the State and its subjective laws, for that's how the constitutions of totalitarian countries are worded. In a free country, you don't need to have a vote to have inalienable rights - those rights are "higher truths" than the government's subjective truths and civil laws. The Founders framed things specifically to protect the people <i>from</i> the government's subjectivity, which it had used to overwhelm the American colonies with laws and taxes and bureaucracies which did not benefit them. In other words, it was a fundamental part of what America's War for Independence was about!<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGd15cXQ8No13DNS3bLfvpUZDQKYsOTc2EeOQYUed5-CNQPgmZBHUmkFzVlg5OcCB59JCgMWxeMQFGwKhbeBT9FGeXUg0zM1GIdzsyLlQVpsA2Hhqbw0HuZkt833mOfcwz0ggWh6rjcoA/s1600/Well+Armed+Sheep.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGd15cXQ8No13DNS3bLfvpUZDQKYsOTc2EeOQYUed5-CNQPgmZBHUmkFzVlg5OcCB59JCgMWxeMQFGwKhbeBT9FGeXUg0zM1GIdzsyLlQVpsA2Hhqbw0HuZkt833mOfcwz0ggWh6rjcoA/s1600/Well+Armed+Sheep.jpg" width="265" /></a><b>"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, <i>That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,and to institute new Government</i>, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed,
will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for
light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn,
that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable,
than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are
accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
absolute Despotism,<i> it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."</i> </b>-- United States Declaration of Independence<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2SWzAeIAm5brpoqIp5URau0jaC3t3RjalbA52643OKisu5Q7WO-lb7aqVaYq8dXmmoNvN1q-c0DGPnWvPUgObbswgS8Rebzf3TV5HkdYTZH4Y3vNoEoOVXCxMbXi9Y8zgzdBVWECG2I4/s1600/Guns_God_Religion_5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2SWzAeIAm5brpoqIp5URau0jaC3t3RjalbA52643OKisu5Q7WO-lb7aqVaYq8dXmmoNvN1q-c0DGPnWvPUgObbswgS8Rebzf3TV5HkdYTZH4Y3vNoEoOVXCxMbXi9Y8zgzdBVWECG2I4/s1600/Guns_God_Religion_5.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
The consent of the governed is not exercised through the vote. The consent of the governed is granted by the right to alter or abolish a tyrannical form of government. In otherwords, to hold a revolution and shoot everyone in the government - which is why Americans are <a href="http://mddall.com/sbss/0912.htm" target="_blank">armed to the eyeballs by the Constitution.</a><br />
<br />
<b>"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. </b><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2iCEeju36YWsCEizuRhuy0qZ8dQ8qZhuCWxQ0-FopA0bG-OH7j6ZC546fwzeXbelEv_VrgV_mCQ5hTsNLTMkTL0dQVMY_0RdHuMwBC-n_jvahFiZ5NFJwD99wtXm93i6dkVcYx6IBy2o/s1600/gun_barrel_05_lg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="191" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2iCEeju36YWsCEizuRhuy0qZ8dQ8qZhuCWxQ0-FopA0bG-OH7j6ZC546fwzeXbelEv_VrgV_mCQ5hTsNLTMkTL0dQVMY_0RdHuMwBC-n_jvahFiZ5NFJwD99wtXm93i6dkVcYx6IBy2o/s1600/gun_barrel_05_lg.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">"Yeah, alright. You can govern me... but if you piss me off... POW!"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."</b> -- Thomas Jefferson<br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Although the suffragettes were perfectly within their rights to make the demands of society they were making, they were blatantly untruthful to claim that the vote itself was an inalienable right. The consent of the governed is given from the barrel of a gun, not through the vote. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLoej46ETJvWo7GR655JX1pP1UH8OKZMwpV_nEGP_J0bOTnpraCKb5MWHqQOJJifXq2NIoDvX3Q-VaBNcTTUduPmqiCfqIcD58MiZDC9-WS0HmWH-TjCbhiY-pGMxYqLJU7qygIPCaub0/s1600/National_Association_Against_Woman_Suffrage.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="318" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLoej46ETJvWo7GR655JX1pP1UH8OKZMwpV_nEGP_J0bOTnpraCKb5MWHqQOJJifXq2NIoDvX3Q-VaBNcTTUduPmqiCfqIcD58MiZDC9-WS0HmWH-TjCbhiY-pGMxYqLJU7qygIPCaub0/s1600/National_Association_Against_Woman_Suffrage.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
This ordering of truth is why the Founders still wouldn't have given women the vote. They did <i>not </i>adhere to the notion that "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">gender was a social construct</a>" like we've been propagandized to believe today.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<b>"The appointment of a woman to office is an innovation for which the public is not prepared, nor I."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/thomas-jefferson-selections.html" target="_blank">Thomas Jefferson</a><br />
<br />
<b>"Were our state a pure democracy there would still be excluded
from our deliberations [<i>...</i>]<i> </i>women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and
ambiguity of issues, should not mix promiscuously in gatherings of men." </b>-- <a href="http://www.thecurseof1920.com/P6_Thomas_J.htm" target="_blank">Thomas Jefferson</a><br />
.<br />
<br />
The Founding Fathers, remember, established their republic based upon the ideas of John Locke, who philosophised upon an ordering of truth inspired by the Absolute Truth of the Bible, where <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">the lower truths must be contained by the higher truths</a> so that we remain anchored to reality. <br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" height="264" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiS9kwYojNhborP8GLXw6sIalfYIs8GPOFHpIAKUBbl3UJsdu_6fJp30PnWkhmrtGrbzOz6Ux5I0Tp1AdCwkftTtaKmEtYgkQw9q03SUpTsS-RPN2KZx0LJgvGB7om4mlLbtN1cmZAC18k/s1600/Truth.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic to read "The Masculine Principle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
1 - God's Law/Absolute Truth<br />
2 - Natural Law/Objective Truth = Masculine Principle<br />
2 - Civil Law/Subjective Truth = Feminine Principle<br />
.<br />
If a natural law contradicts the Absolute Truth, it is a false law. And if a civil law contradicts a natural law, it too is a false law. <br />
<br />
But a democracy, you see, is very much the political embodiment of the feminine principle. Like all things female - from herds & hives, to social proofing & harems, to attention to ever-changing fashions and a fixation with gossip, and even to co-ordinating the rhythym of their menstrual cycles to eachother when living in close proximaty to one another - they all <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" target="_blank">derive their truth from opinions and consensus</a>. And what better illustrates this than the mob rule of democracy and its subjective truth? <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/useful-idiots-play-checkers-marxists_20.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg_6HHGzoexJ3U6dSgM3eAe5b6hS08hw1rClnfupqOu5GRwnthTKqje7oY1cSIZUwVNt3z0IRPqNUhwuCjLevD1j7FurrPjxouEOvhBelRdNRQYlRGvwP_th3yn644ouPF9BRsvbvaN0_s/s1600/hillary-clinton-bruja.jpg" width="291" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Useless Idiots Play Checkers, Marxists Play Chess"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Here's how the philosopher G.F. Hegel put it: <br />
<br />
<b>"... When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy,
because women regulate their actions not by the demands of
universality but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions. Women are
educated--who knows how?" </b>-- G.F. Hegel<br />
<br />
A republic based on universality and principles which are protected
by laws, is the political embodiment of the masculine
principle - <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">the principle which created and maintains civilization</a>. You can see this in the Constitution itself, which is designed to protect a citizen's rights regardless of what the populace votes for. The "principles" of the republic (masculine principles) are to be held in higher regard than the current voting whims of the day (feminine principles). Why would you "un-order" this at the outset by placing the feminine principle at an equal level to the male principle? You wouldn't base a republic on known successful principles only to immediately subject it to the very force that would remove such principles.<br />
<br />
You can see from the very first of the sentiments, as discussed above, that the <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i> is already trying to subvert the objective truth with the subjective truth. As we go through this list of sentiments over the next sections, I'll be pointing out more falsehoods - all of which actually strengthen the case for not allowing women to decide with their subjectivity which objective truths society ought to follow. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCWZXkMAK_jlKao8vYqr5ahbsnFRISCXU2M-gASE5D6JvU-RrZTgKPL8V682O6PJ3ZgXrjor7NFqmk42qPptMbnyQZ9XQ-XQgOUCrjszNiqTxHO2S-Osp1gx_aPIiUeBKmlBjT73G5bpE/s1600/0213OPEDothermeans-blog480-v2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCWZXkMAK_jlKao8vYqr5ahbsnFRISCXU2M-gASE5D6JvU-RrZTgKPL8V682O6PJ3ZgXrjor7NFqmk42qPptMbnyQZ9XQ-XQgOUCrjszNiqTxHO2S-Osp1gx_aPIiUeBKmlBjT73G5bpE/s1600/0213OPEDothermeans-blog480-v2.jpg" width="320" /></a>A further reason for voting restrictions (including on the men) was so those who relied upon others for their very survival would be prevented from directing their actions legally. A welfare recipient, for example, should not be able to vote for the productive classes to give him more free benefits. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html" target="_blank">When the parasite leads the host, it destroys both organisms. But when the host leads the parasite, both organisms can survive</a> - it just takes an ordering, like the ordering of truth shown in the diagram of the Russian dolls above. <br />
.<br />
We know from the research of John Lott and Lawrence Kenny's study titled, <a href="http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/%7Eiversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf" target="_blank">"Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?"</a> that indeed, women, who tend to vote for their collective security, grew the government far more than men did, who tend to vote for individualism and freedom. <br />
.<br />
<span class="caption"><b>"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to
gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one"</b> ~ Benjamin
Franklin</span><br />
<br />
<span class="caption">I regularly read financial and politically focused blogs and often it is pointed how, since the advent of the Federal Reserve in 1913, the dollar has lost 96% of its value. This is true - and a significant portion of the debt they created from doing this has gone to fund vast government bureaucracies and welfare entitlements that we simply can't afford, thus why we keep borrowing money from the Central Bankers to fund our defecits. </span><br />
<span class="caption">. </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbxd0wOnXFYY78puSXIKdV2dy8BboYzqpz_NX9dg7STgUOqcC6yISDsd5EhIsQbyWGgqwGBRY5GZeuKyLO8Y4WtwoPCZi0KYHXaE3y4p3szProJZB2GGHux4nTR5iYy8Dksh5UKd62e84/s1600/gold-vs-usdollar1.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="284" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbxd0wOnXFYY78puSXIKdV2dy8BboYzqpz_NX9dg7STgUOqcC6yISDsd5EhIsQbyWGgqwGBRY5GZeuKyLO8Y4WtwoPCZi0KYHXaE3y4p3szProJZB2GGHux4nTR5iYy8Dksh5UKd62e84/s1600/gold-vs-usdollar1.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<span class="caption">. </span><br />
<span class="caption"><b>"Democracy is the road to Socialism"</b> -- Karl Marx </span><br />
<span class="caption">. </span><br />
<span class="caption">What I rarely see pointed out, however, is this exponential rise in government spending also co-incides with women being given the vote in 1919. The majority of government bureaucracies, educational institutions and medical-care facilities are staffed by women - in fact, I've read that 70% of government employees (all earning 30% more than the private sector can afford to pay them - plus benefits!) are women. And, the majority of tax dollars spent on welfare programs, healthcare and other such government services also goes to women (something like 65% - <i>aside</i> from maternity issues). Yet, it's the dreaded, misogynist, racist, white males working in the actually productive private sector that are providing over 65% of the tax dollars to keep the whole system afloat. Doesn't that sound like the parasites leading the host to you? </span><br />
<span class="caption"> </span><br />
<span class="caption"><b>"Give us suffrage and we'll give you Socialism,"</b> <b>quipped Susan B. Anthony.</b></span><br />
<span class="caption"><b>"Give us Socialism and we'll give you the vote!," replied <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Hm665oA_9PUJ:debsfoundation.org/womensrights.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca" target="_blank">Eugene V. Debs</a>. </b></span><br />
<span class="caption">(Eugene V. Debs was a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Debs" target="_blank">5-time Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America) </a></span><br />
<br />
<span class="caption">How the framework for this was laid down by the suffragette movement's undermining of the nuclear family with points 4 to 8 of the <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i>' will be explored in the next section. </span><br />
<span class="caption">. </span> <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. <br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
.<b> </b><br />
<span class="caption"><b>“Remember, Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts
and murders itself! There never was a democracy that ‘did not commit
suicide.’”</b> -- Samuel Adams </span><br />
<span class="caption">. </span><br />
<b>“...democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and
contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or
the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their
lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”</b> -- James Madison<span class="caption"> </span><br />
<span class="caption">.</span><br />
<b>“Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”</b> -- John Marshall, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, 1801-1835<span class="caption"> </span><br />
<span class="caption">.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgX31IsYqgK9rWS78u9u7e8VO11c9WUufyLe1axBAlWEICAGzPAJ8tTDCd-A1Z-OvnbbFKSF6Cv3x3kaUWPxXWRzjH2wmm3KlKf1zqxNp3lBV9v03jtKrKOcBVGZ7MY5RYBZM7LK5khBdo/s1600/1920.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgX31IsYqgK9rWS78u9u7e8VO11c9WUufyLe1axBAlWEICAGzPAJ8tTDCd-A1Z-OvnbbFKSF6Cv3x3kaUWPxXWRzjH2wmm3KlKf1zqxNp3lBV9v03jtKrKOcBVGZ7MY5RYBZM7LK5khBdo/s1600/1920.png" /></a></div>
<span class="caption"><span class="caption">. </span> <br />
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
. .http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-2252044060809305442015-03-11T15:20:00.000-07:002015-05-01T10:23:15.902-07:00The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy . <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwbacNOvCva5QGdw-w2UpXzdDw2ZZDTqgpXyqfpdHJbAq-BY1x8cMDbnmBmucvsMUdzmLNryKBUk6WtvsUMcd4kluJN0s1HcOWGIb8fQPASTGIWrIRc6OG8lATesP2JjV5gaNY8xH_rh8/s1600/picture-32.png" height="163" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic to Read "The Declaration of Sentiments"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">In the last section</a> we examined points 1 to 3 of the <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i> and how the suffragette movement's demand for the "unalienable" (<a href="http://mddall.com/sbss/0912.htm" target="_blank">inalienable?</a>) right to vote was against the concept of the Republic formed by America's Founding Fathers. America was never intended to be a democracy but adhered to principles which were the political embodiment of <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">the masculine principle and the ordering of truth as put forth by John Locke</a>.<br />
<br />
As we carry on through the 16 sentiments made in this document, which is obviously based upon the United States' Declaration of Independence itself (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">since its preample is almost a word for word copy of it</a>) we are presented with the 4th sentiment:<br />
<br />
<i><b>4</b>
- Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective
franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of
legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.</i><br />
<br />
When I looked at this point, I struggled a bit whether to include it in the last section, which was about the nature of the State and the difference between inalienable rights and legal rights, or whether it should be included in this section - which will deal much more with the notion of "equality" in society. It belongs in both because we first must clarify what is exactly meant by this statement.<br />
<br />
Although the first three points of the Declaration of Sentiments are in regard to the vote, and this is what Elizabeth Cady Stanton is referring to as the "first right of a citizen," it's already been shown that voting is not an inalienable right, but a legal one.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvvQDiPRf5M_50q-SeV1ai6PmjnPdwG8FhOxo_9jsy4XFMqzjFUZs6n9YOClMYANdQIv3bsDJSOaLbzNlvXUzloJVThymyueB_XhAPBOzVzj2xJMCxxH56WEI7HHExXC8Q0nPAGRHO02s/s1600/brokenclock.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvvQDiPRf5M_50q-SeV1ai6PmjnPdwG8FhOxo_9jsy4XFMqzjFUZs6n9YOClMYANdQIv3bsDJSOaLbzNlvXUzloJVThymyueB_XhAPBOzVzj2xJMCxxH56WEI7HHExXC8Q0nPAGRHO02s/s1600/brokenclock.jpg" /></a>The phrase "a stopped clock is right twice a day" comes to mind here, because although she was wrong about the vote, she actually is right to say "the first right is equality" - and in fact, she is perfectly valid when, in the beginning of her drawing off the Declaration of Independence, she only makes the single alteration of inserting "and women" into it:<br />
<br />
<b>We hold these truths to
be self-evident: that all men </b><i><b>and women</b></i><b> are created equal; that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;</b> <i>-- </i>The Declaration of Sentiments<i>.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
Our "first right" is that we are all created equal, but this is not the kind of "50-50 quota system" of equality we think of today. No. This equality is another of those "unalienable" rights which exist <i>outside</i> of the State. <br />
<br />
<b>"While <i>natural rights are innately part of being
human, and exist prior to any culture or society</i>, legal rights are those
that are acknowledged and protected by a given government. So, in the
Founders’ understanding, natural rights would include the right to life
itself, the right to think for oneself, the right to self-defense, and
the right to keep what one has worked honestly for, among others. <i>Legal
rights would include the right to vote</i>, the specific methods by which
fair trials are conducted, and copyrights and patents–all of which might
be defined and protected in different ways in different countries or
states, based on their particular customs and beliefs."</b> -- <a href="https://www.docsoffreedom.org/readings/equal-and-inalienable-rights" target="_blank">Documents of Freedom</a><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8igcZFzFMNCMZfU_zH4xiPpQzryA7WX8cztF88y11Op4C83lS1cHM-lK-hbXllS4cMQbt4GxBiNUOoo5vWQ030xL1-G082Xb7ttxwrQJxE75VA5r1oPoVAqcUBcVfLkZS7i21gskx4q0/s1600/Thomas_Jefferson_by_Rembrandt_Peale,_1800.jpg" height="320" width="268" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Republic"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The equality referenced to in the Declaration of Independence is saying that all men (and indeed women) <i>are equal</i> <i>before The Creator</i>. Therefore all the rest of the unalienable rights granted by Him - such as the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - are applicable to <i>everyone</i> because <i>it is part of being a human being</i> - and women, I've heard, are part of the human race. This is not the same as "the right to vote," or "the right to an education" or "the right to free healthcare," because those are legal rights provided by the State - and which the State can take away. Unalienable rights exist <i>outside</i> of the State - therefore the State has no authority over them, which is actually the point of the Declaration of Independence making such a statement.<br />
<br />
You are not guaranteed any other equality than that of: <b>before the Creator</b>, <b>we are all seen as <i>equally</i> <i>human</i>... because he created us.</b> Therefore, all the things that are <i>part of being human</i>, the government is prohibited from trying to control, for it is not their right to do so - but only the Creator's.<b><i> </i></b><br />
<br />
<b>It is not, however, an<i> unalienable right</i> to have civil and legal equality.</b> If it were, five year old children would be permitted to drive their cars to the voting polls. We don't allow that because they obviously are not capable of doing such things. A five year old child is, however, as equal before "The Creator" as any other human being.<br />
<br />
Phew! I'm glad we got that out of the way! <br />
<br />
As we carry on through the 16 sentiments made in the Declaration of Sentiments, you will see that points 5 to 12 are in regard to women's position in marriage, the workplace, and education. While a lot of these points seem reasonable to us in the modern day, things were different back in 1848 when the sentiments were written and under closer examination, it was not entirely unreasonable for people to be opposed to their demands. <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguUVL8J9t0UzjAMZiy84AhWrowxG9JIeqgTxrcjD3aENzLjJiRv3IrX-hqwrs7Fd-q8C_bex812_xVJXjYXN5lNRDKfHrx0XqkUe_qbCp3dnqI_npMkAvB9vxV4-7Q8f0z3iSKeylfPJo/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguUVL8J9t0UzjAMZiy84AhWrowxG9JIeqgTxrcjD3aENzLjJiRv3IrX-hqwrs7Fd-q8C_bex812_xVJXjYXN5lNRDKfHrx0XqkUe_qbCp3dnqI_npMkAvB9vxV4-7Q8f0z3iSKeylfPJo/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" /></a><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">The Declaration of Sentiments:</a></b><br />
.<br />
<i><b>5</b> - He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.<br /><br /><b>6</b> - He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.<br /><br /><b>7</b>
- He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit
many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her
husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise
obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her
master - the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to
administer chastisement.</i><br />
<i>.</i><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***<i><b> </b></i></span></div>
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoy_OS0eSUD2EctbhWS6IUpy4AzKeJ9cSxeT2ocnqoOYw9HAcRaxnnIWfHK0XrjBnldoC1gzo1LcM7oEW5h-QjnCWurQQUosryhJXULL0nlzfQ9KyTIOp23DJ3CQZ7qVDUP4-shn_TB7Y/s1600/1195427607377807441Stellaris_Yin_Yang.svg.med.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoy_OS0eSUD2EctbhWS6IUpy4AzKeJ9cSxeT2ocnqoOYw9HAcRaxnnIWfHK0XrjBnldoC1gzo1LcM7oEW5h-QjnCWurQQUosryhJXULL0nlzfQ9KyTIOp23DJ3CQZ7qVDUP4-shn_TB7Y/s1600/1195427607377807441Stellaris_Yin_Yang.svg.med.png" height="200" width="200" /></a>Point five declares women were civilly dead in marriage. This was no doubt true, since all the legal titles went to the husband and even the woman's last name changed to show she was now part of a new family. The point of marriage is to become "one flesh" - to become a family unit - the <b><i>only</i></b> system of "<i>from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs</i>" that has <i><b>ever</b></i> worked! The family is pure Socialism, but aside from perhaps extended family, it has <i>never</i> worked at any level higher than this. You'll
notice that Socialist countries also don't adhere much to individualism.
Private property is appropriated in Socialism for "the Greater Good" -
if the concept of private property is present at all. The same thing
happens in the family unit. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgi8c0Ta-JjiLC40s7eHEfLWBFRJ-dp2YO4bzraGMa_10KGI95h-mqZ1-EbTHIHLdfKB2Z-Zuf_-VB4nOWYZej-CJ5pHw4sckUFnfX1bw3i2IiMdpIYBQ3uiNiQ5qAUzj7DSHxVQmM6YFE/s1600/parents-love.jpg" height="320" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhMiGuP-A1KXH7XR2FfmRL2J9qxATBe4Hj425ZShfD1H6_fKEy_VAZrdJQ5RVVnMkUiMzh1wOgn8k7EjOF6X3FJ-x4kLXxjvyCdta-LxQU7f5l8IaktWAqMapIY0yZoGAfCJjpNCFc0kNA/s1600/i-do-i-do-wp-e1382727554196.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhMiGuP-A1KXH7XR2FfmRL2J9qxATBe4Hj425ZShfD1H6_fKEy_VAZrdJQ5RVVnMkUiMzh1wOgn8k7EjOF6X3FJ-x4kLXxjvyCdta-LxQU7f5l8IaktWAqMapIY0yZoGAfCJjpNCFc0kNA/s1600/i-do-i-do-wp-e1382727554196.jpg" height="200" width="187" /></a>And let's also be clear here: She <i>voluntarily</i> entered into the marriage contract. She <i>chose</i> her husband, she <i>chose</i> to exchange vows with him, and she <i>chose</i> to leave a life of spinsterhood and civil autonomy behind.<br />
<br />
It's been a long time since arranged marriages were the norm for anyone but royalty in our culture - and it certainly wasn't the case in 1848 that women were brought kicking and screaming to the altar by their evil fathers, forcing them to marry ugly frogs. <br />
<br />
It's the same as <i>volunteering</i> for the army means you agree to submit to the authority<i> </i>of your commanding officers. You are <i>willfully</i> entering into a hierarchal system. The private cannot lead the general. The employee cannot lead the employer. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">The wife cannot lead the husband</a>, and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" target="_blank">the child cannot lead the parent</a>. <br />
<br />
Point six - that he has taken from her all rights to property, even to the wages she earns - is something that benefited women in marriage far more than men. As has already been discussed, the point of marriage is to become "one." If wives would be allowed to keep their property and wages outside of the marriage, then logically it extends that husbands should be permitted to do so as well.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj8fRs71mKEqXtdspwrokojFprZrvxZYlPtQtro8bf4mFb7LTgRFeItHWt6oYK-cO6iQJiA7cWBb15GPVBoicAQGL6I2qPuJA3t2JeLHrOS8JCQucRIJsemEYCyYVOvaDTqr1aNn3WehIE/s400/Snow-White-and-the-Seven-Dwarfs-Wallpaper-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-6496592-1024-768.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Women, however, are hypergamous - they tend to "marry up" rather than down. In most cases, <a href="http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/devlin_home_ec_02.htm" target="_blank">marriage was an economic bonanza for a woman</a> because she joined her far lesser assets with his much more substantantial wealth - and his future ability to create ever more wealth. Holding all property together meant that in practice, "the pool of marital assets" would be substantially contributed to mostly by the husband - all of which the wife would have access to during his life, and title to after his death. It wouldn't take you too long to decide to co-join your assets with Bill Gates, would it?<br />
<br />
Also, keep in mind that in 1848 society had not yet been propagandized into believing "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">Gender is a Social Construct</a>" and they pretty much acknowledged there were innate differences between the sexes. (It's pretty hard to live on a farm and believe anything but!). <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">As has been pointed out before</a> - both in Rome because of their dowry laws, and in Sparta because of dowry <i>and</i> inheritance laws, when their cultures allowed women to hold property outside of marriage, divorce rose, birthrates plummeted, and the culture collapsed. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/love-is-for-suckers-blood-suckers.html" target="_blank">Obviously there is something about structuring marital holdings under the male that works!</a> <br />
<br />
Point seven can hardly be made into a case for the oppression of women
at the hands of men. Let me get this straight. You breaking the law and
me doing the time in jail for it is <b>me </b>oppressing <i>you</i>? Have a look at how this man oppressed his wife: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/12/sends-husband-to-jail-to-aid-suffrage.html" target="_blank">Sends Husband To Jail To Aid Suffrage Cause -- The Milwaukee Journal, Sept. 21, 1912</a> <br />
. <br />
<b>Mrs. Mark Wilks, whose <i>husband</i> is in jail because she refuses
to pay her taxes, is credited with discovering a new and formidable
weapon for the suffragettes. The suffragettes are generally women of
property and they will follow Mrs. Wilkes example immediately, it is
said.</b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGWCuFwLQ7F_NGglhEEZXL3enWzVdhHdKvyAbW_TQVgxKydsXbhOimUG_qy7tonAPxcngQntCu8YOsGbH7ujJEB2ArnNhocm1gtSlHDudNa5vVW4yCD95BuBxqcc9epMxR4UfjgUb2moM/s400/Al+Bundy.bmp" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGWCuFwLQ7F_NGglhEEZXL3enWzVdhHdKvyAbW_TQVgxKydsXbhOimUG_qy7tonAPxcngQntCu8YOsGbH7ujJEB2ArnNhocm1gtSlHDudNa5vVW4yCD95BuBxqcc9epMxR4UfjgUb2moM/s400/Al+Bundy.bmp" height="299px" width="400px" /></a><b>The plan will work only in cases of husbands whose wives have
independent incomes. Nor will it work in cases where the husbands pay
taxes on their wives' incomes. Some husbands, like Wilks, haven't enough
money to pay their wives taxes. Suffragette husbands who can pay are
counted on to refuse to do so. Thus will a large portion of the
Englishmen with suffragette wives be in jail shortly.</b><br />
<br />
<b>Under the married women property act a husband has no jurisdiction
over his wife's property and income. Under the income tax he is
responsible for her taxes. If the taxes are not paid, the husband, not
the wife, is imprisoned. Mrs. Wilks refused to pay her income tax - $185
- and her husband was locked up. He will spend the rest of his life in
prison unless his wife pays or the law is changed. When at liberty he is
a teacher in Clapton.</b><br />
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
</div>
After they changed the property laws, splitting husband
from wife, they still didn't remove the responsibilities from the
husband.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-womans-right-to-choose.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-womans-right-to-choose.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYIDFVHQMRN8u3zsNgGxz-9Fplqv1pgB7J2wZ2JtRIUMZkbNQnGrTf5Bje7Uo76kFiNtA7-k9bzooOWi56vveXRwYlz0PXfn7eggXQMAaZwlY9Qf29xTtyeGUGu8xBIN99eUmS3lh6ong/s320/r-vs-r.jpg" height="288" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "A Woman's Right to Choose"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Can you imagine it? Your wife inherits a $5 million estate that
requires $50,000/year in taxes. You make only $45,000/yr, and when your
wife refuses to pay the taxes, <b>you</b> go to jail for tax-evasion on
her behalf. You have no way out. You have no right to take the funds
out of her estate to cover the expenses. It kind of makes sense why all property was put into the husband's
name, wouldn't you agree?<br />
.<br />
As you can tell, I agree with Elizabeth Cady Stanton - that women are considered morally irresponsible beings and shouldn't be allowed to break laws with impunity, then have her husband blamed for it. But society just doesn't work this way - and it never has! <br />
<br />
Society bends over backwards to try and lay blame at the hands of men rather then women - even today:<br />
<br />
- If a man cheats on his wife he's a lout for betraying her, but if the wife cheats on the husband, he's a lout for not keeping her happy.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkIIQ6sAruZ8gE-_2JH8HDgNrkcufiU_nNuy999A4J8EOyyqu-1GoGuAdR1zAeBYkDlYDewUN0mSBeJ3gwq_604wVqeRczjueCcQ95rVonwglYAuQ5HIKWAWMjtrj5E84KI5xprDEFkWo/s1600/pretty_woman_trivia5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkIIQ6sAruZ8gE-_2JH8HDgNrkcufiU_nNuy999A4J8EOyyqu-1GoGuAdR1zAeBYkDlYDewUN0mSBeJ3gwq_604wVqeRczjueCcQ95rVonwglYAuQ5HIKWAWMjtrj5E84KI5xprDEFkWo/s1600/pretty_woman_trivia5.jpg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
- When a man hires a prostitute, society tries to consider her a victim and him the criminal. This not only occured before women's suffrage (As is illustrated in <i><a href="https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/1913/fraud/" target="_blank">The Fraud of Feminism</a></i>) but it still occurs today. Canada, for example, has been tripping over itself lately to "help prostitutes" <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canadas-new-prostitution-laws-everything-you-need-to-know/article19610318/" target="_blank">by increasingly laying the blame on <i>men</i> for using their services.</a> We do this nowhere else but when men and women are together. For example, we don't consider drug dealers to be the innocent party, and lay all the blame on the college kid trying to score a joint. But we actually do this with prostitution, and have been ever since the government stuck its nose into the oldest profession. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU9aNcOOk17QsAWVV0fT9FOaU4OxqbRzMEJ22N7-WGp1SrHZoMss6YlmoHmiOJfKNIC3oC6XE8tQpCrDFMpqQ0IPdY7DxA7RgY1OGvbYXdpl2_TZNJP49OeVxYTcWVEDHNgA3ebpxV2-8/s1600/Bobbit+Jokes.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU9aNcOOk17QsAWVV0fT9FOaU4OxqbRzMEJ22N7-WGp1SrHZoMss6YlmoHmiOJfKNIC3oC6XE8tQpCrDFMpqQ0IPdY7DxA7RgY1OGvbYXdpl2_TZNJP49OeVxYTcWVEDHNgA3ebpxV2-8/s1600/Bobbit+Jokes.jpg" height="185" width="200" /></a></div>
- When Lorena Bobbit viciously attacked and mutilated her husband by severing his penis as he slept, society went out of its way to excuse her. Not only was she not properly prosecuted for her violent crime, but she was invited to appear on the Oprah Winfrey show and was hailed as a hero by feminists clear across the land. "Bobbit jokes" became all the rage of the 1990's. Could you ever imagine a man carving his wife's uterus out of her body while she slept being hailed as a hero and greeted with standing ovations? <br />
.<br />
- We've had several cases over the last few years where men have been charged with rape for having sex with a woman who is intoxicated, even though she consented at the time. The exact same excuse, that he was intoxicated when they had sex too, is not a justifiable defense on his part, but instead he is held fully responsible for his actions. Furthermore, if this same woman got behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated, she would not be excused from her actions but considered to be responsible for them. But whenever it comes down to doling out justice between men and women, the blame is nearly always shifted to the man. Belfort Bax noted already a century ago in <i><a href="http://menstribune.com/Belfort_Bax.html" target="_blank">The Legal Subjection of Men</a></i> that the only time it appears the legal system is capable of delivering justice to a woman is when she has harmed <i>another woman</i>. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEir8ncLsDa5IABEXevznZ9VmVVUdfRu1cDVn2BfZJpm9Hdps2kJyix5howX789kYPrrvgD1Q__UMdt0Nix_5_DMaYz2Sc1I2F2CvGHzLe4TKs8ExlwC09Qk0AGZoZvwQB9MrAnBKYvgcSw/s1600/Pussy+Pass.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEir8ncLsDa5IABEXevznZ9VmVVUdfRu1cDVn2BfZJpm9Hdps2kJyix5howX789kYPrrvgD1Q__UMdt0Nix_5_DMaYz2Sc1I2F2CvGHzLe4TKs8ExlwC09Qk0AGZoZvwQB9MrAnBKYvgcSw/s1600/Pussy+Pass.jpg" height="180" width="320" /></a><b>"Nature has given women so much power that the law has wisely given them little."</b> -- Samuel Johnson<br />
.<br />
This is not so much a legal or social problem as a biological one rooted deep within us. We are naturally inclined to blame men over women - just as we naturally tend to blame parents when a child does something morally improper. Women are <a href="http://www.quebecoislibre.org/010203-9.htm" target="_blank">not only prosecuted for committing crimes less than men</a>, when they're convicted they aren't held equally to account either: <br />
.<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742.html">
<b>"Men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than
their female counterparts.</b></a><i><b> females arrested for a crime are also significantly more
likely to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as
likely to avoid incarceration if convicted."</b> </i><br />
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj81TnPGzGaYLVK3M7k1iLlWH0rDddOGTSKlD_TWbG_D8tYR7XMOIY4VOUxOcsk93mNgtOJlIJmEO-sl7Qy8CEQm7tdQwI2CaWPzq9cxQmxDTxGEfYQUFFJimT254nHZ50-xdohS6O4jvQ/s1600/Duke-Lacrosse-114088483256_xlarge.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj81TnPGzGaYLVK3M7k1iLlWH0rDddOGTSKlD_TWbG_D8tYR7XMOIY4VOUxOcsk93mNgtOJlIJmEO-sl7Qy8CEQm7tdQwI2CaWPzq9cxQmxDTxGEfYQUFFJimT254nHZ50-xdohS6O4jvQ/s1600/Duke-Lacrosse-114088483256_xlarge.jpeg" /></a></div>
And make no mistake, it's not just the men that do this excusing of women. Men don't "impose" this upon women, as Elizabeth Cady Stanton suggests. In the case of Lorena Bobbit, it was the entire feminist movement which made excuses for her. In the more recent case of the Duke Lacrosse Team's Fake Rape Trial, every single person from the feminist movement to the Duke University's "80 Professors," to the media to the eventually disgraced District Attorney, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Nifong" target="_blank">Mike Nifong</a>, all bent over backwards to blame men rather than examine where the fault actually was - with the woman. Even after it was shown she had committed several crimes and innocent men were purposefully being railroaded, she was hardly held accountable - in fact, she was offered assistance to help her out of her situation. <br />
<br />
It happened this way in Sparta too: <br />
.<br />
<b>...<i>in those states in which the condition of the women is bad, </i></b><i><b>half the
city may be regarded as having no laws.</b></i><b> And this is what has actually
happened at Sparta; the legislator wanted to make the whole state hardy
and temperate, and <i>he has carried out his intention in the case of the
men, but he has neglected the women, who live in every sort of
intemperance and luxury.</i></b> <br />
.<br />
<b>"...But, when Lycurgus, as tradition says, wanted to bring the women under his laws,</b><b> <i>they resisted, and he gave up the attempt."</i></b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">The Politics of Aristotle, The Spartan Women</a> <br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.debunker.com/texts/ruleofthumb.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.debunker.com/texts/ruleofthumb.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSYkygYARws4-mBDwA7OBZx8myhllcuBqe6pzU0yB32PQ6GNxogVsHxyRq0ktMiMb9Zgj8Gd-_ORsp2JL2bbuUL01lWuLDHo0I9Hj-pFOHL8xZpKk_vhoUQaeBOSIXFwHhhqDcvAs7b2w/s1600/tumblr_mrsicnmLay1sdug4fo1_400.gif" height="280" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Rule of Thumb for Wife-Beating Hoax"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span id="goog_1908848130"></span><span id="goog_1908848131"></span>So, if society can't keep women under control and will always be seeking to blame the man anyways, then the man ought to at least be empowered to have authority over her. You can't blame parents for not keeping their children under control if you remove any and all means of actually keeping them under control, can you?<br />
<br />
This is the simple logic of hierarchy, the same as in the army. The general has authority over the colonel and the lieutenant has authority over the enlisted men. But the reverse is also true: the officer is held accountable more than the subordinates he commands.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, unlike children, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">women seem to get enjoy getting a few smacks on the rear</a> - so be it, <i><a href="http://www.debunker.com/texts/ruleofthumb.html" target="_blank">as long as he doesn't use a rod thicker than his thumb.</a></i> <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
.<br />
<i><b>8</b> - He has so framed
the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce,
in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be
given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of the women - the
law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of a
man, and giving all power into his hands.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgatCS1qtXrU4zdTvdYifQxNvW6ZYbTNWN962jB8FxbDAi0K1FLQdJ-q82pgs5YRM0IDixra0i1JllG0V9n_dXwc32CcrV5VGIjjNiGQqlvakljmBOTohGqk50FqmS9sPGrxh4TLnbPoy4/s1600/iStock_000020016019Small.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgatCS1qtXrU4zdTvdYifQxNvW6ZYbTNWN962jB8FxbDAi0K1FLQdJ-q82pgs5YRM0IDixra0i1JllG0V9n_dXwc32CcrV5VGIjjNiGQqlvakljmBOTohGqk50FqmS9sPGrxh4TLnbPoy4/s1600/iStock_000020016019Small.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a>The eighth point is the one which undermines the <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html" target="_blank">ancient contract of marriage</a> entirely. It is, in my opinion, <i><b>THE </b></i>most significant thing the suffragettes did - and it wasn't a good thing.<br />
<br />
<b>“I would die before I will give up the child to its father.”</b> -- Susan B. Anthony, Quoted in Phyllis Chesler, <i>Patriarchy: Notes of an Expert Witness</i> (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p. 38. <br />
<br />
The ancient contract of marriage is not about romantic love - as
Elizabeth Cady Stanton insinuates when she says divorce laws give no regard for women's happiness.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD2q29QCoxzw1-Ajv34xx0jkg3bXUC8ROpbhN7DG1r7m1Ems9IDS-H-kvArLCSNvhfbxpzKcMHUqNAlErZDemEtCPwfoWfUpMtwsik3lwkhrOvd7K2-382DyJupYJEy845qc9R0KnfaBQ/s1600/make-me-a-sandwich-funny-singer.jpg" height="242" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Wife of Noble Character (Would Make Me a Sandwich!)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
These notions that men are <i>obligated</i> to make women "happy" are relatively recent. No, marriage was an <i><b>economic</b></i>
contract between a man and a woman, whereby the man traded his
lifetime's work of generating "excess resources" for children that are <i><b>his own.</b></i> In other words, he would have 100% presumed custody of any children produced from the woman's <i>sexuality</i>
for the duration of their time together. It was about the concept
of property rights, or in this case, of custody rights. The products of
his wife's sexuality (children) became "his" and the products of his
life's work became "hers."<br />
<br />
I will be going into this again later in this chapter, so I will keep this short here.<br />
<br />
<br />
Women
have a <i>natural</i> right to have children - it's "unalienable" because it's
part of what it is to be human. Women do not require society for it -
nor the concept of marriage.<br />
<br />
All they really need is a six pack of beer, a clearing in
the bushes, and a sultry look in their eyes. Even if it was frowned
upon in the past, it was still entirely possible for women to <i>choose</i> to have
children outside of wedlock.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg40s0fFxfqvCk7-Mth7jgLBUfWHcvwcsy4c_nRqj_o4hpUdNXN0dUPxxYmq9y2Vna1ydkh2vT2SHykoI3Om0TdZkNgGHR0tdr7wq4J5M3P45J1OmrZJQyKw0VS4eq3rBD8lR5Nbfg_3Q4/s400/RSCN0985.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168830234980415954" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Fraud of Modern Marriage"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Marriage is a vehicle for <i>men</i> to have children - <i>not women</i>.
When she "<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" target="_blank">sells</a>" her reproductive ability to the man, who pays for such
ability with his lifetime of labour, his "unalienable right" to keep
what he has honestly worked and paid for has been violated if she can
retain custody of the children in divorce. <br />
<br />
A brief history of what happened is as follows: The (British) Custody of Infants Act of 1839
already gave judges some power to over-ride a father's custody rights
in certain instances, particularly in establishing mother-custody for
children under seven years old. By 1873, Parliament extended the age of
mother-custody to sixteen years, effectively undermining father-custody
altogether. (In some states, the age was thirteen). This is known as the
<a href="http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Tender+Years+Doctrine" target="_blank">Tender Years Doctrine</a>,
and although it was first established in Britain, it spread around the
world fast as the British Empire was at its peak in the late 19th
Century. The Tender Years Doctrine was similarly used in the USA as a
principle in the courts to establish the arguments of parental custody. This is the beginning of the
"Best Interests of the Child Doctrine," (something which is purely
relative, whereas custody laws are exact and absolute) and we have been
dealing with it ever since. <br />
<br />
Also, while Elizabeth Cady Stanton claims this practice of father-custody was
built on the presumption of the supremacy of man, this is another obfuscation of the truth.
The reason why ancient marriage was structured that way is because of the hierarchy of how "love" works. It kind of goes like this:<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN0VmbW2nXCv6sZ3iAAs8fcOhi4gE_ePozYpHmJQdRiER0v19EciU7olmwSrKq05kveeFAGryzeELkVJbGxbtfPr-SH6qXNCM-vzUGH7cP9JSi0V34uLjC3lBl5lGMlRBzpxNuIEh_E5o/s400/EpiSelkie9web.jpg" height="400" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5486444801111832978" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" width="285" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Legend of the Selkie"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html" target="_blank">Men love women --> Women love children --> Children love puppies.</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
Men's love for women is greater than women's love for men, just like
parental love for children is greater than children's love for their
parents. The Bible indicates this concept when it commands men to <i>love</i>
their wives, but commands wives to <i>honour</i> their husbands in return,
just as children are commanded to honour their parents, not love them. <br />
<br />
When children are placed in the position of 100% presumed custody of the
father, it strengthens the weakest bond in the family - that between
father and children. Fatherhood mostly doesn't exist in the animal
world, while motherhood is positively everywhere. By attaching fathers and children directly to one another, the mother now equates her children with the father. If she divorces the father, she <i>knows</i>
she will lose access to her children. <b>Therefore, in order to maintain
her love with her children <i>she must also maintain her love with their
father.</i></b> <br />
<br />
If one believed that men and women were the same, one might project the
female behaviours of the present day, where women leave their husbands simply to "Eat, Pray, Love" whenever they please, as how men abused such
rights in the past. However, this was <i>not</i> the case. Men's greater love
for women than women have for men made it so the vast majority of men
never tried to remove their wives from the children. However, after
presumed custody was shifted from father to mother by around the 1870's,
divorce rates began rising... and kept rising right up until the
present day<b>. </b> <br />
.<b> </b><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpt3Kg6EGjM3sHXAY-cvVm64ERDuzlyp-qOWvUNmvT_Yb3w8DsnSHmzcCXPFXUF-VX8jli6n0ByH9Nnjncn8z8czAVsBdeU1DyUNxj7onyT2jRCyAUbriUfPRnpmf6UgemRgmxAxlJwMc/s400/divorce-decree.jpg" height="265" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for the free online book, "The Case for Father Custody" -- by Daniel Amneus</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>There were only a few thousand divorces annually in the
mid-nineteenth century when divorce cost wives their children and Dad’s
paycheck. This family stability began eroding as later nineteenth
century divorce courts, under pressure from the rising feminist
movement, began awarding child custody to mothers.</b> -- Daniel Amneus, <i><a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank">The Case for Father Custody</a></i>, p360 <br />
<br />
<b>“Between 1870 and 1920 the divorce rate rose fifteenfold, and by 1924 one marriage out of seven ended in divorce" --</b> James H. Jones, <i>Alfred Kinsey: A Public/Private Life</i> (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), p.292.<br />
<br />
Probably the one single largest problem of marriage and divorce today stems from the custody changes the suffragettes introduced a century and a half
ago, when they undermined the ancient contract of marriage which had
held marriages strong and divorce rates low throughout the
West's long history. This was far more significant than anything the
second wave feminists did with "no-fault divorce," but this will be explored in depth later in this chapter. <br />
. <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span>
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-IEM6q-ABdtU%2FT4fPiPgTeKI%2FAAAAAAAACNY%2FwWIdXzRjnyU%2Fs400%2FAl%2BBundy.bmp&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGWCuFwLQ7F_NGglhEEZXL3enWzVdhHdKvyAbW_TQVgxKydsXbhOimUG_qy7tonAPxcngQntCu8YOsGbH7ujJEB2ArnNhocm1gtSlHDudNa5vVW4yCD95BuBxqcc9epMxR4UfjgUb2moM/s400/Al+Bundy.bmp" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-45813262032872976522015-03-11T15:15:00.000-07:002015-11-17T00:37:57.477-08:00The Suffragettes versus The Marketplace.<br />
Let's continue our examination of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">Declaration of Sentiments</a> with points 9 to 12 done briefly, as these issues will be addressed with greater detail <a href="http://better%20to%20live%20on%20a%20corner%20of%20the%20roof%20than%20share%20a%20house%20with%20a%20quarrelsome%20wife/" target="_blank">later in this chapter</a>. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguUVL8J9t0UzjAMZiy84AhWrowxG9JIeqgTxrcjD3aENzLjJiRv3IrX-hqwrs7Fd-q8C_bex812_xVJXjYXN5lNRDKfHrx0XqkUe_qbCp3dnqI_npMkAvB9vxV4-7Q8f0z3iSKeylfPJo/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic to read "The Declaration of Sentiments"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><b>9</b> -
After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the
owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which
recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.<br /><br /><b>10</b>
- He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from
those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty
remuneration.<br /><br /><b>11</b> - He closes against her all the
avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to
himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known</i>.<br />
<br />
<i><b>12</b> - He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her.</i><br />
. <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
---</div>
.<br />
To show that I am not <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/misogyny.html" target="_blank">a horrible cretin of a misogynist</a>,
I'm going to grant Elizabeth Cady Stanton her point number nine. I
wholeheartedly agree that a woman who owns property while single should
be allowed a voice if she is being taxed upon the property. This was the
basis for men having suffrage too, and indeed, this is how women slowly
on began getting more access to the vote - especially since women who
were widows owning substantial property holdings left behind by their
husbands paid hefty taxes indeed. Most of society thought this
reasonable as well, which is why women in such situations were soon
allowed to vote by proxy - they could send a man in their stead to
deliver their vote. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States" target="_blank">Women were sometimes given the vote in various states or municipalities long before 1919</a>).
Back in those days, voting was quite often violent, with union leaders
trying to intimidate voters and riots erupting at the polls. So, instead
of sending these women into the dragon's lair, they arranged for such
property-holding women to vote by proxy rather than in person. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWOQiOdV7cceELYazU3eZNsQ1PK8t0tstBCO0A_Rszmwk2VmjCgnSDCmIIdemHEznvDPnUCnBhj3gaBOzSUwmmzFfkODKy1gaePSvmLT183xsjY01PLG4zKIxGpLBT_0BgVmMOIGQmsY4/s1600/salute.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWOQiOdV7cceELYazU3eZNsQ1PK8t0tstBCO0A_Rszmwk2VmjCgnSDCmIIdemHEznvDPnUCnBhj3gaBOzSUwmmzFfkODKy1gaePSvmLT183xsjY01PLG4zKIxGpLBT_0BgVmMOIGQmsY4/s1600/salute.gif" width="200" /></a><i><span class="Latn headword">Touché</span></i>, Elizabeth Cady Stanton.<br />
<br />
However, I'd like to remind her that Sparta fell because, <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">according to Aristotle</a>, its faulty inheritance laws resulted in women owning 2/5 of the land - so, there's what we think is fair, <i>and there's what works</i>.
The two need balance. I suspect women not holding property outside of
marriage, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">as addressed in point six</a>, would suffice to keep this in check
in our civilization because it would keep the number much smaller than
that which Aristotle claimed as the cause of Sparta's plummeting
birthrates. (How much of the population were widows and single women
back in 1848? Not that much.) Keep in mind this is a <i>legal</i> right, not an "unalienable" one, which has been established earlier. Legal rights are about making society "function."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" border="0" height="214" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJTehTy3b2e1OPMfSkUufKvPS6sin7SDElw_fVlt1OtASsoq5BQTYwceEmyCRFV68dTDjmgTNCFN29UyERxB_kYTyC-jSwXYu8nfgaW9xAzT6IanDT_51oGW3OhMcbe-I8pob5y-L91O4/s1600/Woman+Churning+Butter.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Amazon Women (The Science of Why Males Exist)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Points 10 to 12 were pretty much true as well, although this wasn't
something women didn't neccessarily approve of themselves either. Most
of the suffragettes were upperclass women - but most of the wives around
the country were decidedly not. They did not get to sit around
prattling away about their rights. They were busy out<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUdgJWw-UyBfwwe_w_fXvRHvt5ou5jKIcgDWO_08d9KHERIhVHpLqAeiC7oGsT3knmrJ76p11Nv94wzU1NsbDzaKoCuxKdkSarmTjQwRsD-vi7iYh5tL-KWtuOPni5eex5O45hjG114Vo/s1600/Ingallsfamily4.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUdgJWw-UyBfwwe_w_fXvRHvt5ou5jKIcgDWO_08d9KHERIhVHpLqAeiC7oGsT3knmrJ76p11Nv94wzU1NsbDzaKoCuxKdkSarmTjQwRsD-vi7iYh5tL-KWtuOPni5eex5O45hjG114Vo/s1600/Ingallsfamily4.jpg" width="205" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOVxCXyNJeXrb3xDMcezi5TNab_ooQ0BhXAYxWVQ1MiGybJBOlrxcnQZq551ePbM2QaDF-YLP_HiAaUUwFvHqRybrYylCrjaNut3Cr4XvRJcxMRiHXv0X0gazrUUQ4qwkKpNRDz8pfXR4/s1600/Washboard+and+Tub.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOVxCXyNJeXrb3xDMcezi5TNab_ooQ0BhXAYxWVQ1MiGybJBOlrxcnQZq551ePbM2QaDF-YLP_HiAaUUwFvHqRybrYylCrjaNut3Cr4XvRJcxMRiHXv0X0gazrUUQ4qwkKpNRDz8pfXR4/s1600/Washboard+and+Tub.jpg" width="132" /></a>on
some Little House on the Prairie, chopping wood to boil water and to
cook food on a woodstove. When they were done that, there was the cow
that needed to be milked and the eggs to collect. The butter needed to
be churned and the clothes needed to be scrubbed on the washboard. There
was a garden to tend to and preserves to make - or the family would
starve through the winter. And there was a lot of them in the family too
- maybe 6 to 12 of the little rug-rats, all hanging off of her breast while she did this... and amazingly, she found ways to nurse all of them in private...<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFy6ZOH2VE7RL3-xWP1bd7Qf-EqLTP6QF3JrYnwkLvKpxWymmnCJf5NS_dvfqNWb9YI56f0yhhIqN9PSMNV1m818KPdetSF4NpTsF333GU2NTws44MLTFnD2XfKg9VSrNboOn0qFaN9TQ/s1600/stock-footage-historical-reenactment-in-promontory-utah-ws-four-workers-pounding-railroad-spikes-with.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFy6ZOH2VE7RL3-xWP1bd7Qf-EqLTP6QF3JrYnwkLvKpxWymmnCJf5NS_dvfqNWb9YI56f0yhhIqN9PSMNV1m818KPdetSF4NpTsF333GU2NTws44MLTFnD2XfKg9VSrNboOn0qFaN9TQ/s1600/stock-footage-historical-reenactment-in-promontory-utah-ws-four-workers-pounding-railroad-spikes-with.jpg" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTgmbnAomU104dE7_XjXqeN3BnG8WeSLCKPsF0IJmeyfjXgUxxlTMoBoB2TGPZU1nXtxeXoDi45WsaZSMITzG4B3XFbYp1BpQvieTebngsl1UU6zs4FNce9xT1lo_CB7PFcKxV3AM3v5A/s1600/1283441923.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTgmbnAomU104dE7_XjXqeN3BnG8WeSLCKPsF0IJmeyfjXgUxxlTMoBoB2TGPZU1nXtxeXoDi45WsaZSMITzG4B3XFbYp1BpQvieTebngsl1UU6zs4FNce9xT1lo_CB7PFcKxV3AM3v5A/s1600/1283441923.jpg" width="220" /></a><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjmcLpp3U3BhKJ6NELpzS-o3Gg5XKgFmH_OhZdG5XICOhnBJPtN9YvwhKx7nDbi0Ttk44Q-dgWqSOeikVbG1ppKW6anZ5hwiR33LCDT6NrlZOdS9LP0oRXwSQHAQJYlYLlakANxDAxN3c/s1600/100.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="112" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjmcLpp3U3BhKJ6NELpzS-o3Gg5XKgFmH_OhZdG5XICOhnBJPtN9YvwhKx7nDbi0Ttk44Q-dgWqSOeikVbG1ppKW6anZ5hwiR33LCDT6NrlZOdS9LP0oRXwSQHAQJYlYLlakANxDAxN3c/s1600/100.jpg" width="200" /></a> <i>And after all of this, do you think she wanted a job too?</i> <br />
<br />
Furthermore, what kind of work would she have gone to do? Would she have
competed with her husband in the workplace? The "common-man" of those
days mostly found employment in the most inhospitable of conditions -
down dirty and dangerous mines; on construction projects in inclement
weather; away from home for months at a time driving spikes into the
railroad; chopping down trees with an axe and a cross-cut saw - sailing
on a ship for perhaps years at a time; joining the military...<br />
<br />
Believe it or not, the vast majority of men were not working as lawyers
and doctors and accountants in fancy air-conditioned offices as they do
today. Men lived under horrible and dangerous conditions and regularly
died in the workplace. They did all this 12 to 16 hours a day, for very
little pay, and without much in the way of having labour rights. What
little money they did make was sent home to support their families. <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://thesilverpeopleheritage.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/the-panama-canal-death-tolls/" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="https://thesilverpeopleheritage.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/the-panama-canal-death-tolls/" border="0" height="257" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1otBCnpr92xlYt819VvYtD7kWEibkZxYldAiFvhiN8_HRO-sn1aXQ_flYfHoWgOm75Z-AgKfvAFVNKBFXsPlqZUy7iyUr_qPlOpV7cwRVFE-IpD5TZFwo1Hj-D1At5oxdvSFTqx_KK-c/s1600/1913culebracut01.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">27,609 Men Died Building the Panama Canal</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The truth is that women were not oppressed by being out of the workplace. Rather, <i><a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esDidWomenReallyWantToGoOutToWork.htm" target="_blank">they were spared from being a part of it</a>. </i><br />
<br />
<b>"The desire to free oneself from work
was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College,
London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930.
During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75
per cent to 10 per cent. This was regarded as a huge step forward for womankind,
an opinion shared by the women whose writings Dr Bourke researched. Freed from
mills and factories, they created a new power base for themselves at home. This
was, claims Dr Bourke, "a deliberate choice. . . and a choice that gave
great pleasure.""</b><i> -- </i>Extract from David Thomas' book,<i> Not Guilty</i><br />
<br />
<b>USA
<a href="http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/how-war-amplified-federal-power-in-the-twentieth-century" target="_blank">"In 1900, <i>only 6 percen</i>t of married women worked outside the home, usually when their blue-collar husbands were unemployed. Among wives with children at home, very few worked at all. Almost half of single women held jobs, but they usually stopped working when they married or, at the latest, when they got pregnant, and most never worked for pay again. About a third of widowed and divorced women worked, typically out of economic necessity. Never-married women with children were virtually unknown."</a></b> <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgriygy1-1o8hRjD451on7fI5NpK96n1OBwAhLdLNyZoRsJLocEEyuwoZbMrk7OYPt_AjJl74aw7DnXWwtcoL-m5K83ucVM3qdkTkpEhYJwe9maMNTyLps8bhMKaYeWLNwYFHYQi3Hy5yA/s1600/school.preview.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="229" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgriygy1-1o8hRjD451on7fI5NpK96n1OBwAhLdLNyZoRsJLocEEyuwoZbMrk7OYPt_AjJl74aw7DnXWwtcoL-m5K83ucVM3qdkTkpEhYJwe9maMNTyLps8bhMKaYeWLNwYFHYQi3Hy5yA/s1600/school.preview.jpg" width="320" /></a>As
for the Declaration of Sentiments' points about women's education,
first we must decide what kind of education we are actually looking at,
because in the aggregate, the women were actually educated more than men
back then. More women went on to the higher grades in highschool, while
the boys got pulled out of school when still quite young to work on the
farm. Often times, after missing two or three months here and there,
the boys found themselves several years behind and simply dropped out to
join the workforce fulltime. The reason why the girls stayed on in
school was because it was important for <i>someone</i> on the farm to know their reading and writing, and <i>someone</i>
had to know their maths so they could keep the books. This task was
usually left to the girls, and it was considered an attractive feature
in a farm wife - because so few men had those skills. So overall, more
women had a higher level of education than men, although of the small
amount (something like 2% of the population) that went beyond
highschool, it was virtually all male - <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" target="_blank">just like everything else between males and females</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjopWN66zfdXMW31YVEscdxkdPSX2oZnBK1xJ60aRj24qPNpbzAda6zg6PrbixXKjVBo-O5zBN-w6SAWvwvRgLhUhoxw1xkEGeBeRo3WFk1H0xzNb9iTxun1RSOhv5ZQd3cKU3sDSrBlwA/s1600/Mount-Holyoke-College-Slide-1020x476.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="149" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjopWN66zfdXMW31YVEscdxkdPSX2oZnBK1xJ60aRj24qPNpbzAda6zg6PrbixXKjVBo-O5zBN-w6SAWvwvRgLhUhoxw1xkEGeBeRo3WFk1H0xzNb9iTxun1RSOhv5ZQd3cKU3sDSrBlwA/s1600/Mount-Holyoke-College-Slide-1020x476.jpg" width="320" /></a>As an aside, there <i>was</i> actually a women's university in America in 1848. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Holyoke_College" target="_blank">Mount Holyoke College</a> was established in 1837 (as a female seminary!), and Vassar would soon be established in 1861, followed by the other "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Sisters_%28colleges%29" target="_blank">Seven Sisters Colleges.</a>" But it wasn't because of misogyny that so few universities catered to women - it was because of the Free Market.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSumX2SOiXI5E1nqDohJ3EVL45sz83vCf_X5GIiM0DE0RblgM_mQsiADJthaPczOD2tuRJVfLcRF7d9YCwDYpeZ4VXVG5z5WFta-ZyM3ml1ZkPfVXwqqFVF-cJ9H8TzQ1WbWyjNNefYUM/s1600/Make+Me+a+Sandwich+8.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="228" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSumX2SOiXI5E1nqDohJ3EVL45sz83vCf_X5GIiM0DE0RblgM_mQsiADJthaPczOD2tuRJVfLcRF7d9YCwDYpeZ4VXVG5z5WFta-ZyM3ml1ZkPfVXwqqFVF-cJ9H8TzQ1WbWyjNNefYUM/s1600/Make+Me+a+Sandwich+8.jpg" width="320" /></a><br />
It was very expensive to send people to university (still is today) and
most people didn't have a lot of money. Only the very best and brightest
of boys finished high-school and went on to university, and the reason
why was because it had to be a good investment for the family. A boy who
would spend the rest of his life as a doctor or a lawyer would be worth
it. But for a girl, who would most likely be getting married and having
children, then spending the next decade or two taking care of them,
higher education would not be a good investment. If you had five boys
and five girls, and limited funds - who would you spend the money for
education on? The boys, who will be expected to marry and support a family
with their earnings - or the girls who will marry and become part of a
family where they too are provided for by their own working husbands?<br />
<br />
It's known even today, that dollar for dollar, training women to be
doctors is not as cost effective as training men, because the men tend
to work straight through from graduation to retirement while women tend
to take a break in their careers to have children, and often only return
to the workforce part-time. Although it's politically incorrect to
point it out, one of the reasons we have a doctor shortage today is
because we are affirmative actioning less
cost-effective-to-educate-women over and above more efficient
per-education-dollar men. <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esIstheTrainingofWomenDoctorsAWaste.htm" target="_blank">For example</a>: <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9GBEwFsl_uYqcIaKVQzTKaShanIdq3_hp85Q0jdOxBNACcE4iQU3RM5TOna7B7QkkNQqXASTM25uquwpTHqF0YYReP0Vhc_PWubHFI-HVpz2afX-VSzOLXnpfPP0xRbRqXJZfdD-ijV0/s1600/no-doctor.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="187" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9GBEwFsl_uYqcIaKVQzTKaShanIdq3_hp85Q0jdOxBNACcE4iQU3RM5TOna7B7QkkNQqXASTM25uquwpTHqF0YYReP0Vhc_PWubHFI-HVpz2afX-VSzOLXnpfPP0xRbRqXJZfdD-ijV0/s1600/no-doctor.jpg" width="200" /></a><b>June 2003 -
<a href="http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/06/27/do2702.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2003/06/27/ixopinion.html">More
than half of all students taking up scarce places at medical school are women -
yet, after 10 years, 60 per cent of them have given up, leaving a huge hole in
the NHS. The same goes for teaching.</a> </b><br />
<br />
<b>September 2012 -
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9549262/Part-time-women-doctors-are-a-risk-to-NHS.html">
Rising numbers of women doctors working part time present a “huge risk” to
the NHS, the General Medical Council is warning, with hospitals
potentially having to employ many more foreign-trained medics to plug
gaps.</a></b><br />
<br />
It was not the Evil Patriarchy (tm) keeping women out of universities.
It was the Free Market. As the bloated tuitions of our modern
universities illustrate to us today, if there's a market for it, they
will build it. But back in the 19th Century, there simply wasn't a big
market for throwing away vast sums of money on your daughter's degree
and subsequent high-flying career in <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">Women's Studies or Queer Theory</a>. <br />
<br />
Well, we're coming to the end of this section. But the effects of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's points 10 to 12 won't really be
felt until "The Second Wave" appears in the mid and late 20th Century,
when <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">hypergamy</a> coupled with the <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">now bastardized form of marriage</a>, sent
divorce rates to da moon! <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">But this will be dealt with in more detail later in this chapter</a>. <br />
. <br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/11/17/how-the-elite-deal-with-sparks-of-revolt/" target="_blank">Consider the employment conditions in the 19th Century!</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-28240834567391359042015-03-11T15:10:00.000-07:002015-04-21T05:58:27.554-07:00The Suffragettes versus The TruthIn an odd sort of way, I'm excited to tackle the next three points of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i>,
for this is the culminating moment of an underlying theme found throughout this book: The Truth, how it differs for men and women, and why
it matters very much which one leads the other.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguUVL8J9t0UzjAMZiy84AhWrowxG9JIeqgTxrcjD3aENzLjJiRv3IrX-hqwrs7Fd-q8C_bex812_xVJXjYXN5lNRDKfHrx0XqkUe_qbCp3dnqI_npMkAvB9vxV4-7Q8f0z3iSKeylfPJo/s1600/senecafalls-womanspeaking.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to read The Declaration of Sentiments in full.</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Points 13 to 15 of the Declaration are as follows: <br />
<br />
<i><b>13</b>
- He allows her in church, as well as State, but a subordinate
position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the
ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in
the affairs of the Church.</i><br />
<br />
<i><b>14</b> - He has created a
false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of
morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude
women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account
in man.</i><br />
<i><br /><b>15</b> - He has usurped the prerogative of
Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of
action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.</i><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAOX5urwL30DmoAsDHOjGfkRhI2nibdOA290CcadR7gKB9luMRTXff-GMwPy0XEpy4NrHqgiOgstGieIhzDd_eUldqe-_pphgiohyOQ5gga3R6bck2sydTC1TiO239WhpPELIBu7jr9VU/s1600/When+the+cow+rides+the+bull,+priest,+watch+your+skull.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAOX5urwL30DmoAsDHOjGfkRhI2nibdOA290CcadR7gKB9luMRTXff-GMwPy0XEpy4NrHqgiOgstGieIhzDd_eUldqe-_pphgiohyOQ5gga3R6bck2sydTC1TiO239WhpPELIBu7jr9VU/s1600/When+the+cow+rides+the+bull,+priest,+watch+your+skull.jpg" height="320" width="252" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"><b>"When the Cow Rides the Bull, </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Priest, Watch Your Skull!"</b></span> </div>
<br />
<b>"Women can sing to more than one tune. What good were the Perihermeneias,
the Elenchi, divided into several branches, the Prior and Posterior
Analytics, logic, or the mathematical sciences to Aristotle? For a woman
surmounted all of these in mounting him and conquered the master of
logic. She placed a bit and headstall on his head and he was dragged
into solecism, barbastoma, and barbarism. The hussy used him as a horse
and spurred him on like a female ass. She lifted her crotch far too high
when she rode the male. The governor was governed and the roles of the
sexes reversed, for she was active and he passive, willing to neigh
under her. . . ."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/woman-over-wisdom.html" target="_blank">Woman over Wisdom, The Lamentations of Matheolus, 1295AD</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
<br />
First, let's be clear here. In case you haven't noticed, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">I am an unabashed sexist</a>. I absolutely <i><b>do not</b></i> believe <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">Gender is a Social Construct</a>.
I think there certainly were social constructs society once endorsed,
but they were based upon our biological differences - and it was more or
less correct to structure society as it once was because of them. Our civilization has endured for millenia - proof of its viability under defined gender roles - while in the past century we've been tripping over ourselves to <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html" target="_blank">commit cultural suicide</a>. The Bible, whether you believe in God or not, is the "blueprint" for our civilization - it is the key to how our cultural and social mores developed. It has proven itself to be a "Book of Life" because the structure of the society it puts forth certainly endures, grows and succeeds.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/male-and-female-equal-but-different.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoy_OS0eSUD2EctbhWS6IUpy4AzKeJ9cSxeT2ocnqoOYw9HAcRaxnnIWfHK0XrjBnldoC1gzo1LcM7oEW5h-QjnCWurQQUosryhJXULL0nlzfQ9KyTIOp23DJ3CQZ7qVDUP4-shn_TB7Y/s1600/1195427607377807441Stellaris_Yin_Yang.svg.med.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Male and Female: Equal but Different"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
That there are biological differences between man and woman is clearly evident. It behooves me how society could think this only stops on the surface. There is evidence of it all around us, but the problem is we are only premitted to speak of these things when they praise women's attributes over men's - and we never point out the drawbacks of their features. For every cloud there's a silver lining. There is balance to these things - what gives you power in one area, takes away power in the other. For example - Men have greater physical strength than women, but also die seven years earlier and are far more succeptible to the top ten fatal diseases. So who is stronger? The willow or the oak? They are both strong, but possess entirely different features which make them so. <br />
<br />
Here's a study that touches on a biological difference in the way men's and women's brains work:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<b><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-hardwired-difference-between-male-and-female-brains-could-explain-why-men-are-better-at-map-reading-8978248.html" target="_blank">Hard-Wired Difference Between Male & Female Brains Could Explain Why Men Are Better At Map Reading</a> </span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1jxha-CM987xWrnutqvLSB-GwhTVhB1jtnPRPguG0DySIc-vTaKuvCzJ26gf0MhyhUvqg6N_goi-C6bEhgWsXsN6Wzw4pHDa9ZrDp55dMkOb7qW7xaDXjeJaD920177x-_t4mtgoWJdM/s1600/Male+and+Female+Brain+Wiring.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1jxha-CM987xWrnutqvLSB-GwhTVhB1jtnPRPguG0DySIc-vTaKuvCzJ26gf0MhyhUvqg6N_goi-C6bEhgWsXsN6Wzw4pHDa9ZrDp55dMkOb7qW7xaDXjeJaD920177x-_t4mtgoWJdM/s1600/Male+and+Female+Brain+Wiring.jpg" height="400" width="263" /></a><b><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">- </span><i>Researchers found that many of the connections in a typical male
brain run between the front and the back of the same side of the brain,
whereas in women the connections are more likely to run from side to
side between the left and right hemispheres of the brain.</i> This
difference in the way the nerve connections in the brain are “hardwired”
occurs during adolescence when many of the secondary sexual
characteristics such as facial hair in men and breasts in women develop
under the influence of sex hormones, the study found. The
researchers believe the physical differences between the two sexes in
the way the brain is hardwired could play an important role in
understanding why <i>men are in general better at spatial tasks involving
muscle control while women are better at verbal tasks involving memory
and intuition.</i><br />
<br />
... Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is
associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with
intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than
men at intuitive tasks, she added. <span style="font-size: large;">“<i>Intuition is thinking without
thinking.</i></span> It's what people call gut feelings. <i>Women tend to be better
than men at these kinds of skills which are linked with being good
mothers</i>,” Professor Verma said.</b><br />
<br />
Note that male brains run front to back, thus not crossing logic with emotion as with women. Not only do women use their greater emotional sensitivities <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">to help them communicate with children</a>, but they also communicate with <i>each other</i> in a similar way. There are plenty of studies out there illustrating how women have better social networks than men do, and they have better support systems to help them through a life crisis (her 4th divorce!) and so on. Women are not only emotionally wired differently than men, they are also emotionally "in-tune" with <i>each other</i> - <span style="font-size: large;"><b>kinda like a herd!</b></span> <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmQQgIeq_nmiBS-hu2w6R8tv2MVc0jt36_J08hAJFswFUyswAsH9Lis7CBmgiz8XrKGOGAhMgoeeggjR4MUZj-VcnyVFsqxCBeCR-uL1AZsk8CCP0QXfvY2WTE6R3TjyIaoehgzIPCR2U/s1600/Feminine+Principle+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmQQgIeq_nmiBS-hu2w6R8tv2MVc0jt36_J08hAJFswFUyswAsH9Lis7CBmgiz8XrKGOGAhMgoeeggjR4MUZj-VcnyVFsqxCBeCR-uL1AZsk8CCP0QXfvY2WTE6R3TjyIaoehgzIPCR2U/s1600/Feminine+Principle+1.jpg" height="266" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiorGVm2FUk81z5cj2DWMJaSdAaHWby9XtJjXARQD26FBMhyphenhyphenRqg6XB6O2yiMl4SF2xjcbeBEqHvy1xPMOtzVHBIk6K4VthZD_D5t-_1OqUfC7zD2MtYph7ZMFqzsbhqBCWaWP_eothhP8/s1600/Feminine+Principle+5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiorGVm2FUk81z5cj2DWMJaSdAaHWby9XtJjXARQD26FBMhyphenhyphenRqg6XB6O2yiMl4SF2xjcbeBEqHvy1xPMOtzVHBIk6K4VthZD_D5t-_1OqUfC7zD2MtYph7ZMFqzsbhqBCWaWP_eothhP8/s1600/Feminine+Principle+5.jpg" height="138" width="200" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjpf9kKvVrk8eEggbsAJ1H9HCU0BJsGz2eq2EJvdS5dDAHpkmtXhvd7MzE4Y8J4L6fUwPGyJPCHBEfjzS3IeL9LRXbALxQ54s54aeAGe8NipKeg59vrIfaRuv6Uu43MLmC6rW4DlWhChs/s1600/Feminine+Principle+6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjpf9kKvVrk8eEggbsAJ1H9HCU0BJsGz2eq2EJvdS5dDAHpkmtXhvd7MzE4Y8J4L6fUwPGyJPCHBEfjzS3IeL9LRXbALxQ54s54aeAGe8NipKeg59vrIfaRuv6Uu43MLmC6rW4DlWhChs/s1600/Feminine+Principle+6.jpg" height="128" width="200" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Or a beehive,</b></span> <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Or a harem,</b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> Or feminist protests:</b></span> <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2CUvbRtbSn0qxTGFPtgPMSaTMHRwwrS9j8XCDZolrZd9AfeOp9gEyqvACgKrUWplCRMgePLcbxhTfsMo1FiBt9S19inTackmqOdvWDAwhkD0161BJHbK21_9rnQwTvWzViZx9faRcVdI/s1600/Feminine+Principle+4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2CUvbRtbSn0qxTGFPtgPMSaTMHRwwrS9j8XCDZolrZd9AfeOp9gEyqvACgKrUWplCRMgePLcbxhTfsMo1FiBt9S19inTackmqOdvWDAwhkD0161BJHbK21_9rnQwTvWzViZx9faRcVdI/s1600/Feminine+Principle+4.jpg" height="202" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiE4nGa_3xcOipv7lxD_37a6KB3Ziea1_aSXJnoxELA2dllpC7k15R3YQ80aWffJZK6ytvZHen9D8Hk3ZoXvo6gCksHZM2rZ8iSdITUg7HyJ-tZQ_rkOYMEFcz2TVWTZNzafIRiy0tgT4M/s1600/Feminine+Principle+2jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiE4nGa_3xcOipv7lxD_37a6KB3Ziea1_aSXJnoxELA2dllpC7k15R3YQ80aWffJZK6ytvZHen9D8Hk3ZoXvo6gCksHZM2rZ8iSdITUg7HyJ-tZQ_rkOYMEFcz2TVWTZNzafIRiy0tgT4M/s1600/Feminine+Principle+2jpg.jpg" height="200" width="158" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEBDO7qWbGHWaJwwGC9-E6naUM94IpUvqaKX-XbFIZIfz0xzRZ9VkqwPnVKMSPqKxVobf_nY_WYnLJo_F9paiCD8b8rn2mWbzIP8hRynag_S69f-0IgjunREsuSsx5SsAtm4pK1OWXrGc/s1600/Feminine+Principle+3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEBDO7qWbGHWaJwwGC9-E6naUM94IpUvqaKX-XbFIZIfz0xzRZ9VkqwPnVKMSPqKxVobf_nY_WYnLJo_F9paiCD8b8rn2mWbzIP8hRynag_S69f-0IgjunREsuSsx5SsAtm4pK1OWXrGc/s1600/Feminine+Principle+3.jpg" /></a>Women find a man sexy because of "social proofing" - if enough women find a man sexy, other women will find him sexy too, which is how harems develop. Women are in-tune to ever-changing fashions in a way men never are - because fashion is an ever changing opinion "of the herd." When women seek to aggress against another, they mostly do so by-proxy - through using other people. This is called "Social Aggression" or "Relational Aggression," where they use gossip and social manipulation to hurt others - by excluding them from a group for example, which is why so many "traditional punishments" for women involved things like shunning - it really matters to them! Heck, I've even read that women who live together wind up co-ordinating their menstrual cycles to each other! <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>And it's all <i>"thinking without thinking."</i></b></span><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie9IgHGyT47bIt3XLQudgFHSwA0fnGLypjPD0wKvtoDmbUnPZC0Z_WzSJopXc__laQK-6a9cSxGkgfrOc0zngX0XaYStphx3rfVixX6J_EqT-d5uPSUPPVMLd57pouQwoi3welu29_lxk/s1600/Man+and+Woman+Arguing.jpg" height="320" width="309" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Social Strategy: Why Men Shouldn't Argue with Women"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>"... Women may have happy ideas, taste, and elegance, but they cannot
attain to the ideal. The difference between men and women is like
that between animals and plants. Men correspond to animals, while
women correspond to plants because their development is more placid
and <i>the principle that underlies it is the rather vague unity of feeling.</i> When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy,<i> </i>because <i>women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions.</i> Women are educated--who knows how?" </b>-- G.F. Hegel <br />
<br />
The female principle, like a herd, is pure Democracy. It seeks to find truth through consensus and opinions without regard for timeless principles. If the herd believes that 1+1=1, then it is correct because the herd believes it is so. Tomorrow, perhaps the herd will believe 1+1=3 and then that will be correct. Sometimes they may even stumble on 1+1=2 and look pretty smart, but the day after it could easily be 1+1=4 again. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6Qa25dBSgR-SF2HoSZNZZitwoJUuEvXHubRillQgyno09Tb9j3779uw9SNCim7fn34xBLgPZOD1va97_oGCGrd66OOvAL_ylTHsvaUJdhHymk-e8eQwSLDFJaCrty4GT_yWohiA64Bp8/s1600/Tender+Year's%2BDoctrine.jpg" height="320" width="267" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
This is precisely why women were not supposed to be mixing with men's place in the government, which was based upon the <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">timeless, unalienable principles found in a Republic</a>:<br />
<br />
<b>"Were our state a pure democracy there would still be excluded
from our deliberations [<i>...</i>]<i> </i>women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and
ambiguity of issues, should not mix promiscuously in gatherings of men." </b>-- <a href="http://www.thecurseof1920.com/P6_Thomas_J.htm" target="_blank">Thomas Jefferson</a><br />
<br />
Men are like a pack of wolves - they have an established hierarchy and don't work quite so democratically, but rather assign themselves different positions to achieve their goals. There are leaders and there are followers - there are established "truths" to the male principle.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgV5UsBPeqsHC36iIBDA3R4OMeacQJpo3FWmhlR9mdEd3f4mIo0Rnoxao2HEbEB-opCu4bUAxZex9blk-_SzO9ceSiKzC7wpDY6eJx3f4hv6iOmlfFMdt5PdubZqg6d4rqlOUx5hmIBAA/s1600/Wolf-Pack-Quote-477x500.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgV5UsBPeqsHC36iIBDA3R4OMeacQJpo3FWmhlR9mdEd3f4mIo0Rnoxao2HEbEB-opCu4bUAxZex9blk-_SzO9ceSiKzC7wpDY6eJx3f4hv6iOmlfFMdt5PdubZqg6d4rqlOUx5hmIBAA/s1600/Wolf-Pack-Quote-477x500.png" height="320" width="305" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Female Principle is a representation of Democracy, while the Male Principle represents a Republic.<br />
<br />
And last I heard, the Bible wasn't a Democracy either. Instead, it's based on the concept of timeless, never changing Absolute Truth. God doesn't hold a vote to see if you approve of what he has to say. Like the Absolute Truth, what he says just IS!<br />
<br />
God's Law = Absolute Truth<br />
Natural Law = Objective Truth = Male Principle<br />
Civil Law = Subjective Truth = Female Principle<br />
<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-9w1dRa8XON3pkvpVnyZ86bTtJ1i-k9oej9eIe3-nDM7qKm3MU4ZaPd9RMewR5x2cL9MMbCqzw06OQWy7FwBZmmUZVFjpuMeurFAndb9dw73hHBe6Mz4mmi4F34jngYfu3boSxC6dHKKw/s320/Truth.jpg" height="262" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Masculine Principle"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
If a Civil Law contradicts a Natural Law it is a false law, and if a Natural Law contradicts God's Law, it is a false law. <br />
<br />
The whole point of setting things up this way is to control the ever changing subjective truth - that truth which convinces so many convicted felons of their innocence, despite the evidence piled up against them. Certainly <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">men have the subjective truth within them too</a>, although not as much as women, and a man can be held to the Truth by <i>other men</i> in ways they're incapable of doing with women. <br />
<br />
As was pointed out earlier up, because of women's "intuition" and social connections to one another, they are masters at socially manipulating each other - and men. But this social ability women possess has its drawbacks: <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjmssf-1X2QgrZoA50cBxdUjlZQQOOc4MSkmI8D9YiH0PyvjSUBhp2CnipgTxRVYWxVnuaUAVnQJgYptwq2tTZz2DaOxz_Mw9W058K3NEmOjwags8Eeodrg3mvPzidvx5VaX_kOz_O274/s1600/Woman+poking+the+fire+from+the+top.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjmssf-1X2QgrZoA50cBxdUjlZQQOOc4MSkmI8D9YiH0PyvjSUBhp2CnipgTxRVYWxVnuaUAVnQJgYptwq2tTZz2DaOxz_Mw9W058K3NEmOjwags8Eeodrg3mvPzidvx5VaX_kOz_O274/s1600/Woman+poking+the+fire+from+the+top.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>"The consciousness of how one stands
with other people occupies a relatively larger and larger part of the
mind, the lower one goes on the scale of culture. Woman's intuition, so
fine in the sphere of personal relations, is seldom first-rate in the
way of mechanics. Hence Dr. Whately's jest, "Woman is the unreasoning
animal, and pokes the fire from the top."</b> -- <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2003/01/from-principles-of-psychology-by.html" target="_blank">William James, Principles of Psychology</a> </span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRlwQlhs06fYlnCcKssDGkvx1ErvOpYHq695cSIkSDXypZJlqDwuVd2vPpJpY1DvH3RIAi92qfbzS_HpHRyWoxCyV3auOivO_4TV8RtM2vh8HlEu_sLCYX3AZWXpBi12mhdtsxQh2EOwE/s1600/MonstersIncForTheBirdsWallpaper1024.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "A Guide to Birdwatching"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Whenever a woman enters into a group of men, the group becomes subconsciously feminized. In the same way we allow our biology to <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">over-ride principles of justice and excuse women from the most henious of crimes</a>, once a woman enters into a discussion with a group of men, our biology over-rides us as we seek to "please the female." Women quickly lead men away from their ability to seek "principles" and draw them back down to the level of social manipulations found within "the herd," where everything is subjective. Very soon, because of women's much greater social power than men's, she'll be leading the men away from the Truth like the Pied Piper. <br />
<br />
<b><sup>32 </sup>"I want you to be free from anxieties. The unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to please the Lord. <sup>33 </sup>But the married man is anxious about worldly things, how to please his wife, <sup>34 </sup>and his interests are divided." </b>-- 1 Corinthians 7:32-34<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1gB4leFd5mz0ngkYOkZy-BKNOCVURm_psDnEDwzMamB1eiRySa9akEkVwQEGLj8iTncpCpr8ltGmVv2oRtTTwN0ul4irsGqqFrsVP4h7EAwFFprEySvLocnUVyVA_QfeDW5PzvvHawc4/s400/GardenOfEden-large.jpg" height="276" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Garden of Eden, Empty Vessels and Relative Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
This is the story of the Garden of Eden all over again, and how Eve over-ruled the Absolute Truth with her Subjective Truths, leading Adam astray. And, it should be noted, while Eve was <i>deceived,</i> <b>Adam sinned willingly</b>. <br />
<br />
<b>“I permit no woman to teach or have authority over men; she is to
keep silent. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14and <i>Adam was not
deceived</i>, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.”</b> -- 1 Timothy 2:12-14<br />
<br />
Adam, in his desire to please the woman, over-ruled the Truth <i>he knew to exist</i>, and sinned willingly.<br />
<br />
In fact, when God later gives his reasons for cursing Adam, the <i>first</i> reason he gives is for listening to Eve:<br />
<br />
<b>"<i>Because you listened to your wife</i>, and ate of the tree about which I commanded you..."</b> (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank">Adam's Curse</a>) <br />
<br />
It couldn't be more clear. <br />
.<br />
You have to keep in mind, historically, what kind of an atmosphere the Israelites were in during the Old Testament. All of the cultures and civilizations around them were fertility cultures - they worshipped sexuality and women's power was enormous. In fact, the Israelites were constantly being tempted to adopt the practices of these sex-worshiping cultures - like when they were influenced to worship Baal, a consort of the goddess Ishtar. In fact, even <i>the names</i> of the goddesses were removed from the ancient Hebrew texts before they became part of the Old Testament, so it's far more likely that instead of worshipping the male god Baal, they were actually worshipping the goddess Ishtar, since goddesses were considered more powerful than gods in these Sumerian-Babylonian off-shoot cultures. This happens over and over in the Old Testament.<br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUCbO7rTU1hl5n9EsZCcS6cK-UEQujE_mNAdkAI0He60FE5i49xM4y5mTha2rMXuj1_Ea1Gau2TalL40cgVAAAhpVrpVF2RlfLgHGkI2-uerK8WgJOYm2K8Ei9PUiHvSvJTEK7HhUkeek/s1600/ishtar_2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUCbO7rTU1hl5n9EsZCcS6cK-UEQujE_mNAdkAI0He60FE5i49xM4y5mTha2rMXuj1_Ea1Gau2TalL40cgVAAAhpVrpVF2RlfLgHGkI2-uerK8WgJOYm2K8Ei9PUiHvSvJTEK7HhUkeek/s1600/ishtar_2.jpg" height="400" width="302" /></a></div>
<b>Jeremiah 44<br />
15 Then all the men who were aware that their wives were burning
sacrifices to other gods, along with all the women who were standing
by, as a large assembly, including all the people who were living in
Pathros in the land of Egypt, responded to Jeremiah, saying,<br />
<br />
16 "As for the message that you have spoken to us in the name of the LORD, we are not going to listen to you!<br />
<br />
17 "But rather we will certainly carry out every word that has
proceeded from our mouths, by burning sacrifices to the queen of heaven
and pouring out drink offerings to her, just as we ourselves, our
forefathers, our kings and our princes did in the cities of Judah and in
the streets of Jerusalem; for then we had plenty of food and were well
off and saw no misfortune.<br />
<br />
18 "But since we stopped burning sacrifices to the queen of heaven and
pouring out drink offerings to her, we have lacked everything and have
met our end by the sword and by famine."</b> <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2WOBOCu0jxvvRDMudRVdjZj5g3OVRRglG4x71qI4LMPGJpgK0mCmMhEchwAEyRt3O-Tf54Ji30dP0qWFSE2xch19VAB_aI7vrn5mkpsrBZ1G4EVWQt305CuH0_h7z2VQQUdyWC58G-0o/s1600/Moln%C3%A1r_%C3%81brah%C3%A1m_kik%C3%B6lt%C3%B6z%C3%A9se_1850.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2WOBOCu0jxvvRDMudRVdjZj5g3OVRRglG4x71qI4LMPGJpgK0mCmMhEchwAEyRt3O-Tf54Ji30dP0qWFSE2xch19VAB_aI7vrn5mkpsrBZ1G4EVWQt305CuH0_h7z2VQQUdyWC58G-0o/s1600/Moln%C3%A1r_%C3%81brah%C3%A1m_kik%C3%B6lt%C3%B6z%C3%A9se_1850.jpg" height="291" width="320" /></a></div>
In fact, if we go back to the story of Abram/Abraham and compare it to the Ancient Sumerian/Babylonian religions, we actually find that "our God" was present there as well. He was known as "El," and there were even idols of him there. Abram's father was an idol maker, remember, and idol worship wasn't outlawed until Moses came down from the mountain with the Ten Commandments a few centuries later. (There wasn't even a Bible until Moses). <br />
<br />
The plural of these El idols were known as <i>Elohim</i> - the God of the Flood and the God of Noah and his son Shem, who was the ancestor of Abram. When Gilgamesh (a descendant of Noah's other son, Ham - who didn't follow God) was running around in "The Epic of Gilgamesh," he was angered at the God of the Flood for killing his ancestors and swore revenge against him. Some suspect that <a href="http://davelivingston.com/nimrod.htm" target="_blank">the Nimrod of the Tower of Babel and Gilgamesh were actually the same person</a>, since the purpose of building the tower was to defy the God of the Flood while the name Nimrod means "the rebel" and was possibly a nickname rather than a real name.<br />
<br />
El was not a popular god, however, because unlike all of the other gods, <b>he had no wife</b> - <i>and therefore</i> <i>there were no sex worship rituals involved with El</i>. When Abram left the wickedness of the culture surrounding him and set out for the wilderness, he took with him the god of his ancestor Shem - El or <i>Elohim</i>. It is with Elohim that Abram makes a pact to follow One God (One Truth) rather than the multiple gods (multiple truths) he had left behind. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV8xQwXHHo4qSAK0ieoyrF8BIece45tkcWAMUeQi1eqrCYgv1TYYSqGEKg08sMZwGR-wlxMeFVsBrIFVD5mMt_-YQJoderVlDhlOB3_a7XM-T_CyimqdY13QANxB3PtICVTW5gT2D2RPo/s1600/resize.php.jpg" height="330" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character (Would Make Me a Sandwich!)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
So, you can easily see, right from the Garden of Eden all the way through the Old Testament, what we are really talking about is the resistence of letting the female lead the male - because they naturally lead us away from the Truth with the power of their sexual influence. <br />
<br />
And of course, <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" target="_blank">all of the animal kingdom worships female fertility</a> - but we are commanded to not live as animals: Do not kill, do not steal, do not commit adultery, honor your father and mother... all are things which make us different from animals. It is our ability to "rise up" from being animals that makes us human - and we do it by grabbing onto the Truth, and then ordering it in the proper way. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Rising Up from being Beasts of the Field</b></span><i> </i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYuYWWU3J1gJWVKMIDTpmzWtFhNjMRcO0PXyTUYkXC4p7H7BB_WsHFeKChCLsACVsNgBjfUMJ-XidRktlK75kt6xupfkB2icSdO4MCCAuIL2Nym_fnQRiYYDKj-I4MFU_YllPDeE5m_XY/s1600/Beasts+of+the+Field.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYuYWWU3J1gJWVKMIDTpmzWtFhNjMRcO0PXyTUYkXC4p7H7BB_WsHFeKChCLsACVsNgBjfUMJ-XidRktlK75kt6xupfkB2icSdO4MCCAuIL2Nym_fnQRiYYDKj-I4MFU_YllPDeE5m_XY/s400/Beasts+of+the+Field.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5548318782632636898" style="display: block; height: 400px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 358px;" /></a><i>QUOTE: <b>"I think that the closest that we can get to an absolute truth
might be termed “objective truth,” which starts with an objective
assessment of existence and leads to falsifiable conclusions. In a
sense, one starts with axiom(s) and follows the logical consequences."</b></i><br />
<br />
Yes, but remember how the Founding Fathers/John Locke look at truth and “<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle.html" target="_blank">lock one into the other</a>.”<br />
<br />
1 – God’s Law = Absolute Truth<br />
2 – Natural Law = Objective Truth<br />
3 – Civil Law = Relative/Subjective Truth<br />
<br />
I agree that the best “we” can know is the objective truth… but we must
go higher and acknowledge the <i>existence</i> of this Absolute Truth – because
sometimes the objective truth changes, with history or technology or
what not, what is true today is not true always. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.whitman.edu/VSA/trois.imposteurs.html" target="_blank"><b>"If God did not exist, <i>it would be neccessary to invent him."</i></b></a> -- Voltaire </span><br />
<br />
An example of this is found in <a href="http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orwell/george/o79n/contents.html" target="_blank">Orwell’s book <i>1984</i></a>.
The storyline is essentially a struggle between the Relative Truth (or
lies) surrounding the main character who believes in an External Truth.<br />
<br />
And, aside from direct philosophical discussion about “finding Truth” –
what I keep seeing is the necessity for Truth to exist. An external
truth – one that can’t be changed – one we can’t deny. Whether there
actually is Truth might not be as important as the human need to believe
in Truth.<br />
<br />
There has never really been a civilization that has ever existed that didn’t have some form of religion - it's a <i>universal</i> trait in human cultures.<br />
<br />
And keep in mind how the Absoluteness of the Bible has been used to keep us in check - by using it to reign in the king and force him to sign the Magna Carta, for example. Despite the fact that the king had his "divine rights," he still couldn't over-rule the Bible - just like although the President is the most powerful man in the world, the Constitution still has authority over him and can be used to curtail his powers. Like the Constitution, since the Bible is unchangeable, it keeps us from drifting off into La-la Land as time goes on. <br />
<br />
In order to “rise up from being a beast of the field” we need to grab onto a Truth – preferably a never changing one, like the Bible, or at least a hard to change one, like the Constitution. <br />
<br />
In Angry Harry’s piece <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esMenareMoreIntelligentthanWomen.htm" target="_blank">Men Are More Intelligent Than Women,</a>
he points out how the more you emote, the less you think… and which sex
would one think is the “most emotional,”
and which sex is, by their own admission, “more in touch with their
emotions?”<br />
<br />
Alright ladies, I’ll believe you.<br />
<br />
But it is also clear that, the more you emote, the less you “think.” The
more your emotions lead you, the less your reason leads you. “Passion”
is all great and fine, until it becomes “murder in the heat of passion”
or a bazillion other things resulting from a highly emotional state
leading to a person “not thinking.” <br />
<br />
Life by “passion” is the life of living by instinct, which is the life of an animal.<br />
.
<br />
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbwGFNEEmQ7toaEjObyNrZaza_alOWjTTCiKSIF6G8n7tiPtlWKxeiY8ef261i44P65Q9Ffhg7ec_olAyy7M7V613DA6sHr_ZaNlPyu_vAf5dNA4p8FN8E2PSw7Gj-WMxeMbCPeHD23DI/s1600/Image1.gif" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbwGFNEEmQ7toaEjObyNrZaza_alOWjTTCiKSIF6G8n7tiPtlWKxeiY8ef261i44P65Q9Ffhg7ec_olAyy7M7V613DA6sHr_ZaNlPyu_vAf5dNA4p8FN8E2PSw7Gj-WMxeMbCPeHD23DI/s1600/Image1.gif" height="241" width="320" /></a>Now, I am not a neurosurgeon either, but I have read of the “three brains.”<br />
<br />
The old brain/lower brain/reptilian brain, which contains the brain stem and spinal cord, is the one that doesn’t
“think.” This is where your fight or flight response comes from and a
whole host of other things that don’t involve “thinking.”<i> It is also
where our sexual instinct and mating behaviour comes from</i>. In the days when such experiments were still allowed, you could
open a cat’s skull and suck out all the cortex. Sexual and mating
behavior was not affected at all, but social behavior was destroyed<b>.</b></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBC3VyjqTKjCAXRzuBtMDNt4ZOJUH-ZLfDHXrDWj9iCCdNJusv9oUr6uGzywWWmJUCUgqcuFY0_tnpzq2O6MPTZA8ybGkZKSNjS-L_0zP2Hfv4nYQMEPgsB8Z21EkG-g5uziQKxKBhsU4/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo1_400.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBC3VyjqTKjCAXRzuBtMDNt4ZOJUH-ZLfDHXrDWj9iCCdNJusv9oUr6uGzywWWmJUCUgqcuFY0_tnpzq2O6MPTZA8ybGkZKSNjS-L_0zP2Hfv4nYQMEPgsB8Z21EkG-g5uziQKxKBhsU4/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo1_400.gif" height="112" width="200" /></a></div>
The next brain is the limbic/mammalian brain, and this is the brain where
emotions come from, or "our passions." Animals have emotions. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEwH_ngg0pI" target="_blank">Ever separate a cow from its calf?</a> Ever seen a dog wag its tail when it sees its owner?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinDyhZkRJly0Wib3RC1Q_ss2x8IXGuWa1c_OJzRTG6uE2ZByxVdN2ekcyYMfsoXhdunplETJtB5rGVW1_UZnKW_fFwIbW2UHoCxmSTS3dw3KrEHj4ugxt4NhDSibuvZYnU88fmKwqUyLE/s1600/the_thinker.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinDyhZkRJly0Wib3RC1Q_ss2x8IXGuWa1c_OJzRTG6uE2ZByxVdN2ekcyYMfsoXhdunplETJtB5rGVW1_UZnKW_fFwIbW2UHoCxmSTS3dw3KrEHj4ugxt4NhDSibuvZYnU88fmKwqUyLE/s320/the_thinker.jpg" height="320" width="243" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg115kKp6JFfEoZp3TnNoGZ3BQg-9c7tdMoCs5dcbT9rTL6DWk5b8TLhxobOh0jbbdCaQJdoUPsSH_1lu57zwdM8-CPtVZykBMJP4eshwRHwzD1dyrbEHOq23kEw5OB1uPPgx4LvDJcJsU/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo2_400.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg115kKp6JFfEoZp3TnNoGZ3BQg-9c7tdMoCs5dcbT9rTL6DWk5b8TLhxobOh0jbbdCaQJdoUPsSH_1lu57zwdM8-CPtVZykBMJP4eshwRHwzD1dyrbEHOq23kEw5OB1uPPgx4LvDJcJsU/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo2_400.gif" height="112" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsnWgC18BeF198zpdAkbZCq2UfXyDUQKMdovR77nTutx5wYlKdCljb8S-BMF-s0MvrVhlHT-dlcALEpMjP43vlHi7hdarmDe8k8jp4p30DGB6IHYKnjAxCcgLu3LIWETxBeuA_I1cIcAY/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo4_400.gif" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsnWgC18BeF198zpdAkbZCq2UfXyDUQKMdovR77nTutx5wYlKdCljb8S-BMF-s0MvrVhlHT-dlcALEpMjP43vlHi7hdarmDe8k8jp4p30DGB6IHYKnjAxCcgLu3LIWETxBeuA_I1cIcAY/s1600/tumblr_mj22t8a4O41ric71wo4_400.gif" height="112" width="200" /></a>The new brain, or cortex, is where we “think.”<br />
<br />
So, in order to “rise up from being beasts of the field” we have to “think.”<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ4pyEulQ6xaZ47-1qlWbI5pJMgdWH0lIH5CsVjJPriKarAqUn2k12fDLqmrn2aLWtM085TN6KwL1pL0vzweaeDIifF2AvtUqdoqrE59DkkgxlwavsCw-N5fPLuXoEpMI-4XqZNY6xXM0/s1600/Up_arrow_vote_like_upload.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ4pyEulQ6xaZ47-1qlWbI5pJMgdWH0lIH5CsVjJPriKarAqUn2k12fDLqmrn2aLWtM085TN6KwL1pL0vzweaeDIifF2AvtUqdoqrE59DkkgxlwavsCw-N5fPLuXoEpMI-4XqZNY6xXM0/s1600/Up_arrow_vote_like_upload.png" height="200" width="200" /></a>As we get assaulted with things – violently or emotionally or in any
number of ways – our brains “shut down.” The “thinking brain” will shut
down in favour of the mammal brain, which will in turn, in emergency,
shut down if it has to and run completely on instinct – fight or flight.
There is no “thinking” or “emotion” in it.<br />
It just “happens.”<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp4G_5CEQNPPbel-sDiwnPKITcGV_BTCpc5ih_-GpmFFirpgcI4HEUkTF2qAYgbtVFZfEJsSxHUXrRmpwezCtqSPuPF5Aze5tGHwNQfA4WeYnTRvi19bJcUqwQZfrtWwhegugRnT1xghU/s1600/Down_arrow_download_up_page.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjp4G_5CEQNPPbel-sDiwnPKITcGV_BTCpc5ih_-GpmFFirpgcI4HEUkTF2qAYgbtVFZfEJsSxHUXrRmpwezCtqSPuPF5Aze5tGHwNQfA4WeYnTRvi19bJcUqwQZfrtWwhegugRnT1xghU/s1600/Down_arrow_download_up_page.png" height="200" width="200" /></a><br />
<div>
So, we have to keep “rising up” in order to find enlightenment.</div>
<div>
<br />
And now, these highly emotional creatures with hairy triangles between
their legs, what do they do to us? They get our emotions running all the
time. All of the girls that wing their <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-guide-to-birdwatching.html" target="_blank">shaming language</a> around are trying to control men emotionally instead of rationally.<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>"I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare, whose heart
is a trap and whose hands are chains. The man who pleases God will
escape her, but the sinner she will ensnare."</b> -- Ecclesiastes 7:26<br />
<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/social-strategy-why-men-shouldnt-argue.html" target="_blank">The Feminine is constantly manipulating away from the truth with emotions that are subjective</a>.</div>
<div>
<br />
If there is an external unchanging standard of Truth to compare things
to, men can much better pull themselves out of being led by their
mammalian brain, and lead themselves by their “thinking” brain.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuX4ovRjQec1edbRUalB68kOCoOB-xa3efVt0B_DCOv3RjbXcexNmuo2inqJ9wleLCyxHkwZp9OT88AhAU1348v8fRuegYvSwEYoJdNiZj-fs8yRamnMiFovK3U3esZv_pOrdFIZ16LWg/s1600/Blah+Blah+Blah.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuX4ovRjQec1edbRUalB68kOCoOB-xa3efVt0B_DCOv3RjbXcexNmuo2inqJ9wleLCyxHkwZp9OT88AhAU1348v8fRuegYvSwEYoJdNiZj-fs8yRamnMiFovK3U3esZv_pOrdFIZ16LWg/s400/Blah+Blah+Blah.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5548328743345657842" style="display: block; height: 267px; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 400px;" /></a><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank"><i><b>"Because you listened to your wife</b> and ate from the tree about which I commanded you…"</i></a> </div>
<div>
<br />
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank"><i></i></a> </div>
I'm sorry, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, but you are trying to subvert God himself with your subjective truths - and the very fact you are trying to do so is the reason women have no business philosophizing about Church doctrines. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" target="_blank">After all, wasn't God's Absoluteness the entire justification for this <i>Declaration of Sentiments</i> in the first place?</a> <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnrxe3NmTtjp6gZoVdedB9eFHtnntv3ns_oao5gK7jLsiQFYrkgfKVReMdIPRh7ai7VpBuvVU4FcLvpKMUzQv674nEk-lsabcnxGo_tsk6Slp_Or39Qwl91Zg0ol9P2uRLnSs_fwPJHjU/s320/pregnant_woman_with_hammer_and_nail_11has0089rf.jpg" height="236" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "You're Such a Tool! (Briffault's law)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The final point of the Declaration of Sentiments:<br />
.<br />
<i><b>16</b>
- He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her
confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make
her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.</i><br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiTQujhTApDZGiAj4dyk-ZFmF5puLg_v8fz2K4qsosRpm4-FMFeOfSp4b9PyghST7fjM0rudNc0hWkrviLc4pbOXU18iUw4mU4OrqtIAEZ2vRJOk1FB6YcyLdEtwQGsiIAs20NqEL_ESM/s1600/honest-feminist.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiTQujhTApDZGiAj4dyk-ZFmF5puLg_v8fz2K4qsosRpm4-FMFeOfSp4b9PyghST7fjM0rudNc0hWkrviLc4pbOXU18iUw4mU4OrqtIAEZ2vRJOk1FB6YcyLdEtwQGsiIAs20NqEL_ESM/s1600/honest-feminist.jpg" height="320" width="219" /></a>Yes, I know, you're a victim... but the fact is, women are always victims, because <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">it's one of the primary methods used to entice men to be their tools in society</a>. Babies who don't cry don't get milk either, and when something goes wrong, the first people children blame is their parents - just as the first people women look to blame is men.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifruw5KeRrLMG1_xCQpMjiFJ6Ti23p18oTmNkhZ0onUyOUf7_U_hOXXi3MqgTZbV1KsVRQHTSSldSjYxt9Brs-L2iI9njvoCL5jYbFeztcJ4Tqb2_yKEyQFvl9rdDKOwoH-QxuCeOKcuU/s1600/james-spader-secretary-spanking.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifruw5KeRrLMG1_xCQpMjiFJ6Ti23p18oTmNkhZ0onUyOUf7_U_hOXXi3MqgTZbV1KsVRQHTSSldSjYxt9Brs-L2iI9njvoCL5jYbFeztcJ4Tqb2_yKEyQFvl9rdDKOwoH-QxuCeOKcuU/s1600/james-spader-secretary-spanking.gif" height="200" width="198" /></a>Children are at war with their parents, women are at war with men, and men are at war with God/Truth. But it descends from here as well. The Truth is not at war with men, men are not at war with women, and parents are not at war with their children. Furthermore, only when man is in proper relation to the Truth can he be in proper relation to woman. The fact of the matter is, as Jesus told us, to rule is to serve... and the Truth is, as I think I've demonstrated throughout <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-noble-suffragettes.html" target="_blank">this series</a>, the entire Declaration of Sentiments is an <i>absolute fail</i>. Sometimes the Truth hurts... but it's still the Truth. <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-76413647158578058702015-03-11T15:00:00.000-07:002015-04-21T05:59:10.945-07:00Father Custody and the Legend of the Selkie <span style="font-size: large;"><b>BRIFFAULT'S LAW</b></span> <br />
.<br />
<b>“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the
animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association
with the male, no such association takes place.”</b> -- Robert Briffault, <i>The Mothers</i>, I, 191<br />
.<br />
<b>The Corollaries to Briffault's law:</b><br />
<br />
<b>1 - Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.<br />
<br />
2 - Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return
for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male
has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)<br />
<br />
3 - A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future
association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of
time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the
degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
</b><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">*** </span></div>
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN0VmbW2nXCv6sZ3iAAs8fcOhi4gE_ePozYpHmJQdRiER0v19EciU7olmwSrKq05kveeFAGryzeELkVJbGxbtfPr-SH6qXNCM-vzUGH7cP9JSi0V34uLjC3lBl5lGMlRBzpxNuIEh_E5o/s1600/EpiSelkie9web.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN0VmbW2nXCv6sZ3iAAs8fcOhi4gE_ePozYpHmJQdRiER0v19EciU7olmwSrKq05kveeFAGryzeELkVJbGxbtfPr-SH6qXNCM-vzUGH7cP9JSi0V34uLjC3lBl5lGMlRBzpxNuIEh_E5o/s400/EpiSelkie9web.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5486444801111832978" style="display: block; height: 400px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 286px;" /></a>Some years ago, through the usual discourse of mindlessly arguing with
people on the internet, I met a woman online who went by the handle of
“Selkie.” I had no idea what a selkie was, so I typed it into Google and
discovered an interesting legend that I believe is directly about human
sexuality.<br />
<br />
The mythological <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/selkie">selkie</a>
is similar to a mermaid, except the selkie is a seal which can shed its
skin and transform into a human being. The selkie can be either male or
female, but most are female. Once they are in their human form, if
their seal skin is taken and hidden from them, they are unable to turn
back into a seal and thus cannot return to their home in the sea.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCKkPLBRrZnjvrn2MDGaXmkPssYho7Wu7rVQ5CUvXPqPl-I7JQVkaPIirWpBOVI7Bw9kmflUOxewB8YWOU35rsxbwglGv8JZKUD5i3rURWV7BQW17HECjhHm17AVCC0wkltydINL1bHRw/s200/The+Wife+of+Noble+Character.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click for "The Wife of Noble Character"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Now, as the legend goes, female selkies make great wives when in their
human form and so men would hide the skins of selkies so they would stay
with them - for if she found her skin she would right away put it back
on, abandon her human husband and escape to the sea to seek out her male
selkie lover/husband.<br />
<br />
There is an interesting twist though, in that
even after she abandons her human husband she will return from time to
time to visit the children which she had while with him.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJyfxvSoa9A86ERAt04zR24QRMzqXY8DNvvxGtELpiH6PKaDHo88_vQPOm8qMKjKP9dASATGOPRTcurSZLTqndR-DNVn0jEfiTKL2HtoyTKZrhn-atoYCTkpeZ6kLV3MJl_UNjUroMg-U/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+Sailing+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJyfxvSoa9A86ERAt04zR24QRMzqXY8DNvvxGtELpiH6PKaDHo88_vQPOm8qMKjKP9dASATGOPRTcurSZLTqndR-DNVn0jEfiTKL2HtoyTKZrhn-atoYCTkpeZ6kLV3MJl_UNjUroMg-U/s1600/Legends+of+the+Fall+-+Tristan+Sailing+1.jpg" height="251" width="320" /></a></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.rooshv.com/" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.rooshv.com/" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDNcmCY3j8qpk4f6nbcY70qCU0oBeTBSBea_T5yIJC-HsARJkyO9MRtvBETtEcjJ26Jm4wKoGSU8sQmer5yC8cAG8Al1LFCKdl6a9fCqiBbsifCiN1oPxEV05fIm8btRtJP8MO_t_tyEE/s1600/roosh-v.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click pic for Roosh V</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha39WyXOsLUAYiP6wLLAxhj62n_5GVOrvhJAveVT2b0HH3fgxLuIAVxNa7KPR2Dcz8B1bdKdQez6tAvaPso8DtwWkjjmtr9l38O2d68bQ2rjJtcM6Q-gAAeILij8SLMUZSOci1oTXIGI4/s1600/mystery.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha39WyXOsLUAYiP6wLLAxhj62n_5GVOrvhJAveVT2b0HH3fgxLuIAVxNa7KPR2Dcz8B1bdKdQez6tAvaPso8DtwWkjjmtr9l38O2d68bQ2rjJtcM6Q-gAAeILij8SLMUZSOci1oTXIGI4/s1600/mystery.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a>The male selkie, according to the legend, has enormous powers of
seduction. His favourite love interests are married women who are
dissatisfied with their marriage, and often he seduces the wives of
fisherman while their husbands are away at sea.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ7lw4mwK04_2zDIP0tnx78Dg97xFnf5aE-LnrK9KebZ2Y2hfC_gG7BJfzG48kFPwjtEsBMkLJp_H0iX2QYAwPWBfaoYm6x6M944_qEycimJXeZ28tqx-D61HnI8miRbLpH3sUPDhF6dZv/s200/x2_ec38d7d.jpg" height="320" width="235" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Sex Sells (Hypergamy Explained)"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The legend of the selkie seems to be a way of telling about the nature
of human sexuality. The “seal skin” represents human sexuality in its
natural form, as is often discussed within circles of the Manosphere.
The stories have elements of suppressing female sexuality, which makes
for great, reliable wives, but when she is unrestrained with her
sexuality, she instantly uses it and reverts back to her natural state…
and in her natural state as a seal, she seeks out the cad, the male
selkie who is like her, and is a master seducer who plays upon women’s
emotions. This seems very much like the whole concept of “game” when
understanding human sexuality. The male PUA is very much like the female
in the way he seduces women - he understands about women’s emotions and
how to manipulate them for his own benefit - which is very similar to
what women tend to do with their sexuality when relating to men.<br />
<br />
In fact, the entire legend of "Don Juan" is about flipping the sexual script! It's us, in the modern day, that has forgotten it. <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/empty-vessels-and-relative-truth.html" target="_blank">Because we listened to the words of Eve</a>, we've thrown away the collected wisdom of our ancestors under<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank"> the emotional charge of "misogyny!"</a> <br />
<br />
There are many myths and legends that discuss the nature of females. I think this is so because women “are” society. What women want, society also
wants. What women find desirable, society finds desirable. What women
frown upon, society frowns upon. Women “are” society with males as mere
interlopers in their midst, doing women’s bidding.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmQQgIeq_nmiBS-hu2w6R8tv2MVc0jt36_J08hAJFswFUyswAsH9Lis7CBmgiz8XrKGOGAhMgoeeggjR4MUZj-VcnyVFsqxCBeCR-uL1AZsk8CCP0QXfvY2WTE6R3TjyIaoehgzIPCR2U/s400/Feminine+Principle+1.jpg" height="166" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Often women are
referred to as having a herd mentality. I agree with this. And what is a
herd made up of? Mostly females with only a few males, or sometimes
just one male. The rest of the males – the outliers, or the betas that
have been rejected by the herd, are always desperately competing to be
let back into the herd though – and that means doing what the herd finds
desirable. But anyway, since women “are” society, and since women
absolutely despise having anything negative about their natures brought
into daylight, they screech and shout and shame such things back into
the deep darkness of the closet, and then society forgets all about them
again as time goes on.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6iJkjds1eeY3k9hPFdVKJHmAitJ8cnS7UFt497lemO8TOFacRlQS2XdWx26eOTG5PCxOV1rbpm85EgKz0e92lU88iTXkLEEfZDkl6IiL4X-8iSRPdrNWMFHBLWW-iw3rsorkfzNOiYFc/s1600/medusa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6iJkjds1eeY3k9hPFdVKJHmAitJ8cnS7UFt497lemO8TOFacRlQS2XdWx26eOTG5PCxOV1rbpm85EgKz0e92lU88iTXkLEEfZDkl6IiL4X-8iSRPdrNWMFHBLWW-iw3rsorkfzNOiYFc/s1600/medusa.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfB8FUgqszUc4pLdWPSivoGGWr15dFaZGVTQRy_lU2Ry-o_ncyr7CKp9qIDoaePXbgPgLzyzUukiKUpfE4xrWUX974xt2VpBRbdIHGqUBbDPlqv8b0edWRZKvmuP4bIcHuoOFaglU9rcI/s1600/pandoras-box-2k3ifby.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfB8FUgqszUc4pLdWPSivoGGWr15dFaZGVTQRy_lU2Ry-o_ncyr7CKp9qIDoaePXbgPgLzyzUukiKUpfE4xrWUX974xt2VpBRbdIHGqUBbDPlqv8b0edWRZKvmuP4bIcHuoOFaglU9rcI/s1600/pandoras-box-2k3ifby.jpg" height="183" width="200" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1xZT8CIujjSbeOGRHsulHe3m9_1JTVVfEuu8FRlUpkYZRyUBRMQ3uCjqq4Y2cFModc-5myXJlsM1tr3IZa4-o8ilsU4LpKcqQqT4M3Z-b4NiqMasYLD3jiTOFc2_-CnPJduCFjqB8Ffg/s1600/111109-Sirens-Amazon-photo-cropped-picnik-ratio-254x300.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1xZT8CIujjSbeOGRHsulHe3m9_1JTVVfEuu8FRlUpkYZRyUBRMQ3uCjqq4Y2cFModc-5myXJlsM1tr3IZa4-o8ilsU4LpKcqQqT4M3Z-b4NiqMasYLD3jiTOFc2_-CnPJduCFjqB8Ffg/s1600/111109-Sirens-Amazon-photo-cropped-picnik-ratio-254x300.jpg" height="200" width="169" /></a>I think many times in the past, men have observed the nature of females
(and males) and it seems to me that there is a consistency in what they
find, and of course, it is very similar to what we have been discovering
over the past years in our discussions of feminism and the destruction
of the family. Every time I see a legend like the selkie one, I think to
myself, “I’ll bet that comes from a man/men who 'figured things out'
and also recognized the only way to send that message forward through
time without being thwarted by the totalitarian nature of females, is to
disguise it in a myth or a legend."<br />
<br />
Something that I find interesting about the legend of the selkie though
is how it makes mention that after the selkie abandons her human husband
to go back to the sea, she will return from time to time to visit her
human children. This legend is old, as most myths & legends
obviously are, so of course it comes from a time when father-custody was
the norm. It was not until the 1800’s that presumed father-custody was
undermined, and presumed mother-custody took its place. It was when this change of custody occurred that the divorce
rates began to slowly but steadily increase.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-patriarchy.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpt3Kg6EGjM3sHXAY-cvVm64ERDuzlyp-qOWvUNmvT_Yb3w8DsnSHmzcCXPFXUF-VX8jli6n0ByH9Nnjncn8z8czAVsBdeU1DyUNxj7onyT2jRCyAUbriUfPRnpmf6UgemRgmxAxlJwMc/s400/divorce-decree.jpg" height="265" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>There were only a few thousand divorces annually in the
mid-nineteenth century when divorce cost wives their children and Dad’s
paycheck. This family stability began eroding as later nineteenth
century divorce courts, under pressure from the rising feminist
movement, began awarding child custody to mothers.</b> -- Daniel Amneus, <i><a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf" target="_blank">The Case for Father Custody</a></i>, p360 <br />
<br />
<b>“Between 1870 and 1920 the divorce rate rose fifteenfold, and by 1924 one marriage out of seven ended in divorce" --</b> James H. Jones, <i>Alfred Kinsey: A Public/Private Life</i> (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), p.292.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg40s0fFxfqvCk7-Mth7jgLBUfWHcvwcsy4c_nRqj_o4hpUdNXN0dUPxxYmq9y2Vna1ydkh2vT2SHykoI3Om0TdZkNgGHR0tdr7wq4J5M3P45J1OmrZJQyKw0VS4eq3rBD8lR5Nbfg_3Q4/s400/RSCN0985.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168830234980415954" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Fraud of Modern Marriage" </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The whole “point” of marriage used to be father-custody. Back before the days of romance, when marriage used to be an <i>economic</i>
contract, marriage & wedlock birth was all about putting children
into the possession of men. In the rare event of a divorce, the custody
of the child was automatically given to the husband. If the child was
young, the mother would sometimes care for it until around 6 or 7 years
old, and then would be forced to turn over the child to the father for
education and proper discipline. The whole concept of wedlock birth is
to create legitimate, father-custody children. When an “oops-pregnancy”
would occur, the first question out of the woman’s mouth would be “will
you give the child your name?” As in, will you make this child
legitimate, and show it by giving him your name – and not a hyphenated
pseudo name either!<br />
<br />
Women don’t actually “need” marriage to have children. They can get
boffed by any number of men through a variety of seductive techniques,
of which I think we are all aware of. Men however, did “need” marriage
to have children, and thus, children born within wedlock are to belong
to the man, while children born out of wedlock are to belong to the
woman.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in-house.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRS3hJPYU952KXKKtn3rdheOEPDfeJM4kzwLjMQfZmdY7XhnFcpvGlJo8B3OWjrvD5xDLITB25QsxwQSyVTBHUrp-PCAcpGCDOGoJrYgYJow13DQgjfEo3TejgkyAJyaXZJ_wLRUoZKSs/s1600/parents-love.jpg" height="320" width="318" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The parts of the selkie legend that discuss how she would come back to
visit her children even after abandoning her husband seems to support
the concept that divorce rates began to increase after presumed custody
was changed from the father to the mother. Also supporting this notion
is the evidence put forth by present day “joint-custody” advocates, who
state that divorce rates significantly drop when sole mother-custody is
not expected. Of course, women file for most of divorces as we all know,
and so not having sole custody of the children significantly deters
them from destroying their families, and rather encourages them to try
harder to make things work.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFyOscbIyyb52oevK0b7qesN_vM7WzXV215EGnXNRq-0JJ9-QnPBXGW6e35mi5dPl4WK4mHBZ8bm_HF7CwZYFfkACuqcBeN6cnlH_3DZXXwuC7FA3yf-le2CQy1MYINj8pODh3H2srGeQ/s200/Rotating+Polyandry.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rotating.pdf" target="_blank">Click for "Rotating Polyandry - And Its Enforcers"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Sure, one can write this off to saying that removing the financial
incentives will lower the divorce rates, but keep in mind
another thing one will find about women and sexuality throughout history: It has <i>always</i> been that women have ended relationships
more often than men. It is part of human nature that women do this,
regardless of financial incentives. It seems though that placing the
children in a situation where it is presumed that the father will gain
custody upon the ending of marriage, is enough to encourage women to
over-ride this instinct which they have.<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-24199178372127161702015-03-11T14:30:00.000-07:002015-09-06T12:25:08.875-07:00The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHHnEfCuDskHsc6Wmxzb8aNIcwuwSekuFZC5so6nZs0N3VfnLPaxDNW5BugNJHJGGU8Hd7YIB738x4veRgFLx4c0wa7d7HI6NOSDRufft8AMwvmZBoYPloQQpc_sLBvCeWzV1D2rzkxQ4/s1600/Copy+of+Anti-Feminist-25.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="http://www.angryharry.com/esMenhavebreddogsandcattle.htm" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168823152579344818" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHHnEfCuDskHsc6Wmxzb8aNIcwuwSekuFZC5so6nZs0N3VfnLPaxDNW5BugNJHJGGU8Hd7YIB738x4veRgFLx4c0wa7d7HI6NOSDRufft8AMwvmZBoYPloQQpc_sLBvCeWzV1D2rzkxQ4/s1600/Copy+of+Anti-Feminist-25.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a><b><i>[Do you believe women have the right] to divorce? </i></b><br />
<br />
Answer:<br />
<br />
Ah… I suspect this question is based on the tired old feminist refrain, “Women were owned as chattel!”<br />
. <br />
I think in order for this question to be properly answered, one must first examine the concept that marriage is an <i>economic </i>contract based on property rights.<br />
<br />
You see, all throughout the animal kingdom, motherhood is a pretty
common theme. It is positively everywhere! What is not common in the
animal kingdom however, is <i>fatherhood</i>. Nope, not too many baby deer know who their fathers are. Fatherhood is a foreign concept in most of the animal kingdom.<br />
<br />
Female mammals often find themselves living in a herd filled with many
other females, all being bred by one dominant alpha male. The females
congregate in herds because it is the only way they and their offspring
can safely survive. Yes, herd living is true Communism where all is
shared and they all get fat or starve together. Ever wonder why women
tend to all think the same way and why they desire big, Socialist
government over individualism and freedom? Ever wonder why women will
stick up for another woman even when they <i>know</i> that woman is obviously in the wrong? It’s because of their allegiance to the herd. The herd comes first. Now you know.<br />
<br />
But, one must wonder, what happens to the males that don’t become the alpha male who breeds the whole lot of women?<br />
<br />
Well, when a male reaches sexual maturity, he must challenge for
breeding rights within the herd. Those males who fail to successfully
challenge the alpha males become beta males, and get forced to leave the
herd by the alpha. The beta males generally end up living on the
fringes of the herd/society where they fend for themselves <i>individually</i>.<br />
<br />
Now, interestingly, the beta males living <i>outside</i> the herd seem to manage to survive <i>individually</i>
just fine without the need to be part of a herd like the females do.
This is because the male is not saddled with children and, also, he is
stronger than a female. The male has a <i>surplus</i> of labour which
enables him to live individually apart from the herd. In fact, a male
has so much surplus labour, that if he lives individually he needs only
to expend about 20-30% of it to ensure his survival.<br />
<br />
When one stands back and observes the whole lot, we see that both males and females have a surplus and a shortage:<br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5VMoTxMoaBOA3C0GfJDNd2MricAKTO6f3zFJyvq8t5df-mES2kA7CBhY7mxFUq4OtcrFJ8YyNyiMpfFJeYxm4xJjFa8tA_uyqd-39mb-8-MjB8jjWeOOCUHAOXJyTxug3R9XDsCwCOfQ/s1600/shortage.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5VMoTxMoaBOA3C0GfJDNd2MricAKTO6f3zFJyvq8t5df-mES2kA7CBhY7mxFUq4OtcrFJ8YyNyiMpfFJeYxm4xJjFa8tA_uyqd-39mb-8-MjB8jjWeOOCUHAOXJyTxug3R9XDsCwCOfQ/s1600/shortage.gif" width="400" /></a>Males have a surplus of labour but a shortage of reproductive ability.<br />
<br />
Females have a surplus of reproductive ability but a shortage of labour.<br />
<br />
Now, perhaps, you can see why marriage is an <i>economic </i>contract.<br />
<br />
The male “sells” his surplus labour to the female in exchange for her reproductive ability.<br />
<br />
The female “sells” her reproductive ability to the male in exchange for his surplus labour.<br />
<br />
In order to “sell” something, you first must “own it” yourself, and upon
“selling it,” you are agreeing to transfer ownership of it to the
buyer. This is the basis of economics, and as you can see, it is based
on <i>property rights</i>.<br />
<br />
In the <i>economic</i> contract of marriage, the female agrees to transfer the <i>ownership</i> of her sexual reproductive ability to the male, and she takes <i>ownership</i> of his surplus labour as payment for it.<br />
.<br />
So, yes, while the feminists harp on and on that women were once “owned”
as chattel, there is truth to this because in a very real sense, a
woman’s <i>sexuality</i> became the property of the husband. He very much was considered to “own” her sexuality <i>and the products of her sexuality (children).</i> The children of a <i>marriage</i> became <i>his </i>property, because he <i>paid</i> for them.<br />
<br />
(Note that while the children of a marriage are supposed to belong to
the husband, children born out of wedlock are the property of the woman.
A woman who is not married owns her own sexuality and the
products/children of that sexuality are also her property).<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQ8bOXcC6fndO7Wz8DFLREtqbtilHPjRLUJ5wkbwju1o-BGMyAnfq40J0AOoRNY8APqx1asLvxmsf6SjBMYrKZoUXrBdFzzAGpnganxov56046YWL4b0pKP_IN7aHpq58efYYr_f3Wtq4/s1600/no-trespassing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQ8bOXcC6fndO7Wz8DFLREtqbtilHPjRLUJ5wkbwju1o-BGMyAnfq40J0AOoRNY8APqx1asLvxmsf6SjBMYrKZoUXrBdFzzAGpnganxov56046YWL4b0pKP_IN7aHpq58efYYr_f3Wtq4/s1600/no-trespassing.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
This is also why, in the past, women were so much more harshly condemned for adultery than men. <i>The wife's sexuality was no longer hers to give away. </i><br />
<br />
This is why, in the past, when a woman was raped it was considered an act of theft against <i>the husband</i>. Someone “stole” the sexuality which was his property.<br />
<br />
This is why, in the past, it was considered impossible for a husband to
be found guilty of spousal rape. How can you possibly steal your own
property?<br />
<br />
So, feminists are <i>somewhat</i> truthful when they claim that women were “owned” as chattel. A wife’s <i>sexuality (<b>NOT</b> her person), </i>was very much “owned” by her husband and it <i>was </i>in fact used as a means of production: The production of the husband’s <i>own </i>children.<br />
<br />
But, as always, feminists are only capable of speaking in <i>half-truths. </i><br />
<br />
The part of the “women were owned as chattel” song leaves out the second
verse, which is “and men were owned as beasts of burden.”<br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg40s0fFxfqvCk7-Mth7jgLBUfWHcvwcsy4c_nRqj_o4hpUdNXN0dUPxxYmq9y2Vna1ydkh2vT2SHykoI3Om0TdZkNgGHR0tdr7wq4J5M3P45J1OmrZJQyKw0VS4eq3rBD8lR5Nbfg_3Q4/s1600/RSCN0985.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168830234980415954" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg40s0fFxfqvCk7-Mth7jgLBUfWHcvwcsy4c_nRqj_o4hpUdNXN0dUPxxYmq9y2Vna1ydkh2vT2SHykoI3Om0TdZkNgGHR0tdr7wq4J5M3P45J1OmrZJQyKw0VS4eq3rBD8lR5Nbfg_3Q4/s400/RSCN0985.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>“Hyahhh! Move it, you strong ox!” bellows the wife. “You are married
now, so start pulling this plow! No more lazing around for you!”<br />
<br />
For eons, <i>mothers </i>have told their daughters, “Why <i>buy </i>the cow when the milk is free?”<br />
<br />
You see, the feminists <i>always </i>leave out that the woman <i>sold</i> her sexuality and took something in exchange for it: <i>The man's surplus labour. </i><br />
<br />
And benefit from a man’s surplus labour the wives of the past most surely did!<br />
. <br />
She benefited by no longer having to rely on the Communist lifestyle of
the herd for her survival. When in need of protection she pushed the man
out the door first to deal with the danger, rather than rely on the
size of the herd, hoping it would hide her from harm when the weak
stragglers get taken down by the wolves.<br />
<br />
She benefited enormously by increasing the amount of labour available to
her, giving her the ability to live in a wooden house with a real roof,
rather than sharing a grass hut with a bunch of other women.<br />
<br />
Women took something <i>very real</i> in exchange for selling their
sexuality. They took a man’s labour as their own, and they benefited
from this in almost every way imaginable.<br />
<br />
So did the children she mothered benefit a great deal, <i>and so did society in general. </i><br />
<br />
Remember all those beta males who were existing outside of the herd,
living on the fringes of society? They were only exerting 20-30% of
their potential labour to survive.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFiq7QekBopTwAMUTB9jGzKov0v4HDSHA1SNbSNuV9ynzXuGzYWynM_lgTFxTcQNZf6lehLWObV1rRZYnNfYxGbFRkHHOZnJoVl1-UVi0MMA5MJQ5tnmBeb2bMg5H62JtMR6j1Y9XR8BE/s1600/Fatherhood.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFiq7QekBopTwAMUTB9jGzKov0v4HDSHA1SNbSNuV9ynzXuGzYWynM_lgTFxTcQNZf6lehLWObV1rRZYnNfYxGbFRkHHOZnJoVl1-UVi0MMA5MJQ5tnmBeb2bMg5H62JtMR6j1Y9XR8BE/s1600/Fatherhood.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
Once married and <i>attached to their <b>own </b>children, </i>these
beta males were suddenly yoked like an ox and working at 100% capacity.
This utilization of the full capacity of male labour is what pulled
mankind into a civilization. It is what built our houses and planted our
corn. It built our roads and our bridges. It created our literature and
our art. It created, well, pretty much everything that we have. Men,
women and children all obviously benefited from this.<br />
<br />
Have a look around the room you are in.<br />
<br />
<br />
Everything within it involving more than two moving parts was invented by a man.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgngcqP9dvgGnZ9LtuCy9DhsodKz4AfRnU8sixnIqKiLxF89YOyBS6pj6kgyRAnasw7W7CWeEjEHJQFw31CPf_uZQxSdAnmeu4qIqNrgrimyMwWn3pdoITOT2mcYdCK7hbxLq1ab4YlVew/s1600/Tourism+Vancouver,+photo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgngcqP9dvgGnZ9LtuCy9DhsodKz4AfRnU8sixnIqKiLxF89YOyBS6pj6kgyRAnasw7W7CWeEjEHJQFw31CPf_uZQxSdAnmeu4qIqNrgrimyMwWn3pdoITOT2mcYdCK7hbxLq1ab4YlVew/s1600/Tourism+Vancouver,+photo.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
Welcome to the Patriarchy! (Sometimes it is simply known as civilization, but also, occasionally, as <i>fatherhood</i>).<br />
<br />
Thus, when you hear that “marriage is the foundational building block of
society,” you are hearing the exact truth. And society, or rather, <i>advanced</i> society, is based on the <i>economic </i>contract of marriage. The economic contract of marriage is based on <i>property rights. </i>Property
rights are the basis for Capitalism, and Capitalism is the basis for an
advanced society which upholds the ideals of individualism, personal
responsibility and Liberty.<br />
<br />
Now, whether you wish to agree or disagree with the way society has
existed for millennia, as outlined above, is entirely irrelevant. What
is relevant is that the above description is what the <i>contract </i>of marriage was based on throughout history. Your personal feelings are irrelevant to history.<br />
<br />
So, back to the original question: <b><i>"Do you believe women have the right to divorce?" </i></b><br />
<br />
My answer is a resounding <b>NO! </b><br />
<br />
Why, you might ask?<br />
.<br />
<b>Because modern marriage has become a FRAUDULENT contract, and therefore women shouldn’t be allowed to marry in the first place! </b><br />
<br />
It is simple. No right to marry equals <i>no right to divorce. </i><br />
<br />
You see, in the 1860’s, the wonderful women’s rights movement combined
with the heavy hand of the courts, ruled that custody of the children of
a marriage should belong to the mother, not the father. In effect, they
strengthened the strongest family bond, that of mother and child which
exists everywhere in nature, and vastly diminished the weakest family
bond, fatherhood, which exists almost nowhere in nature – but is the
bond that creates civilization.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgORtHvI2JlY6mf0pSFE_KTjSYfNc8F12OAvnDbonYm2bh3w39zlobQWx000e-H2GR7NH3Nw0aXlmEB8fUuvuIB6sd5LSw4ut3sEC09mJJ90Db5grLDzjNPPHO5iX3HdIT__JVrF4dgYtVR/s1600/original1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html" border="0" height="303" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgORtHvI2JlY6mf0pSFE_KTjSYfNc8F12OAvnDbonYm2bh3w39zlobQWx000e-H2GR7NH3Nw0aXlmEB8fUuvuIB6sd5LSw4ut3sEC09mJJ90Db5grLDzjNPPHO5iX3HdIT__JVrF4dgYtVR/s1600/original1.jpg" width="400" /></a>Before the 1860’s, if a woman decided to leave her husband, she had to
leave the children behind, which were a product of the marriage, because
<i>property rights</i> dictated that <i>he</i> had “paid” for them, and thus they were <i>his</i>
property, and not hers. He did not “own” her person, but in marriage he
did “own” her reproductive ability and the products thereof.<br />
<br />
The transferring of these “property rights” back to the woman, when in
fact they were the basis of the economic contract of marriage,
diminished the validity of marriage enormously. It is interesting to
note that the divorce rate has risen steadily from this point onward.<br />
<br />
Keep in mind, women have <i>always</i> had the ability and natural <i>right</i>
to have their own children. No-one ever stopped a woman from shagging
some knave in the bushes after he had been swilling mead in a medieval
tavern. It may have been frowned upon by society, but illegitimate
children have been born since the beginning of civilization. It was a
social stigma that women should not do this because it was widely known
that the woman would be bringing a child into the world under an
enormous disadvantage if she and the child were not coupled to the
labour (and discipline) of a father. But, she owned her sexuality and if
she wanted to have children with it, she most certainly could.<br />
<br />
But, the contract of marriage is, in every sense, the contract of a
woman selling children to a man. The right of a man to “own” what he
paid for was dealt a mortal blow in the 1860’s when he lost the
previously unchallenged right to “own” what he had paid for in marriage,
that being <i>his</i> children.<br />
<br />
Now, all through up until the 1970’s, marriage was still viewed as a legal <i>contract.</i>
It was a given that both parties had an obligation to uphold such a
contract just as within any other economic or legal contract.<br />
<br />
If you wanted to leave you still could. No-one was stopping you. But, as
with any contract, if you breached your contract you would be the one
that was penalized for it.<br />
<br />
If you wanted to leave and receive the benefits from the marriage, or
rather, be compensated for the breach of contract of the other party,
you had to prove they were at fault in order to sue for compensation.
This makes sense, doesn’t it?<br />
<br />
Therefore, there were <i>many </i>things which constituted “fault.”
Adultery, alcoholism, mental insanity, cruelty, physical abusiveness
amongst a host of others all constituted “fault.” If you were at fault,
you could expect to lose your rights as set forth in the contract. But
even so, if there was no fault and you <i>still</i> wanted to leave,
no-one was stopping you. You were not put in jail for leaving, but you
were found to be at fault for “abandonment,” and therefore lost all of
your rights as set forward in the contract – and you would be liable for
any “damages” caused by your “fault.”<br />
<br />
That seems fair to me. All contracts are set forth in this manner. That
is why they are contracts. A contract says that if you behave in such
and such manner and don’t deviate out of that behaviour, you will be
compensated with a <i>guarantee</i> of this and this behaviour from the
other party. Step out of these guidelines and you will be legally
liable, stay within them and your rights will be guaranteed.<br />
<br />
But, in the 1970’s, the ever wise feminists declared that it was <i>far </i>too
difficult to find fault in people’s complex personal relationships, and
therefore “No Fault Divorce” was implemented, again with the aid of the
heavy hand of the courts. (Odd, isn’t it? They have no troubles at all
finding “fault” in cases of domestic violence.)<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBwyoMEUgNzzssd8RjzGxxkDmnYm55mln1BhE0u77yLTt1BEwuRDw-9-o1ri0T-wcyFhEzRJJGz9GjcIY-mGKGcO2rsuRyrJW4YY6GaJZhqcN3oPzSOdEN7NXF8ETxZ7Gf6y-n7qiSQ4U/s1600/marriage-fraud-gif.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="341" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBwyoMEUgNzzssd8RjzGxxkDmnYm55mln1BhE0u77yLTt1BEwuRDw-9-o1ri0T-wcyFhEzRJJGz9GjcIY-mGKGcO2rsuRyrJW4YY6GaJZhqcN3oPzSOdEN7NXF8ETxZ7Gf6y-n7qiSQ4U/s1600/marriage-fraud-gif.gif" width="400" /></a>So what have we got left here?<br />
<br />
<b>WE HAVE A FRAUDULENT CONTRACT MASQUERADING AS MARRIAGE! </b><br />
<br />
What was originally based on a woman “selling” a man the ability to have <i>his own</i> children and taking his surplus labour as “payment,” has become a woman having <i>children of <b>HER </b>own </i>and still taking a man’s surplus labour as “payment” for that which she is <i><b>NOT</b> </i>selling. <b>THAT IS FRAUD! </b><br />
<br />
If you go to a car dealership and buy a shiny new car, you might sign on
the dotted line and agree to make payments for the next five years, but
it is implied in the contract that <i>you own the car. </i><br />
<br />
The dealership cannot decide 6 months later that they want the car back, show up at your house, and just take it. And <i>certainly </i>they
cannot force you to make the next 54 payments on it if they take it
away from you with no breach of contract on your part. It is your <i>property </i>and they have no right to it. To suggest otherwise would be to suggest you signed a <b><i>fraudulent contract. </i></b>To
suggest that you would still have to pay for gas, maintenance, and
insurance after they sell it to someone else because “it is in the best
interests of the car” is to suggest an <b><i>insanely fraudulent contract. </i></b><br />
<br />
Yup.<br />
<br />
But this is what we are left with in the marriage contract.<br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm49h01RAJzMi3waeWxeGE-CDeJE-4TPm-RtgP3-ewYloBQaD9vZinjbtQxQ3QEZ2jvAT_IoB1fPE7ziddzPjixIt-zI4-aqwCDk4i3UVNWa0tXvlfMJ1sAZMQ3YYRU8Evd49tC5oZHPY/s1600/RSCN0985.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168825961487956418" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm49h01RAJzMi3waeWxeGE-CDeJE-4TPm-RtgP3-ewYloBQaD9vZinjbtQxQ3QEZ2jvAT_IoB1fPE7ziddzPjixIt-zI4-aqwCDk4i3UVNWa0tXvlfMJ1sAZMQ3YYRU8Evd49tC5oZHPY/s400/RSCN0985.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>The man gets none of the property or rights which the contract was
originally based upon, but the “vendor” still has the right to make you
into this:<br />
. <br />
“Hyahhh! Move it, you strong ox!” bellows the ex-wife. “You are divorced now with no legal rights to what you <i>thought</i> you paid for, so start pulling this plow! No more lazing around for you, slave! <b><i>MY</i></b> children and I <i>own </i>your labour! You own <i>nothing!</i>”<br />
<br />
<b>MARRIAGE SHOULD BE OUTLAWED!<br /><br />MARRIAGE IS FRAUD!<br /><br />DO NOT ENTER INTO FRAUDULENT CONTRACTS!</b><br />
.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEil72f0n_cGxGshooYKs67EEQuchkTiESR37rYfJtAwvfAhvz-MZ7TNArQ9cPAfvTbSkZHEeL8KYfsXeo1FrTxAxp9PvVOfrQGbVBUSUumgna7HhxNf70x_FzTDBT2gnnm3zWRkuxA2RRU/s1600/1%2520WildeBeest%2520Herd%2520Kenya%2520Africa%2520%2520Bill%2520Klipp%2520%2520jan%252006_lg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168831051024202210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEil72f0n_cGxGshooYKs67EEQuchkTiESR37rYfJtAwvfAhvz-MZ7TNArQ9cPAfvTbSkZHEeL8KYfsXeo1FrTxAxp9PvVOfrQGbVBUSUumgna7HhxNf70x_FzTDBT2gnnm3zWRkuxA2RRU/s400/1%20WildeBeest%20Herd%20Kenya%20Africa%20%20Bill%20Klipp%20%20jan%2006_lg.jpg" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>Nope, let the little ladies and <i>their children </i>go back to living like this:<br />
.<br />
Have nothing to do with them.<br />
<br />
Do not oppress them with marriage.<br />
<br />
Do not oppress them by allowing them to live in your nice home.<br />
<br />
Do not have sex with them. All sex is rape, dontcha know?<br />
<br />
Do not donate sperm. That now makes you liable to be a slave too.<br />
<br />
Again, make sure you <i>do not </i>oppress one single one of them with
marriage. Do you hate women or something? Why would you want to oppress
one of them with marriage, you misogynist! Put down that <i>Bride </i>magazine, mister. We know what you are thinking... now move on and think more wholesome thoughts.<br />
<br />
<i>Do not <b>burden </b></i>a single one of them with a child. Women can’t stand kids and would like to have nothing to do with them.<br />
<br />
And, most certainly, <b>DO NOT </b>pay anyone for a product they have no intention of actually “selling” to you.<br />
<br />
Do not feel you are obligated to work like a fool to pay taxes which
support “the herd” of single and divorced mothers along with <i>their</i> feral children. <i>You</i> are not responsible to pay for <i>someone else's property. </i><br />
<br />
You don’t owe the herd anything. They don’t even want you to be part of the herd.<br />
<br />
<i>You</i> are not responsible to be an economic performer who props up
herd living with your labour while receiving nothing in return except a
pat on the head along with a “good boy.” There are plenty of manginas
who will prop up the herd until it can’t be propped up anymore. Let them
work like dolts in an unsustainable system for someone else’s benefit
then.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNVAFwAGVHEXEabUrA-K0GzlhV0BE6Ap09Bdhlk5dm7pDdWLUbETdIxwchjbm0vknLjvGmdoHT22j72VNOGFBl7HRAPyjFjbVQ7-qC6k_BSSt7iSHHjNIQVliZVaB7rHbFR9KfSlBkm2A/s1600/untitled.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5168832356694260210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNVAFwAGVHEXEabUrA-K0GzlhV0BE6Ap09Bdhlk5dm7pDdWLUbETdIxwchjbm0vknLjvGmdoHT22j72VNOGFBl7HRAPyjFjbVQ7-qC6k_BSSt7iSHHjNIQVliZVaB7rHbFR9KfSlBkm2A/s400/untitled.bmp" style="cursor: move; display: block; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center;" /></a>Give them as few tax dollars as possible.<br />
<br />
Men should go back to only expending 20-30% of their labour ability, so they can return to living like this:<br />
<br />
Why in the <i>hell</i> would you want to oppress one of those tricksters with Patriarchy?<br />
.<br />
Why even bother with a cow that doesn't give milk? Let alone pay for one.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: 180%;">DON'T MARRY!!!</span></b><br />
<br />
It lowers divorce rates and cuts back on fraud.<br />
.<br />
Read more on this subject in the following online book, <a href="http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf">The Case for Father Custody -- by Daniel Amneus</a> <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/father-custody-and-legend-of-selkie.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/feminizing-decline.html">Next</a></span></b></div>
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><u><b>Related:</b></u> </span><br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLEJ3Pw-PWgj6amryFN_T53-bJJmDrqIzC&t=362&v=5Sd83ca3N0o" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">Divorce Corp HD (Video 1:33hrs)</span></a><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">. </span>.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3142829572746303136.post-32837948231378069192015-03-11T13:00:00.000-07:002015-10-08T17:30:11.584-07:00Feminizing the Decline.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>“Remember this: The strongest sign of
the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization
of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted,
and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men’s work. American
women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the
‘barricades’ between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel
triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft
hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope
they will be ‘happy’ when a husband deserts them and they must support
their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be
‘free’ she shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she?) I hope
they will feel ‘fulfilled’ when they are given no more courtesies due to
their sex and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subway buses
by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and
elevators…. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be
pleased to see exhausted, embittered faces, and that they will be
consoled by their paychecks.”</b><i> </i>~ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Caldwell" target="_blank">Taylor Caldwell</a>, 1970</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span> </div>
</div>
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNi5PZ2wUR7kgZr7iGGrW7QXLAs_C32PdamFGaEOOUicNzyMRBJlzYU16nJ7B2pEXiBCQ9ifkWoM_4mK03EhN7rO1qVQtkrxBtczn0oMr0hZgJ4jS5vY4dAvfW9qy1RFRLJ42UnnhYNUhh/s1600/Do-it-for-denmark.png" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="207" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNi5PZ2wUR7kgZr7iGGrW7QXLAs_C32PdamFGaEOOUicNzyMRBJlzYU16nJ7B2pEXiBCQ9ifkWoM_4mK03EhN7rO1qVQtkrxBtczn0oMr0hZgJ4jS5vY4dAvfW9qy1RFRLJ42UnnhYNUhh/s1600/Do-it-for-denmark.png" width="400" /></a><b>Quote from </b><a href="http://www.sovereignman.com/trends/this-will-be-about-the-weirdest-thing-you-see-today-16343/" target="_blank"><b>Sovereign Man</b> (Regarding how various governments are encouraging people to have more sex because of the looming birthrate crisis)</a>:<br />
<br />
<b><i>"Last year, the Danish government promoted an initiative called
"Do it for Denmark", encouraging Danes to travel abroad and have sex
while on holidays. They even have a pretty racy YouTube video featuring a
scantily clad gorgeous blond waiting to do her duty for her country and
procreate.</i></b><br />
<br />
<b><i>Singapore as well has a catchy jingle about going out and making
babies, brought to you by the same guys who did the Mentos theme song. </i></b><br />
<br />
<b><i>The Swedish government actually spent taxpayer money on its new
genitals song, so it can start indoctrinating children early on how to
make babies. </i></b><br />
<br />
<b><i>Here in Japan, which has one of the lowest birthrates in the
world, the government is desperate to find solutions to what it calls
its libido crisis. According to their data, Japanese men aren’t terribly interested in sex and the women find sex to be bothersome.</i></b><br />
<br />
<b><i>[...]</i></b><i><b> Easily the most ridiculous solution they came up with is to impose a
‘handsome tax’ on attractive men. [...] </b></i><b><i>The idea being that if you tax handsome men, then less attractive men would have more money and hence be able to attract women." </i></b> <br />
<br />
(<a href="http://www.sovereignman.com/trends/this-will-be-about-the-weirdest-thing-you-see-today-16343/" target="_blank">Read more here</a>).<br />
. <br />
I think the problems aren't quite as simple as made out to be... and
they are deeply hidden behind political correctness and the out-of-control feminist movement. It will take me a little while to bring this back around to low birth-rates, but please bear with me as I present my case.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2012/03/its-not-marxism-because.html" border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj32xH-OmeXn5rDt2HslFTT9MUTadqrAW01Mqu7mm236ZUrss1nCxq8MLHFle6XFQiz7AzFS-9xsNUTymuVd_MWOQTUwyBKCXSruBdCLwywgIPrdryuvL-XUudN6NeLzQsdKQbI_4YfYvEW/s1600/International+Women's%2BWorking%2BDay.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/its-not-marxism-because_11.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to Read "It's Not Marxism Because..."</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Didn't Britain just declare 30% of
executives are to be women, since gender equality is supposed to be
economically beneficial and has been "proven" by reams of (activist
sponsored) academic research? Norway did the same a few years ago - affirmative actioning in a 40% female quota for all of its major corporations' executive boards and positions.<br />
<br />
One wonders then why the garbage
collection system wouldn't also benefit from a change to 50/50 men
and women instead of it being nearly 100% male. Ditto for the almost
completely female
nursing and education industries... oh... and the 70% of government
workers that are female - all receiving about 30% higher wages than the
private sector would be able to afford. Not only would these changes
supposedly bring greater profits - as women's studies "professors" claim
(without ever stating a specific study we can analyze) - but it ought
to lower other expenses as well, such as worker's compensation for
injuries, which are 94% attributed to careless, clumsy males. Therefore, making all the
dangerous jobs like logger, fisherman, bush pilot, construction
labourer, farmer etc. etc. 50% female ought
to drop the worker's compensation rate by 50% as well! (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/peer-reviewed-research-holy-grail-of.html" target="_blank">See how this feminism inspired logic works?</a>)<br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2013/04/the-liberation-of-men.html" border="0" height="189" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9WHebCJIkF4qoPMc9Ww0Gbn-vo39MkQqGjcLbEbZkDpewWORuDvKu-e6HkpeXPupHY4ha_6oJCiYPzJwR565QWXLcmkCTXSnG_wLZTGa-5IPQHLOXi_5uSXRbthwsQJ-iYAcr2j6PpZvy/s1600/supply_and_demand.gif" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-liberation-of-men.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to read "The Liberation of Men"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
And since everyone points out that
the average worker isn't any better off than he was back in the 1970's, why
doesn't anyone dare to ask why that is? Could it be that <i>doubling</i> the
supply of workers available (<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" target="_blank">by pushing women into the workforce to compete with men</a>) without a subsequent increase in demand for goods
& services, would <i>halve</i> the income of the general worker, and
therefore mean it would take two fulltime incomes to accomplish
that which was previously paid for by one income? It's the freakin' <b>Law</b> of Supply and Demand, yet political correctness prevents even economists from pointing out the bleedingly obvious: <i><b>The problem with wages is an over-supply of workers</b>,</i>
which we've merely been papering over since the 1970's. Illegal
immigrants still can't hold a candle to the effects of women entering
the workforce enmasse over the past forty-five years.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/03/sex-sells.html" border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj8fRs71mKEqXtdspwrokojFprZrvxZYlPtQtro8bf4mFb7LTgRFeItHWt6oYK-cO6iQJiA7cWBb15GPVBoicAQGL6I2qPuJA3t2JeLHrOS8JCQucRIJsemEYCyYVOvaDTqr1aNn3WehIE/s1600/Snow-White-and-the-Seven-Dwarfs-Wallpaper-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-6496592-1024-768.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/sex-sells-hypergamy-explained.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to read "Sex Sells" (Hypergamy Explained)</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Further, and VERY importantly, <a href="http://www.fisheaters.com/gb9.html" target="_blank">women are <i>hypergamous</i></a>
- They tend to marry up socially and financially, not down. Snow White
married the Prince, not one of the Seven Dwarves. CEO's marry their
secretaries; doctors marry nurses; factory workers marry waitresses...
but what you'll have a hard time finding are female CEO's marrying an
auto-mechanic, or a woman lawyer marrying a struggling poet. You can
find evidence of this today in what are known as "Kitchen Bitch
Marriages" - where the woman is the primary breadwinner while the male
takes on a more domestic role. In such marriages, the divorce rate jumps
from 50% all the way up to 90%. That's pretty clear evidence of
hypergamy and the need for defined gender roles, if you ask me.. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ7y-FNtkHOnzk-QoNyhqZimgF3llZWot5RffmCWVwv1ovAJy5pXPjkxSRVfZiuhP4SZaeZeG4h6I3HCbaz0nPbJFiMu7OXQXrcSWLTW8J54V_dW-RXb_mWWEPuXVDrXjc43jvki5soALb/s1600/CareerWoman.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ7y-FNtkHOnzk-QoNyhqZimgF3llZWot5RffmCWVwv1ovAJy5pXPjkxSRVfZiuhP4SZaeZeG4h6I3HCbaz0nPbJFiMu7OXQXrcSWLTW8J54V_dW-RXb_mWWEPuXVDrXjc43jvki5soALb/s1600/CareerWoman.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidMMquxRPUse0EtR1pflcmH1uXGwZ8OMcHFWOzSwEnLtTA1yCGApkUigkr_u870qlwDvWPrVGZEl_kc6U9Mzs_iEDNbdQ7RrvcGzcfdzQRZ6rxifn1J_qacA2FA5yJS46SLZGvtapv02zA/s1600/alpha-male1.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidMMquxRPUse0EtR1pflcmH1uXGwZ8OMcHFWOzSwEnLtTA1yCGApkUigkr_u870qlwDvWPrVGZEl_kc6U9Mzs_iEDNbdQ7RrvcGzcfdzQRZ6rxifn1J_qacA2FA5yJS46SLZGvtapv02zA/s1600/alpha-male1.jpg" width="320" /></a>Thus,
the more you pay women, the less men there are who exceed them in
resources, and <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">the less reason women have to "associate" with them</a>,
which I've heard somehow or other tends to lead to babies. This is a
very large problem with women in the workplace - not that they shouldn't
be there, but rather that the more successful they are, the fewer men
they find attractive. Generally speaking, a woman making $60,000 a year
does not find a man making $40,000/yr to be attractive. And a woman who
makes $250,000 will need to find a man making around $350-400,000/yr to
"trade up" to. The problem now for such a woman becomes that while
she has shrunk her pool of hypergamously selected mates to only those
above her level of income (which is very small in the scope of the
population), the man who is making as much or more than her is
hypergamously attractive to ALL women below him, right down to welfare
queens. Thus, the highly succesful career woman has not only limited her
prospects enormously by shrinking her pool of mates, but of the
prospects she actually does finds attractive, she has to compete with a
gajillion other women for his attentions. Truly, the handsome tax
mentioned above is not as silly as it sounds. (<a href="http://archive.org/stream/HarrisonBergeron/Harrison%20Bergeron_djvu.txt" target="_blank">Although it certainly goes against any principles I adhere to</a>).<br />
. <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2012/05/youre-such-tool.html" border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuPSrdGAdN9e5nIhLD282HLa9DBsse50_5peR_9I8VnrD-Y5grRUCfBmUhtXT_8mL0Y3DDBcQ7vRigWekwRLskW28ytwWpgwWjXl4GW9hJR2zgIuCMpDlmCoJ-VHOI_5t2MYBpI4VgUTks/s1600/444_canadian-girls.jpg" width="256" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/youre-such-tool.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to Read "You're Such a Tool! (Briffault's law)"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizQsQV0CXleagA-Rto0KuBdLB9MrmW7v5IdpzawrJR81-RH1cU8jOTe5IOlYUO4zXXuc9KZdRLTkDnyfOCknFBjzl9wuN3fgE90bArAA2gFCQrM3zCiEfer9YpMB8q4WZToN750RP7AVNL/s1600/maple1.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizQsQV0CXleagA-Rto0KuBdLB9MrmW7v5IdpzawrJR81-RH1cU8jOTe5IOlYUO4zXXuc9KZdRLTkDnyfOCknFBjzl9wuN3fgE90bArAA2gFCQrM3zCiEfer9YpMB8q4WZToN750RP7AVNL/s1600/maple1.jpeg" width="200" /></a>There are lots of
parallels with the economy and the lack of sound money being the cause
of the end of empires, but also to note, in the vast majority of cases
throughout history, at their peak the genders turn on eachother and
androgynize - men and women don't have separate roles anymore, but now
compete with eachother directly in some genderless role neither of us is
particularly good at. Who ever would've thunk it that women would find
masculinity attractive and men would find feminity attractive? Certainly
not feminists and academics, that's for sure. They think men should
find women sexy for their earning abilities (men don't) and women ought
to find men attractive for their metrosexual fashion sense, housekeeping
abilities, and smooth, clear skin (women don't).<br />
. <br />
When Darius III
got his ass handed to him by Alexander the Great, he lamented, "My men
have become women and my women have become men." (It's true too - by the
end of the great Persian Empire - at the time the most powerful in
history - the men were effeminate and the women were leading battalions
in the Persian army).<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2012/05/rites-of-passage-boys-to-men.html" border="0" height="330" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lH5-1IKwxRQ/UwtM9TQSigI/AAAAAAAARok/e-NMbHBv4ng/s400/4b.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/rites-of-passage-making-boys-into-men.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to Read "Rites of Passage - Making Boys into Men"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In Rome they used to say that women married
intending to divorce and divorced intending to remarry (starter
marriages, anyone?). <a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_return_of_patriarchy" target="_blank">They also eventually had to pass laws forcing men to marry or forfeit their inheritances along with other such bachelor taxes</a>, because marriage was such a complete and utter disaster for most
men that they avoided marrying a decadent, sex-positive Roman woman at
all costs, which most were. The government claimed they needed to pass
laws forcing men to marry because the low birthrate was a jeopardy to
the state, which it certainly was.<br />
<br />
The Ottoman Empire lost its
power and lustre when its birthrates fell into negative territory (below
2.1/couple) - sure it struggled on for quite a while, but with
declining birthrates, they never recovered until finally they wheezed
their last breath in WWI. No population has <i>ever</i> reversed a
birthrate that dropped below 1.9/couple, and once it falls below
1.3/couple it is mathematically impossible to reverse the decline
because of the "time gap" that it takes to turn babies into functioning,
productive citizens. By the way, Japan, Spain & Germany are all at or below
this 1.3/couple threshold. Most of the rest of the West is sitting
around 1.5/couple - except for the USA which is still around 2.0/couple,
but this is only because of the immigrant population. The "homegrown
American" population only has a 1.6/couple birthrate. (Birthrates were 3.9/couple back in 1970).<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/03/multi-tasking-pink-proletariat.html" border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg450uJKgv6LwdSEaK1GD3T6zVlVGbEeEWzfle4egt9bgk2oWpmK2W-ZJxh1hlN8bUtJQ9ZZhs7vWNtehFIDAp_yaJkFLeD1496SmzMBNZxQNVSMsjV__9W-3elDYPUy0FgkeUMjivrzlOn/s1600/leaping-lemmings-o.gif" width="400" /></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Abortion Laws are one thing the West has an option of revoking which the civilizations of the past did not. <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html" target="_blank">Currently, 21% of all pregnancies end in abortion, while half of women will experience an unintended pregnancy by age 45</a>.
If the government simply told feminists to get stuffed and made
abortion illegal, the birthrate would jump 21% instantly. That's not a
judgement on the morality of abortion - it is simply a fact. (And after all,
don't we ask men to die in wars to save society? Having a few babies is
the least our women can do - <a href="http://www.angryharry.com/esEqualityNotAchievable.htm" target="_blank">in the name of "equality"</a>).
And while making abortion illegal would not be a complete fix, it would
certainly go a lot further than encouraging people to go on a vacation
to have sex, or writing pee-pee songs to indoctrinate children into
sexuality at an early age. (While at the same criminalizing every expression of male heterosexuality that pops up in society - there's that government inneffeciency for you).. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-womans-right-to-choose.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/02/womans-right-to-choose.html" border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjh44SdP9GfR-LbChqjbeTmHVxaKaO50J5utgI0UuCM4-SSZJjTq5Cp9zDG_mOJwQe7KZ4zIByvldEyOSmiVbOm2EDxs6tGCTo9iLkIuW7LjuUh3BLI8Erinoc53yDvkydog-6R4Eckfdwm/s1600/130710033642-ireland-abortion-protester-story-top.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/a-womans-right-to-choose.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to Read "A Woman's Right to Choose"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
We probably
coulda used some of the 50 million babies that were aborted in the USA
over the past 40 years, couldn't we? Especially since many of those
non-existent people would have also reproduced by now - that means that
perhaps 75 million (or more) homegrown citizens are simply "missing"
from the population. Note that this amount of missing people is about
equal to the entire US population of the Baby Boomer generation... all
of whom were expecting <i>other people's children</i> to fund their
pensions and lifestyles into old age. It woulda worked, you know, if we
hadn't genocided the children of tomorrow which we now need to be
working and paying taxes to fund the elderly in their old age. This is
kind of the story about the grasshopper having fun during the summer
versus the squirrel saving a cache of nuts for the winter, isn't it? There's no such thing as a free lunch!<br />
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html" border="0" height="303" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgORtHvI2JlY6mf0pSFE_KTjSYfNc8F12OAvnDbonYm2bh3w39zlobQWx000e-H2GR7NH3Nw0aXlmEB8fUuvuIB6sd5LSw4ut3sEC09mJJ90Db5grLDzjNPPHO5iX3HdIT__JVrF4dgYtVR/s1600/original1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html" target="_blank">Click Pic to read "The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)"</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Check out the research of
people like <a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html" target="_blank">JD Unwin's "Sex and Culture"</a> - he documented over 80
cultures that have risen and fallen over the millenia, and found that in
almost all of the cases, when a culture was rising it was restricted in
its sexuality, it had clearly defined (and by modern terms misogynist)
gender roles which best utilized both sexes' skills, and women were
directly dependant on their husbands for income, rather than dependant
on government or other such means (<a href="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2007/09/politics-of-aristotle.html" target="_blank">Aristotle claims unreasonable dowry laws as the cause of men and women repelling from eachother in Sparta - and also directly attributed Sparta's demise to a declining birthrate because of women's wealth outside of marriage</a>). Unwin also provides
evidence that during the decline of cultures and empires, the sexes tend
to androgynize - which actually pushes them apart rather than pulling
them together - and thus, in the decline, a culture becomes feminized
and therefore birthrates fall until eventually everything collapses...
kinda like what's happening to us right now.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span> </div>
<br />
<i>QUOTING A YOUNG WOMAN: <b>"As long as mothers and/or wives don’t allow their
careers to consume their lives and interfere with their God-given
duties, then I don’t see a problem. Women have their own aspirations and
dreams as well just like men (and no I don’t believe that the only
reason people have careers is to make money)."</b></i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbF_-RZU6LnHZ-ICxp8RW_0w3Xdrk_uJrFyC2o6jXdT18gcAifdNMetaFyYZiVpVuhoWRN64FyxXCVeW8ybS2D2kPublCEcMwrlX2-qCsbz7wSdPgQZZ0hxnptcu7mAL1KSa2q4JovWvI/s1600/fuckthishousewife.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="320" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549973951179156146" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbF_-RZU6LnHZ-ICxp8RW_0w3Xdrk_uJrFyC2o6jXdT18gcAifdNMetaFyYZiVpVuhoWRN64FyxXCVeW8ybS2D2kPublCEcMwrlX2-qCsbz7wSdPgQZZ0hxnptcu7mAL1KSa2q4JovWvI/s320/fuckthishousewife.jpg" style="display: block; height: 400px; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 269px;" width="215" /></a>I agree with much of what you say. There is nothing inherently wrong
with women having jobs, or their own money, or pursuing their own dreams
and aspirations.<br />
<br />
Now, what those types of dreams and aspirations are, sometimes irks me
enormously, when one stands back and has a good long look at what
society has transformed itself into.<br />
<br />
One of the reasons that women earn less in the workplace is because of
the jobs they choose. Women are often reporting that they want to have a
job that will have some sort of a social impact, or benefit the
community, and so on, and so on, (&, btw, who doesn’t?) and will
take lowered pay in order to find a job that meets these criteria.<br />
<br />
Now, that is all good and fine – in fact, it might even be noble.<br />
<br />
But, look at the friggin’ absurdity of what we have done since those
dreaded, awful, horrible 1950′s. (Arguably the zenith of Western
Civilization).<br />
<br />
A man back then was able to earn enough money from a mere blue collar
job, that his wife could stay at home, he could pay for raising 4 kids,
they could go on a nice family vacation once a year, he could pay for a
decent home, and have a new car in the driveway. On his wage alone!<br />
<br />
And often, after the kids were off in school, the house was nice & clean, and the fridge was properly reloaded, what did those oppressed women go off and do with the rest of their time?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDSpZcbZsUAMeBikHM8jzGJZjxxeDfdIvxY7ndFDbgu5cUpWzpqQK2j8GMYyOoAOTCRIJ5T03T38g7jnmXPP4RaZiOKgK2DvSut4IX6ApXIW-dQxgu4W8TxXhs0o7weCoAUwQZYUfoNak/s1600/packed-lunch1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDSpZcbZsUAMeBikHM8jzGJZjxxeDfdIvxY7ndFDbgu5cUpWzpqQK2j8GMYyOoAOTCRIJ5T03T38g7jnmXPP4RaZiOKgK2DvSut4IX6ApXIW-dQxgu4W8TxXhs0o7weCoAUwQZYUfoNak/s1600/packed-lunch1.jpg" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqh93lCALUVYTh1df_PDJje2wYxollPpJKUoc-bBBzsFFOtIMLZvUiPUgiJJj3zNayYRcad71fLrFp_zxxnD98T2u6hcuIyspmTJTEabhnlcOCL7f9jx3FaooUuQhvbDIiwoFTp-Wxe2Q/s1600/the-fridge.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="214" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqh93lCALUVYTh1df_PDJje2wYxollPpJKUoc-bBBzsFFOtIMLZvUiPUgiJJj3zNayYRcad71fLrFp_zxxnD98T2u6hcuIyspmTJTEabhnlcOCL7f9jx3FaooUuQhvbDIiwoFTp-Wxe2Q/s1600/the-fridge.jpg" width="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKuafF3pAx7TSxFPlAokrK_4Mv8DtCDLK3VoY9Tke4WB5DbjyPFSLiCqonZnR4BT5GWczxWDMem6ueeSBEEjzkJp97n60mNnlqOofBpAubNpyBHiWGCtxolnUXVgqipq_X3hElk574lKc/s1600/woman-sandwhich.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKuafF3pAx7TSxFPlAokrK_4Mv8DtCDLK3VoY9Tke4WB5DbjyPFSLiCqonZnR4BT5GWczxWDMem6ueeSBEEjzkJp97n60mNnlqOofBpAubNpyBHiWGCtxolnUXVgqipq_X3hElk574lKc/s1600/woman-sandwhich.jpg" width="320" /></a><br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixL4aFblaSzbfHvJ8ABvToqnQ2XN3PDrpsotZ__SahCXE766YkS6VMFZZrNpLNNvdnIAwVL35XDmoZlq_9rbeWRaBbKOm_w8T5YA17gnzWkv1L6X9HLfuDdbREkBNcalCOq15Hivfxgdw/s1600/AjqIY.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixL4aFblaSzbfHvJ8ABvToqnQ2XN3PDrpsotZ__SahCXE766YkS6VMFZZrNpLNNvdnIAwVL35XDmoZlq_9rbeWRaBbKOm_w8T5YA17gnzWkv1L6X9HLfuDdbREkBNcalCOq15Hivfxgdw/s1600/AjqIY.gif" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
Well, some of them gossiped like the dickens, I suppose, but many others
did things they found socially rewarding. They raised money for
charities, they volunteered time to help the elderly or the needy, they
organized groups that enhanced the lives of their communities – from
hobbies to sports, and so on and so on. In other words, they sought
social rewards of their own volition, and had money in their jeans, er,
pleasantly sexy sundress pockets to boot!<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3Hw18Z_g-Elpw8rvEvOP8LP-EON2UBntM89x6HwDEKBiOT0mkFQswMK1up_f55vFvisldeSigLrXynWFs77ZxbziFFUaNrap5b_Tn9HshuBCJyFq4PwOLnAssCBGYvb4wZ0EElx7qD7w/s1600/2678310_166ebe073e.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3Hw18Z_g-Elpw8rvEvOP8LP-EON2UBntM89x6HwDEKBiOT0mkFQswMK1up_f55vFvisldeSigLrXynWFs77ZxbziFFUaNrap5b_Tn9HshuBCJyFq4PwOLnAssCBGYvb4wZ0EElx7qD7w/s1600/2678310_166ebe073e.jpg" width="295" /></a>And today? They have “liberated themselves” into halving the income of
men by flooding the job market with labourers, forcing both men and
women to work fulltime jobs in order to live in a crappy condo with
their 1.6 kids, and the two cars they need but can only afford on the
never-never plan. (A lease). And what do they want out of their careers?
To do something socially rewarding that benefits the community! See the irony here?<br />
. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizrO3QXDP-QibICkR9IkHrOmRm2f9bCLLoar234AYBIWVHgNWi6UWSpyVGnFeKjPCOZRG66lrrUPqPcyVF_d_qqcYUyuWKGcfAflPSDPKP5hOhCC-4PhfkovldhXq98RIiKI9pi6tmzeY/s1600/Saw+My+Ex+Working+At+Subway...jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="244" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizrO3QXDP-QibICkR9IkHrOmRm2f9bCLLoar234AYBIWVHgNWi6UWSpyVGnFeKjPCOZRG66lrrUPqPcyVF_d_qqcYUyuWKGcfAflPSDPKP5hOhCC-4PhfkovldhXq98RIiKI9pi6tmzeY/s1600/Saw+My+Ex+Working+At+Subway...jpg" width="320" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
And now, if they get to do such a thing called “social rewards” even
marginally from their job, they have to do it in march step to their
jerk-off boss under far less pleasant circumstances.<br />
.<br />
Oh well, Ladies. I guess you’ve spent the last 50 years proving that men have been right for the past 5,000 years. <br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-marketplace.html" border="0" height="227" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPJEuQfmhyauMGMoDhCF1mXNdScWGMj-BAc-00sJ3kdaGREMld8THYUMeq7Bxvk_7JqYfVNh6rIxnF5rJtD50OiDf2XDpWY6dZtOYwZpF5l4Nzdx_jJngFYjx-5wZeAsNgg-2TpKfZspc/s1600/-girder-working-men-canvas-wall-art-%5B4%5D-1213-p.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Marketplace"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i>QUOTE #2, A MAN: <b>"Women get paid less because they work fewer hours in
less dangerous jobs. It has nothing to do with their noble humanitarian
spirit (excuse me while I gag) to help others.</b></i><br />
<b></b><br />
<b></b>
<b><i>Women are often over-paid for the amount of work they do, leaving men
to pick up the slack and subsidize women’s bloated paychecks.</i></b><br />
<b></b><br />
<b><i>If women were as altruistic as you claim, they’d recognize the
atrocious abuses of the current feminist regime in large numbers, but
that hasn’t happened because women largely live in their own
self-obsessed little worlds. In contrast, men gave women the “women’s
liberation movement” because men actually DO have compassion and noble
intentions."</i></b> ***<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" border="0" height="316" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhG8yC0dCzcnEM2JY9o1IBl8JbacISQatZ3m172TPuN2m5HMb-WQ0bHvB6xW82Dg9W9H0xKyqKRAOdP5AYhooDknA_JoCtEFE38urBfZYqscZ0801dRK5c64X3rnYqwex2sg93ImY3_-PA/s1600/gossip.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Suffragetts versus The Truth"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
No doubt, I agree with much of what you say. Also, women will always put
themselves first. And they are plagued with narcissism and are often
self-obsessed – either with themselves personally, or with their own sex.<br />
<br />
And, I don’t doubt that often times the “charity work” they did in the
past was done for other than purely altruistic reasons. For example:
Most men can instantly understand what I mean when I say, “It’s not
charity if you talk about it.” And I’ll bet that a lot of them ladies
clucked very often, trying to one up the other hens with tales of how
perfect they were, while they cackled about the hens that weren’t doing
enough to be as good as them. They are, after all, social creatures far
more than men, and need the approval of the herd, er, flock, to decide
what is right and wrong.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bEP2LJv9nY" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="Any Gal of Mine" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWjnkwBwELUyw71YcwqTXgwmyLjYmKozP6YYfvFgzDctczQArCKZBAAUMZFEgKcwN3uUvVUdppb1cWmrYz8Sbk1Ov96Syy5JIOzItJ5WX6-IF00oXLt6RVD3n174qVX2Tz6u5CsGBgLOg/s1600-r/Any+Gal+of+Mine1.jpg" height="213" id="Image57_img" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "Any Gal of Mine" (Song/Video) - By Gina Ruberto</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-cMalVpoJUs6hgPL0YVblkH2L1ik-j_Fl5DsOLeiTpHyIb6cz6vl2fv1ypBiSuyAOyFG4Ds2YwSZCIK6lg0x42vFIVpI99l_XH2Vd0tGoOeUYGHT3T-G1wMf_zit28fl0_IByIklbwNg/s1600/sweeping-floor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-cMalVpoJUs6hgPL0YVblkH2L1ik-j_Fl5DsOLeiTpHyIb6cz6vl2fv1ypBiSuyAOyFG4Ds2YwSZCIK6lg0x42vFIVpI99l_XH2Vd0tGoOeUYGHT3T-G1wMf_zit28fl0_IByIklbwNg/s1600/sweeping-floor.jpg" width="176" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
But, at least the way it was before, it took features of “woman-ness”
and harnessed them for the betterment of both families and society - much like how patriarchy <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-amazon-women-science-of-why-males.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">put sex to work.</a>
I don’t think the women of old cared so much about “keeping the door
stoop swept” out of respect for their husbands, but
more so <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-suffragettes-versus-truth.html" target="_blank"><i>the other women</i> </a>thought well of them and had
nothing bad to gossip about when they knocked on the door.<br />
<br />
And, as an added bonus, it kept them out of our hair all day, until we came home and got what we men wanted out of them.<br />
.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/proverbs-3110-31-wife-of-noble.html" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgycqPa7h2MsMMQfWzvyEK63wpAJ-oNDXUkzYigUo1nEKCz2IY5eHZoNl_ZauTSbtzC5qryL9hci4rybQ4Hizj5sRih_7A2MzIH18XBZlsvIxR9AAW_pdCQAh3E4eZ-nKfJxAGd3dDorwo/s1600/87312492.jpg" width="265" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Click Pic for "The Wife of Noble Character"</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFIjMBf6lmm9rFL3qcjavAObRHqswNqqMHOKvfvpaDhAnKfujV2ec4Ub7GQm9LoHPDPvTt3DnLsuvxHtYEDg6Hqw-Hi8X3GlxR0sy_1hB5_mQ8u4rC8Ww-j9_f_8Ri-JkZCEh8YNyre8g/s1600/6bda81_450710.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="260" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFIjMBf6lmm9rFL3qcjavAObRHqswNqqMHOKvfvpaDhAnKfujV2ec4Ub7GQm9LoHPDPvTt3DnLsuvxHtYEDg6Hqw-Hi8X3GlxR0sy_1hB5_mQ8u4rC8Ww-j9_f_8Ri-JkZCEh8YNyre8g/s1600/6bda81_450710.jpg" width="320" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6zt5x-JQZUisvh_5Xjf42zYbPitnBFEA2mas-Cvr9aMjHFgc0-JkH2pfWBiQs0AzHADZJlY453nhwQ6_x-gi2TqMwFk_dUSC-xldznOh3XLJs2sWLBUyCxN8xmqkPdge6U2-aozpO050/s1600/6513676.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6zt5x-JQZUisvh_5Xjf42zYbPitnBFEA2mas-Cvr9aMjHFgc0-JkH2pfWBiQs0AzHADZJlY453nhwQ6_x-gi2TqMwFk_dUSC-xldznOh3XLJs2sWLBUyCxN8xmqkPdge6U2-aozpO050/s1600/6513676.gif" width="320" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">***</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ-I0nOPI42S-5q410PxXbhRAg9pEP9fP9n1xsshnQgOWjPF_Itzn6B-ISD-6POTt4jN4B44sETzcRTEpKUV6rIagveWGN9oi6qZ231yxmBuIOHmBJHKU_hJRyfawRAfPIGsXokGCHi6c9/s1600/This_is_sparta.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2010/11/whats-next-cries-of-sparta.html" border="0" height="217" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ-I0nOPI42S-5q410PxXbhRAg9pEP9fP9n1xsshnQgOWjPF_Itzn6B-ISD-6POTt4jN4B44sETzcRTEpKUV6rIagveWGN9oi6qZ231yxmBuIOHmBJHKU_hJRyfawRAfPIGsXokGCHi6c9/s1600/This_is_sparta.GIF" width="320" /></a>As an interesting side-note on this subject, while Plato argued for the emancipation of women from their traditional role<i>,</i>
he warned that women should not be encouraged to encroach upon the male
role, to prevent what happened in Sparta. Rather, he philosophized,
they should create a <i><b>new role</b></i> from which they can best serve society.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBVpDtNuPvu4jFBoBITyYZlrgnNb61AhRdkGqujiqIAwrSPkFwlNGE1_IgRw14XjQvUgW8bMrj-GE1I_KO2xo3W_nEPKtWA0Awyk4ep5MO669CtKdq02kHnIvbee8OOrwt34eYcWG9u2c/s1600/shut-up-and-make-me-a-sandwich-04.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBVpDtNuPvu4jFBoBITyYZlrgnNb61AhRdkGqujiqIAwrSPkFwlNGE1_IgRw14XjQvUgW8bMrj-GE1I_KO2xo3W_nEPKtWA0Awyk4ep5MO669CtKdq02kHnIvbee8OOrwt34eYcWG9u2c/s1600/shut-up-and-make-me-a-sandwich-04.jpg" width="234" /></a>. <br />
It's an interesting thought, isn't it?<br />
<br />
What kind of new role could they
have created? Well, since even today, women in the workplace claim they
are willing to take lower pay in order to serve the community - and
since women, socialized herd creatures that they are, claim repeatedly
that they want their work to have a positive impact on society while
also allowing them time to tend to children and the elderly in their
families, why are we paying government bureaucrats to do all the social work that women once traditionally did in their free time before all this nonsense started?<br />
<br />
Furthermore, if we returned to the mindset of the home being a place of <i>production</i> rather than <i>consumption</i>, what kind of value do you think a woman could create for herself and her family? <a href="http://virtual-independence.blogspot.ca/2014/06/the-mindset-of-production-versus.html" target="_blank">In many cases, everyone would be better off financially - just do the math! </a><br />
.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-fraud-of-modern-marriage.html">Previous</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html">Index</a> / <a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-powers-that-be.html">Next</a></b></span></div>
. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" target="_blank"><img alt="http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-masculine-principle-table-of.html" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9zUEfsmukMG_zra_THzYUzTWmkge5IobWgKmBwZsgGuzO6x1NHi5XQjrG7TqAtjF6e6V9NjHUrnXrDCHeWPoI8uRVFAYOHA257Erm6EKexlOaRHuovua6BkOuML6lZLSiUQaIi99m_jU/s1600/The+Male+Principle.png" width="200" /></a></div>
.
<!-- Blogger automated replacement: "https://images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-Bhj_FrUxRjE%2FVPs3ShH_nBI%2FAAAAAAAAC_4%2FPJzp2JRTF5E%2Fs1600%2FThis_is_sparta.GIF&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*" with "https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ-I0nOPI42S-5q410PxXbhRAg9pEP9fP9n1xsshnQgOWjPF_Itzn6B-ISD-6POTt4jN4B44sETzcRTEpKUV6rIagveWGN9oi6qZ231yxmBuIOHmBJHKU_hJRyfawRAfPIGsXokGCHi6c9/s1600/This_is_sparta.GIF" -->.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06902486287411065690noreply@blogger.com