 |
| Click Pic for "The Amazon Women (The Science of "Why Males Exist")" |
One thing our society struggles with as it continually fails feminism's cultural fitness tests is the silly notion that men and women are "equal" and thus we are essentially coming at each-other from the same point of view regarding our interactions with the opposite sex. This is the wrong way of thinking. We are not "blank slates" who are different merely because of society's externally imposed social constructs upon us.
.
 |
| Click Pic for "Testing, Testing... 1,2,3... Testing!" |
Between the sexes, we also evolve to do the tasks which we are best suited for. You can see that men and women are physically different, each being designed for what they do best. Certainly there are some social constructs that society imposes upon men and women, but they are based on our biological natures, not upon the blank slate.
 |
| Click Pic for "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager in the House?" |
"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted — in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place." -- Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women
Women have mentally "evolved" to be something intermediate between the child and the man. We have all heard that women are more emotional than men and are more "in tune with feelings" than men. And this is correct, for tell me, how do infants communicate except through the language of emotions and feelings? How does a baby indicate it needs to be fed? It is through the emotional response of crying - certainly not by saying, "Hey momma, bring those soft, round milk thingies over to my mouth." Children communicate emotionally, and since women have evolved to become "better carers of children," they have also evolved to be more in tune to the language of children, which is emotion.
"... Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than men at intuitive tasks, she added. “Intuition is thinking without thinking. It's what people call gut feelings. Women tend to be better than men at these kinds of skills which are linked with being good mothers,”..." (Source)
We also often hear that girls mature faster than boys. This is also true, and to refer back to Schopenhauer again, he acknowledges this as well:
Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. -- Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women
But then, what is it that men have evolved to become?
Once we realize that everywhere in nature the male is the sexual servant of the female, it's pretty easy to see the plot of evolution: Men have evolved to become the best providers and protectors we can
possibly be in order to meet the needs of the female - especially during
her most vulnerable time, which is when she gets pregnant, gives birth,
recuperates, and then raises the child until it becomes self-sufficient
(ie. It can walk, talk and feed itself). This whole process takes about
four years to complete, and then her rotating polyandry
cycle kicks in and she discards the male in order to seek out a new man
to repeat the cycle again. This is the primitive method of assuring
genetic diversity amongst her offspring, which increases their overall
chance of survival. |
| Click Pic for "The Fraud of Modern Marriage (Women as Chattel)" |
So aside from merely being sperm donors, men have also evolved into being the best at what we do - and these are also the things women find attractive in a man: our protecting and providing skills. We have developed upper body strength which is vastly superior to the female's, and so it is tall, strong, broad shouldered men which women find sexually attractive. Men have developed linear thinking brains which help us figure out how to perform specific tasks as efficiently and productively as possible. No matter what men set out to do, aside from raising children, women cannot compete with men on a level playing field because we have evolved to best perform our tasks in order to make ourselves useful to women. Most women admit that they are sexually attracted to men who are more intelligent than they are - this does not mean that all men are are smarter than all women, but merely that each woman tends to seek out a man who has higher intelligence than she possesses.
But ultimately, men do all of these things in service of women, in the hopes of gaining - or maintaining - her favour. However, the kink in this plot is that women don't actually "love" men, only gay men truly love men. Rather women love being loved. "Love" means different things to men and women.
"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." -- Florence Nightingale
.
 |
| Click Pic for "Rites of Passage: Making Boys into Men" |
.
This is one thing that men must always keep in mind in his dealings with women. For women, their love is parasitic - it is based upon what she gets from a man. But for men, their love is the host to the parasitic nature of the woman - it is based upon what he gives.
"When I started researching this book, I was prepared to rediscover the old saw that conventional femininity is nurturing and passive and that masculinity is self-serving, egotistical, and uncaring. But I did not find this. One of my findings here is that manhood ideologies always include a criterion of selfless generosity, even to the point of sacrifice. Again and again we find that 'real' men are those who give more than they take." -- David Gilmore in his 1990 book Manhood in the Making
Also, one must keep in mind that relationships don't mean the same thing to women as they do to men. Relationships are a "tool" for women - they get things from it, or rather from the man. Women get over relationships far more easily than men do. They are never as deeply "in love" with a man as a man is in love with the woman. Men and women are polar opposites. We are two sides to the same coin, but those sides are not the same. Women have more emotions but they are shallower. Men have fewer emotions but they run deeper. In an
 |
| Click Pic for "Male and Female: Equal But Different" |
Everything a man does in a relationship is in her benefit. This is the basis of Briffault's law.
“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.” -- Robert Briffault, The Mothers, I, 191
It is also important to note the corollaries to Briffault's law:
1 - Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2 - Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3 - A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.
 |
| Click Pic for "The Suffragettes versus The Patriarchy" |
.
There were only a few thousand divorces annually in the mid-nineteenth century when divorce cost wives their children and Dad’s paycheck. This family stability began eroding as later nineteenth century divorce courts, under pressure from the rising feminist movement, began awarding child
 |
| Click for "Rotating Polyandry & Its Enforcers" |
Father Custody, p360
“Between 1870 and 1920 the divorce rate rose fifteenfold, and by 1924 one marriage out of seven ended in divorce” — James H. Jones, Alfred Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), p.292.
Women's attitude to men is easiest to understand by comparing it to our attitude towards a job. Whether we love our job or not, most of us think we must have one. We often think a bad job is better than not having a job at all. No matter how much we may love our job, we'll jump ship and go with a better one if it's offered. And no matter how good our job may have been for us in the past, if something happens that upsets us, the love has probably gone forever. We don't ever think we are owed for the past.
 |
| Click Pic for the Free Online Book, "The Predatory Female" -- by Rev. Lawrence Shannon |
To entertain themselves while they aren't working"
- The Predatory Female
Women never want to be without a "tool" in society, for it is through her man-tool that she accomplishes what she needs in society - thus, women are like monkeys and never let go of one branch until she has gotten hold of the next. This is why you usually find that at the end of her relationship with a particular tool, er, man, there is always another man hanging around somewhere in the wings. Female "independence" is an illusion.
What women's independence actually means is that they want the freedom to change from one tool to the next without consequences. Men would view independence in a much different manner. In fact, Buddhism acknowledges the three phases women go through of using men as "tools" for their own designs during their lives:
Women have the “five obstacles” (inability to become anything great) and the “three followings” (follows first the father, then the husband, then the son).-- Buddha - from Selected Writings of Nichiren
In her youth, a woman gains her power through her father - he is the
"tool" that serves her and represents her in society. In adulthood, she
gains power through her husband, who spends his life's energy providing
for her and the offspring they produce together. In her old age, she
gains her power through her son. In each case, she uses a man as her
tool to deal with society.  |
| Click Pic for "The Fish and The Bicycle" |
 |
| Click Pic for "The Ballad of NO MA'AM" (Song/Video - 3min) |
NO! Learn to say it, and learn to say it often.
You don't even have to be rude about it. You could also say "NO MA'AM!"
Women are as independent as a tropical fern in a greenhouse in Iceland.
If the men “leave” the women will follow, because female “independence” is an illusion.
.
.
“The woman follows the man. In her youth she follows her father and
elder brother; when married, she follows her husband; when her husband
is dead, she follows her son.” – Confucius
.
36. Mothers appear to be more fond of their sons, because those sons
are able to help them, and fathers of their daughters, because
daughters need their help. Maybe also it is out of compliment to each
other that both parties desire to be seen making much of that which is
more akin to the other. This, perhaps, is a trait of no importance, but
there is another which is charming. I mean, when the wife's respect is
seen to incline rather to the husband's parents than to her own, and
when, in case of anything troubling her, she refers it to them and
conceals it from her own people. If you are thought to trust, you are
trusted; if you are thought to love, you are loved. -- Advice to Married Couples, by Plutarch
.
"I ran into a friend from college I hadn't seen in years. He was a stud back then, and it looked like he still had it. He told me he'd never gotten married, and I asked him why. He said he was looking for a really nice, cute, girl-next-door who wasn't looking for a guy as a meal ticket. I said, `Oh. That explains it. You'll be single forever."' -- Sex-Ploytation (p.36)
.
.
.
***
.  |
| Click for "Advice to Married Couples" |
.
***
. |
| Click for "Sex-Ploytation" |
.
.
.
